Skip to main content
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2009 Feb 3;20(4):391–397. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960200417

Is computer interpretation of the exercise electrocardiogram a reasonable surrogate for visual reading?

Marek Malik, Judith K Mickelson 1,, Eric R Bates, Pamela Hartigan, Edward D Folland, Alfred F Parisi
PMCID: PMC6656253  PMID: 9098601

Abstract

Background: Interpretation of exercise tests as positive or negative is primarily based upon exercise‐induced ST segment changes. Consistently accurate measurements are difficult to obtain during exercise.

Hypothesis: This study compared on‐line computer‐generated electrocardiographic (ECG) analysis with visual interpretation. The goals were to document the extent of agreement, establish reasons for disagreements, characterize ST‐segment depression (extent, onset, duration), and determine the sensitivity and ability to localize coronary artery disease for each method.

Methods: Comparisons were made in 120 patients at eight Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. An exercise test was considered positive if > 1.0 mm horizontal or downsloping ST‐segment depression was detected 0.08 s after the J point during exercise or recovery. The ST‐segment depression had to be present on at least two successive ECG recordings 15 s apart. Computer interpretation was based on median averaged beats.

Results: There was an 88% agreement of visual and computer interpretations [106/120 (both positive, n = 62; both negative, n = 44)]. The disagreements involved visual negative, computer positive in 10 cases and visual positive, computer negative in 4 cases. Correlation was excellent between methods for characterization of ST‐segment depression (p<0.0001). Sensitivity for detecting and the ability to localize coronary artery disease (≥70% stenosis) were similar for both methods.

Conclusion: This computer algorithm using median averaged beats is a reasonable surrogate for visual interpretation of the exercise ECG, making it a valuable source of confirmation of physician readings in large research trials and in clinical settings.

Keywords: computer electrocardiogram analysis, exercise electrocardiogram analysis, coronary artery disease, exercise tolerance test, angioplasty, computer, arteriography

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (715.9 KB).

References

  • 1. Blackburn H: The exercise electrocardiogram: Differences in interpretation. Am J Cardiol 1968; 21: 871–880. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Blomqvist G: The Frank lead exercise electrocardiogram: A quantitative study based on averaging technique and digital computer analysis. Acta Med Scand 1965; 178 (suppl 440): 5–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Forlini FJ, Cohn K, Langston MF: ST segment isolation and quantification as a means of improving diagnostic accuracy in treadmill stress testing. Am Heart J 1975; 90: 431–438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. McHenry PL, Stowe D, Lancaster MC: Computer quantification of ST‐segment response during maximal treadmill exercise. Circulation 1968; 38: 691–701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Sheffield LT, Holt JH, Lester FM, Conroy DV, Reeves TJ: On‐line analysis of the exercise electrocardiogram. Circulation 1969; 40: 935–944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Detrano R, Gianrossi R, Froelicher V: The diagnostic accuracy of the exercise electrocardiogram: A meta‐analysis of 22 years of research. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1989; 33: 173–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Port SC, Oshima M, Ray G, McNamee P, Schmidt DH: Assessment of single vessel coronary artery disease: Results of exercise electrocardiography, thallium‐201 myocardial perfusion imaging and radionuclide angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 6: 75–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Caldwell JH, Hamilton GW, Sorensen SG, Ritchie JL, Williams DL, Kennedy JW: The detection of coronary artery disease with radionuclide techniques: A comparison of rest‐exercise thallium imaging and ejection fraction response. Circulation 1980; 61: 610–619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hammond HK, Kelly TL, Froelicher VF: Noninvasive testing in the evaluation of myocardial ischemia: Agreement among tests. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 5: 59–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Botvinick EH, Taradash MR, Shames DM, Parmley WW: Thallium‐201 myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the clinical clarification of normal, abnormal and equivocal electrocardiographic stress tests. Am J Cardiol 1978; 41: 43–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Abouantoun S, Ahnve S, Savvides M, Witztum K, Jensen D, Froelicher V: Can areas of myocardial ischemia be localized by the exercise electrocardiogram? A correlative study with thallium‐201 scintigraphy. Am Heart J 1984; 104: 933–941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ritchie JL, Trobaugh GB, Hamilton GW, Gould KL, Narahara KA, Murray JA, Williams DL: Myocardial imaging with thallium‐201 at rest and during exercise: Comparison with coronary arteriography and resting and stress electrocardiography. Circulation 1977; 56: 66–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. O'Keefe JC, Cooper RA, Edwards AC, Shuter B, Wiseman J, Donnelly GL: Comparison of exercise electrocardiography, thallium‐201 myocardial imaging and exercise gated blood pool scan in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Aust NZ J Med 1983; 13: 45–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Watanabe K, Bhargava V, Froelicher V: Computer analysis of the exercise ECG: A review. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1980; 22: 423–446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Sheffield LT: Computer‐aided electrocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 10: 448–455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hollenberg M, Budge WR, Wisneski JA, Gertz EW: Treadmill score quantifies electrocardiographic response to exercise and improves test accuracy and reproducibility. Circulation 1980; 61: 276–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Savvides M, Ahnve S, Bhargava V, Froelicher V: Computer analysis of exercise‐induced changes in electrocardiographic variables: Comparison of methods and criteria. Chest 1983; 84: 699–706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kligfield P, Okin PM, Stumpf T, Zachman D: Computer‐based ST/HR slope calculation on Marquette CASE 12: Development and technical considerations. J Electrocardiol 1988; 21 (suppl): S134–S138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Walling AD, Crawford MH: Exercise testing in women with chest pain: Applications and limitations of computer analysis. Coron Art Dis 1993; 4: 783–789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Robert AR, Melin JA, Detry JR: Logistic discriminant analysis improves diagnostic accuracy of exercise testing for coronary artery disease in women. Circulation 1991; 83: 1202–1209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Halon DA, Mevorach D, Rodeanu M, Lewis BS: Improved criteria for localization of coronary artery disease from the exercise electrocardiogram. Cardiology 1994; 84: 331–338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Caralis DG, Shaw L, Bilgere B, Younis L, Stocke K, Wiens RD, Chaitman BR: Application of computerized exercise ECG digitization: Interpretation in large clinical trials. J Electrocardiol 1992; 25: 101–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Parisi AF, Folland ED, Hartigan P: A comparison of angioplasty with medical therapy in the treatment of single‐vessel coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 10–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Drazen E, Mann N, Borun R, Laks M, Bersen A: Survey of computer‐assisted electrocardiography in the United States. J Electrocardiol 1988; 21 (suppl): S98–S104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Detrano R, Salcedo E, Leatherman J, Day K: Computer‐assisted versus unassisted analysis of the exercise electrocardiogram in patients without myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 10: 794–799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lachterman B, Lehmann KG, Detrano R, Neutel J, Froelicher VF: Comparison of ST segment/heart rate index to standard ST criteria for analysis of exercise electrocardiogram. Circulation 1990; 82: 44–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Sketch MH, Mohiuddin SM, Nair CK, Mooss AN, Runco V: Automated and nomographic analysis of exercise tests. J Am Med Assoc 1980; 243: 1052–1055. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Rossi L, Carbonieri E, Castello C, Rossi R, Sciarretta G, Eng D, Zardini P: Description and evaluation of a method for computer analysis of the exercise electrocardiogram. J Electrocardiol 1987; 20: 312–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Redwood DR, Borer JS, Epstein SE: Editorial—whither the ST segment during exercise? Circulation 1976; 545: 703–706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Morris CK, Ueshima K, Kawaguchi T, Hideg A, Froelicher VF: The prognostic value of exercise capacity: A review of the literature. Am Heart J 1991; 122: 1423–1431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES