Skip to main content
PMC home page
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2009 Aug 7;21(1):22–26. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960210105

Costs and outcomes of patients admitted with chest pain and essentially normal electrocardiograms

Peter A McCullough 1,✉, Osama Ayad 1, William W O'Neill 1, James A Goldstein 1
PMCID: PMC6656188  PMID: 9474462

Abstract

Background: Although inroads have been made in the outpatient evaluation of chest pain, the majority of hospitals in the United States do not have chest pain centers and the direct costs associated with hospital admissions in low‐risk patients is unknown.

Hypothesis: The study was undertaken to evaluate the cost and outcomes of admission to the hospital for patients with acute chest pain and essentially normal electrocardiograms (ECGs).

Methods: For that purpose, we reviewed 1,670 patients presenting to our emergency department with chest pain over a 5‐month period in 1994. Of these, 567 [34.0%, confidence interval (CI) 95%, 31.7–36.3%] patients were considered to be low risk by ECG criteria alone.

Results: Complete clinical and financial data were available in 445 cases of which 152 had a previous history of coronary artery disease (CAD) and 31 (7.0%, CI95%, 4.9‐9.6%) were ultimately proven to have acute myocardial infarction (AMI). There were no deaths. All patients initially underwent noninvasive evaluation, and an additional 177 (39.8%) underwent subsequent cardiac catheterization. Of those, 107 (60.5%) had significant CAD (at least one vessel>70% stenosis). We assumed an expected mortality rate of 1% in the AMI group based on previously reported series with all the mortalities preventable by hospitalization. This yielded a valuation of $1.7 million dollars per life saved. Sensitivity analysis revealed the practice of admission and in‐patient evaluation for this group of patients was cost ineffective at all assumption levels.

Conclusion: The practice of hospital admission for patients with chest pain and essentially normal ECGs is not cost favorable, and all hospital facilities should consider outpatient chest pain evaluation strategies.

Keywords: chest pain, cost analysis, electrocardiography, patient admission

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (563.0 KB).

References

  • 1. National Health Survey : Physician Contacts by Sociogeographic and Health Characteristics. Series 10, No. 161, 1982–1983 [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Karlson BW, Herlitz J., Wiklund O., Richter A., Hjalmarson A., Early prediction of acute myocardial infarction from clinical history, examination and electrocardiogram in the emergency room. Am J Cardiol 1991: 68: 171–175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Rouan GW, Lee TH, Cook EF, Brand DA, Weisberg MC, Goldman L., Clinical characteristics and outcome of acute myocardial infarction in patients with initially normal or nonspecific electrocardiograms (a report from the Multicenter Chest Pain Study). Am J Cardiol 1989: 64: 1087–1092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Gibler WB, Blanton J., Early identification of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Compr Ther 1988: 14: 41–44 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Fesmire FM, Percy RF, Wears RL, MacMath TL, Risk stratification according to the initial electrocardiogram in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med 1989: 149: 1294–1297 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Stomel RJ, Kovack PJ, Unstable angina: Clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and management. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. J Am Osteopath Assoc 1995: 95: 45–51 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ryan TJ, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Braniff BA, Brooks NH, Califf RM, Hillis LD, Hiratzka LF, Rapaport E., Riegel BJ, Russell RO, Smith EE, Weaver WD, ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 1996: 28: 1328–1428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. McCarthy BD, Beshansky JR, D'Agostino RB, Selker HP, Missed diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department: Results from a multicenter study. Ann Emerg Med 1993: 22: 579–582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. McCallion WA, Templeton PA, McKinney LA, Higginson JD, Missed myocardial ischaemia in the accident & emergency department: E.C.G. a need for audit? Arch Emerg Med 1991: 8: 102–107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Rusnak RA, Stair TO, Hansen K., Fastow JS, Litigation against the emergency physician: Common features in cases of missed myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med 1989: 18: 1029–1034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Udvarhelyi IS, Goldman L., Komaroff AL, Lee TH, Determinants of resource utilization for patients admitted for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Gen Intern Med 1992: 7: 1–10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Weissman IA, Dickinson CZ, Dworkin HJ, O'Neill WW, Juni JE, Cost‐effectiveness of myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT in the emergency department evaluation of patients with unexplained chest pain. Radiology 1996: 199: 353–357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Lewis WR, Amsterdam EA, Evaluation of the patient with “rule out myocardial infarction,” Arch Intern Med 1996: 156: 41–45 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. deWinter RJ, Koster RW, Sturk A., Sanders GT, Value of myoglobin, troponin T, and CK‐MBmass in ruling out an acute myocardial infarction in the emergency room. Circulation 1995: 92: 3401–3407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hoekstra JW, Gibler WB, Levy RC, Sayre M., Naber W., Chandra A., Kacich R., Magorien R., Walsh R., Emergency‐department diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction and ischemia: A cost analysis of two diagnostic protocols. Acad Emerg Med 1994: 1: 103–110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Gaspoz JM, Lee TH, Weinstein MC, Cook EF, Goldman P., Komaroff AL, Goldman L., Cost‐effectiveness of a new short‐stay unit to “rule out” acute myocardial infarction in low risk patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994: 24: 1249–1259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Varetto T., Cantalupi D., Altieri A., Orlandi C., Emergency room technetium‐99m sestamibi imaging to rule out acute myocardial ischemic events in patients with nondiagnostic electrocardiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993: 22: 1804–1808 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kerns JR, Shaub TF, Fontanarosa PB, Emergency cardiac stress testing in the evaluation of emergency department patients with atypical chest pain. Ann Emerg Med 1993: 22: 794–798 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Shalowitz M., Heaton AH, Cost effectiveness of risk reduction: The managed care perspective. Am J Med 1996: 101: 4A71S–74S; discussion 4A74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Wears RL, Li S., Hernandez JD, Luten RC, Vukich DJ, How many myocardial infarctions should we rule out? Ann Emerg Med 1989: 18: 953–963 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Goldman L., Sia ST, Cook EF, Rutherford JD, Weinstein MC, Costs and effectiveness of routine therapy with long‐term beta‐adrenergic antagonists after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1988: 319: 152–157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Lee TH, Fukui T., Weinstein MC, Tosteson AN, Goldman L., Cost‐effectiveness of screening strategies for left main coronary artery disease in patients with stable angina. Med Decis Making 1988: 8: 268–278 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Goldman L., Weinstein MC, Goldman PA, Williams LW, Cost‐effectiveness of HMG‐CoA reductase inhibition for primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. J Am Med Assoc 1991: 265: 1145–1151 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Goldman L., Cost‐effectiveness perspectives in coronary heart disease. Am Heart J 1990: 119: 733–739; discussion 739–740 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Edelson JT, Weinstein MC, Tosteson AN, Williams L., Lee TH, Goldman L., Long‐term cost‐effectiveness of various initial monotherapies for mild to moderate hypertension. J Am Med Assoc 1990: 263: 407–413 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Sheng A., Ellrodt AG, Agocs L., Tankel N., Weingarten S., Is cardiac test availability a significant factor in weekend delays in discharge for chest pain patients? J Gen Intern Med 1993: 8: 573–575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Weingarten SR, Riedinger MS, Conner L., Lee TH, Hoffman I., Johnson B., Ellrodt AG, Practice guidelines and reminders to reduce duration of hospital stay for patients with chest pain. An interventional trial. Ann Intern Med 1994: 120: 257–263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Patterson RE, Eisner RL, Horowitz SF, Comparison of cost‐effectiveness and utility of exercise ECG, single photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and coronary angiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Circulation 1995: 91: 54–65 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Manson JE, Grobbee DE, Stampfer MJ, Taylor JO, Goldhaber SZ, Gaziano JM, Ridker PM, Buring JE, Hennekens CH, Aspirin in the primary prevention of angina pectoris in a randomized trial of United States physicians. Am J Med 1990: 89: 772–776 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Shepherd J., Cobbe SM, Ford I., Isles CG, Lorimer AR, MacFarlane PW, McKillop JH, Packard CJ, Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995: 333: 1301–1307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES