Skip to main content
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2006 Dec 5;27(7):388–392. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960270704

Vascular age: Integrating carotid intima‐media thickness measurements with global coronary risk assessment

James H Stein 1,, Michael C Fraizer 1, Susane Aeschlimann 1, Jane Nelson‐Worel 1, Patrick E McBride 1, Pamela S Douglas 1
PMCID: PMC6653859  PMID: 15298037

Abstract

Background: An imaging test that quantifies atherosclerotic burden and that can be integrated with existing risk stratification paradigms would be avery useful clinical tool.

Hypothesis: Measurement of carotid intima‐media thickness (CIMT) is feasible in a clinical setting. Such measurements can be integrated into coronary risk assessment models.

Methods: Carotid intima‐media thickness was measured by B‐mode ultrasound in 82 consecutive patients without manifest atherosclerotic vascular disease. The values were used to determine “vascular age” (VA) based on nomograms from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Vascular age was substituted for chronological age and standard and vascular age‐adjusted 10‐year coronary heart disease (CHD) risk estimates were compared.

Results: The mean chronological age was 55.8 ± 9.0 years. The mean VA using CIMT was 65.5 ± 18.9 years (p<0.001). The Framingham 10‐year hard CHD risk estimate was 6.5 ± 4.9%. Substituting CIMT‐derived VA for chronological age increased the 10‐year CHD risk estimate to 8.0 ± 6.8% (p< 0.001). Of 14 subjects initially at intermediate risk, 5 (35.7%) were reclassified as higher risk and 2 (14.3%) were reclassified as lower risk. Significant predictors of reclassification were tobacco use, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Conclusions: Measurement of CIMT, a noninvasive estimate of current atherosclerotic burden, is feasible in a clinical setting and can be integrated into CHD risk assessment models. Determining VA using CIMT values may help individualize the age component of population‐based CHD risk estimates. This strategy should be tested in a large trial with hard clinical endpoints.

Keywords: atherosclerosis, cardiovascular diseases, carotid arteries, prevention, risk factors

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (58.3 KB).

References

  • 1. Executive Summary : Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). J Am Med Assoc 2001; 285: 2486–2497 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Grundy SM, Pasternak R, Greenland P, Smith S Jr, Fuster V: Assessment of cardiovascular risk by use of multiple‐risk‐factor assessment equations: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. Circulation 1999; 100: 1481–1492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Grundy SM: Coronary plaque as a replacement for age as a risk factor in global risk assessment. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 8E–11E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Burke GL, Evans GW, Riley WA, Sharrett AR, Howard G, Barnes RW, Rosamond W, Crow RS, Rautaharju PM, Heiss G: Arterial wall thickness is associated with prevalent cardiovascular disease in middle‐aged adults: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Stroke 1995; 26: 386–391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Chambless LE, Heiss G, Folsom AR, Rosamond W, Szklo M, Sharrett AR, Clegg LX: Association of coronary heart disease incidence with carotid arterial wall thickness and major risk factors: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, 1987‐1993. Am J Epidemiol 1997; 146: 483–494 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. O'Leary D, Polak J, Kronmal R, Manolio TA, Burke GL, Wolfson SK Jr: Carotid‐artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults: Cardiovascular Health Study. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 14–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Greenland P, Abrams J, Aurigemma GP, Bond MG, Clark LT, Criqui MH, Crouse JR, Friedman L, Fuster V, Herrington DM, Kuller LH, Ridker PM, Roberts WC, Stanford W, Stone N, Swan HJ, Taubert KA, Wexler L: Prevention Conference V: Beyond secondary prevention: Identifying the high‐risk patient for primary prevention: Noninvasive tests of atherosclerotic burden: Writing Group III. Circulation 2000; 101: E16–E22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Bond MG, Barnes RW, Riley WA, Wilmoth SK, Chambless LE, Howard G, Owens B, ARIC Study Group : High‐resolution B‐mode ultrasound scanning methods in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC). The ARIC Study Group. J Neuroimaging 1991; 1: 68–73 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Howard G, Sharrett A, Heiss G, Evans GW, Chambless LE, Riley WA, Burke GL, for the ARIC Investigators : Carotid artery intimal‐medial thickness distribution in general populations as evaluated by B‐mode ultrasound. Stroke 1993; 24: 1297–1304 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Minitab Statistical Software (Release 13.31). State College, Pa. 2001.
  • 11. Douglas PS: Atherosclerosis: It's all in the arteries. J Am Soc Echo 2002; 15: 26a [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES