Abstract
Background and hypothesis: Noninvasive risk stratification for coronary artery disease (CAD) is less accurate in women than in men. Based on recent reports that gender‐specific exercise electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters predict CAD, we evaluated the independent predictive value of the resting ECG for angiographic CAD in women with chest pain.
Methods: Women (n = 850, mean age 58 years) with chest pain in the NHLBI Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) underwent 12‐lead ECG testing and quantitative coronary angiography.
Results: Significant angiographic CAD (≥ 50% stenosis in ≥1 coronary) was present in 39% of women. Q waves in ≥2 contiguous ECG leads were present in 107 women (13%), including 49 of 657 (7%) without history of infarction. Among 585 women without prior infarction or revascularization, 48% of those with Q waves in contiguous leads versus 26% of others, had significant CAD (p = 0.003; odds ratio [OR] = 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3‐4.8). Women with Q waves in ≥2 inferior ECG leads were particularly likely to have CAD (63 vs. 26% of others, p < 0.001; OR = 4.6, 95% CI = 2.0‐10.8). Other ECG findings predictive of CAD were any ST‐T abnormality (OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.3‐2.8) and T‐wave inversion (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.3‐4.2). In risk‐adjusted analysis, inferior Q waves and T‐wave inversion independently predicted significant CAD. When considered together with radionuclide perfusion test results, T‐wave inversion on resting ECG added significant independent predictive value (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.1‐7.2, p = 0.03).
Conclusions: Selected resting ECG parameters independently predict angiographic CAD in women with chest pain, including women who have also undergone radionuclide stress testing. Prospective studies should consider resting ECG parameters in diagnostic algorithms for CAD in women.
Keywords: coronary artery disease, chest pain, women, electrocardiogram
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (54.2 KB).
References
- 1. American Heart Association : 1998 Heart and Stroke Statistical Update. American Heart Association, Dallas, Texas, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Sox HC: Noninvasive testing in coronary artery disease. Selection of procedures and interpretation of results. Postgrad Med 1983; 74:319–336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Okin PM, Kligfield P: Gender‐specific criteria and performance of the exercise electrocardiogram. Circulation 1995; 92:1209–1216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Merz CN, Kelsey SF, Pepine CJ, Reichek N, Reis SE, Rogers WJ, Sharaf BL, Sopko G: Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study: Protocol design, methodology and feasibility report. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33:1453–1461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Molloy TJ, Okin PM, Devereux RB, Kligfield P: Electrocardiographic detection of left ventricular hypertrophy by the simple QRS voltage‐duration product. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20:1180–1186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Scoblionko DP, Brown BG, Mitten S, Caldwell JH, Kennedy JW, Bolson EL, Dodge HT: A new digital electronic caliper for measurement of coronary arterial stenosis: Comparison with visual estimates and computer‐assisted measurements. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53:689–693 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Lewis JF, Lin L, McGorray S, Pepine CJ, Doyle M, Edmundowicz D, Holubkov R, Pohost G, Reichek N, Rogers W, Sharaf BL, Sopko G, Merz CN: Dobutamine stress echocardiography in women with chest pain. Pilot phase data from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE). J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33(6): 1462–1468 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Guiteras P, Chaitman BR, Waters DD, Bourassa MG, Scholl JM, Ferguson RJ, Wagniart P: Diagnostic accuracy of exercise ECG lead systems in clinical subsets of women. Circulation 1982; 65:1465–1474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Hlatky MA, Pryor DB, Harrell FE Jr, Califf RM, Mark DB, Rosati RA: Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of exercise electro‐cardiography. Am J Med 1984; 77:64–71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Secknus MA, Marwick TH: Influence of gender on physiologic response and accuracy of dobutamine echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80:721–724 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Amanullah AM, Berman DS, Erel J, Kiat H, Cohen I, Germano G, Friedman JD, Hachamovitch R: Incremental prognostic value of adenosine myocardial perfusion single‐photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82:725–730 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Hansen CL, Crabbe D, Rubin S: Lower diagnostic accuracy of thallium‐201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in women: An effect of smaller chamber size. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28:1214–1219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ayanian JZ, Epstein AM: Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 1991; 325:221–225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Steingart RM, Packer M, Hamm P, Coglianese ME, Gersh B, Geltman EM, Sollano J, Katz S, Moyé L, Basta LL, Lewis SJ, Gottlieb SS, Bernstein V, McEwan P, Jacobson K, Brown EJ, Kukin ML, Kantrowitz NE, Pfeffer MA, for the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Investigators : Sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1991; 325:226–230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Schussheim DH, Schussheim AE: Is digoxin a designer oestrogen? (letter). Lancet 1998; 351:1734 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Rifka SM, Pita JC Jr, Loriaux DL: Mechanism of interaction of digitalis with estradiol binding sites in rat uteri. Endocrinology 1976; 99:1091–1096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Pirwitz MJ, Lange RA, Landau C, MeShack BM, Hillis LD, Willard JE: Utility of the 12‐lead electrocardiogram in identifying underlying coronary artery disease in patients with depressed left ventricular systolic function. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77:1289–1292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Myocardial infarction redefined—a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction Eur Heart J 2000; 21:1502–1513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]