Skip to main content
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2006 Dec 5;25(1):19–22. doi: 10.1002/clc.4950250106

Significance of anterior Q waves in left anterior fascicular block—A clinical and noninvasive assessment

Udipi R Shettigar 1,, Anu Pannuri 2, George H Barbier 3, Doreen O Appunn 1,3
PMCID: PMC6654265  PMID: 11808834

Abstract

Background: Electrocardiographic (ECG) Q waves in V leads (V2 or V3) pose a diagnostic challenge in the presence of left anterior fascicular block (LAFB). Benign Q waves in the absence of coronary artery disease (CAD) primarily due to LAFB have been described. This study evaluates Q waves in the presence of LAFB.

Hypothesis: Anterior Q waves in the presence of LAFB may not be indicative of myocardial infarction (MI).

Methods: From 1990 to 1997, ECGs of 236 male patients with LAFB were analyzes for presence of Q waves in the V leads. Records were reviewed for evidence of CAD. Of 236 patients with LAFB, 61 (26%) had Q waves in the V leads. In this group, 31 patients were available for further analysis.

Results: Of the 31 patients with Q waves in the V leads who were available for further study, LAFB was present in 22 patients (71%) and LAFB plus right bundle‐branch block (RBBB) were present in 9 (29%). Of 20 patients with Q waves due to MI, 13 (65%) had LAFB and 7 (35%) had LAFB plus RBBB. Of 11 patients with benign Q waves, 9 (82%) and 2 (18%) had LAFB and LAFB plus RBBB, respectively. Benign Q waves were noted in 5.3% (11/206) patients with LAFB. The mean duration of Q waves and Q‐wave location limited to V2 and/or V3 are 0.029 s and 64% versus 0.053 s and 15% in benign versus pathologic Q waves, respectively.

Conclusion: Patients with LAFB in the absence of MI may have Q waves in the V leads that are approximately 0.02 s in duration and restricted to one or two leads. This anomaly may represent a variation of conduction in the initial 0.02 s QRS vector due to LAFB.

Keywords: myocardial infarction, coronary disease, electrocardiography, bundle‐branch block

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (95.6 KB).

References

  • 1. Rosenbaum MB, Elizari MV, Lazzari JO: Los hemibloqueos. Buenos Aires: Paidos, 1968. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Rosenbaum MB: The hemiblocks: Diagnostic criteria and clinical significance. Mod Concepts Cardiovasc Dis 1970; 39:141–146 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Farnham DJ, Shah PM: Left anterior hemiblock simulating anteroseptal myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1976; 92:363–367 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. McHenry PL, Phillips JF, Fisch C, Corya BR: Right precordial ‘qrS’ pattern due to left ventricular hemiblock. Am Heart J 1971; 81:498–502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Shettigar UR, Hultgren HN, Pfeifer JF, Lipton MJ: Diagnostic value of Q waves in inferior myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1974; 88:170–175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kaplan BM, Berkson DM: Serial electrocardiograms after myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 1964; 60:430–436 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Coll S, Betriu A, Flores TD: Significance of Q wave regression after transmural acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1988; 61:739–742 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Uhley H: Transient abnormal Q waves. Chest 1974; 65:123–124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Castellanos A, Lemberg L: Re‐evaluation septal activation. Am Heart J 1969; 78:(4)575–577 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kulbertus HE: Electrocardiographic recognition of anterior infarction in LAFB: A diagnostic challenge. Chest 1972; 62:91–93 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES