Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2009 Feb 3;20(Suppl 1):31–38. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960201308

Current role of contrast echocardiography in the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases

Julio E Pérez 1,2
PMCID: PMC6656139  PMID: 9383600

Abstract

The use of contrast echocardiography (CE) in cardiovascular medicine has grown significantly over the last 15 years. Depending on the site of injection, contrast enhancement of the right‐ or left‐sided cardiac chambers or myocardium now can be achieved. Contrast echocardiography can improve the evaluation of patients with valvular heart disease by enhancing the Doppler signal; CE also improves detection of intracardiac or intrapulmonary shunts. In patients with coronary artery disease, enhancement of the endocardial blood‐tissue boundary allows for improved visualization of endocardial wall motion, assessment of wall thickening, and calculation of ejection fraction. Contrast echocardiography promises to delineate myocardial perfusion and has the potential for quantitating coronary flow and assessing myocardial viability. These applications may add important physiologic information to the anatomic information readily available from noncontrast echocardiography. Because it can be rapidly performed at the bedside, CE may be a valuable tool for use with inpatients with acute myocardial ischemia. When CE has been used after recanalization of occluded coronary arteries, the assessment of myocardial salvage conveys information concerning reflow, stunning, and prognosis, and in the case of an angioplasty it provides immediate information regarding the success of the procedure. Contrast echocardiography can also assess myocardial areas at risk of irreversible damage and the presence or absence of collateral flow. When performed with transesophageal or epicardial echocardiography in the operating room, CE is emerging as a valuable tool in the assessment of cardioplegia distribution and graft patency as well as in the delineation of the regional supply of each graft. With the continued development of newer contrast agents and refinement of ultrasound imaging equipment, the applications of CE will continue to grow.

Keywords: diagnostics, contrast echocardiography, stress echocardiography, wall motion, viability, myocardial perfusion, contrast agents, visualization, Doppler, gray scale

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

References

  • 1. Gramiak R, Shah PM: Echocardiography of the aortic root. Invest Radiol 1968; 3: 356–366 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Beppu S, Matsuda H, Shishido T, Matsumura M, Miyatakake K: Prolonged myocardial contrast echocardiography via peripheral venous administration of QW3600 injection (EchoGen): Its efficacy and side effects. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997; 10: 11–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Tokgozoglu SL, Caner B, Kabakci G, Kes S: Measurement of right ventricular ejection fraction by contrast echocardiography. Int J Cardiol 1997; 59: 71–74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Byrd B, O'Kelly BF, Schiller NB: Contrast echocardiography enhances tricuspid but not mitral regurgitation. Clin Cardiol 1991; 14: V10–14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Waggoner AD, Barzilai B, Pérez JE: Saline contrast enhancement of tricuspid regurgitation jets detected by Doppler color flow imaging. Am J Cardiol 1990; 65: 1368–1371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Nakatani S, Imanishi T, Terasawa A, Beppo S, Nagata S, Miyatake K: Clinical application of transpulmonary contrast‐enhanced Doppler technique in the assessment of severity of aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20: 973–978 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Von Bibra H, Sutherland G, Becher H, Nevdert J, Nihoyannopoulos P: Clinical evaluation of left heart Doppler contrast enhancement by a saccharide‐based transpulmonary contrast agent. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 500–508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lechat P, Mas JL, Lascault G, Loron P, Theard M, Klimczack M, Drubinski G, Thomas D, Grosgogeat Y: Prevalence of patent foramen ovale in patients with stroke. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 1148–1152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Di Tullio M, Sacco RL, Gopal A, Mohr JP, Homma S: Patent foramen ovale as a risk factor for cryptogenic stroke. Ann Intern Med 1992; 117: 461–465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Hagen PT, Sholz DH, Edwards WD: Incidence and size of patent foramen ovale during the first 10 decades of life: An autopsy study of 965 normal hearts. Mayo Clin Proc 1984; 59: 17–20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Hausman D, Mugge A, Becht I, Daniel WG: Diagnosis of patent foramen ovale by transesophageal echocardiography and association with cerebral and peripheral embolic events. Am J Cardiol 1992; 70: 668–672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Van Camp G, Schulze D, Cosyns B, Vandenbossche JL: Relation between patent foramen ovale and unexplained stroke. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71: 596–598 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Louie EK, Konstadt SN, Rao TLK, Scanlon PJ: Transesophageal echocardiographic diagnosis of right to left shunting across the foramen ovale in adults without prior stroke. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 1231–1237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Sun JP, Stewart WJ, Hanna J, Thomas JD: Diagnosis of patent foramen ovale by contrast versus color Doppler by transesophageal echocardiography: Relation to atrial size. Am Heart J 1996; 131: 239–244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hausmann D, Mügge A, Daniel WG: Identification of patent foramen ovale permitting paradoxic embolism. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 1030–1038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Cross SF, Thomson LF, Evans SA, Lee HS, Jennings KP: Inter‐ and intra‐observer variability in detection of patent foramen ovale with contrast echocardiography. Eur Heart J 1993; 14: 388–390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Voci P: Opacification of the thoracic aorta after venous injection of sonicated albumin microbubbles. Implications for aortic dissection. Cardiologia 1997; 42: 299–304 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Callahan JA, Seward JB Jr, Nishimura RA, Miller FA Jr, Reeder GS, Shub C, Callahan MJ, Schattenberg TT, Tajik AJ: Two‐dimensional echocardiography guided pericardiocentesis: Experience in 117 consecutive patients. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55: 476–479 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Marwick TH, Nemec JJ, Pashkow FJ, Stewart WJ, Salcedo EE: Accuracy and limitations of exercise echocardiography in a routine setting. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 74–81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Crouse LJ: Sonicated serum albumin in contrast echocardiography: Improved segmental wall motion depiction and implications for stress echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 42H–45H [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Porter TR, Xie F, Kriesfeld A, Chiou A, Dabestani A: Improved endocardial border resolution during dobutamine stress echocardiography with intravenous sonicated dextrose albumin. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 1440–1443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. DeMaria AN, Bommer WJ, Riggs K, Dajee A, Keown M, Ling‐Kwan O, Mason DT: Echocardiographic visualization of myocardial perfusion by left heart and intracoronary injections of echocardiographic contrast agents. Circulation 1980; 62: III–143 [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kaul S: A glimpse of the coronary microcirculation with myocardial contrast echocardiography. J Investig Med 1995; 43: 345–361 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Lim YJ, Nanto S, Masuyama T, Hori M: Subendocardial myocardial ischemia as assessed with myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients with ischemic heart disease. Biorheology 1993; 30: 349–358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Porter TR, Kriesfeld A, Deligonul U, Xie F: Detection of regional perfusion abnormalities during adenosine stress echocardiography with intravenous perfluorocarbon‐exposed dextrose albumin. Am Heart J 1996; 132: 41–17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Agati L, Voci P, Bilotta F, Luongo R, Iacoboni C, Fedele F, Dagianti A: Dipyridamole myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients with single‐vessel coronary artery disease: Perfusion, anatomic, and functional correlates. Am Heart J 1994; 128: 28–35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Cheirif J, Desir RM, Bolli R, Mahmarian JJ, Zoghbi WA, Verani MS, Quiñones MA: Relation of perfusion defects observed with myocardial contrast echocardiography to the severity of coronary stenosis: Correlation with thallium‐201 single photon emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 1343–1349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Meza MF, Mobarek S, Sonnemaker R, Shuler S, Ramee SR, Collins TJ, White CJ, Aristizabal D, Murgo JP, Cheirif J: Myocardial contrast echocardiography in human beings: Correlation of resting perfusion defects to sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography. Am Heart J 1996; 132: 528–535 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kaul S: Myocardial contrast echocardiography in coronary artery disease: Potential applications using venous injections of contrast. Am J Cardiol 1995; 75: 61D–68D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Cosgrove D: Why do we need contrast agents for ultrasound? Clin Radiol 1990; 51: (suppl 1) 1–4 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Porter TR, Xie F, Klizer K, Deligonul O: Detection of myocardial perfusion abnormalities during dobutamine and adenosine stress echocardiography with transient myocardial contrast imaging after minute quantities of intravenous perfluorocarbon‐exposed sonicated dextrose albumin. