Skip to main content
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2009 Feb 3;21(6):415–418. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960210609

Assessment of mitral valve volume by quantitative three‐dimensional echocardiography in patients with rheumatic mitral valve stenosis

Yuba Raj Limbu 1,, Haozhu Chen 1, Xuedong Shen 2, Cuizhen Pan 2, YuefanG Shi 2
PMCID: PMC6655304  PMID: 9631271

Abstract

Background: Thickening of mitral leaflets in rheumatic mitral valve stenosis is well described in necropsy studies; however, volume computation of the thickening mitral leaflets has not been attempted. Atrial fibrillation is one of the complications of rheumatic mitral stenosis. Quantitative assessment of thickened mitral valve and its relation to clinical complications is clinically desirable.

Hypothesis: The study was undertaken to compare measurement of mitral valve volume in normal subjects and in patients with rheumatic mitral valve stenosis.

Methods: An HP Sonos 2500 echocardiography system with 5 MHz multiplane transesophageal transducer was used for data acquisition, and TomTec Echoscan computer setup was used to off‐line volume computation. Study subjects included 10 normal subjects (mean age 44.8 years) and 36 patients with rheumatic mitral valve stenosis (22 female, 14 male) with an age range of 25 to 69 years (mean age 47 $pL 9.6 years). Mitral valve volumes were compared between the normal subjects and patients with mitral valve stenosis, and further comparison was made between the sinus rhythm (SR) and atrial fibrillation (AF) groups in patients with mitral valve stenosis. In all study subjects, the mitral valve area (MVA) was determined by two‐dimensional echocardiography.

Results: Quantitative three‐dimensional (3‐D) echocardiography showed that mitral valve volume was significantly larger in patients with mitral valve stenosis than in normal subjects (9.0 $pL 2.2 and 4.5 $pL 0.7 ml, respectively, p<0.001). When patients with mitral valve stenosis were divided into the SR and AF groups, mitral valve volume was found to be significantly larger in the AF group than in the SR group (9.76 $pL 2.2 ml.and 7.72 $pL 1.5 ml, respectively, p < 0.01) and patients in the AF group tended to be older (p < 0.05) with larger left atrial diameter (LAD) (p<0.01). However, MVA between the two groups showed no statistical significance (1.1 $pL 0.43 and 1.0 $pL 0.34 cm2, respectively, p >0.2). When the study subjects were divided into two groups (< 50 and > 50 years) according to age, the comparison of mitral valve volume between these two groups (9.37 $pL 2.18 and 8.56 $pL 2.14 ml, p >0.2) showed no statistical significance.

Conclusions: Quantitative 3‐D echocardiography can be applied for the measurement of mitral valve volume in vivo. Patients with rheumatic mitral valve stenosis with atrial fibril lation have a propensity to have a larger mitral valve volume and are older than the patients with sinus rhythm; however, the age per se does not seem to be a cause for larger mitral valve volume.

Keywords: quantitative three‐dimensional echocardiography, mitral valve stenosis, mitral valve volume

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (575.9 KB).

References

  • 1. Wood P: An appreciation of mitral stenosis. Br Med J 1954; 1: 1051, 1113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Selzer A, Cohn KE: Natural history of mitral stenosis: A review. Circulation 1972; 45: 878–890 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Rusted IE, Scheifley CH, Edwards JE: Studies of the mitral valve II. Certain anatomic features of mitral valve and associated structures in mitral stenosis. Circulation 1956; 14: 398–406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Luo W. Sun WG, Tan YS, Chen QC: The question of the traditional concept of pathology in rheumatic mitral valve deformity. Chin J Path 1984; 13: 153–158 (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Siu SC, Levine RA, Rivera JM, Xie SW, Lethor JP, Handsehumacher MD, Weyman AE, Picard MH: Three‐dimensional echocardiography improves noninvasive assessment of left ventricular volume and performance. Am Heart J 1995; 130: 812–822 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Handschumacher MD, Lethor JP, Siu SC. Picard MH, Weyman AE, Levine RA: A new fully integrated system for three‐dimensional echocardiography reconstruction: Validation for ventricular volume with application in human subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 743–753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Siu SC, Rivera JM. Guerrero JL, Handschumacher MD. Lethor JP. Weyman AE, Levine RA. Picard MH: Three‐dimensional echocardiography in vivo validation for ventricular volume and performance. Circulation 1993; 88: 1715–1723 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Vogel M, White PA, Redington AN: In vitro validation of right ventricular volume measurement by three‐dimensional echocardiography. Br Heart J 1995; 74: 460–463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Apfel HD. Shen Z, Gopal AS, Vangi V, Solowiejczyk D, Altman K, Barst RJ, Boxt LM, Allan LD, King DL: Quantitative three‐dimensional echocardiography in patients with pulmonary hypertension and compressed left ventricles: Comparison with cross‐sectional echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. Heart 1996; 76: 350–354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Nanda NC, Rahman SMA. Khatri G, Agrawal G, El‐sayed AA Hassanian HAS, Kamran M, Kirklin J. McGiffin DC, Holman WL. Pacifico AD: Incremental value of three‐dimensional echocardiography over transesophageal multiplane two‐dimensional echocardiography in qualitative and quantitative assessment of cardiac masses and defects. Echocardiography 1995; 12: 619–628 [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Salustri A, Roelandt JRTC: Three‐dimensional reconstruction of the heart with rotational acquisition: Methods and clinical applications. Br Heart J 1995; 73 (suppl 2): 10–15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Flachskampf FA, Franke A, Job FP, Krebs W, Terstegge A. Klues HG, Hanrath P: Three‐dimensional reconstruction of cardiac structures from transesophageal echocardiography. Am J Cardiol Imaging 1995; 2: 141–147 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Pai G, Azevedo J, Pandian N, Schwartz S, Cao QL, Klus B, Shah PM: Delineation of the dynamic surgical anatomy of diseased mitral valve by three‐dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (abstr). Circulation 1993; 88: 1–349 [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Mautner SL, Klues HG, Mautner GL, Proschan MA, Roberts WC. Maron BJ: Comparison of mitral valve dimensions in adults with valvular aortic stenosis, pure aortic regurgitation and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71: 949–953 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Roberts WC: Morphological features of the normal and abnormal mitral valves. Am J Cardiol 1983; 51: 1005–1028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Magida MG, Streitfeld FH: The natural history of rheumatic heart disease in the third, fourth and fifth decades of life. II. Prognosis and special reference to morbidity. Circulation 1957; 16: 713–722 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES