Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to determine whether baseline physical examination and history are useful in identifying patients with cardiac edema as defined by echocardiography, and to compare survival for patients with cardiac and noncardiac causes of edema.
Hypothesis: Physical examination and history data can help to identify patients with edema who have significant cardiac disease.
Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 278 consecutive patients undergoing echocardiography for evaluation of peripheral edema. We classified cardiac edema as the presence of any of the following: left ventricular ejection fraction <45%, systolic pulmonary artery pressure >45 mmHg, reduced right ventricular function, enlarged right ventricle, and a dilated inferior vena cava.
Results: The mean age of the 243 included patients was 67 ±12 years and 92% were male. A cardiac cause of edema was found in 56 (23%). Independent predictors of a cardiac cause of edema included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, odds ratio [OR] 1.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14–2.60) and crackles (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.26–3.10). The specificity for a cardiac cause of edema was high (91% for COPD, 93% for crackles); however, the sensitivity was quite low (27% for COPD, for 24% crackles). Compared with patients without a cardiac cause of edema, those with a cardiac cause had increased mortality (25 vs. 8% at 2 years, p < 0.01), even after adjustment for other characteristics (hazard ratio 1.55, 95% CI 1.08–2.24).
Conclusions: A cardiac cause of edema is difficult to predict based on history and examination and is associated with high mortality.
Keywords: edema, echocardiography, physical examination, heart disease, crackles, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (39.8 KB).
References
- 1. Cho S, Atwood JE: Peripheral edema. Am J Med 2002; 113: 580–586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Otto C: Textbook of Clinical Echocardiography, pp. 120–121. Philadelphia, Pa.: W. B. Saunders, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Goldberger JJ, Himelman RB, Wolfe CL, Schiller NB: Right ventricular infarction: Recognition and assessment of its hemodynamic significance by two‐dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1991; 4: 140–146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Singh JP, Evans JC, Levy D, Larson MG, Freed LA, Fuller DL, Lehman B, Benjamin EJ: Prevalence and clinical determinants of mitral, tricuspid, and aortic regurgitation (the Framingham Heart Study). Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 897–902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Blankfield RP, Finkelhor RS, Alexander JJ, Flocke SA, Maiocco J, Goodwin M, Zyzanski SJ: Etiology and diagnosis of bilateral leg edema in primary care. Am J Med 1998; 105: 192–197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Miller TD, Hodge DO, Christian TF, Milavetz JJ, Bailey KR, Gibbons RJ: Effects of adjustment for referral bias on the sensitivity and specificity of single photon emission computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Am J Med 2002; 112: 290–297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hunt HA, Baker DW, Chin MH, Cinquegrani MP, Feldman AM, Francis GS, Ganiats TG, Goldstein S, Gregoratos G, Jessup ML, Noble RJ, Packer M, Silver MA, Stevenson LW, Gibbons RJ, Antman EM, Alpert JS, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Jacobs AK, Hiratzka LF, Russell RO, Smith SC Jr: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult: Executive Summary. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure). Circulation 2001; 104: 2996–3007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Heidenreich PA, Gubens MA, Fonarow GC, Konstam MA, Stevenson LW, Shekelle PG: Cost‐effectiveness of screening with B‐type natriuretic peptide to identify patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 1019–1026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]