Skip to main content
mSphere logoLink to mSphere
. 2019 Jul 24;4(4):e00373-19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00373-19

Genotypic and Phenotypic Characterization of Antimicrobial Resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a Cross-Sectional Study of Isolates Recovered from Routine Urine Cultures in a High-Incidence Setting

Adam L Bailey a,#, Robert F Potter b,#, Meghan A Wallace a, Caitlin Johnson a, Gautam Dantas a,b,c,d,, Carey-Ann D Burnham a,c,e,f,
Editor: Brandi M Limbagog
PMCID: PMC6656870  PMID: 31341071

Neisseria gonorrhoeae causes the sexually transmitted infection gonorrhea, which is most commonly diagnosed using a DNA-based detection method that does not require growth and isolation of N. gonorrhoeae in the laboratory. This is problematic because the rates of antibiotic resistance in N. gonorrhoeae are increasing, but without isolating the organism in the clinical laboratory, antibiotic susceptibility testing cannot be performed on strains recovered from clinical specimens. We observed an increase in the frequency of urine cultures growing N. gonorrhoeae after we implemented a total laboratory automation system for culture in our clinical laboratory. Here, we report on the rates of resistance to multiple historically used, first-line, and potential future-use antibiotics for 64 N. gonorrhoeae isolates. We found that the rates of antibiotic resistance in our isolates were comparable to national rates. Additionally, resistance to specific antibiotics correlated closely with the presence of genetic resistance genes, suggesting that DNA-based tests could also be designed to guide antibiotic therapy for treating gonorrhea.

KEYWORDS: Neisseria gonorrhoeae, gonorrhea, urine culture

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this study were to perform genomic and phenotypic characterization of antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates recovered from urine samples from patients in St. Louis, MO, USA. Sixty-four clinical isolates were banked over a 2-year period and subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion (penicillin, tetracycline, cefuroxime, and ciprofloxacin) and gradient diffusion (tetracycline, doxycycline, azithromycin, ceftriaxone, cefixime, ciprofloxacin, gemifloxacin, and delafloxacin). The medical records for the patients were evaluated to determine the demographics, location, and prescribed treatment regimen. Isolate draft genomes were assembled from Illumina shotgun sequencing data, and resistance determinants were identified by ResFinder and PointFinder. Of the 64 isolates, 97% were nonsusceptible to penicillin, with resistant isolates all containing the blaTEM-1b gene; 78 and 81% of isolates were nonsusceptible to tetracycline and doxycycline, respectively, with resistant isolates all containing the tet(M) gene. One isolate was classified as non-wild-type to azithromycin, and all isolates were susceptible to ceftriaxone; 89% of patients received this combination of drugs as first-line therapy. Six percent of isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin, with most resistant isolates containing multiple gyrA and parC mutations. Correlation between disk and gradient diffusion AST devices was high for tetracycline and ciprofloxacin (R2 > 99% for both). The rates of N. gonorrhoeae antibiotic resistance in St. Louis are comparable to current rates reported nationally, except ciprofloxacin resistance was less common in our cohort. Strong associations between specific genetic markers and phenotypic susceptibility testing hold promise for the utility of genotype-based diagnostic assays to guide directed antibiotic therapy.

IMPORTANCE Neisseria gonorrhoeae causes the sexually transmitted infection gonorrhea, which is most commonly diagnosed using a DNA-based detection method that does not require growth and isolation of N. gonorrhoeae in the laboratory. This is problematic because the rates of antibiotic resistance in N. gonorrhoeae are increasing, but without isolating the organism in the clinical laboratory, antibiotic susceptibility testing cannot be performed on strains recovered from clinical specimens. We observed an increase in the frequency of urine cultures growing N. gonorrhoeae after we implemented a total laboratory automation system for culture in our clinical laboratory. Here, we report on the rates of resistance to multiple historically used, first-line, and potential future-use antibiotics for 64 N. gonorrhoeae isolates. We found that the rates of antibiotic resistance in our isolates were comparable to national rates. Additionally, resistance to specific antibiotics correlated closely with the presence of genetic resistance genes, suggesting that DNA-based tests could also be designed to guide antibiotic therapy for treating gonorrhea.

INTRODUCTION

Neisseria gonorrhoeae, the microorganism that causes the sexually transmitted disease gonorrhea, infects approximately one million people in the United States annually (1, 2). Historically, penicillin and doxycycline have been used to treat gonorrhea; however, the emergence of N. gonorrhoeae strains resistant to these antibiotics in the 1980s prompted the implementation of alternative treatment strategies. While the antimicrobial regimen of choice recommended in clinical guidelines has varied over the past decades, today, single-dose ceftriaxone plus azithromycin combination therapy is the standard of care for the treatment of gonorrhea in the United States and much of the world (37). With the advent of direct-from-specimen nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT), gonorrhea can now be diagnosed and treated in a single clinic or emergency room encounter. NAAT is rapid, highly sensitive, and specific; as such, it has become the standard of care for diagnosing gonorrhea and has largely replaced culture-based diagnosis of N. gonorrhoeae, which is slow and suffers from poor sensitivity (8, 9). Importantly however, culture is a prerequisite for performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) on an organism, and recent trends suggest that N. gonorrhoeae is becoming increasingly resistant to antibiotics, including azithromycin and ceftriaxone (7, 1014) (for a review, see reference 15).

Within the past 3 years, the clinical microbiology laboratory at Barnes-Jewish Hospital (affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis)—a central laboratory for 5 hospitals in a 13-hospital health care system—implemented a total laboratory automation system for culture-based microbiology (BD KiestraTLA; Becton-Dickinson). After these changes, the laboratory observed a dramatic increase in the number of routine urine cultures from which fastidious microorganisms were recovered (16). This included a large increase in routine urine cultures growing N. gonorrhoeae, which typically does not grow on blood agar medium under atmospheric oxygen tension commonly used for conventional urine culture (Fig. 1A). Here, we use whole-genome sequencing and AST to characterize the epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance patterns and establish genotype-phenotype correlations for 64 N. gonorrhoeae isolates from patients in the St. Louis area.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Recovery of N. gonorrhoeae from urine cultures in the St. Louis area. (A) Blood agar plate showing growth of N. gonorrhoeae from routine urine culture performed on a total laboratory automation system (the BD KiestraTLA). Colonies appear nonhemolytic, pin-point, and clear/gray/white in color. (B) Map of the St. Louis metropolitan area showing the primary residence of the patient from which each isolate was obtained at the zip code level or with an arrow indicating the direction of zip codes that are not on the map. Heat mapping highlights the number of patients per zip code, with darker red indicating more patients per zip code. BJH, Barnes-Jewish Hospital; SLCH, St. Louis Children’s Hospital.

RESULTS

Sample set and patient demographics.

Of 74 isolates initially identified as N. gonorrhoeae during routine workup by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization−time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (BioTyper) in the clinical microbiology laboratory at Barnes-Jewish Hospital between November 2015 and October 2017, 64 met all inclusion criteria for this study, including recovery from cryopreservation, confirmed identification as N. gonorrhoeae by MALDI-TOF MS (Vitek MS) after subculture, and complete patient records. Of note, there was 96% agreement between the two MALDI-TOF MS methods.

The majority of the isolates in our sample set came from young black men living in North St. Louis, MO. All were symptomatic with some degree of urogenital discomfort (e.g., “urethral discharge” or “dysuria”); urine cultures were performed as part of a general urogenital tract infection workup at the discretion of the treating physician. The mean age of patients was 27 years old (standard deviation [SD], 9.6 years), but ages ranged from 15 to 58 years of age (Table 1). Of 64 (93.8%) patients, 60 were male, and 59/64 (92.2%) of patients were black. Two black women, two white women, and three white men were also represented in our data set. Of 64 isolates, 54 (84.4%) isolates came from patients residing in zip codes from the predominantly African American community of North St. Louis (Fig. 1B). Isolates from other locations were rare and originated from patients scattered throughout more demographically heterogeneous neighborhoods in South St. Louis (3/64 [4.7%]) or St. Louis suburbs in Illinois (5/64 [7.8%]).

TABLE 1.

