Abstract
Background: Mitral regurgitation (MR) is frequently associated with aortic stenosis. Previous reports have shown that coexisting mitral insufficiency can potentially regress after aortic valve replacement.
Hypothesis: This study sought to assess the frequency and severity of MR before and after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis and to define the determinants of its postoperative evolution.
Methods: For this purpose, 30 adult patients referred for aortic valve surgery underwent pre‐ and postoperative transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography and color Doppler examination.
Results: Mean preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction was 57 ± 16% and remained unchanged postoperatively. Preoperative MR was usually mild to moderate and correlated with aortic stenosis severity and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The color Doppler mitral regurgitant jet area significantly decreased during the postoperative period (p = 0.016) as left ventricular loading conditions returned to normal, suggesting an early decrease of the functional part of MR. On the other hand, the mitral regurgitant jet width at the origin remained unchanged. Statistical analysis found pulmonary artery pressure (p = 0.02) and indexed left ventricular mass (p = 0.009) to be preoperative predictive factors of postoperative MR improvement. Predictive factors of postoperative MR severity were left atrial diameter (p = 0.02), pulmonary artery pressure (p = 0.003), and the presence of mitral calcifications (p = 0.004).
Conclusion: In our cohort of patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction, the majority of moderate MR, associated with severe aortic stenosis, regresses early after aortic valve replacement. Mitral calcifications and/or left atrial dilation seem to be predictive factors of fixed MR.
Keywords: mitral regurgitation, aortic stenosis, aortic valve replacement, transthoracic echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (44.2 KB).
References
- 1. Brener SJ, Duffy CI, Thomas JD, Stewart WJ: Progression of aortic stenosis in 394 patients: Relations to changes in myocardial and mitral valve dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 305–310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Comes PC, Riley MF, Berman AD, Safian RD, Waksmonski CA, McKay RG: Serial assessment of mitral regurgitation by pulsed Doppler echocardiography in patients undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 14: 677–682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Tunick PA, Gindea A, Kronzon I: Effect of aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis on severity of mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 1990; 65: 1219–1221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Harris KM, Malenka DJ, Haney MF, Jayne JE, Hettleman B, Plehn JF, Griffin BP: Improvement in mitral regurgitation after aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80: 741–745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Adams PB, Otto CM: Lack of improvement in coexisting mitral regurgitation after relief of valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1990; 66: 105–107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Skjaerpe T, Hegrenaes I, Hatle L: Non invasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two‐dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1985; 72: 810–818 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Perry GL, Helmcke F, Nanda NC, Byard C, Soto B: Evaluation of aortic insufficiency by Doppler flow mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 9: 952–959 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Devereux RB, Reichek N: Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man. Anatomic validation of the method. Circulation 1977; 55: 613–618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Silverman NH, Ports TA, Snider AR, Schiller NB, Carisson E, Heilbron DC: Determination of left ventricular volume in children: Echocardiographic and angiographic comparisons. Circulation 1980; 62: 548–557 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Castello R, Fagan L, Lenzen P, Pearson AC, Labovitz AJ: Comparison of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography for assessment of left‐sided valvular regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 1991; 68: 1677–1680 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Yoshida K, Yoshikawa J, Yamaura Y, Hozumi T, Akasaka T, Fukaya T: Assessment of mitral regurgitation by biplane transesophageal color Doppler flow mapping. Circulation 1990; 82: 1121–1126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Tribouilloy C, Shen WF, Quere JP, Rey JL, Choquet D, Dufosse H, Lesbre JP: Assessment of severity of mitral regurgitation by measuring regurgitant jet width at its origin with transesophageal Doppler color flow imaging. Circulation 1992; 85: 1248–1253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Sutton MSJ, Plappert T, Spiegel A, Raichlen J, Douglas P, Reichek N, Edmunds L: Early post‐operative changes in left ventricular chamber size, architecture, and function in aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation and their relation to intraoperative changes in afterload: A prospective two‐dimensional echocardiographic study. Circulation 1987; 76: 77–89 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Brasch AV, Khan SS, DeRobertis MA, Kong JHK, Chiu J, Siegel R: Change in mitral regurgitation severity after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85: 1271–1474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Tassan S, Metz D, Torossian F, Nazeyrollas P, Chapoutot L, Tassigny C, Wagner E, Heuls S, Jamet B, Elaerts J: Incidence et facteurs prédictifs de l'insuffisance mitrale dans le rétrécissement aortique chirurgical: Évaluation échographique transthoracique et transoesophagienne. Arch Mal Cœur 1999; 92: 11–17 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]