Skip to main content
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2009 Feb 3;22(5):366–368. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960220514

Physician risk assessment and apache scores in cardiac care units

Gordon L Pierpont 1,, Connie M Parenti 1
PMCID: PMC6655287  PMID: 10326171

Abstract

Background: The need to correct outcome data for case mix is well recognized, but risk assessment for coronary care unit (CCU) patients remains problematic.

Hypothesis: This study determined the feasibility of using physicians' opinions to predict mortality for CCU patients and compared their results to Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores.

Methods: A prospective observational study was performed on consecutive patients admitted to a university‐affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center CCU over a 2‐month period. Physician assessment of likely mortality during hospitalization, obtained using an MD Prognosis Score ranging from 1 (best) to 7 (worst), was compared with APACHE II scores.

Results: MD Prognosis Scores were obtained on 122 of the 237 eligible patients (51% response rate) and averaged 2.3 ± 1.4 (mean ± standard deviation). APACHE II scores on these patients averaged 9.9 ± 4.8 (range 2‐29) with very poor correlation between the two methods (r = 0.3). Of the four patients who died, three had MD prognosis scores of 7. None of the survivors had scores of 7 and only three had scores of 6. APACHE II did not predict a high likelihood that any of the patients would die (none with > 90% likelihood of mortality).

Conclusions: APACHE scores are inadequate for cardiac patients. Although physicians can identify CCU patients most likely to die, reliance on physicians scoring systems is limited by difficulties in obtaining their opinion. A new method of risk assessment for acutely ill cardiac patients is needed if CCU outcomes are to be compared across institutions.

Keywords: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, coronary care unit, severity of illness, risk assessment, prognosis, physician assessment

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (346.5 KB).

References

  • 1. Smith DW, Pine M, Bailey RC, Jones B, Brewster A, Krakauer H: Using clinical variables to estimate the risk of patient mortality. Med Care 1991; 29: 1108–1129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE: APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985; 13: 818–829 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Le Gall J‐R, Loirat P, Alperovitch A, Glaser P, Granthil C, Mathieu D, Mercier P, Thomas R, Villers D: A simplified acute physiology score for ICU patients. Crit Care Med 1984; 12: 975–977 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Cullen DJ, Civetta JM, Briggs BA, Ferrara LC: Therapeutic intervention scoring system: A method for quantitative comparison of patient care. Crit Care Med 1974; 2: 57–60 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Lemeshow S, Teres D, Avrunin JS, Gage RW: Refining intensive care unit outcome by using changing probabilities of mortality. Crit Care Med 1988; 16: 470–477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Teskey RJ, Calvin JE, McPhail I: Disease severity in the coronary care unit. Chest 1991; 100: 1637–1642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Burnette ES, Wunderink RG: Comparison of two predictive models for prognosis in critically ill patients in a veterans affairs medical center coronary care unit. Chest 1995; 108: 1333–1337 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Fedullo AJ, Swinburne AJ, Wahl GW, Bixby K: Acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema treated with mechanical ventilation: Factors determining in‐hospital mortality. Chest 1991; 99: 1220–1226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Norris RM, Brandt PWT, Lee AJ: Mortality in a coronary‐care unit analyzed by a new coronary prognostic index. Lancet 1969; 1: 278–281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Sahasakul Y, Chaithiraphan S, Panchavinnin P, Jootar P, Thongtang V, Srivanasont N, Charoenchob N, Kangkagate C: Multivariate analysis in the prediction of death in hospital after acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J 1990; 64: 183–185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Charlson ME, Sax FL, MacKenzie CR, Fields SD, Brahm RL, Douglas RG Jr: Assessing illness severity: Does clinical judgment work? J Chron Dis 1986; 39: 439–452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Brannen L, Godfrey LJ, Goetter WE: Prediction of outcome from critical illness: A comparison of clinical judgment with a prediction rule. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149: 1083–1086 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Detsky AS, Stricker SC, Mulley AG, Thibault GE: Prognosis, survival, and expenditure of hospital resources for patients in an intensive care unit. N Engl J Med 1981; 305: 667–672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Kruse JA, Thill‐Baharozian MC, Carlson RW: Comparison of clinical assessment with APACHE II for predicting mortality risk in patients admitted to a medical intensive care unit. J Am Med Assoc 1988; 260: 1739–1742 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Connors AF, Speroff T, Dawson NV, Thomas C, Harrell FE, Wagner D, Desbiens N, Goldman L, Wu AW, Califf RM, Fulkerson WJ, Vidaillet H, Broste S, Bellamy P, Lynn J, Knaus WA: The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. J Am Med Assoc 1996; 276: 889–897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Zimmerman JE, Bergner M, Bastos PG, Sirio CA, Murphy DJ, Lotring T, Damiano A, Harrell FE: The APACHE III prognostic system: Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 1991; 100: 1619–1636 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES