Skip to main content
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2006 Dec 5;29(3):112–116. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960290306

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: Direct transportation to catheterization laboratory by emergency teams reduces door‐to‐balloon time

Andreas Van De Loo 1,, Bernward Saurbier 1, Johannes Kalbhenn 1, Frank Koberne 2, Manfred Zehender 1
PMCID: PMC6654352  PMID: 16596833

Abstract

Hypothesis: In this prospective study, we sought to evaluate the effect of a logistic modification in this treatment process.

Methods: Local emergency ambulance teams were instructed to identify and evaluate patients with STEMI eligible for direct PCI and to transport them directly to the cardiac catheterization laboratory for immediate percutaneous coronary intervention (“ER bypass”). This study prospectively included 74 consecutive patients with acute coronary syndromes (STEMI) and compared them with a matched historic control group (“ER evaluation”). Primary endpoint was the reduction in door‐to‐balloon time; secondary endpoint was quality of preclinical emergency diagnosis.

Background: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the recommended revascularization strategy for patients presenting with acute ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In most hospitals, transfer of patients with STE‐MI is organized from the emergency site via emergency room (medical and cardiologic evaluation) and then to the catheterization laboratory.

Results: Median door‐to‐balloon time was reduced by 27 min. Primary interventional success was achieved in 92% of patients. Preclinical emergency diagnoses were correct in 95% of patients.

Conclusion: The preclinical emergency diagnosis of STEMI was reliable. Direct transport of patients with STEMI to the cardiac catheterization laboratory and early preclinical alert by the interventional PCI team significantly reduces door‐to‐balloon‐times compared with established standard processes‐of‐care for patients considered for primary PCI.

Keywords: primary coronary angioplasty; ST‐elevation myocardial infarction; 12‐channel surface electrocardiogram; logistic, emergency care

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (29.2 KB).

References

  • 1. Andersen HR, Rasmussen K: A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 733–742 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Weaver WD, Betriu A, Grines CL, Zijlstra F, Garcia E, Grinfield L, Gibbons RJ, Ribeiro EE, DeWood MA, Ribichini F: Comparison of primary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: A quantative review. J Am Med Assoc 1997; 278: 2093–2098 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Berger PB, Holmes DR Jr, Granger CB, Criger DA, Betriu A, Topol EJ: Relationship between delay in performing direct coronary angioplasty and early clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Results from the Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO‐IIb) trial. Circulation 1999; 100 (1): 14–20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Newby LK, Califf RM, Simoons ML, Aylward PE, Armstrong PW, Wood‐lief LH, Topol EJ, Van de Werf F: Time from symptom onset to treatment and outcomes after thrombolytic therapy. GUSTO‐1 Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27 (7): 1646–1655 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Van de Werf F, Betriu A, Cokkinos DV, Falk E, Fox KA, Julian D, Neumann FJ, Ruzyllo W, Thygesen C, Underwood SR, Vahanian A, Verheugt FW: Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology: Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST‐segment elevation. The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2003; 24 (1): 28–66 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Nallamothu BK, Bates ER, Herrin J, Wang Y, Bradley EH, Krumholz HM: Times to treatment in transfer patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI)‐3/4 analysis. Circulation 2005; 111 (6): 761–767 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Jacobs A: Primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction—is it worth the wait? N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 798–800 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Hamm C: Leitlinien Akutes Koronarsyndrom (ACS) Teil 2: Akutes Koronarsyndrom mit ST‐Hebung. Z Kardiol 2004; 93: 324–341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Antman EM, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, Hochman JS, Krumholz HM, Lamas GA, Mullany CJ, Ornato JP, Pearle DL, Sloan MA, Smith SC Jr, Anderson JL, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gibbons RJ, Gregoratos G, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Jacobs AK, Ornato JP: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44 (3): E1–E211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Boersma E, Maas AC, Deckers JW, Simoons ML: Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: Reappraisal of the golden hour. Lancet 1996; 348 (9030): 771–775 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Cannon CP, Lambrew CT, Shoultz DA, Levy D, French WJ, Gore JM, Weaver WD, Tiefenbrunn AJ: Relationship of symptom‐onset‐to‐balloon time and door‐to‐balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. J Am Med Assoc 2000; 283: 2941–2974 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. De Luca G, Ottervanger JP, Antman EM: Time delay to treatment and mortality in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: Every minute of delay counts. Circulation 2004; 109 (10): 1223–1235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Herrmann HC: Transfer for primary angioplasty: The importance of time. Circulation 2005; 111 (6): 718–720 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Zahn R, Gitt AK, Schneider S, Seidl K, Voigtlander T, Gottwik M, Altmann E, Gieseler U, Rosahl W, Wagner S, Senges J; Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) Study Group; Myocardial Infarction Registry Study Group: Impact of prehospital delay on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolysis. Am Heart J 2001; 142: 105–111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Smalling RW, Giesler G: The level I cardiovascular center: Is it time? Am Heart Hosp J 2003; 1 (2): 170–174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES