Skip to main content
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2009 Feb 3;22(1):17–20. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960220108

Emergency department thrombolysis critical pathway reduces door‐to‐drug times in acute myocardial infarction

Christopher P Cannon 1,, E Blair Johnson 2, Benjamin M Scirica 2, Monica Cermignani 3, Mark J Sagarin 4, Ron M Walls 4
PMCID: PMC6656060  PMID: 9929749

Abstract

Background: Rapid time to treatment with thrombolytic therapy is an important determinant of survival in acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Hypothesis: We hypothesized that establishment of an AMI thrombolysis critical pathway in the Emergency Department could successfully reduce the “door‐to‐drug” time, the time between patient arrival and start of thrombolysis.

Methods and results: Before establishment of the AMI critical pathway, median door‐to‐drug time was 73 min, which was reduced to 37 min after critical pathway implementation (p<0.05). The percentage of patients treated within 30 min rose from 0% prior to establishment of the pathway to 43% (p = 0.03). Similarly, the percentage treated in within 45 min rose from 0 to 67% (p = 0.0005). Door‐to‐drug times were longer for women than for men (median 105 min for women vs. 70 min for men before pathway implementation). The pathway reduced door‐to‐drug time for both genders, but the median door‐to‐drug times were higher for women than for men (Mann‐Whitney p = 0.013). The difference between men and women was 35 min before establishment of the pathway to 10 min by the end of the study period.

Conclusions: Our critical pathway was successful in reducing door‐to‐drug times. We observed a “gender gap” in door‐to‐drug times, with longer mean times for women, which was reduced by the AMI critical pathway. Thus, our data provide support for the use of critical pathways to reduce door‐to‐drug times, as recommended by the National Heart Attack Alert Program.

Keywords: acute myocardial infarction, thrombolysis, time to treatment, gender

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (395.3 KB).

References

  • 1. Cannon CP, Antman EM, Walls R, Braunwald E: Time as an adjunctive agent to thrombolytic therapy. J Thromb Thrombolysis 1994; 1: 27–34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists' (FTT) Collaborative Group : Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: Collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients. Lancet 1994; 343: 311–322 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. National Heart Attack Alert Program Coordinating Committee—60 Minutes to Treatment Working Group : Emergency department: Rapid identification and treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med 1994; 23: 311–329 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. The GUSTO Angiographic Investigators : The comparative effects of tissue plasminogen activator, streptokinase, or both on coronary artery patency, ventricular function and survival after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1615–1622 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Krall SP, Reese CL, Donahue L: Effect of continuous quality improvement methods on reducing triage time to thrombolytic interval for acute myocardial infarction. Acad Emerg Med 1995; 2: 603–609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Cannon CP, McCabe CH, Gibson CM, Ghali M, Sequeira RF, McKendall GR, Breed J, Modi NB, Fox NL, Tracy R, Love TW, Braunwald E, and the TIMI 10A Investigators: TNK‐tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction: Results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 10A dose‐ranging trial. Circulation 1997; 95: 351–356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Antman EM, for the TIMI 9B Investigators: Hirudin in acute myocardial infarction: Thrombolysis and Thrombin Inhibition in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 9B trial. Circulation 1996; 94: 911–921 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Rogers WJ, Bowlby LJ, Chandra NC, French WJ, Gore JM, Lambrew CT, Rubison M, Tiefenbrunn AJ, Weaver WD, for the Participants in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction: Treatment of myocardial infarction in the United States (1990 to 1993). Observations from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 1994; 90: 2103–2114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Boisjolie CR, Sharkey SW, Cannon CP, Brunette D, Haugland JM, Thatcher JL, Henry TD: Impact of a thrombolysis research trial on time to treatment for acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 396–398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Weaver WD, Cerqueira M, Hallstrom AP, Litwin PE, Martin JS, Kudenchuk PJ, Eisenberg M, for the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project Group : Prehospital‐initiated vs. hospital‐initiated thrombolytic therapy. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Trial. J Am Med Assoc 1993; 270: 1211–1216 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES