Abstract
Background: Heart rate recovery (HRR) during exercise testing is an independent predictor of prognosis. The relative predictive power of computational analysis of HRR as a function of resting and maximum heart rate (HR) compared with direct measurement of the drop in HR has not been determined.
Hypothesis: We aimed to improve on the prognostic value of HRR by the use of mathematical representations of HRR kinetics.
Methods: In all, 2,193 patients who underwent exercise testing, coronary angiography, and clinical evaluation were followed up for 10.2 ±3.6 years. Mathematical functions were used to model HRR as a function of resting (HRRest), maximum HR (HRPeak) and time (t):
-
(a)
HRR = HRRest + (HRPeak ‐ HRRest)× e−kt and
-
(b)
HRR = HRRest + (HRPeak ‐ HRRest)× e−kt
Results: Equation (b) provided the best fit of the recovery HR curve. An abnormal HRR at 2 min was a better predictor of mortality than HRR at 1, 3, or 5 min. At 2 min, HRR also predicted mortality better than computational models of HRR, relating HRR as a function of maximum and resting HRs. After adjusting for univariately significant predictors of mortality, HRR, age, exercise capacity, and maximum HR were chosen in order as the best predictors of mortality.
Conclusion: Even though the computational models of HRR and the determination of HRR at different time intervals were significant predictors of mortality, the simple discrete measure of HRR at 2 min was the best predictor of mortality. At 2 min, HRR outperformed age, METs, and maximum exercise HR in predicting all‐cause mortality.
Keywords: heart rate recovery, autonomic nervous system, exercise testing, exercise physiology, mathematical models, heart rate reserve, exercise capacity
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (79.1 KB).
References
- 1. Kannel WB, Kannel C, Paffenbarger RS Jr, Cupples LA: Heart rate and cardiovascular mortality: The Framingham Study. Am Heart J 1987; 113(6): 1489–1494 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Cole CR, Blackstone EH, Pashkow FJ, Snader CE, Lauer MS: Heart‐rate recovery immediately after exercise as a predictor of mortality. N Engl J Med 1999; 341(18): 1351–1357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Shetler K, Marcus R, Froelicher VF, Vora S, Kalisetti D, Prakash M, Do D, Myers J: Heart rate recovery: Validation and methodological issues. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 1980–1987 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Mora S, Redberg RF, Cui Y, Whiteman MK, Flaws JA, Sharrett AR, Blumenthal RS: Ability of exercise testing to predict cardiovascular and all‐cause death in asymptomatic women: A 20‐year follow‐up of the lipid research clinics prevalence study. J Am Med Assoc 2003; 290(12): 1600–1607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Singer RB: Abnormal delay in recovery of pulse rate in 9,454 patients referred for treadmill exercise test to Cleveland Clinic, 1990‐1997: An independent predictor of excess mortality. J Insur Med 2002; 34(1): 3–11 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Morshedi‐Meibodi A, Larson MG, Levy D, O'Donnell CJ, Vasan RS: Heart rate recovery after treadmill exercise testing and risk of cardiovascular disease events (The Framingham Heart Study). Am J Cardiol 2002; 90(8): 848–852 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Wolthuis R, Froelicher VF, Hopkirk A, Fischer JR, Keiser N: New practical treadmill protocol for clinical use. Am J Cardiol 1997; 39: 697–700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Myers J, Buchanan N, Smith D, Neutel J, Boewes E, Walsh D, Froelicher VF: Individualized ramp treadmill: Observations on a new protocol. Chest 1992; 101(suppl): 236S‐241S [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Myers J, Do D, Herbert W, Ribisl P, Froelicher VF: A nomogram to predict exercise capacity from a specific activity questionnaire and clinical data. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73: 591–596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT, Chaitman BR, Fletcher GF, Froelicher VF, Mark DB, McCalliester BD, Mooss AN, O'Reilley MG, Winters WL, Gibbons RJ, Antman EM, Alpert JS, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gregoratos G, Hiratzka LF, Jacobs AK, Russell RO, Smith SC: ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: Summary article: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). Circulation 2002; 106(14): 1883–1892 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Morris CK, Myers J, Froelicher VF, Kawaguchi T, Ueshima K, Hideg A: Nomogram based on metabolic equivalents and age for assessing aerobic exercise capacity in men. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22(1): 175–182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Mark DB, Shaw L, Harrell FE, Hlatky MA, Lee KL, Bengtson JR, McCants CB, Califf RM, Pryor DB: Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1991; 325 (12): 849–853 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Califf RM, Phillips HR, Hindman MC, Mark DB, Lee KL, Behar VS, Johnson RA, Pryor DB, Rosati RA, Wagner GS: Prognostic value of a coronary artery jeopardy score. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 5: 1055–1063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Nishime EO, Cole CR, Blackstone EH, Pahkow FJ, Lauer MS: Heart rate recovery and treadmill exercise score as predictors of mortality in patients referred for exercise ECG J Am Med Assoc 2000; 283(11): 1392–1398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]