Demographics, diagnosis, and antimicrobial therapy for study subjects (n = 64)

Characteristica No. of subjects (%)
or parameter value
Age (yr)
    Mean 27.0
    Range 15 − 58
    SD 9.6
Sex
    Male 60 (93.8)
    Female 4 (6.3)
Race
    Black 59 (92.2)
    White 5 (7.8)
Treatment regimen
    Azithromycin (1 g) + ceftriaxone (250 mg) 34
    Azithromycin (1 g) + ceftriaxone (250 mg) + metronidazole (2 g) 23 (35.9)
    Azithromycin (1 g) + ceftriaxone (250 mg) + ciprofloxacin
  (500 mg BID for 7 days)
1 (1.6)
    Ciprofloxacin (500 mg BID for 14 days) 1 (1.6)
    Cephalexin 500 mg BID for 7 daysb 1 (1.6)
    Azithromycin (1 g) + TMP-SMX 1 (1.6)
    Metronidazole (2 g) onlyc 1 (1.6)
    Treatment information not available 2 (1.6)
Neisseria gonorrhoeae NAAT test result
    Positive for N. gonorrhoeae (of tested subjects) 59 (98.3)
    Negative for N. gonorrhoeae (of tested subjects) 0 (0.0)
    Indeterminate (of tested subjects) 1 (1.7)
    NAAT not performed (of total subjects) 4 (6.3)
Concurrent STI
    None documented 37 (57.8)
    Chlamydia trachomatis 18 (28.1)
    Trichomonas vaginalis 2 (3.1)
    HIV 2 (3.1)
    HCV 1 (1.6)
    Not screened or data not available 4 (6.3)
Specimen source
    Urine sample 58 (90.6)
    Genital swab 4 (6.3)
    Wound swab 1 (1.6)
    Ocular swab 1 (1.6)
Culture method
    Kiestra TLA 52 (81.3)
    Conventional microbiology workflow 12 (18.8)
a

Abbreviations: BID, twice a day; TMP-SMX, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

b

Complicated by pyelonephritis.

c

This patient, treated with metronidazole only, presented 2 weeks later and was treated with azithromycin (1 g) plus ceftriaxone (250 mg).

Over the time frame when this study was conducted, N. gonorrhoeae was isolated from 0.064% of all urine cultures performed, representing 0.3% of all uropathogens recovered (16). NAAT was the predominant method of gonorrhea diagnosis, with 60/64 (93.8%) isolates having a corresponding NAAT test at the time of specimen collection; all were positive except for one that was “indeterminate.” The converse was difficult to assess, given the high prevalence of gonorrhea within our laboratory’s catchment area and the superior sensitivity of NAAT over culture as a primary method for diagnosis. Therefore, we were unable to estimate the percentage of specimens that were positive by NAAT but negative by urine culture. Most patients (37/64 [57.8%]) had no concurrent sexually transmitted infections (STIs). However, concurrent infections (as documented via review of the electronic medical record) with Chlamydia trachomatis (18/64 [28.1%]), Trichomonas vaginalis (2/64 [3.1%]), HIV (2/64 [3.1%]), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) (1/64 [1.6%]) were identified in a subset of patients. At the time of presentation, 57/64 (89%) individuals received standard-of-care antimicrobial therapy for gonorrhea: single-dose azithromycin (1 g) plus ceftriaxone (250 mg) (Table 1).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of N. gonorrhoeae isolates.

Given recent reports of increasing antibiotic resistance among N. gonorrhoeae isolates, we evaluated resistance to several antibiotics in our sample set. We assessed antibiotics from the tetracycline, quinolone, beta-lactam, and macrolide classes that were either used historically to treat gonorrhea or are used currently as first-line agents for treating gonorrhea or have been proposed as future therapies for treating multidrug-resistant N. gonorrhoeae (17).

We first assessed the distribution of MICs (or zone diameters) displayed by N. gonorrhoeae isolates against each antibiotic. For penicillin, tetracycline, and doxycycline, isolates formed a multimodal distribution of MICs (or zone diameters) that roughly corresponded to the susceptible (S), intermediate (I), and resistant (R) categories of antimicrobial susceptibility (Fig. 2A and B). A bimodal distribution of MICs was also observed for azithromycin, with a group of isolates straddling the lower bound of the clinical breakpoint. In contrast, the susceptibility of isolates to cephalosporins was distributed about a mean that resided deep within the susceptible category. This was also true for the quinolone class of antibiotics, with the exception of four outliers that displayed increased MICs to ciprofloxacin, gemifloxacin, and delafloxacin.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Antimicrobial susceptibility of N. gonorrhoeae isolates. (A and B) Clinical isolates (n = 64) were subjected to AST via the disk diffusion method (A) or gradient diffusion (i.e., “Etest”) method (B). Zone-of-inhibition diameters (A) and MICs (B) are shown. Each black circle represents the value for one isolate, and the geometric mean (horizontal black bar) with 95% confidence interval (error bars) for the different treatment groups are shown. For isolates with MICs that were off the measurable scale, a value of 65 mm (disk) or the lowest value (gradient strip) was assigned. Throughout the figure, the breakpoints for each antibiotic are shown by colors: green, susceptible; yellow, intermediate; red, resistant (except for azithromycin, where green represents “wild-type” and red represents “non-wild type.” CLSI breakpoints were used with the following exceptions: doxycycline breakpoints were inferred from tetracycline; gemifloxacin breakpoints were inferred from ciprofloxacin; delafloxacin breakpoints were inferred from ciprofloxacin; and EUCAST breakpoints were used for ceftriaxone. (C) The percentages of isolates that are susceptible (S), intermediate (I), and resistant (R) are shown with the method of susceptibility testing for each drug denoted by a “D” (for disk diffusion) or an “E” (for Etest/gradient diffusion methods) in parentheses after the drug (note that susceptibility results for doxycycline were available for only 63 isolates). (D) Each row in panel D shows the susceptibility profile of a single isolate, with isolates hierarchically clustered by Euclidean distance after assigning a score to each isolate (scores were assigned as follows: 3 for resistant, 2 for intermediate, and 1 for susceptible) to create a matrix. The dendrogram on the left side represents clustering of the individual isolates (n = 64), and the dendrogram above the clustermap represents clustering of the antibiotics (n = 12). The clustermap was generated in python3 with seaborn (https://seaborn.pydata.org/). The method of susceptibility testing for each drug is denoted by a “D” (for disk diffusion) or an “E” (for Etest/gradient diffusion methods). (Note that susceptibility results for doxycycline were available for only 63 isolates.).

The greatest percentage of isolates with nonsusceptible phenotypes (i.e., resistant or intermediate) were found for penicillin (96.9%: 7.8% R, 89.0% I), doxycycline (81.0%), and tetracycline (40.6% by disk diffusion; 78.1% by gradient diffusion) (Fig. 2C). Isolates were highly susceptible to first-line therapy: only 1 isolate of 64 isolates (1.6%) was non-wild-type to azithromycin, and none of the 64 isolates (0%) were resistant to ceftriaxone (or any of the other cephalosporins tested). Among quinolone antibiotics, the highest rate of nonsusceptibility was seen for ciprofloxacin (5/64 [7.8%]), with four of the ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates also testing nonsusceptible to gemifloxacin (4/64 [6.25%]) and displaying increased MICs for delafloxacin. These four isolates also tested nonsusceptible to penicillin, doxycycline, and tetracycline, indicative of a multidrug-resistant phenotype (Fig. 2D).

We also examined categorical agreement between the disk and gradient diffusion methods for tetracycline and ciprofloxacin. Isolates displayed a wide range of susceptibilities to tetracycline, with zone diameter correlating strongly with MIC (R2 = 99% using a least-squares nonlinear fit model; Fig. 3). However, this corresponded to only 40/64 isolates (62.5%) having categorical agreement, with the remaining 24/64 isolates (37.5%) testing susceptible by disk diffusion but intermediate by gradient diffusion. Nonetheless, there were zero major or very major errors for tetracycline disk versus gradient diffusion methods. Isolates with resistance to ciprofloxacin were uncommon; nonetheless, the correlation between zone diameter and MIC was very high (R2 = 99%), as was categorical agreement (100%).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Gradient diffusion versus disk diffusion methods for antimicrobial resistance testing of N. gonorrhoeae isolates. The susceptibility of each isolate to tetracycline and ciprofloxacin was assessed by gradient diffusion and disk diffusion for each antibiotic. MIC, as determined by gradient diffusion, is shown on the y axis (natural log scale) with dashed lines denoting the breakpoints between susceptible (S), intermediate (I), and resistant (R). Disk diameter is shown on the x axis. Colors demarcate zones of categorical concordance between the two test methods (green for S, yellow for I, red for R).

Genetic determinants of antimicrobial resistance in N. gonorrhoeae isolates.

For most of the antibiotics we tested, the zone sizes (or MICs) were not normally distributed (as measured by the D’Agostino-Pearson omnibus normality test; Fig. 2A and B)—a potential indication of acquired resistance genes and/or mutations in a subset of isolates. To explore this observation further, we performed whole-genome sequencing on each isolate. The ResFinder and PointFinder databases were used to identify known genes and mutations (collectively referred to as “resistance determinants”), respectively. We detected several penicillin resistance determinants; however, only acquisition of the blaTEM-1b beta-lactamase gene was consistently associated with penicillin resistance and was found in 100% of penicillin-resistant isolates (Fig. 4A). As expected, the presence of blaTEM-1b was not associated with increased cephalosporin MICs (or reduced zone sizes), nor were any of the other resistance determinants we examined (Fig. 4B).

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Correlation of resistance phenotypes with known resistance determinants in N. gonorrhoeae isolates. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on all clinical isolates (n = 64), and common antimicrobial resistance determinants were identified. Each graph shows the zone of inhibition or MIC for a drug with the corresponding resistance determinants displayed on the x axis. Only determinants that were present in one or more isolates are shown; if an isolate harbored more than one resistance determinant, it is displayed for each determinant. Colors denote breakpoints for each antibiotic: green, susceptible; yellow, intermediate; red, resistant. P values show the results of Mann-Whitney U tests between selected groups. (A) Penicillin; (B) ceftriaxone (results for cefuroxime and cefixime were similar); (C) doxycycline (results for tetracycline were virtually identical); (D) ciprofloxacin (results for delafloxacin and gemifloxacin were similar).

Within the tetracycline class, acquisition of tet(M) was highly associated with resistance to both tetracycline and doxycycline, with all five (100%) resistant isolates containing tet(M) (Fig. 4C). All five isolates resistant to tetracycline also had the rpsJ V57M mutation, but isolates containing the rpsJ mutation yet lacking tet(M) were not resistant.

Only one of five isolates with increased MICs to azithromycin contained an established multidrug resistance determinant (an mtrR promoter mutation), although this particular isolate still met the definition of “wild type.”

The genotype-phenotype correlation for the quinolone antibiotics was less straightforward. All four isolates with known resistance mutations in gyrA and parC were resistant to ciprofloxacin, with the exception of one isolate with a gyrA S91F mutation which was categorized as “intermediate” to ciprofloxacin (MIC = 0.125 μg/ml). This particular isolate contained only the gyrA S91F mutation whereas the other three isolates contained a gyrA D95G mutation in addition to the gyrA S91F mutation (Fig. 4D). Accordingly, the isolate with the lone gyrA S91F mutation was also susceptible to gemifloxacin and delafloxacin, whereas the other isolates containing multiple quinolone resistance determinants tested “intermediate” to gemifloxacin and had increased MICs to delafloxacin. Finally, one isolate contained no known quinolone resistance determinants but repeatedly tested as resistant to ciprofloxacin with increased MICs to gemifloxacin and delafloxacin.

Phylogenetic analysis of N. gonorrhoeae isolates.

To examine relationships between isolates, we constructed a core genome phylogeny using PRANK and raxML on the 1,563 genes shared by the genomes collected in our investigation and the WHO reference strains (18, 19) (Fig. 5). Midpoint rooting of the phylogenetic tree showed that the collected isolates fell within three major clades. WHOF/WHOW strains were in the first cluster, WHOO strain was in the second cluster, and the remaining WHO strains were in the third cluster. To identify putative transmission clusters, we labeled each isolate with its corresponding zip code; however, transmission clusters were not identified. However, we observed associations between resistance determinants and position of the isolates on the phylogenetic tree. blaTEM-1b was located only in isolates within the first cluster, and tet(M) was found only in the second cluster.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Core genome phylogenetic analysis with geographic information and antibiotic resistance determinants. A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed based upon the 1,563 core gene alignment created in PRANK. Bootstrap support values below 90% are shown at the corresponding branch-points. The geographic origin of each isolate (zip code) is denoted by color adjacent to the isolate name. The presence or absence of an antibiotic resistance determinant in a particular isolate is denoted by a colored or blank square, respectively. If resistance determinants in the ResFinder or PointFinder databases were not found in any of the isolates, they are not shown in the figure.

DISCUSSION

Because NAAT is the standard of care for diagnosis of N. gonorrhoeae, clinical isolates for detailed phenotypic and genotypic characterization are scarce. New culture methods facilitated enhanced recovery of N. gonorrhoeae isolates in our laboratory, and subsequently, we characterized 64 patient isolates, including analysis of demography, geography, AST, and whole-genome sequencing.

As expected, the rates of antibiotic resistance to historically used antibiotics such as penicillin and doxycycline were high and were correlated with the presence of the blaTEM-1b and tet(M) genes, respectively. However, almost no resistance to current first-line antibiotics, including azithromycin or drugs in the cephalosporin class was detected, consistent with low rates of resistance to first-line antibiotics reported throughout the United States (1). We also found a relatively low rate of ciprofloxacin resistance (6%) in the N. gonorrhoeae isolates in our study, which is in contrast to the rapid increase in resistance to quinolone antibiotics seen nationwide (approximately 20 to 40% of isolates in 2016, depending on location) (1, 20). However, several of the ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates we identified contained a combination of mutations in the gyrA and parC genes known to confer high-level resistance to ciprofloxacin (15, 21). These isolates also displayed increased MICs to quinolones that have been proposed as next-generation agents to combat multidrug-resistant N. gonorrhoeae—gemifloxacin and delafloxacin—suggesting that determinants of resistance to ciprofloxacin may be poised to rapidly acquire resistance and/or exhibit cross-resistance to other antibiotics in the quinolone class (17, 21). Furthermore, all isolates containing quinolone resistance determinants were also resistant to antibiotics from at least two other classes, suggesting that quinolone resistance may be a marker of multidrug resistance and that this association could be a useful tool as a surrogate for multidrug resistance to incorporate into future molecular diagnostic methods. One limitation of the antimicrobial resistance characterization in our study is that opportunistically available isolates from routine urine cultures could have biased our recovery of antibiotic-resistant organisms.

Given the AST profiles of the N. gonorrhoeae isolates in our study and considering that the majority of patients (57/64 [89%]) received single-dose azithromycin (1 g) plus ceftriaxone (250 mg) at the time of presentation (Table 1), we predict that the cure rate for gonorrhea using empirical treatment in our patient population is high. The high percentage of N. gonorrhoeae-positive cultures that were concurrently diagnosed by NAAT (Table 1) also implies that few additional cases are diagnosed by urine culture. Taken together, these findings suggest that the current standard of care for N. gonorrhoeae diagnosis, NAAT, continues to be appropriate in our patient population, except in cases of suspected treatment failure when cultured isolates are necessary for AST.

Nevertheless, global trends in N. gonorrhoeae antimicrobial resistance portend the need for AST methods that are more accessible than the agar dilution method, which is labor-intensive and performed only in reference laboratories. Studies comparing agar dilution to gradient diffusion devices for several antibiotics have demonstrated acceptable performance characteristics of gradient diffusion devices compared to agar dilution for several antibiotics (2224). We found a high degree of correlation between gradient diffusion and disk diffusion AST results for tetracycline and ciprofloxacin, as reflected by the observed R2 values, suggesting that disk diffusion may also be an acceptable and accessible method of tetracycline and ciprofloxacin resistance testing in N. gonorrhoeae; however, this may require future reassessment of the tetracycline breakpoints. Although no major or very major errors occurred, 24/64 isolates (37.5%) tested susceptible by disk diffusion but intermediate by gradient diffusion.

Given the ongoing challenges of performing AST on N. gonorrhoeae isolates in the clinical setting, direct-from-specimen genotyping, especially when multiplexed with NAAT, could have a major impact on guiding the choice of antimicrobial therapy (25). Indeed, a recent proof-of-concept study showed that ciprofloxacin therapy was 100% effective in curing gonorrhea caused by strains lacking resistance-conferring gyrA mutations (26). Our study adds to a growing body of literature demonstrating strong associations between specific genotypic markers and resistance to several antibiotics [i.e., blaTEM-1b for penicillin, tet(M) for tetracyclines, and gyrA with or without parC for quinolones], suggesting that additional genetic targets—via a targeted or whole-genome sequencing approach—may enable the effective use of antimicrobials that are no longer appropriate for use as empirical therapy (2729). However, our identification of one ciprofloxacin-resistant isolate lacking any known quinolone resistance determinants highlights the current limitations of this approach and the need for ongoing efforts to interrogate the resistome of N. gonorrhoeae strains and expand the repository of genetic determinants of phenotypic resistance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethics statement.