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1996; 9: 779–786 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Jayaweera AR, Edwards N, Glasheen WP, Villaneuva FS, Abbott RD, Kaul S: In vivo myocardial kinetics of air‐filled albumin microbubbles during myocardial contrast echocardiography. Comparison with radiolabeled red blood cells. Circ Res 1994; 74: 1157–1165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Kaul S, Kelly P, Oliner JD, Glashen WP, Keller MW, Watson DD: Assessment of regional myocardial blood flow with myocardial contrast two‐dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13: 468–482 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Cheirif J, Zoghbi WA, Raizner AE, Minor ST, Winters WL, Klein MS, DeBauche TL, Lewis JM, Roberts R, Quiñones MA: Assessment of myocardial perfusion in humans. I. Evaluation of regional coronary reserve by contrast echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 11: 735–743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Jayaweera AR, Mathew Tl, Sklenar J, Spotnitz WD, Watson DD, Kaul S: Method for the quantitation of myocardial perfusion during myocardial contrast two‐dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1990; 3: 91–98 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Heindrich PA, Wiencik JG, Aronson S: In vitro calculation of flow by use of cardiac ultrasound. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1993; 6: 51–61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Desir RM, Cheirif J, Bolli R, Zoghbi WA, Hoyt BD, Quinones MA: Assessment of regional myocardial perfusion with myocardial contrast echocardiography in a canine model of varying degrees of coronary stenosis. Am Heart J 1994; 127: 56–63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Porter TR, D'Sa A, Pesko L, Turner C, Nath A, Vetrovec GW, Nixon JV: Usefulness of myocardial contrast echocardiography in detecting immediate changes in antegrade blood flow reserve after coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71: 893–896 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Perchet H, Duouy P, Duval‐Moulin AM, Hittinger L, Pelle G, Brun P, Castaigne A, Geschwind H, Dubois‐Rande JL: Improvement of subendocardial myocardial perfusion after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: A myocardial contrast echocardiography study with correlation between myocardial contrast reserve and Doppler coronary reserve. Circulation 1995; 91: 1419–1426 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Villanueva FS, Glasheen WP, Sklenar J, Jayaweera AR, Kaul S: Successful and reproducible myocardial opacification during two‐dimensional echocardiography from right heart injection of contrast. Circulation 1992; 85: 1557–1564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Voci P, Bilotta F, Merialdo P, Agati L: Myocardial contrast enhancement after intravenous injection of sonicated albumin microbubbles: A transesophageal echocardiography dipyridamole study. Echocardiography 1994; 7: 337–346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Ismail S, Jayaweera AR, Goodman NC, Camarano GP, Skyba DM, Kaul S: Detection of coronary stenoses and quantification of the degree and spatial extent of blood flow mismatch during coronary hyperemia with myocardial contrast echocardiography. Circulation 1995; 91: 821–830 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Skyba DM, Jayaweera AR, Goodman NC, Ismail S, Camarano G, Kaul S: Quantification of myocardial perfusion with myocardial contrast echocardiography during left atrial injection of contrast. Implications for venous injection. Circulation 1994; 90: 1513–1521 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Villanueva FS, Camarano G, Ismail S, Goodman NC, Sklenar J, Kaul S: Coronary reserve abnormalities in the infarcted myocardium. Assessment of myocardial viability immediately versus late after reflow by contrast echocardiography. Circulation 1996; 94: 748–754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Kloner RA, Ganote CE, Jennings RB: The “no‐reflow” phenomenon after temporary coronary artery occlusion in the dog. J Clin Invest 1974; 54: 1496–1508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Kloner RA, Reude RE, Carlson N, Maroko PR, DeBoer LWV, Braunwald E: