Abstract
The concept of the ventricular gradient was conceived in the mind of Frank Wilsonin the early 1930s. Wilson, a mathematical genius, believed that the calculation of the ventricular gradient yielded information that was not otherwise obtainable. The method of analysis was not utilized by clinicians at large because the concept was not easy to understand and because the method used to compute the direction of the ventricular gradient was so time consuming that clinicians could not use it. Grant utilized the concept to create vector electrocardiography, but he believed that if his method of analysis was used, it was not often necessary to compute the direction of the ventricular gradient. He did, however, describe an easy way to compute the direction of the ventricular gradient. The current major clinical use of the ventricular gradient is to identify primary and secondary T‐wave abnormalities in an electrocardiogram showing left or right ventricular hypertrophy or left or right ventricular conduction abnormalities. In addition, the author uses the term ventricular time gradient instead of ventricular gradient in an effort to clarify the concept. Finally, the author discusses the possible clinical significance of a normally directed but shorter than normal ventricular time gradient, an attribute that has not been emphasized previously.
Keywords: ventricular time gradient
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (212.3 KB).
References
- 1. Wilson PF, MacLeod AG, Barker PS, Johnston FD: The determination and the significance of the areas of the ventricular deflections of the electrocardiogram. Am Heart J 1934; 10: 46 [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bayley RH, Monte LA: Acute local ventricular ischemia, or impending infarction, caused by dissecting aneurysm: Case report with necropsy. Am Heart J 1943; 25: 262–270. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Ashman R, Byer E: The normal human ventricular gradient. I. Factors which affect its direction and its relation to the mean QRS axis. Am Heart J 1943; 25: 16–35 [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ashman R, Byer E: The normal human ventricular gradient. II. Factors which affect its manifest area and its relationship to the manifest area of the QRS complex. Am Heart J 1943; 25: 36–57 [Google Scholar]
- 5. Ashman R, Gardberg M, Byer E: The normal human ventricular gradient. III. The relation between the anatomic and electrical axes. Am Heart J 1943; 25: 473–494 [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ashman R: The normal human ventricle gradient. IV. The relationship between the magnitudes, AQRS and G, and deviations of the RS‐T segment. Am Heart J 1943; 25: 495–510 [Google Scholar]
- 7. Burch G, Winsor T: A Primer of Electrocardiography, pp. 179–189. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1945. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Barker JM: The Unipolar Electrocardiogram: A Clinical Interpretation, p. 578 New York: Appleton‐Century‐Crofts, Inc., 1952. [Google Scholar]
- 9.(a) Grant RP: Clinical Electrocardiography: The Spatial Vector Approach. pp. 1–225. New York: The Blakiston Division, McGraw‐Hill Book Company, Inc., 1957;(a) pp. 132–134; [Google Scholar]; (b) Clinical Electrocardiography: The Spatial Vector Approach. New York: The Blakiston Division, McGraw‐Hill Book Company, Inc., pp. 71–72 [Google Scholar]
- 10. Burch G, Winsor T: A Primer of Electrocardiography. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1945; 23–31; (a)p. 181 [Google Scholar]
- 11. Grant RP: Clinical Electrocardiography: The Spatial Vector Approach. New York: The Blakiston Division, McGraw‐Hill Book Company, Inc., 1957: 69; (a) p. 31 [Google Scholar]