Skip to main content
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2007 Mar 26;30(3):141–143. doi: 10.1002/clc.11

Hemodynamic changes during cardiac resynchronization therapy

H Nägele 1,, M Azizi 1, M A Castel 2
PMCID: PMC6653627  PMID: 17385702

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a new method for the correction of inter‐ and/or intraventricular conduction delays of patients with heart failure. The long‐term impact of CRT on central hemodynamics is not fully characterized. We performed complete right heart catheterization studies in 31 patients receiving a CRT device pre and 6 months after implantation. Most of the patients improved in their NYHA stage, their LVEF, and in parallel showed reduced right atrial (RA) pulmonary artery (PA) and pulmonary capillary wedge (PCW) pressures and pulmonary vascular resistance both at rest and at 25 watts. In addition, we found a reduction in heart rate accompanied by an increased mean arterial pressure both at rest and at 25 watts. Accordingly, brain natriuretic peptide levels (BNP) were lowered. It was concluded that, besides other well‐known effects on ventricular coordination, central hemodynamics after 6 months were improved during CRT. Copyright © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords: cardiac resynchronization therapy, heart failure, hemodynamics

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (216.1 KB).

REFERENCES

  • 1. Aaronson KD, Schwartz JS, Chen TM, Wong KL, Goin JE, et al.: Development and prospective validation of a clinical index to predict survival in ambulatory patients referred for cardiac transplant evaluation. Circulation 1997; 95: 2660–2667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, Delurgio DB, Leon AR, et al.: Miracle Study Group. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1845–1853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Cazeau S, Leclerque C, Lavergne T, Walker S, Varma C, et al.: Multisite Stimulation in Cardiomyopathies (MUSTIC) Study Investigators. Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 873–880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Cleland JGF, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, Freemantle N, Gras D, et al.: Cardiac Resynchronization—Heart Failure (CARE‐HF) Study Investigators. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1539–1549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Leclercq C, Cazeau S, Le Breton H, Ritter Ph, Mabo Ph, et al.: Acute hemodynamic effects of biventricular DDD pacing in patients with end‐stage heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 1825–1831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Hamdan MH, Zagrodzky JD, Joglar JA, Sheehan CJ, Ramaswamy K, et al.: Biventricular pacing decreases sympathetic activity compared with right ventricular pacing in patients with depressed ejection fraction. Circulation 2000; 102: 1027–1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Nelson GS, Berger RD, Fetics BJ, Talbot M, Spinelli JC, et al.: Left ventricular or biventricular pacing improves cardiac function at diminished energy cost in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and left bundle‐branch block. Circulation 2000; 102: 3053–3059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES