Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common complication following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). The mechanism of AF after CABG is not well defined; however, it is suggested that endogenous adenosine, released in response to tissue hypoxia, may play a mechanistic role in these arrhythmias.
Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to examine whether intravenous theophylline, via adenosine A1 receptor antagonism, would correct or modify new‐onset early (< 48 h post CABG) atrial fibrillation in patients post CABG, and thereby implicate endogenous adenosine as an inciting agent.
Methods: A prospective double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study design was applied to 385 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease who had undergone CABG. Any patient who developed AF within 48 h of the operative procedure was randomly assigned to receive 5 mg/kg of intravenous theophylline (Group A) or matched intravenous placebo (Group B). The patients who converted to sinus rhythm within 15 min of drug administration were accepted as showing positive responses.
Results: Thirty patients comprised the study group. In Group A, 8 of the 15 patients (53%) converted from AF to sinus rhythm within 15 min of theophylline administration. One patient who converted to sinus rhythm 20 min after theophylline administration was accepted as showing a negative response. In the placebo‐treated group, no patient converted to sinus rhythm within 15 min (p < 0.007 compared with Group A).
Conclusions: The mechanism of AF after CABG is not well defined and is probably multifactorial. However, this study demonstrated that antagonism of the adenosine A1 receptor can promptly convert many of these patients back to sinus rhythm, and thereby implicates endogenously released adenosine in a mechanistic role for inciting early (< 48 h) post‐CABG AF.
Keywords: adenosine, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, coronary bypass surgery, complications, theophylline, cardiac arrhythmia
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (99.5 KB).
References
- 1. Almassi GH, Schowalter T, Nicolasi AC, Aggarwal A, Moritz TE, Henderson WG, Tarazi R, Shroyer AL, Sethi GK, Grover FL, Hammermeister KE: Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: A major morbid event? Ann Surg 1997; 226: 501–513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Zaman AG, Archbold RA, Helft G, Paul EA, Curzen NP, Mills PG: Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: A model for preoperative risk stratification. Circulation 2000; 101: 1403–1408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Belardinelli L, Linden J, Berne RM: The cardiac effects of adenosine. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1989; 32: 73–97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Pattison C, Dimitri W, Williams B: Dysrhythmias following coronary artery surgery. A comparison between cold cardioplegic and intermittent ischaemic arrest with the effect of right coronary endarterectomy. J Cardiovasc Surg 1988; 29: 601–605 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bertolet BD, Hill JA, Kerensky RA, Belardinelli L: Myocardial infarction related atrial fibrillation: Role of endogenous adenosine. Heart 1997; 78: 88–90 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Bertolet BD, Belardinell L, Avasarala K, Calhoun WB, Franco EA, Nichols WW, Kerensky RA, Hill JA: Differential antagonism of cardiac actions of adenosine by theophylline. Cardiovasc Res 1996; 32: 839–845 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Cox JL: A perspective of postoperative atrial fibrillation in cardiac operation. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 56: 405–409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Lauer MS, Eagle KA, Buckley MJ, DeSanctis RW: Atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass surgery. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1989; 31 (5): 367–378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Aranki SF, Shaw DP, Adams DH, Rizzo RJ, Couper GS, VanderVliet M, Collins Jr. JJ , Cohn LH, Burstin HR: Predictors of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery. Current trends and impact on hospital resources. Circulation 1996; 94: 390–397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Siebert J, Anisimowicz L, Lango R, Rogowski J, Pawlaczyk R, Brzezinski M, Beta S, Narkiewicz M: Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: Does the type of procedure influence the early postoperative incidence? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 19: 455–459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Kabell G, Buchanan LV, Gibson JK, Belardinelli L: Effects of adenosine on atrial refractoriness and arrhythmias. Cardiovasc Res 1994; 28: 1385–1389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Botteron GW, Smith JM: Spatial and temporal inhomogeneity of adenosine's effect on atrial refractoriness in humans: Using atrial fibrillation to probe atrial refractoriness. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1994; 5: 477–484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Szegi J, Szentmiklosi AJ, Cseppento A: Adenosine decreases the fibrillation threshold in atrial myocardium. Pol J Pharmacol Pharm 1989; 41: 511–518 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Szentmiklosi AJ, Nemeth M, Szegi J, Papp JG, Szekeres L: On the possible role of adenosine in the hypoxia‐induced alteration of the electrical and mechanical activity of the atrial myocardium. Arch Int Pharmacodyn 1979; 238: 283–295 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Lerman BB, Wesley RC, Belardinelli L: Electrophysiologic effects of dipyridamole on atrioventricular nodal conduction and supraventricular tachycardia: Role of endogenous adenosine. Circulation 1989; 80: 1536–1543 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Bertolet BD, McMurtrie EB, Hill JA: Theophylline for the treatment of atrioventricular block after myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 509–511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]