Skip to main content
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2009 Feb 3;24(10):682–688. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960241009

Magnetocardiographic mapping of QRS fragmentation in patients with a history of malignant tachyarrhythmias

P Göudde 1, R Agrawal 1, H‐P Müuller 1, K Czerski 1, P Endt 2, U Steinhoff 2, M Oeff 3, H‐P Schultheiss 3, S Behrens 3,
PMCID: PMC6654772  PMID: 11594414

Abstract

Background: The identification of patients at increased risk for ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) and sudden cardiac death has consequences for therapeutic options and thus may reduce mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the intra‐QRS fragmentation in magnetocardiographic recordings is increased in patients with CAD and with a history of VT/VF.

Methods: Multichannel magnetocardiography (MCG) was carried out in 34 healthy controls, 42 patients with CAD without a history of VT/VF, and 43 patients with CAD and with a history of VT/VF. The intra‐QRS fragmentation was quantified by a new fragmentation score. Its spatial distribution was investigated using two‐dimensional (2‐D) contour maps according to the sensor position of the 49‐channel magnetogradiometer.

Results: Patients with CAD and with a history of VT/VF had significantly increased QRS fragmentation compared with patients with CAD without VT/VF or controls (72.9 ± 37.5,48.5 ± 14.3, and 42.5 ± 7.8, respectively; p< 0.05). The area of high fragmentation in 2‐D contour maps was twice as large in patients with than in those without a history of VT/VF (represented by the number of MCG channels with high fragmentation: 26.3 ± 15.5 vs. 12.4 ± 9.9, p<0.0001). Patients prone to VT/VF could be identified with a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 90%.

Conclusion: In patients with CAD and with a history of VT/VF, intra‐QRS fragmentation is increased and the area of high fragmentation in 2‐D contour maps is enlarged. These findings may be helpful in identifying patients with CAD at risk for malignant tachyarrhythmias.

Keywords: magnetocardiography, mapping, ventricular arrhythmias, coronary artery disease, arrhythmogenic substrate

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (932.6 KB).

References

  • 1. The Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators : A comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near‐fatal ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 1576–1583 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, Higgins SL, Klein H, Levine JH, Saksena S, Waldo AL, Wilber D, Brown MW, Heo M: Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multi‐center Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1933–1940 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. de Bakker JM, van Capelle FJ, Janse MJ, Tasseron S, Vermeulen JT, de Jonge N, Lahpor JR: Slow conduction in the infarcted human heart. “Zigzag” course of activation. Circulation 1993; 88: 915–926 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Hood MA, Pogwizd SM, Peirick J, Cain ME: Contribution of myocardium responsible for ventricular tachycardia to abnormalities detected by analysis of signal‐averaged ECGs. Circulation 1992; 86: 1888–1901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Buxton AE, Kleiman RB, Kindwall KE, Josephson ME: Endocardial mapping during sinus rhythm in patients with coronary artery disease and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71: 695–698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Habbab MA, el Sherif N: Recordings from the slow zone of reentry during burst pacing versus programmed premature stimulation for initiation of reentrant ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1992; 70: 211–217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Cassidy DM, Vassallo JA, Miller JM, Poll DS, Buxton AE, Marchlinski FE, Josephson ME: Endocardial catheter mapping in patients in sinus rhythm: Relationship to underlying heart disease and ventricular arrhythmias. Circulation 1986; 73: 645–652 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Gardner PI, Ursell PC, Fenoglio JJ Jr, Wit AL: Electrophysiologic and anatomic basis for fractionated electrograms recorded from healed myocardial infarcts. Circulation 1985; 72: 596–611 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Fenoglio JJ Jr, Pham TD, Harken AH, Horowitz LN, Josephson ME, Wit AL: Recurrent sustained ventricular tachycardia: Structure and ultrastructure of subendocardial regions in which tachycardia originates. Circulation 1983; 68: 518–533 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. el Sherif N: Electrophysiologic mechanisms of ventricular arrhythmias. Int J Cardiol Imag 1991; 7: 141–150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. de Bakker JM, van Capelle FJ. Janse MJ, Wilde AA, Coronel R, Becker AE, Dingemans KP, van Hemel NM, Hauer RN: Reentry as a cause of ventricular tachycardia in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease: Electrophysiologic and anatomic correlation. Circulation 1988; 77: 589–606 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Simson MB: Noninvasive identification of patients at high risk for sudden cardiac death. Signal‐averaged electrocardiography. Circulation 1992; 85: 1145–151 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Bigger JT Jr: Prophylactic use of implanted cardiac defibrillators in patients at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Patch Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 1569–1575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Lander P, Gomis P, Goyal R, Berbari EI, Caminal P, Lazzara R, Steinberg JS: Analysis of abnormal intra‐QRS potentials. Circulation 1997; 95: 1386–1393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Simson MB, Untereker WJ, Spielman SR, Horowitz LN, Marcus NH, Falcone RA, Harken AH, Josephson ME: Relation between late potentials on the body surface and directly recorded fragmented electrograms in patients with ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 1983; 51: 105–112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Link A, Trahms L, Zimmermann R, Oeff M: Complex binomial bandpass filters for analysing phase and envelope of high frequency components in cardiac signals. Computers in Cardiology 1994; 21: 617–620 [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Freedman RA, Fuller MS, Greenberg GM, Ershler PR, Lux RL, McLaughlin TB, Menlove R, Green LS, Moddrelle D, Krall R: Detection and localization of prolonged epicardial electrograms with 64‐lead body surface signal‐averaged electrocardiography. Circulation 1991; 84: 871–883 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Fisch C: Electrocardiography In Heart Disease, A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, p. 115 (Ed. Braunwald E.). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Brockmeier K, Schmitz L, de Chavez JJB, Burghoff M, Koch H, Zimmermann R, Trahms L: Magnetocardiography and 32 lead potential mapping: The repolarization in normal subjects during pharmacologically induced stress. J Cardiovasc Electrophys 1997; 8: 615–626 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Mäkijärvi M, Montonen J, Toivonen L, Siltanen P, Nieminen MS, Leinio M, Katila T: Identification of patients with ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction by high‐resolution magnetocardiography and electrocardiography. J Electrocardiol 1993; 26: 117–124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Hren R, Steinhoff U, Gessner C, Endt P, Godde P, Agrawal R, Oeff M, Lux R, Trahms L: Value of magnetocardiographic QRST integral maps in the identification of patients at risk of ventricular arrhythmias. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999; 22: 1292–1304 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Stroink G, Lant J, Elliott P, Charlebois P, Gardner MJ: Discrimination between myocardial infarct and ventricular tachycardia patients using magnetocardiographic trajectory plots and iso‐integral maps. J Electrocardiol 1992; 25: 129–142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Oeff M, Burghoff M: Magnetocardiographic localization of the origin of ventricular ectopic beats. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1994; 17: 517–522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Mäkijärvi M, Nenonen J, Leinio M, Montonen J, Toivonen L, Nieminen MS, Katila T, Siltanen P: Localization of accessory pathways in Wolff‐Parkinson‐White syndrome by high‐resolution magnetocardiographic mapping. J Electrocardiol 1992; 25: 143–155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Nenonen J, Mäkijärvi M, Toivonen L, Foreman K, Leinio M, Montonen J, Jarvinen A, Keto P, Hekali P, Katila T, Siltanen P: Non‐invasive magnetocardiographic localization of ventricular pre‐excitation in the Wolff‐Parkinson‐White syndrome using a realistic torso model. Eur Heart J 1993; 14: 168–174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Hausleiter J, Jost S, Nolte CWT, Dirschinger J, Kastrati A, Stiel GM, Wunderlich W, Fischer F, Linderer T, Hausmann D, Schömig A: Comparative in‐vitro validation of eight first‐ and second‐generation quantitive coronary angiography systems. Coronary Artery Dis 1997; 8: 83–90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Drung D: The PTB 83‐squid system for biomagnetic applications in stchmc. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 1995; 5: 2112–2117 [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Erne SN, Trahms L, Trontelj Z: A novel approach for selected averaging of biomagnetic signals In Biomagnetism, p. 298–301 (Eds. Atsumi K, Kotani M, Ueno S, Katila T, Williamson SJ.). Tokyo: Tokyo Denki University Press, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Endt P, Hahlbohm H‐D, Kreiseler D, Oeff M, Steinhoff U, Trahms L: Fragmentation of bandpass‐filtered QRTS‐complex of patients prone to malignant arrhythmia. Med Biol Eng Comput 1998; 36: 723–727 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Plonsey R: Comparative capabilities of electrocardiography and magnetocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1972; 29: 735–736 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Wikswo JJ, Barach J: Possible sources of new information in the magnetocardiogram. J Theor Biol 1982; 95: 721–729 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Weismuller P, Richter P, Abraham‐Fuchs K, Harer W, Schneider S, Hoher M, Kochs M, Edrich J, Hombach V: Spatial differences of the duration of ventricular late fields in the signal‐averaged magnetocardiogram in patients with ventricular late potentials. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1993; 16: 70–79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Korhonen P, Montonen J, Mäkijärvi MTK, Nieminen M, Toivonen L: Late fields of the magnetocardiographic QRS complex as indicators of propensity to sustained ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2000; 11: 413–420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Brockmeier K, Comani S, Erne SN, Di Luzio S, Pasquarelli A, Romani GL: Magnetocardiography and exercise testing. J Electrocardiol 1994; 27: 137–142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Schmitz L, Czerski K, Brockmeier K, Agrawal R, Steinhoff U, Trahms L, Oeff M: Magnetocardiographic turbulence analysis in patients widi long QT syndrome. J Electrocardiol 1998; 30: 105–113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Brockmeier K, Schmitz L, Wiegand S, Raff K, Hirth C, Weber B, Bein G: High‐pass‐filtered magnetocardiogram and cardiomyopathy in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Electrocardiol 1997; 30: 293–300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Fenici R, Nenonen J, Pesola K, Korhonen P, Lotjonen J, Mäkijärvi M, Toivonen L, Poutanen V, Keto P, Katila T: Nonflouroscopic localization of an amagnetic stimulation catheter by multichannel magnetocardiography. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999; 22: 1210–1220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Gödde P, Czerski K, Agrawal R, Lampe F, Schultheiss H‐P, Behrens S: Magnetocardiographic mapping for prediction of arrhythmia relapse in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (abstr). Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999; 22 (Part II): A 171 [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Untereker WJ, Spielman SR, Waxman HL, Horowitz LN, Josephson ME: Ventricular activation in normal sinus rhythm: Abnormalities with recurrent sustained tachycardia and a history of myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55: 974–979 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Klein H, Karp RB, Kouchoukos NT, Zorn GL Jr, James TN, Waldo AL: Intraoperative electrophysiologic mapping of the ventricles during sinus rhythm in patients with a previous myocardial infarction. Identification of the electrophysiologic substrate of ventricular arrhythmias. Circulation 1982; 66: 847–853 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Freedman RA, Gillis AM, Keren A, Soderholm Difatte V, Mason JW: Signal‐averaged electrocardiographic late potentials in patients with ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia: Correlation with clinical arrhythmia and electrophysiologic study. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55: 1350–1353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Kertes PJ, Glabus M, Murray A, Julian DG, Campbell RWF: Delayed ventricular depolarization: Correlation with ventricular activation and relevance to ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1984; 5: 974–983 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Denniss AR, Ross DL, Richards DA, Holley LK, Cooper MJ, Johnson DC, Uther JB: Differences between patients with ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation as assessed by signal‐averaged electrocardiogram, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiac mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 11: 276–283 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES