Skip to main content
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2007 Feb 14;29(11):494–497. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960291105

The effect of coronary angiography on residual renal function in patients on peritoneal dialysis

Steven D Weisbord 1,2,3,, J Udith Bernardini 3, Maria K Mor 2,4, Kathryn C Harrwig 1,2, Patricia J Nicoletta 1, Paul M Palevsky 1,3, B Eth Piraino 3
PMCID: PMC6654194  PMID: 17133846

Abstract

Background: The risk of intravascular radiocontrast to residual renal function (RRF) in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) remains largely unknown.

Hypothesis: This study sought to estimate the effect of coronary angiography on RRF in patients on PD.

Methods: All patients at the VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System and University of Pittsburgh who underwent coronary angiography between 1993 and 2005 while on PD and who had RRF measured prior to angiography were identified retrospectively. For patients without a postprocedure RRF recorded, medical records were reviewed to determine whether anuria had developed. The longer‐term rate of loss of RRF among cases was compared with a composite rate of decline in RRF among cases before angiography and matched controls.

Results: Twenty‐nine patients with a mean preprocedure RRF of 4.4 ±3.2 ml/min/1.73m2 were evaluated. Of these patients, 23 (79%) had postangiography RRF assessments (mean clearance 3.4 ± 3.0 ml/min/1.73m2). One of the remaining six patients definitely became permanently anuric following angiography, one was lost to follow‐up, and there was no postprocedure RRF assessment in four others. The rate of decline in RRF in the cases was similar to the composite rate (0.07 ml/min/1.73m2/month vs. 0.09 ml/min/1.73m2/month, p = 0.53)

Conclusion: The risk for permanent anuria in patients on PD undergoing coronary angiography appears to be quite small. Patients who do not develop anuria following coronary angiography have the same gradual rate of loss of RRF as other patients on PD. Providers should be vigilant in protecting RRF in patients on PD undergoing coronary angiography.

Keywords: coronary angiography, residual renal function, peritoneal dialysis

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (366.6 KB).

References

  • 1. Diaz‐Buxo JA, Lowrie EG, Lew NL, Zhang SM, Zhu X, Lazarus JM: Associates of mortality among peritoneal dialysis patients with special reference to peritoneal transport rates and solute clearance. Am J Kidney Dis 1999; 33: 523–534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bargman JM, Thorpe KE, Churchill DN: Relative contribution of residual renal function and peritoneal clearance to adequacy of dialysis: A reanalysis of the CANUSA study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12: 2158–2162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Rottembourg J: Residual renal function and recovery of renal function in patients treated by CAPD. Kidney Int Suppl 1993; 40: S106–110 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Paniagua R, Amato D, Vonesh E, Correa‐Rotter R, Ramos A, Moran J, Mujais S: Effects of increased peritoneal clearances on mortality rates in peritoneal dialysis: ADEMEX, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: 1307–1320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Lo WK, Ho YW, Li CS, Wong KS, Chan TM, Yu AW, Ng FS, Cheng IK: Effect of Kt/V on survival and clinical outcome in CAPD patients in a randomized prospective study. Kidney Int 2003; 64: 649–656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Szeto CC, Wong TY, Chow KM, Leung CB, Law MC, Li PK: Independent effects of renal and peritoneal clearances on the mortality of peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int 2004; 24: 58–64 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Shin SK, Noh H, Kang SW, Seo BJ, Lee IH, Song HY, Choi KH, Ha SK, Lee HY, Han DS: Risk factors influencing the decline of residual renal function in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int 1999; 19: 138–142 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Jansen MA, Hart AA, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW, Boeschoten EW, Krediet RT: Predictors of the rate of decline of residual renal function in incident dialysis patients. Kidney Int 2002; 62: 1046–1053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Baker RJ, Senior H, Clemenger M, Brown EA: Empirical aminoglycosides for peritonitis do not affect residual renal function. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 41: 670–675 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Shemin D, Maaz D, St. Pierre D, Kahn SI, Chazan JA: Effect of aminoglycoside use on residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 1999; 34: 14–20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Tepel M, van der Giet M, Schwarzfeld C, Laufer U, Liermann D, Zidek W: Prevention of radiographic contrast agent‐induced reductions in renal function by acetylcysteine. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 180–184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Dittrich E, Puttinger H, Schillinger M, Lang I, Stefenelli T, Horl WH, Vychytil A: Effect of radio contrast media on residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis patients—a prospective study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21: 1334–1339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Moranne O, Willoteaux S, Pagniez D, Dequiedt P, Boulanger E: Effect of iodinated contrast agents on residual renal function in PD patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21: 1040–1045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Hiroshige K, Yuu K, Soejima M, Takasugi M, Kuroiwa A: Rapid decline of residual renal function in patients on automated peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 1996; 16: 307–315 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hufnagel G, Michel C, Queffeulou G, Skhiri H, Damieri H, Mignon F: The influence of automated peritoneal dialysis on the decrease in residual renal function. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14: 1224–1228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES