Abstract
Background: Depressed baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), usually estimated using the invasive phenylephrine method or the nitroprusside test, is significantly and independently associated with an increased risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in patients surviving acute myocardial infarction. Several investigators have compared the standard phenylephrine test and different noninvasive methods.
Hypothesis: This study evaluated the influence of different body positions with different breathing regimes on cross‐spectral baroreflex indices (coherence between the spectral densities of blood pressure and cardiac cycle variabilities) in both low‐ and high‐frequency bands.
Methods: The data were obtained in 103 patients (73 males, aged 53 ± 12 years) with coronary artery disease and/or hypertension. Simultaneous electrocardiographic and noninvasive blood pressure recordings were obtained in each subject in both supine and sitting positions during both spontaneous and slow and fast controlled respiration (0.1 and 0.33 Hz).
Results: The results show a significant bias and disagreement between noninvasive baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) indices. The mean values of the baroreflex in low frequency ranged from 5.0 ± 5.3 to 10.1 ± 7.9 ms/mmHg, while in high frequency, the mean values ranged from 6.6 ± 6.1 to 10.1 ± 7.9 ms/mmHg. The limits of agreement ranged from ± 1.7 to ± 4.1 ms/mmHg with bias from ‐1.0 to + 0.7 ms/mmHg.
Conclusion: A comprehensive comparison of different methods shows that BRS estimated in low‐frequency band in sitting position during spontaneous respiration is the most representative part of the global baroreflex gain.
Keywords: baroreflex, noninvasive assessment, spectral analysis
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (365.8 KB).
References
- 1. La Rovere MT, Bigger JT Jr, Marcus FI, Mortara A, Schwartz PJ: Baroreflex sensitivity and heart‐rate variability in prediction of total cardiac mortality after myocardial infarction. ATRAMI (Autonomic Tone and Reflexes After Myocardial Infarction) Investigators. Lancet 1998; 351: 478–484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. De Ferrari GM, Landolina M, Mantica M, Manfredini R, Schwartz PJ, Lotto A: Baroreflex sensitivity, but not heart rate variability, is reduced in patients with life‐threatening ventricular arrhythmias long after myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1995; 130: 473–480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Smyth HS, Sleight P, Pickering GW: Reflex regulation of arterial pressure during sleep in man: A quantitative method of assessing baroreflex sensitivity. Circ Res 1969; 24: 109–121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Chen RY, Fan FC, Schuessler GB, Chien S: Baroreflex control of heart rate in humans during nitroprusside‐induced hypotension. Am J Physiol 1982; 243: R18–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Parati G, Di Rienzo M, Bertinieri G, Pomidossi G, Casadei R, Groppelli A, Pedotti A, Zanchetti A, Mancia G: Evaluation of the baroreceptor‐heart rate reflex by 24‐hour intra‐arterial blood pressure monitoring in humans. Hypertension 1988; 12: 214–222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Robbe HWJ, Mulder LJM, Rueddel H, Langewitz WA, Veldman JBP, Mulder G: Assessment of baroreceptor reflex by means of spectral analysis. Hypertension 1987; 10: 538–543 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Pagani M, Somers V, Furlan R, Dell'Orto S, Conway J, Basseli G, Cerrutti S, Sleight P, Malliani A: Changes in autonomic regulation induced by physical training in mild hypertension. Hypertension 1988; 12: 600–610 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Watkins LL, Grossman P, Sherwood A: Noninvasive assessment of baroreflex control in borderline hypertension: Comparison with the phenylephrine method. Hypertension 1996; 28: 238–243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Parlow J, Viale JP, Annat G, Hughson R, Quintin L: Spontaneous cardiac baroreflex in humans. Comparison with drug‐induced responses. Hypertension 1995; 25: 1058–1068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Parati G, Frattola A, DiRienzo M, Castiglioni P, Pedotti A, Mancia G: Effects of aging on 24‐h dynamic baroreceptor control of heart rate of ambulant subjects. Am J Physiol 1995; 268: H1606–1612 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. James MA, Panerai RB, Potter JF: Applicability of new techniques in the assessment of arterial baroreflex sensitivity in the elderly: A comparison with established pharmacological methods. Clin Sci 1998; 94: 245–253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Maestri R, Pinna GD, Mortara A, La Rovere MT, Tavazzi L: Assessing baroreflex sensitivity in post‐myocardial infarction patients: Comparison of spectral and phenylephrine techniques. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 344–351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Pitzalis MV, Mastropasqua F, Passatino A, Massari F, Ligurgo L, Forleo C, Balducci C, Lombardi F, Rizzon P: Comparison between noninvasive indices of baroreceptor sensitivity and the phenylephrine method in post‐myocardial infarction patients. Circulation 1998; 97: 1362–1367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; i: 307–310 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]