Abstract
Background: It is still unknown whether or not the additional right precordial leads (RPL) during exercise testing contribute to detection of coronary artery disease (CAD).
Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to evaluate the RPL during exercise testing for the detection of CAD.
Methods: The study included 157 consecutive patients (116 men and 41 women, mean age 66 years) suspected of having CAD, who underwent conclusive treadmill exercise testing (heart rate reached at least 85% of the predicted maximum or positive electrocardiogram [ECG] changes were exhibited) and coronary angiography. During exercise testing, the ECG was recorded with the standard 12 leads and 4 RPL (V3R, V4R, V5R, V6R).
Results: Of the 157 patients, 67 had CAD (> 75% stenosis in at least one major coronary artery), and 64 had positive ST changes in the standard ECG leads during exercise testing. Using the conventional 12‐lead method, sensitivity and specificity were 76 and 86%, respectively. Only three patients exhibited positive changes in the RPL leads; all had > 0.1 mV ST elevation in one of the RPL leads with > 0.1 mV ST elevation in aVR. Two of these patients had significant right coronary artery lesions and the other had a lesion of the left anterior descending artery which perfused the inferior as well as the anteroseptal area. In the standard 12 leads, one of the patients with an abnormal RPL and a right coronary lesion was negative, while the other two patients were positive. Combining RPL with the conventional 12‐lead method, sensitivity and specificity were 78 and 86%, respectively. Therefore, RPL did not improve the accuracy of the exercise ECG.
Conclusion: The use of RPL during exercise testing may contribute to the detection of ischemia perfused by the right coronary artery; however, it does not improve the diagnostic accuracy of the exercise test.
Keywords: exercise electrocardiography, standard 12 leads, right precordial leads, coronary artery disease
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (181.5 KB).
References
- 1. Detrano R, Gianrossi R, Mulvihill D, Lehmann K, Dubach P, Colombo A, Froelicher V: Exercise‐induced ST‐segment depression in the diagnosis of multivessel coronary disease: A meta analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 15: 1501–1508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Michaelides AP, Psomadaki ZD, Dilaveris PE, Richter DJ, Andrikopoulos GK, Aggeli KD, Stefanadis CI, Toutouzas PK: Improved detection of coronary artery disease by exercise electrocardiography with the use of right precordial leads. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 340–345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bokhari S, Blood DK, Bergmann SR: Use of right precordial leads during exercise testing. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 968–969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Braat SH, Brugada P, den Dulk K, van Ommen V, Wellens HJ: Value of lead V4R for recognition of the infarct coronary artery in acute inferior myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53: 1538–1541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Andersen HR, Thomsen PE, Nielsen TT, Henningsen P: ST deviation in right chest leads V3R to V7R during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 1990; 119: 490–493 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Krueger DW, Lesnefsky EJ, Groves BM, Lindenfeld J: Right ventricular ischemia and proximal right coronary artery narrowing indicated by exercise ST‐segment elevation in lead V1 . Am J Cardiol 1989; 63: 107–109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]