Skip to main content
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2009 Feb 3;23(8):600–606. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960230811

Changes of the t‐wave amplitude and angle: An early marker of altered ventricular repolarization in hypertension

Polychronis Dilaveris 1, Elias Gialafos 2, Jan Poloniecki 3, Katerina Hnatkova 3, Dimitris Richter 4, George Andrikopoulos 4, Elena Lazaki 4, John Gialafos 4, Marek Malik 5,
PMCID: PMC6654945  PMID: 10941547

Abstract

Background: The heterogeneity of ventricular repolarization is an important proarrhythmic factor. QT dispersion has been proposed to reflect the inhomogeneity of ventricular repolarization, but a poor reproducibility limits its clinical applicability. Reliable noninvasive methods to quantify abnormalities in ventricular repolarization are still lacking. The T‐loop morphology analysis is a novel method aimed at quantifying ventricular repolarization.

Hypothesis: To test the ability of the T‐loop morphology analysis to discriminate between hypertensive patients and healthy subjects, 105 hypertensive patients (mean age 63.6 ± 12.3 years) and 110 healthy controls (mean age 49.7 ± 14.3 years) were evaluated.

Methods: The maximum QT interval (QT maximum), the minimum QT interval (QT minimum), and their difference (QT dispersion) were calculated from a digitally recorded 12‐lead electrocardiogram (ECG) in both study groups. X, Y, and Z leads were reconstructed from the 12‐lead ECG, and the amplitude of the maximum T vector (T amplitude) and the angle between the maximum T vector and X axis (T angle) were calculated from the projection of the T loop in the frontal plane.

Results: T amplitude (p < 0.001), T angle (p=0.05), and QT dispersion (p = 0.04) were significandy different between hypertensive patients and controls, while QT maximum (p = 0.14) and QT minimum (p = 0.35) did not differ between the groups. T amplitude was the only marker which differed between hypertensive patients without ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy and controls (p = 0.002).

Conclusions: T‐loop features and particularly T amplitude are significantly different between hypertensive patients and healthy controls and may serve as early markers of repolarization abnormalities in a hypertensive population.

Keywords: T loop, maximum vector, QT dispersion, ventricular repolarization

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (663.9 KB).

References

  • 1. Abildskov JA, Burgess MJ, Lux RL, Wyatt RF: Experimental evidence for regional cardiac influence in body surface isopotential maps of dogs. Circ Res 1976; 38: 386–391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Han J, Moe GK: Nonuniform recovery of excitability in ventricular muscle. Circ Res 1964; 4: 44–60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kuo CS, Munakata K, Reddy CP, Surawicz B: Characteristics and possible mechanisms of ventricular arrhythmia dependent on the dispersion of action potential durations. Circulation 1983; 67: 1356–1367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bonatti V, Rolli A, Botti G: Recording of monophasic action potentials of the right ventricle in long QT syndromes complicated by severe ventricular arrhythmias. Eur Heart J 1983; 4: 168–179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Rautaharju PM: QT and dispersion of ventricular repolarization: The greatest fallacy in electrocardiography in the 1990s. Circulation 1999; 99 (18): 2476–2479 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Day CP, McComb JM, Campbell RWF: QT dispersion: An indication of arrhythmic risk in patients with long QT intervals. Br Heart J 1990; 63: 342–344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Kautzner J, Malik M: QT interval dispersion and its clinical utility. PACE 1997; 20 (Pt. II): 2625–2640 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Starters DJ, Malik M, Ward DE, Camm AJ: QT dispersion: Problems of methodology and clinical significance. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1994; 5: 672–685 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hnatkova K, Malik M, Kautzner J, Gang Y, Camm AJ: Adjustment of QT dispersion assessed from 12‐lead electrocardiograms for different numbers of analyzed electrocardiographic leads: Comparison of stability of different methods. Br Heart J 1994; 72: 390–396 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kautzner J, Gang Y, Camm AJ, Malik M: Short‐ and long‐term reproducibility of QT, QTc and QT dispersion measurement in healthy subjects. PACE 1994: 17 (Pt. I): 928–937 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Glancy JM, Garratt CJ, Wooks KL, de Bono DP: QT dispersion and mortality after myocardial infarction. Lancet 1995; 345: 945–948 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Savelieva I, Yap YG, Gang Y, Guo X, Camm AJ, Malik M: Comparative reproducibility of QT, QT peak, and T peak‐T end intervals and dispersion in normal subjects, patients with myocardial infarction, and patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. PACE 1998; 21 (Pt. II): 2376–2381 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Priori SG, Mortara DW, Napolitano C, Diehl L, Paganini V, Cantu F, Schwartz PJ: Evaluation of the spatial aspects of T‐wave complexity in the long‐QT syndrome. Circulation 1997; 96: 3006–3012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Gang Y, Prasad K, Elliott P, Sharma S, Guo X, McKenna WJ, Malik M: T wave complexity in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. PACE 1998; 21 (Pt. II): 2382–2386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kors JA, Van Herpen G, Van Bemmel JH: QT dispersion as an attribute of T‐loop morphology. Circulation 1999; 99: 1458–1463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Perkiömäki JS, Ikäheimo MJ, Pikkujämsä SM, Rantala A, Lilja M, Kesäniemi A, Huikuri HV: Dispersion of the QT interval and autonomic modulation of heart rate in hypertensive men with and without left ventricular hypertrophy. Hypertension 1996; 28: 16–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Clarkson PBM, Naas AAO, McMahon A, MacLeod C, Struthers AD, MacDonald TM: QT dispersion in essential hypertension. Q J Med 1995; 88: 327–332 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Davey PR Bateman J, Mulligan IP, Forfar C, Barlow C, Hart G: QT interval dispersion in chronic heart failure and left ventricular hypertrophy: Relation to autonomic nervous system and Holter tape abnormalities. Br Heart J 1994; 71: 268–273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Mayet J, Shahi M, McGrath K, Poulter NR, Sever PS, Foale RA, Thorn SAMcG: Left ventricular hypertrophy and QT dispersion in hypertension. Hypertension 1996; 28: 791–796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Tomiyama H, Doba N, Fu Y, Kushiro T, Hisaki R, Shinozaki Y, Kanmatsuse K, Kajiwara N, Yoshida H, Hinohara S: Left ventricular geometric patterns and QT dispersion in borderline and mild hypertension: Their evolution and regression. Am J Hypertens 1998; 11 (3Pt.l): 286–292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Lim PO, Nys M, Naas AAO, Struthers AD, Osbakken M, MacDonald TM: Irbesartan reduces QT dispersion in hypertensive individuals. Hypertension 1999; 33: 713–718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Van Bemmel JH, Kors JA, Van Herpen G: Methodology of the modular ECG analysis system MEANS. Methods Inf Med 1990; 29: 346–353 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Willems JL, Arnaud P, Van Bemmel JH, Bourdillon PJ, Degani R, Denis B, Graham I, Harms FMA, Macfarlane PW, Mazzocca G, Meyer J, Zywietz C: A reference data base for multilead electrocardiographic computer measurement programs. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 10: 1313–1321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Fisch C: Electrocardiography In Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine (Ed Braunwald EG.), p. 116–117. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Edenbrandt L, Pahlm O: Vectorcardiogram synthesized from a 12‐lead ECG: Superiority of the inverse Dower matrix. J Electrocardiol 1988; 21: 361–367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Kors JA, Van Herpen G, Sittig AC, Van Bemmel JH: Reconstruction of the Frank vectorcardiogram from standard electrocardiographic leads: Diagnostic comparison of different methods. Eur Heart J 1990; 11: 1083–1092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Hnatkova K, Poloniecki JD, Camm AJ, Malik M: Computation of multifactorial receiver operator and prediction accuracy characteristics. Comput Meth Prog Biomed 1994; 42: 147–152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, Kannel WB, Castelli WP: Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1561–1566 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Koren MJ, Devereux RB, Casale PN, Savage DD, Laragh JH: Relation of left ventricular mass and geometry to morbidity and mortality in uncomplicated essential hypertension. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114: 345–352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kleiman RB, Houser SR: Calcium currents in normal and hypertrophied isolated feline ventricular myocytes. Am J Physiol 1988; 255: H1434–H1442 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kleiman RB, Houser SR: Outward currents in normal and hypertrophied feline ventricular myocytes. Am J Physiol 1989; 256: H1450–H1461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Brilla CG, Pick R, Tan LB, Janicki JS, Weber KT: Remodeling of the rat right and left ventricle in essential hypertension. Circ Res 1990; 67: 1355–1364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Larsen JA, Kadish AH: Effects of gender on cardiac arrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1998; 9: 655–664 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Stramba‐Badiale M, Locati E, Martinelli A, Courville J, Schwartz PJ: Gender and the relationship between ventricular repolarization and cardiac cycle length during 24‐hour Holter monitor recordings. Eur Heart J 1997; 18: 1000–1006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Malfatto G, Beria G, Sala S, Bonazzi O, Schwartz PJ: Quantitative analysis of T wave abnormalities and their prognostic implications in the idiopathic long QT syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 296–301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Ishizawa K, Ishizawa K, Motomura M, Konishi T, Wakabayashi A, Ishikawa K, Nohara Y, Kawai C, Koie H: High reliability rates of spatial pattern analysis by vectorcardiogram in assessing the severity of eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy. Am Heart J 1976; 91 (l): 50–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Draper HW, Peffer CJ, Stallmann FW, Littmann D, Pipberger HV: The corrected orthogonal electrocardiogram in 510 normal men (frank lead system). Circulation 1964; 30: 853–864 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Silverberg SM: A quantitative study of the Frank vectorcardiogram: A comparison of younger and older normal populations. Am J Cardiol 1966; 18: 672–681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES