Abstract
Background: Recent studies have shown that patient‐triggered cardiac event recorders (CER) have an increased diagnostic yield and are more cost effective than conventional 24‐h‐Holter electrocardiograms (ECGs) for the evaluation of sporadic, potentially arrhythmia‐related symptoms.
Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic yield of a patient‐triggered CER combined with continuous automatic arrhythmia detection in the evaluation of sporadic dizziness/syncope or palpitations and its clinical relevance in assessing the further management.
Methods: We investigated 101 consecutive outpatients (54 ± 20 years, 40 women), referred for evaluation of sporadic dizziness and syncope (36%) or palpitations (64%) of suspected rhythmogenic origin. All were monitored by patient‐triggered CER with continuous automatic arrhythmia detection.
Results: After a mean monitoring period of 103 ± 38 h, 83 patients registered symptoms and 57 patients had diagnostic or therapeutic relevant arrhythmias (relA). A total of 196 episodes of relA were recorded; 31 (16%) episodes were patient‐triggered and 165 (84%) automatically recorded. Diagnostic relevant episodes (relA and/or typical symptoms) occurred in 94 patients, in 54% after the first 24 h of monitoring. According to the results of the CER, 80 patients needed no further diagnostic evaluation; 20 had additional diagnostic tests.
Conclusions: Cardiac event recorders with a continuous automatic arrhythmia detection function are a well‐tolerated device for sporadic, potentially arrhythmia‐related symptoms. The patient‐triggered mode alone is not sufficiently reliable; the automatic continuous arrhythmia detection function has additional diagnostic and therapeutic consequences. In 54% of all patients, the first diagnostic event would not have been recorded with a single conventional 24‐h‐Holter ECG.
Keywords: cardiac event recorders, dizziness, palpitation, syncope, arrhythmias
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (29.9 KB).
References
- 1. Kroenke K, Arrington ME, Mangelsdorff AD: The prevalence of symptoms in medical outpatients and the adequacy of therapy. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150: 1685–1689 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Day SC, Cook EF, Funkenstein H, Goldman L: Evaluation and outcome of emergency room patients with transient loss of consciousness. Am J Med 1982; 73 (1): 15–23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Zimetbaum PJ, Kim KY, Ho KK, Zebede J, Josephson ME, Goldberger AL: Utility of a patient‐activated cardiac event recorder in general clinical practice. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 371–372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Zimetbaum PJ, Kim KY, Josephson ME, Goldberger AL, Cohen DJ: Diagnostic yield and optimal duration of continuous‐loop event monitoring for the diagnosis of palpitations. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128: 890–895 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Linzer M, Pritchett EL, Pontinen M, McCarthy E, Divine GV: Incremental diagnostic yield of loop electrocardiographic recorders in unexplained syncope. Am J Cardiol 1990; 66: 214–219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Fogel RI, Evans JJ, Prystowsky EN: Utility and cost of event recorders in the diagnosis of palpitations, presyncope, and syncope. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 207–208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kinlay S, Leitch JW, Neil A, Chapman BL, Hardy DB, Fletcher PJ: Cardiac event recorders yield more diagnoses and are more cost‐effective than 48hour Holter monitoring in patients with palpitations. A controlled clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 1996; 124: 16–20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Simonetti G, Spina E, Bracher J, Fuhrer J: Prospektive Vergleichsuntersuchung eines Aktivierungs‐Holters mit einem konventionellen Holter‐EKG bei Patienten mit Synkopen, Präsynkopen and Palpitationen. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1998; 128 (suppl 97)29S [Google Scholar]
- 9. Roche F, Gaspoz JM, Pichot V, Costes F, Isaaz K, Ferron C, Roche C, Geyssant A, Lacour JR, Barthelemy JC: Accuracy of an automatic and patient‐triggered long‐term solid memory ambulatory cardiac event recorder. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80: 1095–1098 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]