Skip to main content
PMC home page
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2007 Jul 5;25(11):525–531. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960251109

Signal‐Averaged P‐Wave Analysis of Normal Controls and Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Study in Gender Differences, Age Dependence, and Reproducibility

Anwer Dhala 1,✉, Donald Underwood 1, Robert Leman 1, Ernest Madu 1, Dainia Baugh 1, Yukio Ozawa 1, Yuji Kasamaki 1, Qiuzhen Xue 1,†, Shankara Reddy 1,†,‡
PMCID: PMC6654186  PMID: 12430783

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation is often first recognized after a complication such as embolic stroke has occurred. Limited data are available for the prospective identification of patients at risk for developing atrial fibrillation.

Hypothesis: Demonstration of areas of slow conduction in the atrium by means of P‐wave signal averaging may identify individuals at risk for atrial fibrillation.

Methods: P‐wave signal averaging from the surface electrocardiogram was performed in 199 normal controls and 81 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using an automated, P‐triggered, high‐resolution signal for analysis.

Results: Of the variables measured, the filtered P‐wave duration and P‐wave integral were significantly different between controls and patients (filtered P‐wave duration 120 ± 9 vs. 145 ± 21 and P‐wave integral 666 ± 208 vs. 868 ± 352), whereas the terminal root‐mean‐square (RMS) voltages (RMS 20, RMS 30, RMS 40) showed no significant differences between the two groups. Regression analysis of the first and second measurement of the filtered P‐wave duration obtained during consecutive tests showed excellent reproducibility (r and r2 of 0.96 and 0.92). The duration of the filtered P wave showed no age dependence but was shorter in women.

Conclusion: Utilizing the 90th percentile value of the filtered P‐wave duration of 13 3 ms in men and 13 0 ms in women, the sensitivity was 80 and 81%, the specificity 92 and 90%, the positive predictive value 84 and 73%, and the negative predictive value 90 and 93%, respectively.

Keywords: paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, P‐wave signal averaging

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (110.0 KB).

References

  • 1. Fukunami M, Yamada T, Ohmori M, Kumagai K, Umemoto K, Sakai A, Kondoh N, Minamino T, Hoki N: Detection of patients at risk for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm by P‐wave‐triggered signal averaged electrocardiogram. Circulation 1991; 84: 2606–2607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Opolski G, Stanislawska J, Stomka K, Kraska T: Value of the atrial signal averaged electrocardiogram in identifying patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol 1991; 30: 315–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Stafford PJ, Turner I, Vincent R: Quantitative analysis of signal averaged P waves in idiopathic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1991; 68: 751–755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Guidera SA, Steinberg JS: The signal averaged P wave duration: A rapid and noninvasive marker of risk of atrial fibrillation. JAm Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 1645–1651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Villani GQ, Piepoli M, Cripps T, Rosi A, Gazzola U: Atrial late potentials in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation detected using a high gain, signal averaged esophageal lead. PACE 1994; 17: 1118–1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Stafford PJ, Robinson D, Vincent R: Optimal analysis of the signal averaged P wave in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Br Heart J 1995; 413–418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 7. Gondo N, Kumagai K, Matsuo K, Ogawa M, Annoura M, Moroe K, Arakawa K: The best criterion for discrimination between patients with and without paroxysmal atrial fibrillation on signal averaged electrocardiogram. Am J Cardiol 1995; 75: 93–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Xue Q, Reddy S, Dhala A: High‐resolution P wave averaged electrocardiogram for evaluation of patients prone to atrial fibrillation In Electrocardiology, p. 139–142. 1996, Proc. XXIII Internatl. Congress Electrocardiol., Singapore: World Scientific Publishers, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Chauvin M, Caillard JB, Koenig A, Brechenmacher C: P‐wave signal averaged ECG: New algorithms for detecting patients at risk of atrial fibrillation (abstr). Circulation 1994; 90 (Pt 2): 1–437 8025982 [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Dhala A, Underwood D, Madu E, Angel J, Multicenter P HiRes Study : Gender specific differences in the p wave signal averaged electrocardiogram (abstr). Circulation 1996; 94: 1–70 8964107 [Google Scholar]
  • 11. MacFarlane P, Lawrie TDV: Comprehensive Electrocardiography—Theory and Practice in Health and Disease, vol. 1, p. 438 New York: Pergamon Press, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Christiansen EH, Frost L, Pilegaard H, Toftegaard‐Nielsen T, Pedersen AK: Within‐ and between‐patient variation of the signal averaged P wave in coronary artery disease. PACE 1996; 19: 72–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Hofmann M, Goedel‐Meinen L, Beckhoff A, Rehbach K, Schomig A: Analysis of the P wave in the signal averaged electrocardiogram: Normal values and reproducibility. PACE 1996; 19 (Pt. II): 1928–1932 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ehlert FA, Zaman N, Steinberg JS: Immediate and short‐term reproducibility of the P wave signal averaged electrocardiogram. PACE 1997; 20: 1636–1645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Stafford PJ, Cooper J, Fothergill J, Schlindwein F, deBono DP, Garratt CJ: Reproducibility of the signal averaged P wave: Time and frequency domain analysis. Heart 1997; 77: 412–416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Yamada T, Fukunami M, Shimonagata T, Kumagai K, Kim J, Sanada S, Ogita H, Hoki N: Reproducibility and long‐term change of the P wave‐triggered signal averaged ECG (abstr). J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 30A [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Ehlert FA, Korenstein D, Steinberg JS: Evaluation of P wave signal averaged electrocardiographic filtering and analysis methods. Am Heart J 1997; 134: 985–993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Valverde ER, Quinteiro RA, Bertran GC, Arini PD, Glenny P, Biagetti MO: Influence of filtering techniques on the time‐domain analysis of signal averaged P wave electrocardiogram. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1998; 9: 253–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Pellerin D, Attuel P, Davy JM, Slama M, Motte G: Evaluation of signal averaged P‐wave in patients with and without history of atrial arrhythmias. Comparison with ECG and electrophysiological study. Eur Heart J 1991; 12 (suppl): 278 [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Gencel L, Poquet F, Gosse P, Haissaguerre M, Marcus FI, Clementy J: Correlation of signal averaged P wave with electrophysiological testing for atrial vulnerability in strokes of unexplained etiology. PACE 1994; 17 (Part II): 2118–2124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Zelenkofske SL, Brown E, Mogtader A, Menchavez E, Steinberg JS: Prolonged SAECG P‐wave duration is not due to atrial enlarge‐ment(abstr). Circulation 1993; 88: I–311 [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Stafford PJ, Kolvekar S, Cooper J, Fothergill J, Schlindwein F, deBono DP, Spyt TJ, Farratt CJ: Signal averaged P wave compared with standard electrocardiography or echocardiography for prediction of atrial fibrillation after coronary bypass grafting. Heart 1997; 77: 417–422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES