Skip to main content
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2009 Feb 3;23(5):341–346. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960230507

The use of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with acute myocardial infarction in community hospitals

Francesca C Dwamena 1,, Hassan El‐Tamimi 1, Ralph E Watson 1, Jill Kroll 1, Annette Mclane 1, Margaret Holmes‐Rovner 1, Barbara Mcintosh 1, Joel Kupersmith 1, Aryeh D Stein 2
PMCID: PMC6654886  PMID: 10803442

Abstract

Background: Previous studies documenting underutilization of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have been limited to Medicare populations.

Hypothesis: This study examines ACEI prescription rates and predictors in a community sample of hospitalized patients with AMI.

Methods: The charts of 1163 community patients with AMI, prospectively identified at admission between January 1, 1994, and April 30, 1995, were reviewed.

Results: Only 64 of 158 (40%) patients considered ideal candidates for ACEI prescription were discharged with a prescription for an ACEI. In a multivariate logistic regression model, prior ACEI utilization [adjusted odds ration (OR) = 3.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.05–5.20], presence of congestive heart failure (OR = 2.33; CI = 1.50–3.61) and black race (OR = 2.20; CI = 1.34–3.64) were identified as positive predictors of ACEI prescription. Conversely, lack of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurement (OR = 0.46; CI = 0.28–0.75), LVEF > 40 (OR = 0.27; CI = 0.18–0.40), and acute renal failure (OR = 0.08; CI = 0.01–0.44) were negative predictors. Women were also less likely to be discharged with an ACEI prescription (OR = 0.71; CI = 0.48–1.05). Furthermore, women were significantly less likely to have LVEF measured prior to discharge than were males (77 vs. 85%, p = 0.001).

Conclusion: This study underscores the need for improvement in the utilization of ACEI in eligible patients with AMI. It also identifies opportunities for improvement in prescription rates, especially in women.

Keywords: practice patterns, community, acute myocardial infarction, women, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (628.4 KB).

Reference

  • 1. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, Moyé LA, Basta L, Brown EJ Jr, Cuddy TE, Davis BR, Geltman EM, Goldman S, Flaker GC, Klein M, Lamas GA, Packer M, Rouleau J, Rutherford J, Wertheimer JH, Hawkins M, on behalf of the SAVE Investigators : Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Results of the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement trial. The SAVE Investigators. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 669–677 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. The Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy (AIRE) Study Investigators : Effect of ramipril on mortality and morbidity of survivors of acute myocardial infarction with clinical evidence of heart failure. Lancet 1993; 342: 821–828 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. The Trandolapril Cardiac Evaluation (TRACE) Study : Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the screened population. The Trace Study Group. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73: 44c–50c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Tsevat J, Duke D, Goldman L, Pfeffer MA, Lamas GA, Soukup JR, Kuntz KM, Lee TH: Cost‐effectiveness of captopril therapy after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 914–919 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Yim JM, Hoon TJ, Bittar N, Bauman JL, Brown EJ, Celestin C, Phillips BG, Vlasses PH: Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor use in survivors of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1995; 75: 1184–1186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Krumholz HM, Vaccarino V, Ellerbeck EF, Kiefe C, Hennen J, Kresowik TF, Gold JA, Jencks SF, Radfors MJ: Determinants of appropriate use of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors after acute myocardial infarction in persons > or = 65 years of age. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 581–586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ellerbeck EF, Jencks SF, Radford MJ, Kresowik TF, Craig AS, Gold JA, Krumholz HM, Vogel RA: Quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction. A four‐state pilot study from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. J Am Med Assoc 1995; 273: 1509–1514 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie RC: A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chron Dis 1987; 40: 373–383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) For Windows. 6.1 ed. Chicago: SPSS, Inc., 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. ISIS‐4 (Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group : ISIS‐4: A randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58,050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1995; 345: 669–685 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Swedberg K, Held P, Kjekshus J, Rasmussen K, Ryden L, Wedel H, on behalf of the CONSENSUS II Study Group : Effects of early administration of enalapril on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Results of the Cooperative New Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study II (CONSENSUS II). N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 678–684 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Chinese Cardiac Study Collaborative Group : Oral captopril versus placebo among 13,634 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction: Interim report from the Chinese Cardiac Study (CCS‐1). Lancet 1995; 345: 686–687 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. GISSI‐3 : Effects of lisinopril and transdermal glyceryl trinitrate singly and together on 6‐week mortality and ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1994; 343: 1115–1122 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ayanian JZ, Hauptman PJ, Guadagnoli E, Antman EM, Pashos CL, McNeil BJ: Knowledge and practices of generalist and specialist physicians regarding drug therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1136–1142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Herholz H, Goff D, Ramsey D, Chan FA, Ortiz C, Labarthe DR, Nichaman MZ: Women and Mexican‐Americans receive fewer cardiovascular drugs following myocardial infarction than men and non‐Hispanic whites: The Corpus Christi Heart Project, 1988–1990. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 279–287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Wenger NK, Speroff L, Packard B: Cardiovascular health and disease in women. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 247–256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. World Health Organization : The World Health Report 1997. Conquering Suffering, Enriching Humanity. Women—Neglected Victims of Heart Disease? Geneva, 1997.
  • 18. Eaker ED, Chesebro JH, Sacks FM, Wenger NK, Whisnant JP, Winston M: Cardiovascular disease in women. Circulation 1993; 88: 1999–2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ryan T, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Braniff BA, Brooks NH, Califf RM, Hillis LD, Hiratzka LF, Rapaport E, Riegel BJ, Russell RO, Smith EE III, Weaver WD: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 1328–1428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Cody R: Comparing angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor trial results in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 2029–2036 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES