Abstract
Background: Single‐photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) sestamibi (MIBI) is an excellent tool for detection of coronary artery disease (CAD), preoperative risk assessment, and follow‐up management after coronary revas‐cularization. While the sensitivity of MIBI SPECT for detecting CAD has been reported to exceed 90%, the specificity ranges between 53–100%.
Hypothesis: The study was undertaken to assess characteristics of patients with abnormal stress technetium Tc 99m sestamibi SPECT (MIBI) studies without significant coronary artery diameter stenoses (< 50%).
Methods: Between January 1999 and November 2000, 270 consecutive patients were referred for coronary angiography due to reversible MIBI uptake defects during exercise. In 41 patients (15%; 39% women, mean age 59 ± 9 years), reversible MIBI uptake defects were assessed although coronary angiography showed no significant CAD. These patients were compared with age‐ and gender‐matched patients with perfusion abnormalities (39% women, mean age 60 ± 9 years), due to significant CAD (coronary artery stenosis > 50%).
Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding body mass index, left bundle‐branch block (LBBB), or method of stress test (dipyridamole in patients with LBBB or physical inactivity [n= 11] and exercise in all the others [n= 30]). Left ventricular hypertrophy (44 vs. 23%, p = 0.05) and left anterior fascicularblock (LAFB) (17 vs. 0%, p = 0.005) were more common in patients with perfusion abnormalities with no significant CAD, whereas ST‐segment depression during exercise (17 vs. 37% p = 0.05) and angina during exercise (15 vs. 29%, p = 0.02) were significantly less common than in patients with abnormal MIBI perfusion studies and angiographically significant CAD. Sestamibi uptake defects during exercise were significantly smaller in patients without significant CAD than in matched controls with significant CAD (p < 0.0004).
Conclusion: Of 270 consecutive patients, 41 (15%) referred to coronary angiography due to reversible MIBI uptake defects showed coronary artery stenoses <50%. Twenty‐six (10%) of these presented angiographically normal coronary arteries. The significantly higher proportion of left ventricular hypertrophy and LAFB in patients with reversible MIBI uptake defects without significant CAD suggest microvascular disease, angiographically underestimated CAD, and conduction abnormalities as underlying mechanisms.
Keywords: single‐photon emission computed tomography sestamibi, coronary artery disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, left bundle‐branch block
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (26.1 KB).
References
- 1. Wackers FJT, Soufer R, Zaret BL: Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, 5th ed., (Ed. Braunwald E.), p. 273–316. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Zaret BL, Wackers FJ: Medical progress: Nuclear cardiology (first of two parts). N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 855–863 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Fragasso G, Lu C, Dabrowski P, Pagnotta P, Sheiban I, Chierchia SL: Comparison of stress/rest myocardial perfusion tomography, dipyridamole and dobutamine stress echocardiography for the detection of coronary disease in hypertensive patients with chest pain and positive exercise test. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34: 441–447 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Committee on advanced cardiac imaging and technology, council on clinical cardiology, American Heart Association, Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, American College of Cardiology; and Board of Directors, Cardiovascular Council, Society of Nuclear Medicine : Standardization of cardiac tomographic imaging. Circulation 1992; 86: 338–339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Van Train KF, Garcia EV, Maddahi J, Areeda J, Cooke CD, Kiat H, Silagan G, Folks R, Friedman J, Matzer L: Multicenter trial validation for quantitative analysis of same‐day rest‐stress technetium‐99m‐sestamibi myocardial tomograms. J Nucl Med 1994; 35: 609–618 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, Gottlieb GJ, Campo E, Sachs I, Reiche KN: Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: Comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 1986; 57: 450–458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hirzel HO, Senn M, Nuesch K, Buettner C, Pfeiffer A, Hess OM, Krayenbuehl HP: Thallium‐201 scintigraphy in complete left bundle‐branch block. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53: 764–769 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Altehoefer C, Vom Dahl J, Kleinhans E, Uebis R, Hanrath P, Buell U: 99Tcm‐methoxyisobutylisonitrile stress/rest SPECT in patients with constant complete left bundle‐branch block. Nucl Med Commun 1993; 14: 30–35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Knapp WH, Bentrup A, Schmidt U, Ohlmeier H: Myocardial scintigraphy with thallium‐201 and technetium‐99m‐hexakis‐methoxyisobutylisonitrile in left bundle‐branch block: A study in patients with and without coronary artery disease. Eur J Nucl Med 1993; 20: 219–224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Altehoefer C, vom Dahl J, Bares R, Stocklin GL, Bull U: Metabolic mismatch of septal beta‐oxidation and glucose utilization in left bundle‐branch block assessed with PET. J Nucl Med 1995; 36: 2056–2059 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Ono S, Nohara R, Kambara H, Okuda K, Kawai C: Regional myocardial perfusion and glucose metabolism in experimental left bundle‐branch block. Circulation 1992; 85: 1125–1131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Marwick T, D'Hondt AM, Baudhuin T, Willemart B, Wijns W, Detry JM, Melin J: Optimal use of dobutamine stress for the detection and evaluation of coronary artery disease: Combination with echocardiography or scintigraphy, or both? J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 159–167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Elhendy A, Geleijnse ML, van Domburg RT, Bax JJ, Nierop PR, Beerens SA, Valkema R, Krenning EP, Mohsen Ibrahim M, Roelandt JR: Comparison of dobutamine stress echocardiography and technetium‐99m sestamibi single‐photon emission tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in hypertensive patients with and without left ventricular hypertrophy. Eur J Nucl Med 1998; 25: 69–78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Langes K, Beuthien‐Baumann B, Lubeck M, Fuchs C, Schneider MA, Volk C, Nienaber CA: Impairment of myocardial perfusion reserve in microvas‐cular angina (syndrome X): Assessment by 99mTc‐MIBI‐SPECT. Nuklearmedizin 1996; 35: 193–197 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Rosen SD, Uren NG, Kaski JC, Tousoulis D, Davies GJ, Camici PG: Coronary vasodilator reserve, pain perception, and sex in patients with syndrome X. Circulation 1994; 90: 50–60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Verna E, Ceriani L, Giovanella L, Binaghi G, Garancini S: “False‐positive” myocardial perfusion scintigraphy findings in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries: Insights from intravascular sonography studies. J Nucl Med 2000; 41: 1935–1940 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]