Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for bifurcation lesions is technically limited by the risk of side branch occlusion. In comparison with nonbifurcation interventions, bifurcation interventions have a lower rate of procedural success, higher procedural costs and a higher rate of clinical and angiographic restenosis. The recent introduction of drug‐eluting stents (DES) has resulted in reduced incidence of main vessel restenosis compared with historical controls. However, side‐branch ostial residual stenosis and long‐term restenosis still remain problematic. In the era of DES, techniques employing two stents have emerged that allow stenting of the large side branch in addition to the main artery. Stenting of the main vessel with provisional side branch stenting seems to be the prevailing approach. This paper reviews outcome data with different treatment modalities for this complex lesion with particular emphasis on the use of DES as well as potential new therapeutic approaches. Copyright © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keywords: coronary bifurcation, stenting, drug‐eluting stents, bare metal stents, percutaneous coronary intervention
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (67.8 KB).
REFERENCES
- 1. Gotlieb AI, Langille BL: The role of rheology in atherosclerotic coronary artery disease In Atherosclerosis and Coronary Artery Disease (Eds. Fuster V, Ross R, Topol EJ.), pp 595–606. Vol. 1 Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott‐Raven: 1996. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Koller P, Safian RD: Bifurcation stenosis In Manual of Interventional Cardiology (Eds. Freed E, Safian RD, Grines C.), pp 229–241. Birmingham,MI: Physician Press: 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Weinstein JS, Baim DS, Sipperly ME, McCabe CH, Lorell BH: Salvage of branch vessels during bifurcation lesion angioplasty: acute and long‐term follow‐up. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1991; 22(1): 1–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Mathias DW, Mooney JF, Lange HW, Goldenberg IF, Gobel FL, et al.: Frequency of success and complications of coronary angioplasty of a stenosis at the ostium of a branch vessel. Am J Cardiol 1991; 67(6): 491–495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Lewis BE, Leya FS, Johnson SA, Grassman ED, Hwang M, et al.: Assessment of outcome of bifurcation lesions and non‐bifurcation lesions treated in the CAVEAT trial. CAVEAT Investigator Group. J Invasive Cardiol 1995; 7(9): 251–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Iakovou I, Ge L, Colombo A: Contemporary stent treatment of coronary bifurcations. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46(8): 1446–1455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Al Suwaidi J, Berger PB, Rihal CS, Garratt KN, Bell MR, et al.: Immediate and long‐term outcome of intracoronary stent implantation for true bifurcation lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35(4): 929–936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Chevalier B, Glatt B, Royer T, Guyon P: Placement of coronary stents in bifurcation lesions by the “culotte” technique. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 943–949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Yamashita T, Nishida T, Adamian MG, Briguori C, Vaghetti M, et al.: Bifurcation lesions: two stents versus one stent–immediate and follow‐up results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35(5): 1145–1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Pan M, Suarez de Lezo J, Medina M, Romero M, Hernandez E, et al.: Simple and complex stent strategies for bifurcated coronary arterial stenosis involving the side branch origin. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 1320–1325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Anzuini A, Briguori C, Rosanio S, Tocchi M, Pagnotta P, et al.: Immediate and long‐term clinical and angiographic results from Wiktor stent treatment for true bifurcation narrowings. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88(11): 1246–1250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Brunel P, Commeau P, Konig R, Bedossa M, Gilard M, et al.: Assessment of coronary bifurcation lesion treated with stent implantation on parent vessel and with balloon or stent on the side branch. Circulation 1998; 98(17): I–639 (Abstract). [Google Scholar]
- 13. Brunel P, Lefevre T, Darremont O, Louvard Y: Provisional T‐stenting and kissing balloon in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: Results of the French multicenter “TULIPE” study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 68(1): 67–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Rux S, Sonntag S, Schulze R, Rau M, Weber F, et al., BISCOR Investigators : Acute and long‐term results of bifurcation stenting (from the Coroflex Registry). Am J Cardiol 2006; 98(9): 1214–1217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Lefevre T, Louvard Y, Morice MC, Dumas P, Loubeyre C, et al.: Stenting of bifurcation lesions classification, treatments, and results. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000; 49: 274–283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Colombo A, Moses JW, Morice MC, Ludwig J, Holmes DR Jr, et al.: Randomized study to evaluate sirolimus‐eluting stents implanted at coronary bifurcation lesions. Circulation 2004; 109: 1244–1249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Pan M, de Lezo JS, Medina A, Romero M, Segura J, et al.: Rapamycin‐eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcated coronary lesions: a randomized comparison of a simple versus complex strategy. Am Heart J 2004; 148: 857–864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Ge L, Tsagalou E, Iakovou I, Sangiorgi GM, Corvaja N, et al.: In‐hospital and nine‐month outcome of treatment of coronary bifurcational lesions with sirolimus‐eluting stent. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95(6): 757–760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Ge L, Airoldi F, Iakovou I, Cosgrave J, Michev I, et al.: Clinical and angiographic outcome after implantation of DES in bifurcation lesions with the crush stent technique. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46(4): 613–620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Sharma SK: Simultaneous kissing drug eluting stent technique for percutaneous treatment of bifurcation lesions in large size vessels. Catheter & Cardiovasc Interv 2005; 65: 10–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Hoye A, van Mieghem CA, Ong AT, Aoki J, Rodriguez Granillo GA, et al.: Percutaneous therapy of bifurcation lesions with drug‐eluting stent implantation: the Culotte technique revisited. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent 2005; 7(1): 36–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Hoye A, Iakovou I, Ge L, van Mieghem CA, Ong AT, et al.: Long‐term outcomes after stenting of bifurcation lesions with the “crush” technique: predictors of an adverse outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47(10): 1949–1958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Ge L, Iakovou I, Cosgrave J, Agostoni P, Airoldi F, et al.: Treatment of bifurcation lesions with two stents: one year angiographic and clinical follow up of crush versus T stenting. Heart 2006; 92(3): 371–376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Moussa I, Costa RA, Leon MB, Lansky AJ, Lasic Z, et al.: A prospective registry to evaluate sirolimus‐eluting stents implanted at coronary bifurcation lesions using the “crush technique”. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97(9): 1317–1321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Steigen TK, Maeng M, Wiseth R, Erglis A, Kumsars I, et al.: Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic bifurcation study. Circulation 2006; 114(18): 1955–1961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Ikeno F, Kim YH, Luna J, Condado JA, Colombo A, et al.: Acute and long‐term outcomes of the novel side access (SLK‐View™) stent for bifurcation coronary lesions: A multicenter nonrandomized feasibility study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 67(2): 198–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]