Ultrastructural evidence of microvascular damage and myocardial cell injury after coronary artery occlusion: Which comes first? Circulation 1980; 62: 945–952 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Braunwald E, Kloner RA: The stunned myocardium: Prolonged postischemic ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 1982; 66: 1146–1149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Kloner RA, Przyklenk K, Patel B: Altered myocardial states. The stunned and hibernating myocardium. Am J Med 1989; 86: 14–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Ito H, Tomooka T, Sakai N, Hisahiro Y, Higashino Y, Jujii K, Masuyama T, Kitabatake A, Minamino T: Lack of myocardial perfusion immediately after successful thrombolysis. A predictor of poor recovery of left ventricular function in anterior myocardial infarction. Circulation 1992; 85: 1699–1705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Ito H, Maruyana A, Iwakura K, Takiuchi S, Masuyama T, Hori M, Higashino Y, Fujii K, Minamino T: Clinical implications of the “no reflow” phenomenon. A predictor of complications and left ventricular remodeling in reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction. Circulation 1996; 93: 223–228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Ito H, Okamura AA, Iwakura K, Masuyama T, Hori M, Takiuchi S, Negoro S, Nakatsuchi Y, Taniyama Y, Higashino Y, Fujii K, Minamino T: Myocardial perfusion patterns related to thrombolysis in myocardial infarction perfusion grades after coronary angioplasty in patients with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction. Circulation 1996; 93: 1993–1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Kemper AJ, O'Boyle JE, Sharma S, Cohen CA, Kloner RA, Khuri SF, Parisi AF: Hydrogen peroxide contrast‐enhanced two‐dimensional echocardiography: Real‐time in vivo delineation of regional myocardial perfusion. Circulation 1983; 68: 603–611 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Kenner MD, Zajac EJ, Kondos GT, Dave R, Winklemann JW, Joftus J, Laucevicius A, Kybarskis A, Berukstis E, Urbonas A, Feinstein SB: Ability of the no‐reflow phenomenon during an acute myocardial infarction to predict left ventricular dysfunction at one‐month follow‐up. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 861–868 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Agati L, Voci P, Autore C, Luongo AR, Testa G, Mall MT, DiRoma A, Fedele F, Dagianti A: Combined use of dobutamine echocardiography and myocardial contrast echocardiography in predicting regional dysfunction recovery after coronary revascularization in patients with recent myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1997; 18: 771–779 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. White RC, Sanders M, Bloom CM: Regional distribution of myocardial blood flow after coronary occlusion and reperfusion in the conscious dog. Am J Cardiol 1978; 42: 234–243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Jeremy RW, Links JM, Becker LC: Progressive failure of coronary flow during reperfusion of myocardial infarction: Documentation of the no reflow phenomenon with positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16: 695–704 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Lim YJ, Nanto S, Masuyama T, Kohama A, Hori M, Kamada T: Myocardial salvage: Its assessment and prediction by the analysis of serial myocardial contrast echocardiograms in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1994; 128: 649–656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Ragosta M, Carmarano G, Kaul S, Powers ER, Sarembock IJ, Gimple LW: Microvascular integrity indicates myocellular viability in patients with recent myocardial infarction. New insights using myocardial contrast echocardiography. Circulation 1994; 89: 2562–2569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Agati L, Voci P, Bilotta F, Luongo R, Autore C, Penco M, laccoboni C, Fedele F, Dagianti A: Influence of residual perfusion within the infarct zone on the natural history of left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction: A myocardial contrast echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24: 336–342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Ito H, Iwakura K, Oh H, Masuyama T, Hori M, Higashino Y, Fujii K, Minamino T: Temporal changes in myocardial perfusion patterns in patients with perfused anterior wall myocardial infarction: Their relation to myocardial viability. Circulation 1995; 91: 656–662 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Nanto S, Lim YJ, Masuyama T, Hori M, Nagata S: Diagnostic performance of myocardial contrast echocardiography for detection of stunned myocardium. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1996; 8: 314–319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Iliceto S, Galiuto L, Marchese A, Cavallari D, Colonna P, Biasco G, Pizzon P: Analysis of microvascular integrity, contractile reserve, and myocardial viability after acute myocardial infarction by dobutamine echocardiography and myocardial contrast echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77: 441–445 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Sklenar J, Camarano G, Goodman C, Ismail S, Jayaweera AR, Kaul S: Contractive versus microvascular reserve for the determination of the extent of myocardial salvage after reperfusion. The effect of residual coronary stenosis. Circulation 1996; 94: 1430–1440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Sabia PJ, Powers ER, Ragosta M, Ragost M, Sarembock IJ, Burwell LR, Kaul S: An association between collateral blood flow and myocardial viability in patients with recent myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 1825–1831 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Cheirif J, Narkiewicz‐Jodko J, Hawkins HK, Bravenic JS, Quiñones MA, Mickelson JK: Myocardial contrast echocardiography: Relation of collateral perfusion to extent of injury and severity of contractile dysfunction in a canine model of coronary thrombosis and reperfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 537–546 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Sakata Y, Kodama K, Adachi T, Lim YJ, Ishikura F, Fuji H, Masuyama T, Hirayama A: Comparison of myocardial contrast echochardiography and coronary angiography for assessing the acute protective effects of collateral recruitment during occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery at the time of elective angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 1329–1333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Graybum PA, Erickson JM, Escobar J, Womack L, Velasco CE: Peripheral intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography using a 2% decafluoropentane emulsion: Identification of myocardial risk area and infarct size in the canine model of ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 1340–1347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Dittrich HC, Bales GL, Kuvelas T, Hunt RM, McEferran BA, Greener Y: Myocardial contrast echocardiography in experimental coronary artery occlusion with a new intravenously administered contrast agent. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1995; 8: 465–474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Vanoverschelde JLJ, Gerber B, Pasquet A, Melin JA: Nuclear and echocardiographic imaging for prediction of reversible left ventricular ischemic dysfunction after coronary revascularization: Current status and future directions. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1996; 28: S27–S36 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Ragosta M, Beller GA, Watson DD, Kaul S, Gimple LW: Quantitative planar rest‐redistribution 201thallium imaging in detection of myocardial viability and prediction of improvement in left ventricular function after coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with severely depressed left ventricular function. Circulation 1993; 87: 1630–1641 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Lee KS, Marwich TH, Cook SA, Go RT, Fix JS, James KB, Sapp SK, MacIntyre WJ, Thomas JD: Prognosis of patients with left ventricular dysfunction, with and without viable myocardium after myocardial infarction. Relative efficacy of medical therapy and revascularization. Circulation 1994; 90: 2687–2694 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Camarano G, Ragosta M, Gimple LW, Powers ER, Kaul S: Identification of viable myocardium with contrast echocardiography in patients with poor left ventricular systolic function caused by recent or remote myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1995; 75: 215–219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Qureshi U, Nagueh SF, Afridi I, Vaduganathan P, Blaustein A, Verani MS, Winters WL, Zoghbi WA: Dobutamine echocardiography and quantitative rest‐redistribution 201T1 tomography in myocardial hibernation: Relation of contractive reserve to 201T1 uptake and comparative prediction of recovery of function. Circulation 1997; 95: 626–635 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Cheirif J, Meza M, Murgo JP: Dobutamine echocardiography and myocardial contrast echocardiography. Two new techniques for the assessment of myocardial viability. Tex Heart Inst J 1995; 22: 33–39 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Nagueh SF, Vaduganathan P, Ali N, Blaustein A, Verani MS, Winters WL, Zoghbi WA: Identification of hibernating myocardium: Comparative accuracy of myocardial contrast echocardiography, rest‐redistribution thallium‐201 tomography and dobutamine echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 985–993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. deFilippi CR, Willett DL, Irani WN, Eichhom EJ, Velasco CE, Graybum PA: Comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography and low‐dose dobutamine stress echocardiography in predicting recovery of left ventricular function after coronary revascularization in chronic ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1995; 92: 2863–2868 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Picano E, Marzullo P, Gigli G, Reisenhofer B, Parodi O, Distante A, L'Abbate A: Identification of viable myocardium by dipyrid‐amole‐induced improvement in regional left ventricular function as assessed by echocardiography in myocardial infarction and comparison with thallium scintigraphy at rest. Am J Cardiol 1992; 70: 703–709 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Gregg DE: Effect of coronary perfusion pressure or coronary flow on oxygen usage of myocardium. Circ Res 1963; 13: 497–500 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Rovai D, Zanchi M, Lombardi M, Magagnini E, Chella P, Pieroni A, Picano E, Ferdeghini EM, Morris H, Distante A, L'Abbate A: Residual myocardial perfusion in reversibly damaged myocardium by dipyridamole contrast echocardiography. Eur Heart J 1996; 17: 296–301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Meza MF, Kates MA, Barbee W, Revall S, Perry B, Murgo JP, Cheirif J: Combination of dobutamine and myocardial contrast echocardiography to differentiate postischemic from infarcted myocardium. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 974–984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Voci P: Intra‐operative contrast echocardiography in coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 1992; 13: 1146–1152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Allen BS, Winkelmann GS, Hanafy H, Hartz RS, Bolling KS, Ham J, Feinstein S: Retrograde cardioplegia does not adequately perfuse the right ventricle. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 109: 1116–1125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Keller MW, Spotnitz WD, Matthew TL, Glasheen WP, Watson DD, Kaul S: Intraoperative assessment of regional myocardial perfusion using quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography: An experimental evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16: 1267–1279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Villanueva FS, Spotnitz WD, Jayaweera AR, Dent J, Gimple LW, Kaul S: On‐line intraoperative quantitation of regional myocardial perfusion during coronary artery bypass graft operations with myocardial contrast two‐dimensional echocardiography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992; 104: 1524–1531 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Villanueva FS, Spotnitz ED, Glasheen WP, Watson DD, Jayaweera AR, Kaul S: New insights into the physiology of retrograde cardioplegia delivery. Am J Physiol 1995; 268: H1555–1566 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Grondin CM, Helias J, Vouhe PR, Robert P: Influence of a critical coronary artery stenosis on myocardial protection through cold potassium cardioplegia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981; 82: 608–615 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Quintilio C, Voci P, Bilotta F, Luzi G, Chiarotti F, Acconcia MC, Mercanti C, Marino B: Risk factors for incomplete distribution of cardioplegic solution during coronary artery grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 109: 439–447 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Zaroff J, Aronson S, Walker R: Does intraoperative contrast echocardiography predict clinical outcome after cardiac surgery? Anesthesiology 1992; 77: A92 [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Zaroff J, Aronson S, Lee BK, Feinstein SB, Walker R, Wiencek JG: The relationship between immediate outcome after cardiac surgery, homogeneous cardioplegia delivery and ejection fraction. Chest 1994; 106: 38–45 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Spotnitz WD, Kaul S: Intraoperative assessment of myocardial perfusion using contrast echocardiography. Echocardiography 1990; 7: 209–227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Aronson S, Wiencek JG: Intraoperative perfusion echocardiography. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1994; 8: 97–107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Goldman ME, Mindich BP: Intraoperative cardioplegic contrast echocardiography for assessing myocardial perfusion during open heart surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 4: 1029–1034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Mindich BP, Goldman ME, Fuster V, Burgess N, Litwak R: Improved intraoperative evaluation of mitral valve operations utilizing two‐dimensional contrast echocardiography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 90: 112–118 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES