Skip to main content
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2009 Feb 3;20(5):473–476. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960200514

Contraction‐excitation feedback in human atrial fibrillation

Anna Antoniou 1, Dimitris Milonas 1, John Kanakakis 1, Stelios Rokas 1, Dmitris A Sideris 1,
PMCID: PMC6655574  PMID: 9134280

Abstract

Background: Contraction‐excitation feedback, that is, electrophysiologic changes that are caused or preceded by mechanical changes of the myocardium, has been extensively studied in the ventricles. The role of contraction‐excitation feedback in the atria, and more particularly in the genesis and maintenance of atrial fibrillation, has been less adequately investigated.

Hypothesis: The aim of the present study was to determine whether increased right atrial pressure (RAP) facilitates the induction of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with a history of lone AF.

Methods: Sixteen patients with a history of paroxysmal AF but without structural heart disease were included in the study. All patients underwent electrophysiologic study at both a lower (3.1 ± 2.0 mmHg) and (in 13 cases) a higher (6.4 ± 2.5 mmHg) RAP. “Higher” was considered the pressure following rapid (in about 30 min) intravenous administration of normal saline or before the administration of a diuretic.

Results: Rapid atrial pacing induced AF in 19 of 29 attempts. At a lower pressure, rapid pacing induced brief (3 s to 3 min) AF in 3 of 16 patients, long‐lasting (>3 min) AF in 3 of 16 patients, and no AF in 10 of 16 patients. At a higher pressure, brief AF was induced in 3 of 10 patients in whom no AF could be induced at a lower pressure, and long‐lasting AF in 10 patients in whom either brief AF (3 cases) or no AF (7 cases) was induced at a lower pressure. In 11 patients, in whom Wenckebach periodicity was determined at both higher and lower pressure, the critical cycle length at which atrioventricular block appeared was significantly (p<0.001, paired t‐est) longer(349.1 ± 44.4 ms, i.e.,+15.5 ± 11.3 ms)at higher than at lower atrial pressure (333.6 ±41.0 ms). In nine patients, in whom Wenckebach periodicity was determined and two rhythms occurred at different pressures, the critical cycle length was 332.2 ± 45.8 ms when associated with sinus rhythm, and significantly (p<0.01) longer (344.4 ± 48.0 ms, i.e., +12.2 ± 8.3 ms) when associated with induction of AF.

Conclusion: In patients with lone atrial fibrillation, modest increases in atrial pressure may facilitate the induction of atrial fibrillation.

Keywords: contraction‐excitation feedback, atrial fibrillation, atrial refractoriness, Wenckebach periodicity

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (465.2 KB).

References

  • 1. Lab MJ: Contraction‐excitation feedback in myocardium: Physiological basis and clinical relevance. Circ Res 1982; 50: 757–766 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Dean JW, Lab MJ: Arrhythmia in heart failure: Role of mechanically induced changes in electrophysiology. Lancet 1989; 1302–1312 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3. Taggart P, Sutton P, Lab M: Interaction between ventricular loading and repolarization: Relevance to arrhythmogenesis. Br Heart J 1992; 67: 213–215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Sideris DA: High blood pressure and ventricular arrhythmias. Eur Heart J 1993; 14: 1548–1553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Sideris DA: Pressure‐related arrhythmias at atrial and ventricular level. Edit Cardiol 1995; 1: 47–55 [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kaseda S, Zipes DP: Contraction‐excitation feedback in the atria: A cause of changes in refractoriness. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 11: 1327–1336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Klein LS, Miles WM, Zipes DP: Effect of atrioventricular interval during pacing of reciprocating tachycardia on atrial size, pressure, and refractory period. Contraction‐excitation feedback in human atrium. Circulation 1990; 82: 60–68 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Sideris DA, Toumanidis ST, Tselepatiotis E, Kostopoulos K, Strigli T, Kitsiou T, Moulopoulos SD: Atrial pressure and experimental atrial fibrillation. PACE 1995; 18: 1679–1685 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Manyari DE, Paterson C, Johnson D, Melendez L, Kostuk WJ, Cape RDT: Atrial and ventricular arrhythmias in asymptomatic active elderly subjects: Correlation with left atrial size and left ventricular mass. Am Heart J 1990; 119: 1069–1076 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Keren G, Etzion T, Sherez J, Zelcer AA, Megidish R, Miller HI, Laniado S: Atrial fibrillation and atrial enlargement in patients with mitral stenosis. Am Heart J 1987; 114: 1146–1155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Mitchell JH, Shapiro W: Atrial function and the hemodynamic consequences of atrial fibrillation in man. Am J Cardiol 1964; 23: 556–564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Skinner NS, Mitchell JH, Wallace AG, Sarnoff SJ: Hemodynamic consequences of atrial fibrillation at constant ventricular rates. Am J Med 1964; 36: 342–350 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. White CW, Kerber RE, Weiss HR, Marcus ML: The effect of atrial fibrillation on atrial pressure‐volume and flow relationships. Circ Res 1982; 51: 205–215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Solti F, Vecsey T, Kekesi V, Juhasz‐Nagy A: The effect of atrial dilatation on the genesis of atrial arrhythmias. Cardiovasc Res 1989; 23: 882–886 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Lammers WJEP, Allessie MA: Pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation: Current aspects. Herz 1993; 18: 1–8 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Vardas PE, Vemmos K, Sideris DA, Moulopoulos SD: Susceptibility of the right and left canine atria to fibrillation and hypoglycemia. J Electrocardiol 1993; 26: 147–152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Calkins H, El‐Atassi R, Leon A, Kalbfleisch S, Borganelli M, Langberg J, Morady F: Effect of atrioventricular relationship on atrial refractoriness inhumans. PACE 1992; 15: 771–778 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Calkins H, El‐Atassi R, Kalbfleisch S, Langberg J, Morady F: Effects of an acute increase in atrial pressure on atrial refractoriness in humans. PACE 1992; 15 (I ):1674–1680 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Sideris DA, Toumanidis ST, Theodorakis M, Kostopoulos K, Tselepatiotis E, Langoura C, Strigli T, Moulopoulos D: Some observations on the mechanism of pressure‐related atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 1994; 15: 1585–1589 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Sideris DA, Chrysos DN, Maliaras GK, Michalis LK, Moulopoulos SD: Effect of acute hypertension on the cardiac rhythm. Experimental observations. J Electrocardiol 1988; 21: 183–191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Simek CL, Feldman MD, Haber HL, Wu CC, Jayaweera AR, Kaul S: Relationship between left ventricular wall thickness and left atrial size: Comparison with other measures of diastolic function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1995; 8: 37–47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Robinson KC, Frenneaux MP, Stocking B, Karatasakis G, Poloniecki JD, McKenna WJ: Atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A longitudinal study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 15: 1279–1285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES