Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2009 Feb 3;20(1):23–27. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960200107

The effect of atrial fibrillation and the ventricular rate control on exercise capacity

Ralf H Ostermaier 1, Laura Dalla Vecchia 1, Steven Lampert 2, Shmuel Ravid 3,✉
PMCID: PMC6656193  PMID: 8994734

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia, affecting approximately 1.5 million patients in the United States.

Hypothesis: This study was designed to determine the effect of AF and the ventricular rate control during AF on cardiovascular performance as measured by exercise endurance on a standard Bruce protocol.

Methods: Sixty‐three patients with AF who underwent exercise stress testing during both sinus rhythm and AF were analyzed. Heart rate, blood pressure, heart rate acceleration, exercise duration, and left ventricular (LV) systolic function were measured.

Results: Atrial fibrillation resulted in a small but statistically significant decrease in exercise endurance (426 ± 180 vs. 402 ± 168 s, p < 0.05). The drop in exercise tolerance was consistent regardless of the underlying heart condition or adequate ventricular rate control during AF. Heart rate in AF was consistently faster than in sinus rhythm, at rest, and at peak exercise (63 vs. 79 beats/min and 125 vs. 149 beats/min, respectively, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Our analyses indicated that (1) the loss of atrioventricular synchrony had minimal effect on cardiovascular performance in patients with preserved LV function, (2) the decrease in cardiovascular performance was related to loss of atrioventricular synchrony but not to underlying heart disease or ventricular rate control, and (3) compensation for the loss of the atrial contribution was provided by consistently faster heart rate during AF.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (501.7 KB).

References

  • 1. Kannel WB, Wolf PA: Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation In Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanisms and Management (Eds. Falk RH, Podrid PJ.), p. 81–92. New York: Raven Press, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kowey PR, DeSilva RA, Lown B: Sustained atrial fibrillation as a rhythm of choice. Circulation 1979; 59/60 (suppl II): 11–253 [Google Scholar]
  • 3. McIntosh HD, Kong Y, Morris JJ: Hemodynamic effects of supraventricular arrhythmias. Am J Med 1964; 37: 712–727 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Killip T, Baer RA: Hemodynamic effects after reversion from atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm by precordial shock. J Clin Invest 1966; 45: 658–671 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Braunwald E, Frahm CJ: Studies on Starling's law of the heart. IV. Observations on the hemodynamic functions of the left atrium in man. Circulation 1961; 24: 633–642 [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Corday E, Irvine DW: Disturbances of Heart Rate, Rhythm and Conduction, p. 207–224. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co., 1961. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Evans W, Swann P; Lone auricular fibrillation. Br Heart J 1954; 16: 184–194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Bruce RA, Kusumi F, Hosmer D: Maximal oxygen intake and nomographic assessment of functional aerobic impairment in cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J 1973; 85: 546–562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Antman E, Graboys TB, Lown B: Continuous monitoring for ventricular arrhythmias during exercise tests. J Am Med Assoc 1979; 241: 2802–2805 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Teichholz LE, Cohen MV, Sonnenblick EH, Gorlin R: Study of left ventricular geometry and function by B‐scan ultrasonography in patients with and without asynergy. N Engl J Med 1974; 291: 1220–1225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Lewis T: Fibrillation of the auricles: Its effect upon the circulation. J Exp Med 1912; 16: 395–421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Gesell RA: The effects of change in auricular tone and amplitude of auricular systole on ventricular output. Am J Physiol 1911; 29: 329 [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Morris JJ, Entman M, North WC, Kong Y, McIntosh H: The changes in cardiac output with reversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Circulation 1965; 31: 670–678 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Reale A: Acute effects of countershock conversion of atrial fibrillation upon right and left heart hemodynamics. Circulation 1965; 32: 214–222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Rowlands DJ, Logan WFWE, Howitt G: Atrial function after cardioversion. Am Heart J 1967; 74: 149–160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Resnekov L: Haemodynamic studies before and after electrical conversion to atrial fibrillation and flutter to sinus rhythm. Br Heart J 1967; 29: 700–708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kaplan MA, Gray RE, Iseri LT: Metabolic and hemodynamic responses to exercise during atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm. Am J Cardiol 1968; 22: 543–549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Shapiro W, Klein G: Alterations in cardiac function immediately following electrical conversion of atrial fibrillation to normal sinus rhythm. Circulation 1968; 38: 1074–1084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Mitchell JH, Shapiro W: Atrial fibrillation and the hemodynamic consequences of atrial fibrillation in man. Am J Cardiol 1969; 23: 556–567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Graettinger JS, Carleton RA, Muenster JJ: Circulatory consequences of changes in cardiac rhythm produced in patients by transthoracic direct‐current shock. J Clin Invest 1964; 43: 2290–2302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Gosselink AT, Crijns HJ, Van Der Berg MP, Van Der Broek SA, Hillege H, Landsman ML, Lie KI: Functional capacity before and after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: A controlled study. Br Heart J 1994; 72: 161–166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Gosselink AT, Bijilsman EB, Landsman ML, Crijns HJ. Lie KI: Long term effect of cardioversion on peak oxygen consumption in chronic atrial fibrillation: A two year follow up. Eur Heart J 1994; 15: 1368–1372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kruse I. Amman K, Conradson TB, Ryden L: A comparison of the acute and long‐term hemodynamic effects of ventricular inhibited and atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing. Circulation 1982; 65: 846–855 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Fananapazir L, Srinivas V, Bennett DH: Comparison of resting hemodynamic indices and exercise performance during atrial synchronized and asynchronous ventricular pacing. PACE 1983; 6: 202–209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Tischler MD, Lee TH, McAndrew KA, Sax PE, St John Sutton M, Lee RT: Clinical, echocardiographic and Doppler correlates of clinical instability with onset of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1990; 66: 721–724 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Atwood JE, Myers J, Sullivan M, Forbes S, Sandhu S, Callahan P, Froelicher V: The effect of cardioversion on maximal exercise capacity in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J 1989; 118: 913–918 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Rawles, JM : What is meant by a “controlled” ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation? Br Heart J 1990; 63: 157–161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Benditt DG, Mianulli M, Fetter J, Benson DW Jr, Dunnigan A, Molina E, Gornick CC, Almquist A: Single‐chamber cardiac pacing with activity‐initiated chronotropic response: Evaluation by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Circulation 1987; 75: 184–191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kraemer MD, Sullivan M, Atwood JE, Forbes S, Myers J. Froelicher V: Reproducibility of treadmill exercise data in patients with atrial fibrillation. Cardiology 1989; 76: 234–242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES