Skip to main content
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2009 Feb 3;23(6):417–420. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960230608

Comparison of echocardiography and electron beam tomography in differentiating the etiology of heart failure

Thuy Le 1, John Y Ko 1, H Tina Kim 1, Pamela Akinwale 1, Matthew J Budoff 1,
PMCID: PMC6654943  PMID: 10875031

Abstract

Background: The clinical manifestations in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy are often indistinguishable from those in patients with primary dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Clinicians often base work‐up of patients with heart failure on echocardiographic wall motion abnormalities; however misclassification can lead to unnecessary coronary angiography.

Hypothesis: The study was undertaken to evaluate the diagnostic ability of echocardiography and electron beam tomography (EBT) to differentiate between ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

Methods: The accuracy of EBT and echocardiography was compared in 111 patients undergoing coronary angiography for the evaluation of heart failure. The presence of coronary calcification (CC) by EBT or segmental wall motion abnormalities by echocardiography was used as evidence of coronary‐induced cardiomyopathy.

Results: Of 63 patients, 61 (97%) with obstructive coronary artery disease had CC by EBT. This sensitivity was significantly higher compared with 43 of 63 patients (68%) with segmental wall motion abnormalities by echocardiography (p < 0.001). Of 48 patients without obstructive coronary artery disease by angiography, 39 (81%) had no CC by EBT and 35 (73%) had no segmental wall motion (global hypokinesis) by echocardiography (p = 0.33). The overall accuracy of EBT to differentiate ischemic from nonischemic cardiomyopathy was 90%, significantly higher than echocardiography (70%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: This double‐blind study demonstrates that the presence of CC by EBT is superior to that of segmental wall motion abnormalities by echocardiography to distinguish ischemic from nonischemic cardiomyopathy. This modality may prove to be an important diagnostic tool when the etiology of the cardiomyopathy is not clinically evident.

Keywords: electron beam tomography, echocardiography, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, etiology

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (569.0 KB).

