Skip to main content
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2009 Feb 3;20(Suppl 3):6–10. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960201404

Myocardial salvage with early anistreplase treatment

John M Rawles 1,2
PMCID: PMC6656019  PMID: 9422856

Abstract

This randomized, double‐blind trial in 311 patients with acute myocardial infarction has shown that very early therapy with anistreplase outside the hospital is not only feasible, but provides a major survival advantage. The difference in the median delay to treatment between the group treated in the hospital and those treated earlier was 2 1/4 h. After 30 months, mortality in the early group was less than half that in the later group, so that every hour of delay beyond 2 h resulted in almost 7 additional deaths per 100 patients treated. This is a greater percentage loss of life than would have resulted from a similar delay in the provision of resuscitation for the prehospital cardiac arrest. Multivariate analysis showed that age, treatment delay, and time of presentation were significant risk factors, with patients presenting at 1 h having more than twice the mortality of those presenting at 4 h; the sicker the patient, the earlier the presentation. By 5 years, prehospital administration of anistreplase, by saving 2 h, resulted in an additional 57% of a year's survival per patient. This compares favorably with the projected 14% of a year survival per patient reported with TPA versus streptokinase in GUSTO. Prehospital therapy with anistreplase was highly cost effective when compared with streptokinase given in hospital, and the marginal cost‐effectiveness ratio was much lower than that for TPA versus streptokinase derived from GUSTO.

Keywords: acute myocardial infarction, treatment delay, survival, cost effectiveness, thrombolysis

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (456.7 KB).

References

  • 1. Rawles J, GREAT Group : Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of domiciliary thrombolysis by general practitioners: Grampian region early anistreplase trial. Br Med J 1992; 305: 548–553 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Baigent C, Collins R, for the ISIS Collaborative Group : ISIS‐2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) 4‐year mortality follow‐up of 17,187 patients after fibrinolytic and anti‐platelet therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction (abstr). Circulation 1993; 88 (suppl1): I–29 [Google Scholar]
  • 3. The GUSTO Investigators : An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 673–682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Boersma E, Maas ACT, Deckers JW, Simoons ML: Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: Reappraisal of the golden hour. Lancet 1996; 348: 771–775 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Rawles J: Magnitude of benefit from earlier thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: New evidence from Grampian region early anistreplase trial (GREAT). Br Med J 1996; 312: 212–215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Pai GR, Haites NE, Rawles JM: One thousand heart attacks in Grampian: The place of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in general practice. Br Med J 1987; 294: 352–354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Rawles J: Quantification of the benefit of earlier thrombolysis: 5‐year results of the Grampian region early anistreplase trial (GREAT). J Am Coll Cardiol 1997. (in press) [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 8. Vale L, Silcock J, Rawles J: An economic evaluation of thrombolysis in a remote rural community. Br Med J 1997; 314: 570–572 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Bowns IR, Gibson MAJ, Woods KL: Efficient choice between drugs: An application to intravenous thrombolytic drugs. Health Bulletin 1992; 50: 125–131 [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Second International Study of Infarct Survival Collaborative Group : Randomized trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS‐2. Lancet 1988; ii: 349–360 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Mark DB, Hlatky MA, Calif RM, Naylor CD, Lee KL, Armstrong PW, Barbash G, White H, Simoons ML, Nelson CL, ClappChanning N, Knight JD, Harrell F, Simes J, Topol EJ: Cost effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy with plasminogen activator as compared with streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 1418–1424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES