Abstract
Electrophysiologic findings suggesting the coexistence of dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathways and accessory AV connections have been previously described. Anterograde conduction through the accessory pathway (AP) may preclude the diagnosis of AV nodal dual pathway physiology during atrial stimulation. This study reports on a patient with manifest Wolff‐Parkinson‐White syndrome with clinically documented paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, in whom dual AV nodal pathways were unmasked after successful radiofrequency ablation of two accessory AV connections. In spite of detailed investigation, fast and slow AV nodal pathways were not detected in the first electrophysiologic study 8 years before ablation, nor were they detected during preablation study because of exclusive anomalous anterograde conduction. The anterograde AP effective refractory period was shorter than that of the fast and slow AV nodal pathways, and was limited by atrial refractoriness at 190 ms. The present findings strongly suggest the necessity for a careful postablation electrophysiologic study before and after isoproterenol administration with specific evaluation of AV nodal conduction. This is the first documented report on the finding of AV nodal dual pathway physiology and reentry after successful radiofrequency ablation of two APs. This finding may be of great therapeutic significance in light of the feasibility of slow pathway ablation also during a single session, had AV nodal reentry been induced in a sustained manner after ablation of the AP to prevent late recurrence of tachycardia.
Keywords: fast and slow AV nodal pathways, radiofrequency ablation, multiple accessory pathways, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (785.6 KB).
References
- 372. Wellens HJJ, Durrer D: The role of an accessory atrioventricular pathway in reciprocal tachycardia: Observations in patients with and without the Wolff‐Parkinson‐White syndrome. Circulation 1975; 52: 58–72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 373. Reyes W, Milstein S, Dunnigan A, Benditt DG, Kriett J, Pineda E: Indications for modification of coexisting dual atrioventricular node pathways in patients undergoing surgical ablation of accessory atrioventricular connections. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17: 1561–1567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 374. Centurión OA, Fukatani M, Shimizu A, Konoe A, Isomoto S, Tanigawa M, Kaibara M, Yano K: Anterograde and retrograde decremental conduction over left‐sided accessory atrioventricular pathways in the Wolff‐Parkinson‐White syndrome. Am Heart J 1993; 125: 1038–1047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 375. Rosen KM: A‐V nodal reentrance: An unexpected mechanism of paroxysmal tachycardia in a patient with preexcitation. Circulation 1973; 47: 1267–1273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 376. Mandel WJ, Laks MM, Obayashi K: Atrioventricular nodal reentry in the Wolff‐Parkinson‐White syndrome. Chest 1975; 68: 321–325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 377. Amat‐y‐Leon F, Wyndham C, Wu D, Denes P, Dhingra RC, Rosen KM: Participation of fast and slow A‐V nodal pathways in tachycardias complicating the Wolff‐Parkinson‐White syndrome. Circulation 1977; 55: 663–668 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 378. Fischell TA, Stinson EB, Derby G, Swerdlow CE: Long‐term follow‐up after surgical correction of Wolff‐Parkinson‐White syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 9: 283–287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 379. Davis LM, Johnson DC, Uther JB, Nunn G, Richards DAV, Meldrum‐Hanna W, Ross DL: What is the best method for assessing the long‐term outcome of surgery for accessory pathways and atrioventricular junctional reentrant tachycardias. Circulation 1991; 83: 528–535 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 380. Centurión OA, Isomoto S, Hayano M, Yano K: Evidence of quadruple anterograde AV nodal pathways in a patient with atrioventricular node reentry. J Electrocardiol 1994; 24: 71–78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]