Reference

  • 1. Kannel WB, Abbott RD: Incidence and prognosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction: An update of the Framingham Study. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 1144–1147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Raferty EB, Banks DC, Oram S: Occlusive disease of the coronary arteries presenting as primary congestive cardiomyopathy. Lancet 1969; 2: 1147–1150 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Greenberg JM, Murphy JH, Okada RD, Pohost GM, Strauss HW, Boucher CA: Value and limitations of radionuclide angiography in determining the cause of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: Comparison of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55: 541–544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Gau GT, Goodwin JF, Oakley CM, Olsen EG, Rahimtoola SH, Raphael MJ, Steiner RE: Q‐waves and coronary arteriography in cardiomyopathy. Br Heart J 1972; 34: 1034–1041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Franciosa JA, Wilen MW, Ziesche S, Cohn J: Survival in man with severe chronic left ventricular failure due to coronary heart disease or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1983; 51: 831–837 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Passamani E, Davis KB, Gillespie MJ, Killip T: A randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Survival of patients with a low ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 1985; 312: 1665–1672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Pigott JD, Kouchoukos NT, Oberman A, Cutter GR: Late results of surgical and medical therapy for patients with coronary artery disease and depressed left ventricular function. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 5: 1035–1045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Alderman EL, Fisher LD, Litwin P, Kaiser GC, Myers WO, Maynard C, Levine F, Schloss M: Results of coronary artery surgery in patients with poor left ventricular function (CASS). Circulation 1983; 68: 785–795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Zubiate P, Kay JH, Mendez AM: Myocardial revascularization for the patient with drastic impairment of function of the left ventricle. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1977; 73: 84–86 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Freeman AP, Walsh WF, Giles RW, Choy D, Newman DC, Horton DA, Wright JS, Murray IP: Early and long‐term results of coronary artery bypass grafting with severely depressed left ventricular performance. Am J Cardiol 1984; 54: 749–754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Chen Y, Sherrid MV, Dwyer EM Jr: Value of two‐dimensional echocardiography in evaluating coronary artery disease: A randomized blinded analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 5: 911–917 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Diaz RA, Nihoyannopoulos P, Athanassopoulos G, Oakley CM: Usefulness of echocardiography to differentiate dilated cardiomyopathy from coronary induced heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1991; 68: 1224–1227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Medina R, Panidis IP, Morganroth J, Kotler MN, Mintz GS: The value of echocardiographic regional wall motion abnormalities in detecting coronary artery disease in patients with or without a dilated left ventricle. Am Heart J 1985; 109: 799–803 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Wallis DE, O'Connel JB, Henkin RE, Costanso‐Nordin MR, Scanlon PJ: Segmental wall motion abnormalities in dilated cardiomyopathy. A common finding and good prognostic sign. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 4: 674–679 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Davis K, Kennedy JW, Kemp HG, Judkins MP, Gosselin AJ, Kilip T: Complications of coronary arteriography from the Collaborative Study of Coronary Artery Surgery (CASS). Circulation 1979; 59: 1105–1111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Wyman RM, Safian RD, Portway V, Skillman JJ, McKay RG, Baim DS: Current complications of diagnostic and therapeutic catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12: 1400–1406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Budoff MJ, Shavelle DM, Lamont DH, Kim HT, Akinwale P, Kennedy JM, Brundage BH: Usefulness of electron beam computed tomography scanning for distinguishing ischemic from nonischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 1173–1178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Rumberger JA, Schwartz RS, Simons B, Sheedy PF, Edwards WD, Fitzpatrick LA: Relation of coronary calcium determined by electron beam computed tomography and lumen narrowing determined by autopsy. Am J Cardiol 1994; 74: 1169–1173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Janowitz WR, Agatston AS, Viamonte M: Comparison of serial quantitative evaluation of calcified coronary artery plaque by ultrafast computed tomography in persons with and without obstructive coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1991; 68: 1–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Budoff MJ, Georgiou D, Brody A, Agatston AS, Kennedy J, Wolfkiel C, Stanford W, Shields P, Lewis RJ, Janowitz WR, Rich S, Brundage BH: Ultrafast computed tomography as a diagnostic modality in the detection of coronary artery disease: A multicenter study. Circulation 1996; 93: 898–904 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Rumberger JA, Sheedy PF, Breen FJ, Schwartz RS: Electron beam CT coronary calcium score cutpoints and severity of associated angiography luminal stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 1542–1548 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Shors CM, Kozul VJ, Henderson F: The differential diagnosis of congestive cardiomyopathy by echocardiography. Angiology 1975; 26: 723–733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Shemesh J, Tenenbaum A, Fisman EZ, Har‐Zahav Y, Rath S, Apter S, Itzchak Y, Motro M: Coronary calcium as a reliable tool for differentiating ischemic from nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77: 191–194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Simons DB, Schwartz RS, Sheedy PF, Breen JF, Edwards WD, Rumberger JA: Coronary artery calcification by ultrafast CT predicts stenosis size: A necropsy study. Circulation 1990; 82: 62–63 [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Hamby RI, Tabrah F, Wisoff BG, Hartstein ML: Coronary artery calcification: Clinical implications and angiographic correlates. Am Heart J 1974; 87: 565–570 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Corya BC, Feigenbaum H, Rasmussen S, Black MJ: Echocardiographic features of congestive cardiomyopathy compared with normal subjects and patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 1974; 49: 1153–1162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Iskandrian AS, Helfield H, Lemlek J, Lee J, Iskandrian B, Heo J: Differentiation between primary dilated cardiomyopathy and ischemic cardiomyopathy based on right ventricular performance. Am Heart J 1992; 123: 768–773 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Sharp SM, Sawada SG, Segar DS, Ryan T, Kovacs R, Fineberg NS, Feigenbaum H: Dobutamine stress echocardiography: Detection of coronary artery disease in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24: 934–939 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES