Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2009 Feb 3;22(2):59–65. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960220203

Early repolarization

Mahaveer Mehta 1,✉, Abnash C Jain 1, Anurag Mehta 1
PMCID: PMC6655840  PMID: 10068841

Abstract

Early repolarization (ER) is an enigma. The purpose of this review is to reemphasize the overall electrocardiographic (ECG) pattern of this normal ST variant which continues to challenge the clinician because of its similarity to the current of injury potential to myocardium or an acute pericarditis. The data were provided from the studies identified through computerized searches of Medline, Toxline, Oxford, Agricola, and Bios Afterdark, Cumulative index, and a review of bibliographies of relevant articles on the related subjects. Early repolarization has elevated, upward, concave ST segments, located commonly in precordial leads, with reciprocal depression in a VR, tall, peaked and slightly asymmetrical T waves with notch, and slur on the R wave. The other accompanying features in the ECG are vertical axis, shorter and depressed P‐R interval, abrupt transition, counterclockwise rotation, presence of U waves, and sinus bradycardia. Males dominate and patients are often younger than 50 years of age. The incidence of 1 to 2% is found equally common in all races. Degree and incidence of ST elevation decrease as age advances. Exercise or isoproterenol administration may normalize the ST segment. Early repolarization is a benign condition. If the ECG conforms to a classical pattern of ER on serial ECGs, it would exclude the unnecessary hazards of present day revascularization therapy for myocardial infarction such as primary angioplasty or thrombolytic therapy, or aggressive management of acute pericarditis, and so forth. This review concludes with a discussion of comparative ECG features of ER, pericarditis, and myocardial infarction, and provides an algorithm for diagnostic management of patients suffering from these conditions.

Keywords: ST segment in early repolarization, race and early repolarization, early repolarization and myocardial infarction, early repolarization and pericarditis, arrhythmia in early repolarization, PR interval and early repolarization, early repolarization and gender

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (773.7 KB).

References

  • 1. Mehta MC, Jain AC: Early repolarization on scalar electrocardiogram. Am J Med Sc 1995; 309: 305–311 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Braunwald E: Heart Disease., 3rd ed., p.212 Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Shipley RA, Hallaran WR: The four lead electrocardiogram in 200 normal men and women. Am Heart J 1936; 11: 325–345 [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Myers GB, Klein HA, Stofer BE, Hiratzka T: Normal variations in multiple precordial leads. Am Heart J 1947; 34: 785–808 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Oscher HL, Wolff L: Electrocardiographic pattern simulating acute myocardial injury. Am J Med Sci 1953; 226: 541–546 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Goldman MJ: RS–T segment elevation in mid‐ and left precordial leads as normal variant. Am Heart J 1953; 46: 817–820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Goldman MF: Normal variants in the electrocardiogram leading to cardiac invalidism. Am Heart J 1959; 59: 71–77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Goldman MJ: Principles of clinical electrocardiography., p. 83, 84. Los Altos: Lange Medical Publications, 1964. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Grant RP, Estes EH, Doyle JT: Spacial vector electrocardiography. The clinical characteristics of S‐T and T vectors. Circulation 1951; 3: 182–197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Morace G, Padeletti L, Porciani MC, Fantini F: Effects of isoproterenol on the “early repolarization” syndrome. Am Heart J 1979; 97: 343–347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Edeiken J: Elevation of the RS‐T segment, apparent or real, in the right precordial leads as a probable normal variant. Am Heart J 1954; 48: 331–339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Wiener L, Rios JC, Massumi RA: T wave inventions with elevated RS‐T segment simulating myocardial injury. Am Heart J 1964; 67: 684–688 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Chelton LG, Burchell HB: Unusual RT segment deviation in electrocardiograms of normal persons. Am J Med Sci 1955; 230: 54–60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Bedford DE, Thomas SG: The sickle‐shaped R‐T plateau. A common RS‐T pattern in health. Proc Br Cardiac Soc, p. 469, 1954.
  • 15. Graybiel A, White PD: Electrocardiography in Practice., 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1946. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Wasserburger RH: Riddle of the labile T wave. Am J Cardiol 1958; 2: 179–183 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Spodick DH: Differential characteristics of the electrocardiogram in early repolarization and acute pericarditis. N Engl J Med 1976; 295: 523–526 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Santos‐Campo DC: Diaphoresis and ST‐segment elevation. Choices Cardiol 1992; 7: 62–70 [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Sokolow N, Friedlander RD: The normal unipolar precordial and limb lead electrocardiogram. Am Heart J 1949; 38: 665–687 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Fenichel NN: A long term study of concave RS‐T elevation, a normal variant of the electrocardiogram. Angiology 1962; 13: 360–366 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Harlan WR, Graybiel A, Mitchell RE, Oberman A, Osborne RK: Serial electrocardiograms: Their reliability and prognostic validity during a 24‐year period. J Chron Dis 1967; 20: 853–859 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Parisi AF, Beckmann CH, Lancaster MC: The spectrum of ST segment elevation in the electrocardiograms of healthy adult men. Electrocardiography 1971; 4: 137–144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Macfarlane PW, Lawrie TDV: Comprehensive Electrocardiography., Vol. 1, 1st ed. New York: Pergamon Press, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Ashman R: An electrocardiographic study of Caucasians and Negroes. Tri‐State M J 1941; 13: 2686–2704 [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Littman D: Persistence of the juvenile pattern in precordial leads of healthy adult Negroes with a report of electrocardiographic survey on 300 Negro and 200 white subjects. Am Heart J 1946; 32: 370–382 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Keller DH, Johnson IB: The T wave of the unipolar precordial electrocardiogram in normal adult Negro subjects. Am Heart J 1952; 44: 494–498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Greene CE, Kelly JJ: Electrocardiograms of the healthy adult Negro. Circulation 1959; 20: 906–909 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Wasserburger RH: Observation of the “juvenile pattern” of adult Negro males. Am J Med 1955; 18: 428–437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Gottschalk CW, Craige E: A comparison of the precordial ST and T waves in the electrocardiograms of 600 healthy young Negro and white adults. South Med J 1956; 49: 453–457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Thomas J, Harris E, Lassiter G: Observation on the T wave and S‐T segment changes in the precordial electrocardiogram of 320 young Negro adults. Am J Cardiol 1960; 5: 468–472 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Grusin H: Peculiarities of the African's electrocardiogram and the changes observed in serial studies. Circulation 1954; 9: 860–867 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Woods JD, Laurie W: The electrocardiogram of the South African Bantu. Circulation 1959; 19: 251–256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Powell SJ: Unexplained electrocardiogram in the Africans. Br Heart J 1965; 21: 263–268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Seriki O, Smith AJ: The electrocardiogram of young Nigerians. Am Heart J 1966; 72: 153–157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Rees PH: The ST segment in the electrocardiograms of young adults. East Afr Med J 1971; 2 (suppl 48): 622–630 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Walker ARP, Walker BF: The bearing of race, sex, age and nutritional state on the precordial electrocardiograms of young South African Bantu and Caucasian subjects. Am Heart J 1969; 77: 441–459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Somers K, Rankin AM: The electrocardiogram in healthy East African (Bantu and Nilotic) men. Br Heart J 1962; 24: 542–548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Blackburn H, Keys A, Simonson E, Rautaharju P, Punsar S: The electrocardiogram in population studies. A classification system. Circulation 1960; 21: 1160–1175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Brink AJ: An investigation of factors influencing repolarization in the human heart. S Afr J Clin Sc 1951; 2: 288–295 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Fleishman SJ: Observations of the electrocardiogram of the apparently healthy African. M. D. Thesis, 1962, University of the Wit‐watersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
  • 41. Fleishman SJ: The normal electrocardiogram in the African. S Afr Med J 1965; 39: 177–184 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Blackman NS, Kuskin L: Inverted T wave in the precordial electrocardiogram of normal adolescents. Am Heart J 1964; 67: 304–312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Simonson E: Differentiation between Normal and Abnormal in Electrocardiography. St. Louis: The C. V. Mosby Company, 1961. [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Philips JH, Burch GE: Cardiovascular diseases in the white and Negro races. Am J Med Sc 1959; 238: 97–104 13661181 [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Schwartz MB, Schamroth L, Seftel HC: The pattern of heart disease in the urbanized (Johannesburg) African. Med Proc 1958; 4: 275–278 [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Sutin GJ, Schrire V: Inter‐racial study of the electrocardiogram in first two days of life. Am Heart J 1964; 57: 749–754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Turner PP: The electrocardiogram of fifty normal young adult Kikuya males. East Afr Med 1959; 36: 555–560 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Mann GV, Shaffer RD, Anderson RS, Sandstead HH: Cardiovascular disease in the Masai. J Atheroscl Res 1964; 4: 289–312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Epstein FH, Pollack AA, Ostrander LD: An electrocardiographic survey in Peru. Am J Med Sci 1964; 247: 687–693 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Srikantia SG, Padmavati S, Gopalan C: The electrocardiogram in some Indian population groups. Circulation 1964; 29: 118–123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Burns‐Cox CJ: The electrocardiogram of healthier young Chinese and Malay men. J Electrocardiol 1971; 4: 211–219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Mizuno Y: Normal limits and variability of electrocardiographic items in the Japanese. Jpn Circ J 1966; 30: 357–367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Dharmadasa K, Nadarajah M: Electrocardiograms in young Ceylonese. Br Heart J 1968; 30: 765–768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Burchell HB, Barnes AR, Mann FC: The electrocardiographic picture of experimental localized pericarditis. Am Heart J 1939; 18: 133–144 [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Wasserburger RH, Alt WJ, Lloyd C: The normal RS‐T segment elevation variant. Am J Cardiol 1961; 8: 184–192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Spodick DH: Differential characteristics of the electrocardiogram in early repolarization and acute pericarditis. N Engl J Med 1976; 295: 523–526 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Ginzman LE, Laks MM: The differential diagnosis of acute pericarditis from the normal variant: New electrocardiographic criteria. Circulation 1982; 65: 1004–1009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Kambara H, Phillips J: Long‐term evaluation of early depolarization syndrome. Am J Cardiol 1976; 38: 157–161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Watanabe Y: Purkinje depolarization as a possible cause of the U wave in the electrocardiogram. Circulation 1975; 51: 1030–1033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Hurst JW: Abnormalities of the S‐T segment—Part I. Clin Cardiol 1997; 20: 511–520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Morace G, Padeletti L, Porciani MC, Fantini F: Effects of isoproterenol on the “early repolarization” syndrome. Am Heart J 1979; 97: 343–347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Burgen ASV, Terroux KG: On the ionotropic effects in the cat's auricle. J Physiol 1953; 120: 449–464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Hoffman BF, Sucklig EE: Cardiac cellular potentials: Effect of vagal stimulation and acetylcholine. Am J Physiol 1953; 173: 312–320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Gwinup GR: Propranolol toxicity presenting with early depolarization, ST segment elevation and peaked T waves on the ECG. Ann Emerg Med 1988; 17: 171–174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Alimurung BN, Gilbert CA, Felner JM, Schlant RC: The influence of early depolarization variant on the exercise electrocardiogram: A correlation with coronary arteriograms. Am Heart J 1980; 99: 739–745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Surawicz B, Saito S: Exercise testing for detection of myocardial ischemia in patients with abnormal electrocardiograms at rest. Am J Cardiol 1978; 41: 943–948 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Wasserburger RH, Siebecker KL Jr, Lewis WC: The effect of hyperventilation on the normal adult electrocardiogram. Circulation 1956; 13: 850–855 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Thomsen JH, Wasserburger RH: The effect of hyperventilation on precordial T waves of children and adolescents. Circulation 1967; 36: 700–707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Somers K, Rankin AM: The electrocardiogram in healthy East African (Bantu and Nilotic) men. Br Heart J 1962; 24: 542–548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Mabey BE, Wallis RM: Acute pericarditis. J Emerg Med 1985; 3: 457–467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Bren CB: The electrocardiogram in patients undergoing thrombolysis for myocardial infarction. Circulation 1987; 75 (suppl II): 18–24 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Burchell HB, Barnes AR, Mann FC: The electrocardiographic picture of experimental localized pericarditis. Am Heart J 1939; 18: 133–144 [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Schamroth L: The Electrocardiography of Coronary Artery Disease. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Hoffmann BF, Suckling EE: Cardiac cellular potentials: Effects of vagal stimulation and acetylcholine. Am J Physiol 1953; 173: 312–320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Yanowitz F, Preston JB, Abildskov JA: Functional distribution of right and left stellate innervation to the ventricles: Production of neurogenic electrocardiographic changes by unilateral alteration of sympathetic tone. Circ Res 1966; 18: 416–428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Randall WC, Szentivanyi M, Pace JB, Wechsler JS, Kaye MP: Patterns of sympathetic nerve projections onto canine heart. Circ Res 1968; 22: 315–328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Randall WC, Armour JA, Geis WP, Lippincott DB: Regional cardiac distribution of the sympathetic nerves. Fed Proc 1972; 31: 1199–1208 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Ueda H, Yanai Y, Marao S, Harumi K, Mashima S, Kuroiwa A, Sugimoto T, Shimomura K: Electrocardiographic and vector‐cardiographic changes produced by electrical stimulation of the cardiac nerves. Jpn Heart J 1964; 5: 359–372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Kralios FA, Martin L, Burgess MF, Millar K: Local ventricular repolarization changes due to sympathetic nerve‐branch stimulation. Am J Physiol 1975; 228: 1621–1626 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Kuo CS, Surawicz B: Ventricular monophasic action potential changes associated with neurogenic T wave abnormalities and isoproterenol administration in dogs. Am J Cardiol 1976; 38: 170–177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Zimmermann HA, Eduardo B, Carlos D: The Auricular Electrocardiogram. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas, 1968. [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Antzelevitch C, Sicouri S, Lukas A, Nesterenko VV, Liu DW, Diego JMD: Zipes/Jalife Cardiac Electrophysiology., 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1995. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES