Abstract
Background: The diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is traditionally based on clinical history, elevation of serum enzyme activity, and typical changes in the electrocardiogram (ECG); however, not all patients who develop AMI fulfill these criteria on discharge from hospital.
Hypothesis: The aim of the study was to evaluate (1) the frequency with which the traditional criteria for AMI are not fulfilled among patients diagnosed with AMI on discharge, and (2) whether patients with and without these criteria differ in terms of characteristics, treatment, and outcome.
Methods: All patients aged < 75 years and hospitalized in the municipality of Göteborg with a discharge diagnosis of AMI were included. Fulfillment criteria for AMI were two of the following three points: (1) chest pain, (2) increase in cardiac enzymes, and (3) development of Q waves.
Results: In all, 1,188 admitted patients, 27% of whom were women, were included in the analysis. Of these, 193 (16%) did not fulfill the traditional criteria for AMI. These patients had an in‐hospital mortality rate of 48%; of these, 59% died a sudden death, and of those who were autopsied (62%), 96% showed signs of a fresh AMI. The most common symptom on admission to hospital in patients who did not fulfill the traditional criteria was chest pain (34%), followed by dyspnea (27%) and fatigue (14%). Of those who died suddenly, fewer than half had been admitted to the coronary care unit.
Conclusion: Patients diagnosed with AMI who do not fulfill the traditional diagnosis criteria have high mortality. On admission to hospital, the initial suspicion of AMI is often vague. Measures for earlier detection of life‐threatening coronary artery disease among these patients are warranted.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (496.7 KB).
References
- 1. Turi ZG. Rutherford JD, Roberts R, Muller JE, Jaffe AS, Rude RE, Parker C, Raabe DS, Stone PH, Hartwell TD, Lewis SE, Parkey RW, Gold HK, Robertson TL, Sobel BE, Willerson JT, Braunwald E, and Cooperating Investigators from the Multicenter Investigation for Limitation of Infarct Size (MILLS) Study Group : Electrocardiographic, enzymatic and scintigraphic criteria of acute myocardial infarction as determined from a study of 726 patients. Am J Cardiol 1985; 5: 1463–1468 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. de Winter RJ, Koster RW, Sturk A, Sanders GT: Value of myoglobin, troponin T, and CK‐MB mass in ruling out an acute myocardial infarction in the emergency room. Circulation 1995; 92: 3401–3407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Volpi A, Cavalli A, Franzosi MG. Maggioni A, Mauri F, Santoro E, Tognoni G, and the G1SSI Investigators : One‐year prognosis of primary ventricular fibrillation complicating acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1989; 3: 1174–1178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Volpi A. Cavalli A, Santoro E, Tognoni G, and the G1SSI Investigators : Incidence and prognosis of secondary ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction. Evidence for a protective effect of thrombolytic therapy, Circulation 1990; 82: 1279–1288 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Behar S. Reicher‐Reiss H, Shechter M. Rabinowitz B. Kaplinsky E. Abinader E, Agmon J, Friedman Y, Barzilai J, Kauli N. Kishon Y, Palant A, Peled B, Reisin L, Schlesinger Z, Zahavi I, Zion M, Goldbourt U, for the SPRINT Study Group : Frequency and prognosis significance of secondary ventricular fibrillation complicating acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71: 152–156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Herlitz J, Karlson BW, Richter A, Strömbom U, Hjalmarson Å: Prognosis for patients with initially suspected acute myocardial infarction in relation to presence of chest pain. Clin Cardiol 1992; 15: 570–576 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Uretsky BF, Farquhar DS, Berezin AF, Hood WB Jr: Symptomatic myocardial infarction without chest pain: Prevalence and clinical course. Am J Cardiol 1977; 40: 499–503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Margolis JR, Kannel WB, Feinleib M, Dawber TR. McNamara PM: Clinical features of unrecognized myocardial infarctionsilent and symptomatic. Am J Cardiol 1973; 32: 1–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Medalie JH, Goldbourt U: Unrecognized myocardial infarction: Five‐year incidence, mortality and risk factors. Ann Intern Med 1976; 84: 526–531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Montague T, Wong R, Crowell R, Bay K, Marshall D, Tymchak W, Teo K, Davies N: Acute myocardial infarction. Contemporary risk and management in older versus younger patients. Can J Cardiol 1990; 6: 241–246 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Berger JP. Buclin T, Haller E, Van Melle G, Yersin B: Right arm involvement and pain extension can help to differentiate coronary disease from chest pain of other origin: A prospective emergency ward study of 278 consecutive patients admitted for chest pain. J Int Med 1990; 227: 165–172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Ewerts B, Karlson BW. Währborg P, Hedner T, Herlitz J: Localization of pain in suspected acute myocardial infarction in relation to final diagnosis, age and sex, site and type of infarction. Heart Lung 1996; 25: 430–437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Norris RM, Caughey DE, Mercer CJ, Deeming LW, Scott PJ: Coronary prognostic index for predicting survival after recovery from acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1970; 2: 485–487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Herlitz J, Bång A, Sjölin M, Karlson BW: Five‐year mortality after acute myocardial infarction in relation to previous history, level of initial care, complications in hospital, and medication at discharge. Cardiovasc Drugs Titer 1996; 10: 485–490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Herlitz J, Karlson BW, Bång A, Sjölin M: Mortality and risk indicators for death during five years after AMI among patients with and without ST elevation on admission ECG. Cardiology 1998; 89: 33–39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Molstad P: First myocardial infarction in smokers. Eur Heart J 1991; 12: 753–759 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]