Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2009 Feb 3;23(6):449–452. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960230615

Is ventricular repolarization heterogeneity a cause of serious ventricular tachyarrhythmias in aortic valve stenosis?

M K Batur 1,✉, T Açil 1, O Önalan 1, A Yildirir 1, K Övünç 1, G Kabakci 1, A Oto 1, H Özkutlu 1, N Nazli 1, G Gürsel 1, S Kes 1
PMCID: PMC6654880  PMID: 10875037

Abstract

Background: It is well known that there is a close relation between sudden cardiac death and serious ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS). QT dispersion (QTd) reflects the ventricular repolarization heterogeneity and has been proposed as an indicator for ventricular arrhythmias.

Hypothesis: This study investigated the QTd and its relevance to the clinical and echocardiographic variables.

Methods: In all, 51 patients (33 men, 18 women, mean age 56±12) with isolated AS and 51 age‐ and gender‐matched healthy controls comprised the study group. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was calculated by the Devereux formula, and we used continuous‐wave Doppler (n = 15) and cardiac catheterization (n = 36) for the determination of the maximum aortic valve pressure gradient (PG).

Results: Corrected QTd (QTcd) (89±39 vs. 49±15 ms, p<0.001) and LVMI (176±69 g/m2 vs. 101±28 g/m2, p<0.001) in patients with AS were significantly different from those in the control group. The group of 21 patients had a significantly greater number of 24‐h mean ventricular premature beats (VPB) and mean number of couplet VT episodes than did the control group (p<0.05). QTcd also correlated significantly well with LVMI (r=0.58, p<0.001), PG (r=0.41, p=0.003), and number of 24‐h VPB (r=0.56, p=0.008). With respect to symptoms (e.g., angina, syncope, and dyspnea) patients without symptoms (n=19) displayed less QTcd (71±31 vs. 100±39 ms, p=0.007) and less LVMI (144±80 g/m2 vs. 195±57 g/m2, p=0.01) than patients with symptoms. Statistical analysis was similar for all variables with uncorrected QTd values.

Conclusion: We found that ventricular repolarization heterogeneity was greater in patients with AS than in controls. Our findings also showed that QTd in the patient group correlates well with LVMI, severity of AS, and PG. The present results suggest that serious ventricular arrhythmias in patients with AS may be due to spatial ventricular repolarization abnormality.

Keywords: QT dispersion, aortic valve stenosis, arrhythmia

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (396.6 KB).

Reference

  • 1. Schwartz LS, Goldgischer J, Sprague GJ, Schwartz SP: Syncope and sudden death in aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1969; 23: 647–658 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Von Olshausen K, Schwarz F, Apfelbach J, Rohrig N, Kramer B, Kubler W: Determinants of incidence and severity of ventricular arrhythmias and aortic valve disease. Am J Cardiol 1983; 51: 1103–1109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Klein RC: Ventricular arrhythmias in aortic valve disease: Analysis of 102 patients. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53: 1079–1083 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Von Olshausen K, Witt T, Schmidt G, Meyer J: Ventricular tachycardia as a cause of sudden death in patients with aortic valve disease. Am J Cardiol 1987; 59: 1214–1215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kuo CS, Munakata K, Reddy CP, Surawicz B: Characteristics and possible mechanism of ventricular arrhythmia dependent on the dispersion of action potential durations. Circulation 1983; 67: 1356–1367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Day CP, McComb JM, Matthews J, Campbell RW: Reduction in QT dispersion by sotalol following myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1991; 12: 423–427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Day CP, McComb JM, Campbell RWF: QT dispersion: An indication of arrhythmia risk in patients with long QT intervals. Br Heart J 1990; 63: 342–344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Perkiomaki JS, Koistinen J, Yli‐Mayry S, Huikuri HV: Dispersion of QT interval in patients with and without susceptibility to ventricular tachyarrhythmias after previous myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 267: 174–179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Stamm RB, Martin RP: Quantification of pressure gradients across stenotic valves by Doppler ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983; 2: 707–711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, Gottlieb GJ, Campo E, Sachs I, Reichek N: Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: Comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 1986; 57: 450–458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Bazett HC: An analysis of time‐relations of the electrocardiogram. Heart 1920; 7: 353–370 [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Braunwald E: Aortic stenosis In Heart Disease (Ed. Braunwald E.), p. 1035–1043. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Toyoshima H, Park YD, Ishikawa Y, Nagata S, Hirata Y, Sakakibara H, Shimomura K, Nakayama R: Effects of ventricular hypertrophy on conduction velocity of activation front in the ventricular myocardium. Am J Cardiol 1982; 49: 1983–1945 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Kannel WB, Gordon T, Offutt D: Left ventricular hypertrophy by electrocardiogram. Prevalence, incidence, and mortality in the Framingham Study. Ann Intern Med 1969; 71: 89–105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, Kannel WB, Castelli WP: Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1561–1566 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Aronson RA: Mechanism of arrhythmias in ventricular hypertrophy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1991; 2: 249–261 [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Bastianon V, Del Bolgia F, Boscioni M, Gobbi V, Marzano MC, Colloridi V: Altered cardiac repolarization during exercise in congenital aortic stenosis. Pediatr Cardiol 1993; 14: 23–27 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Pye MP, Cobbe SM: Mechanisms of ventricular arrhythmias in cardiac failure and hypertrophy. Cardiovasc Res 1992; 26: 341–348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ducceschi V, Sarubbi B, D'Andrea A, Liccardo B, Briglia N, Carozza A, Marmo J, Santangelo L, Iacono A, Cotrufo M: Increased QT dispersion and other repolarization abnormalities as a possible cause of electrical instability in isolated aortic stenosis. Int J Cardiol 1998;Mar 13, 64 (l): 57–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Mayet J, Shahi M, McGrath K, Poulter NR, Sever PS, Foale RA, Thom SA: Left ventricular hypertrophy and QT dispersion in hypertension. Hypertension 1996; 28: 791–796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. James MA, Jones JV: Systolic wall stress and ventricular arrhythmia: The role of acute change in blood pressure in the isolated working rat heart. Clin Sci 1990; 79: 499–504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Marcus ML, Dot DB, Hiratzka LF, Wright CB, Eastham CL: Decreased coronary reserve. A mechanism for angina pectoris in patients with aortic stenosis and normal coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 1982; 307: 1362–1368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Martinez‐Useroz C, Tornos P, Montoyo J, Permanyer Miralda G, Alijarde M, Garcia del Castillo H, Moreno V, Soler‐Soler J: Ventricular arrhythmias in aortic valve disease: A further marker of impaired left ventricular function. Int J Cardiol 1992; 34: 49–56 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Wolfe RR, Driscoll DJ, Gersony WM, Hayes CJ, Keane JF, Kidd L, O'Fallon WM, Pieroni DR, Weidman WH: Arrhythmias in patients with valvar aortic stenosis, valvar pulmonary stenosis, and ventricular septal defect. Results of 24‐hour ECG monitoring. Circulation 1993; 87 (suppl I): I‐89‐I‐101 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES