Skip to main content
PMC home page
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2006 Dec 5;26(9):411–418. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960260906

Predictors of cause‐specific hospital readmission in patients with heart failure

Zaruhi V Babayan 1,3, Robert L McNamara 1,3, Nagaprasad Nagajothi 2, Edward K Kasper 2, Haroutune K Armenian 3, Neil R Powe 2,3, Kenneth L Baughman 2, João A C Lima 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6654034  PMID: 14524597

Abstract

Background: Repeated hospital readmissions are frequent and increasing over time in patients with heart failure (HF). The predictors for readmission in patients with HF are not completely understood.

Hypothesis: The study was undertaken to investigate the time course of readmission by specific cause in patients with HF, and to examine the independent effects of HF etiology and left ventricular (LV) function on cause‐specific readmissions.

Methods: A retrospective cohort of 493 consecutive patients with HF was followed for readmission for 16.5 ± 12.3 months. Ischemic etiology of HF was defined as history of myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), or > 70% coronary stenosis. Left ventricular function was assessed echocardiographically. Cause‐specific readmissions were classified as HF, cardiovascular disease (CVD) other than HF, and other non‐CVD.

Results: The annual readmission rate was 56.6%. Median time to readmission was 91 days, with 18.3%patients readmitted within 1 month after discharge. Ischemic etiology independently predicted all‐cause readmission: Cox hazard ratio (95%confidence interval): 1.40 (1.11‐1.79). This relationship was significant in women (1.83 [1.31‐2.55]), but not in men (1.15 [0.82‐1.62]), while readmissions were equally frequent in both genders. Similarly, ischemic etiology significantly predicted readmission for CVD in women (4.18 [2.14‐8.19]), but not in men (1.49 [0.83‐2.67]). However, LV dysfunction independently predicted readmission for recurrent HF (2.44 [1.46‐4.08]), while ischemic etiology was not predictive in either gender.

Conclusions: Readmissions for recurrent HF comprise only one‐third of total hospital readmissions in patients with HF. Ischemic etiology is a significant predictor of readmission, and most of this effect is mediated through a four‐fold increased risk of readmission for CVD other than HF in women. Readmission for recurrent HF is predicted by LV dysfunction but not by ischemic etiology. Patients with HF can be accurately risk stratified for cause‐specific readmission with available clinical data.

Keywords: congestive heart failure, hospital readmission, ischemic etiology, gender

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (113.1 KB).

References

  • 1. Haldeman GA, Croft JB, Giles WH, Rashidee A: Hospitalization of patients with heart failure: National Hospital Discharge Survey, 1985 to 1995. Am Heart J 1999; 137 (2): 352–360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Franciosa JA, Wilen M, Ziesche S, Cohn JN: Survival in men with severe chronic left ventricular failure due to either coronary heart disease or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1983; 51 (5): 831–836 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Likoff MJ, Chandler SL, Kay HR: Clinical determinants of mortality in chronic congestive heart failure secondary to idiopathic dilated or to is‐chemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1987; 59 (6): 634–638 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Adams KFJ, Dunlap SH, Sueta CA, Clarke SW, Patterson JH, Blauwet MB, Jensen LR, Tomasko L, Koch G: Relation between gender, etiology and survival in patients with symptomatic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28 (7): 1781–1788 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bart BA, Shaw LK, McCants CB Jr, Fortin DF, Lee KL, Califf RM, O'Connor CM: Clinical determinants of mortality in patients with angiographically diagnosed ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30 (4): 1002–1008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Castro P, Bittner V, Villarreal L: Predictors of readmission in patients with congestive heart failure. Rev Med Chil 1998; 126 (10): 1173–1181 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Zannad F, Braincon S, Juilliere Y, Mertes PM, Villemot JP, Alla F, Virion JM: Incidence, clinical and etiologic features, and outcomes of advanced chronic heart failure: The EPICAL Study. Epidemiologie de l'Insuffisance Cardiaque Avancée en Lorraine. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33 (3): 734–742 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. McDermott MM, Feinglass J, Lee P, Mehta S, Schmitt B, Lefevre F, Puppala J, Gheorghiade M: Systolic function, readmission rates, and survival among consecutively hospitalized patients with congestive heart failure. Am Heart J 1997; 134 (4): 728–736 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Dauterman KW, Massie BM, Gheorghiade M: Heart failure associated with preserved systolic function: A common and costly clinical entity. Am Heart J 1998; 135 (6 Pt 2 Su): S310–S319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Gardin JM, Siscovick D, Anton‐Culver H, Lynch JC, Smith VE, Klopfenstein HS, Bommer WJ, Fried L, O'Leary D, Manolio TA: Sex, age, and disease affect echocardiographic left ventricular mass and systolic function in the free‐living elderly. The Cardiovascular Health Study. Circulation 1995; 91 (6): 1739–1748 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Rich MW: Heart failure disease management: A critical review. J Cardiol Fail 1999; 5 (1): 64–75 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ho KK, Pinsky JL, Kannel WB, Levy D: The epidemiology of heart failure: The Framingham Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22 (4 suppl A): 6A–13A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kaplan EL, Meier P: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457–481 [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Cox D: Regression models and life‐tables. J R Stat Soc 1972; 34: 187–220 [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Rich MW, Freedland KE: Effect of DRGs on three‐month readmission rate of geriatric patients with congestive heart failure. Am J Public Health 1988; 78 (6): 680–682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Vinson JM, Rich MW, Sperry JC, Shah AS, McNamara T: Early readmission of elderly patients with congestive heart failure. J Am Geriatr Soc 1990; 38 (12): 1290–1295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Brophy JM, Deslauriers G, Boucher B, Rouleau JL: The hospital course and short term prognosis of patients presenting to the emergency room with de‐compensated congestive heart failure. Can J Cardiol 1993; 9 (3): 219–224 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Reis SE, Holubkov R, Edmundowicz D, McNamara DM, Zell KA, Detre KM, Feldman AM: Treatment of patients admitted to the hospital with congestive heart failure: Specialty‐related disparities in practice patterns and outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30 (3): 733–738 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Krumholz HM, Parent EM, Tu N, Vaccarino V, Radford MJ, Hennen J: Re‐admission after hospitalization for congestive heart failure among Medicare beneficiaries. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157 (1): 99–104 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Wolinsky FD, Overhage JM, Stump TE, Lubitz RM, Smith DM: The risk of hospitalization for congestive heart failure among older adults. Med Care 1997; 35 (10): 1031–1043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Gillum BS, Graves EJ, Wood E: National hospital discharge survey. Vital Health Stat 13 1998; (133): i‐v, i‐51 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Fernandez GJ, Martinez GM, Garcia RJ, Bueno CA, Lardelli CP, Garcia MM: Factors associated with the incidence of hospital readmission. Med Clin(Barc) 1997; 108 (1): 4–8 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Philbin EF, DiSalvo TG: Influence of race and gender on care process, resource use, and hospital‐based outcomes in congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82 (1): 76–81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Wallentin L, Lagerqvist B, Husted S, Kontny F, Stahle E, Swahn E: Outcome at 1 year after an invasive compared with a non‐invasive strategy in unstable coronary‐artery disease: The FRISC II invasive randomised trial. FRISC II Investigators. Fast Revascularisation during Instability in Coronary artery disease. Lancet 2000; 356 (9223): 9–16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Bergelson BA, Tommaso CL: Gender differences in clinical evaluation and triage in coronary artery disease. Chest 1995; 108 (6): 1510–1513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Harjai KJ, Nunez E, Turgut T, Shah MP, Humphrey JS, Newman J, Cheirif J, Smart FW, Ventura HO: The independent effects of left ventricular ejection fraction on short‐term outcomes and resource utilization following hospitalization for heart failure. Clin Cardiol 1999; 22 (3): 184–190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study : Design and objectives. The ARIC investigators. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 129 (4): 687–702 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Ives DG, Fitzpatrick AL, Bild DE, Psaty BM, Kuller LH, Crowley PM, Cruise RG, Théroux S: Surveillance and ascertainment of cardiovascular events. The Cardiovascular Health Study. Ann Epidemiol 1995; 5 (4): 278–285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Fortmann SP, Haskell WL, Williams PT, Varady AN, Hulley SB, Farquhar JW: Community surveillance of cardiovascular diseases in the Stanford Five‐City Project. Methods and initial experience. Am J Epidemiol 1986; 123 (4): 656–669 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Philbin EF, DiSalvo TG: Prediction of hospital readmission for heart failure: Development of a simple risk score based on administrative data. Rev Port Cardiol 1999; 18 (9): 855–856 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES