Abstract
Background:The use of protocols for patients with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (MI) is growing, but no definite conclusion regarding the value of critical pathways in Europe has been drawn.
Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of critical pathway on processes of care and outcome for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) of a large urban European hospital because of possible ST‐elevation MI.
Methods:Critical pathways for management of acute chest pain at our ED were developed in 1998 and have been revised every year. Accordingly, the records of all patients referred in 1997 to the ED because of chest pain (before pathway implementation) and in 2001 (after last pathway revision) were reviewed. An ST‐elevation MI was diagnosed at ED in 520 of 5,066 (10.3%) patients with chest pain in 1997, and in 452 of 4,843 (9.3%) patients with chest pain in 2001. Patients were managed according to the ED cardiologists' decisions in 1997, whereas they entered the pathways for ST‐elevation MI in 2001, with predefined criteria for diagnosis, thrombolysis, percutaneous coronary intervention, and admission to the coronary care unit.
Results:Comparison of treatment modalities disclosed that more patients were given thrombolysis in 1997 (49 vs. 16%, p < 0.05), whereas in 2001 more patients were sent to primary angioplasty (63 vs. 11%, p < 0.05). Also in 2001, patients more often received aspirin (90 vs. 61%, p < 0.05) and intravenous beta blockers (60 vs. 35%, p < 0.05) soon after arrival at the ED. Comparison between 1997 and 2001 revealed that admission rates to the coronary care unit (69 vs. 78%, NS) and cardiac wards were similar (19 vs. 10%, NS). Conversely, compared with 1997, patients hospitalized in 2001 had a shorter length of stay (12 ± 5 vs. 18 ± 6 days, p < 0.05), as well as fewer major adverse coronary events (21 vs. 30%, p < 0.05) and lower all‐cause in‐hospital mortality (12 vs. 20%, p < 0.05). The quality of care indicators improved with time, as door‐to‐electrocardiogram interval (10 ± 6 vs. 19 ± 9 min, p < 0.05), door‐to‐needle time (25 ± 10 vs. 35 ± 10 min, p < 0.05), and door‐to‐balloon interval (70 ± 15 vs. 99 ± 20 min, p < 0.05) were shorter in 2001 than in 1997.
Conclusions:A critical pathway for ST‐elevation MI at the ED increases the use of evidence‐based treatment strategies and improves outcome and quality of care of patients presenting to a European hospital because of acute chest pain.
Keywords: chest pain, critical pathways, emergency department, acute myocardial infarction
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (41.6 KB).
References
- 1. Every NR, Hochman J, Becker R, Kopecky S, Cannon CP: Critical pathways. Areview. Circulation 2000; 101: 461–465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Cannon CP: Critical pathway for unstable angina and non‐ST elevation myocardial infarction. Crit Pathways Cardiol 2002; 1: 12–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Cannon CP, Johnson EB, Cermignani M, Scirica BM, Sagarin MJ, Walls RM: Emergency department thrombolysis critical pathway reduces door‐to‐drug times in acute myocardial infarction. Clin Cardiol 1999; 22: 17–20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Iliadis EA, Klein LW, Vandenberg BJ, Spokas D, Hursey T, Parrillo VE, Calvin JE: Clinical practice guidelines in unstable angina improve clinical outcomes by assuring early intensive medical treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34: 1689–1695 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. NHAAP Coordinating Committee Critical Pathways Writing Group : Critical pathways for management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: An assessment by the National Heart Attack Alert Program. Am Heart J 2002; 143: 777–789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ryan TJ, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Braniff BA, Brooks NH, Califf RM, Hillis LD, Hiratzka LF, Rapaport E, Riegel BJ, Russell RO, Smith EE, Weaver WD: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 1328–1348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Caputo RP, Ho KK, Stoler RC, Sukin EA, Lopez JJ, Cohen DJ, Kuntz RE, Barman A, Carrozza JP, Baim DS: Effect of continuous quality improvement analysis on the delivery of primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 1159–1164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]