Prior to study initiation, this investigation was reviewed by the institutional review board at the Washington University School of Medicine and approved with a waiver of consent.

Clinical isolates.

Growth of bacterial isolates from clinical specimens identified as N. gonorrhoeae by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization−time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) using the BioTyper (Bruker Corporation) were frozen at −80°C in reconstituted powdered milk. Prior to antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) and sequencing, isolates were thawed and subcultured twice on chocolate agar (Hardy Diagnostics) incubated at 35°C ± 2°C with 5% CO2, and the organism identification was confirmed with Vitek MS MALDI-TOF MS (bioMérieux). Patient characteristics such as age, sex, coinfections, and zip code of residence, were obtained from retrospective review of the electronic medical record.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

After two subcultures, plates containing GC II agar with IsoVitaleX enrichment (Becton-Dickinson) were inoculated with a 0.5 McFarland direct-colony suspension of each isolate. The plates were incubated at 35°C ± 2°C with 5% CO2 and read by two independent readers after 24 h of incubation. Quality control was performed each day of testing (N. gonorrhoeae ATCC 49226 and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922).

For AST results, results from two independent readers were averaged and then rounded up to the nearest doubling dilution (gradient diffusion method only). For isolates with AST values that were off the measurable scale, a value of 65 mm (disk) or the lowest value on the gradient strip was assigned as the value for the purpose of analysis. Categorical results were determined by comparing these results to established clinical breakpoint criteria from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100-S29 document (30) with the following exceptions. Doxycycline breakpoints were inferred from tetracycline (30). Gemifloxacin and delafloxacin breakpoints were inferred from ciprofloxacin (30). The recently published CLSI M100-S29 breakpoint was used for azithromycin (30). The European Union Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints (31) were used for ceftriaxone. Additional information on AST devices, including manufacturer and breakpoint criteria, can be found in Table S1 in the supplemental material.

TABLE S1

Information on antimicrobial susceptibility testing performed in this study. Download Table S1, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (10.8KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2019 Bailey et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Whole-genome sequencing and analysis.

Sample preparation, sequencing, and sequence analysis were performed as described previously (32) using 12 World Health Organization (WHO) reference genomes (18) (Table S2). Genomic DNA was obtained from pure N. gonorrhoeae cultures using the QIAmp BiOstic Bacteremia DNA kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA), and 0.5 ng of genomic DNA was used to create sequencing libraries with the Nextera kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) (33). Samples were pooled and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq to obtain 2 × 150 bp reads. The raw reads and Illumina adapters were removed with trimmomatic v.38, and contaminating DNA was removed with DeconSeq v.4.3 (34, 35). Processed reads were used to de novo assemble scaffolds with SPAdes v3.13.0 (36). Quality statistics were obtained with QUAST v4.5, and protein-coding sequences were identified with prokka v1.12 (Table S3) (37, 38). Of 64 genomes, 61 passed in silico quality assessment and were used in genomic analysis. We additionally gathered World Health Organization (WHO) reference N. gonorrhoeae genomes and identified all protein-coding sequences with prokka (18). Coding sequences were clustered at 95% identity with roary v3.12.0, and the 1,563 core genes were used to create a core genome alignment with PRANK v1.0 (19, 39). The core genome alignment was converted to a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree with RAxML and viewed in iToL with an overlay showing zip code and identified resistance determinant (40, 41). Vertically transmitted mutations associated with antimicrobial resistance were identified with the N. gonorrhoeae database using PointFinder v4.0 on the scaffolds.fasta file from SPAdes. Acquired antibiotic resistance genes were identified with ResFinder v4.0 (42).

TABLE S2

Genomes analyzed in this study. Download Table S2, XLSX file, 0.07 MB (73.1KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2019 Bailey et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S3

Quality metrics for genomic assemblies in this study. Download Table S3, XLSX file, 0.04 MB (36.2KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2019 Bailey et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Data analysis.

Data were tabulated in Excel (Microsoft), where demographic and summary statistics were calculated. Data were then imported into Prism version 7 (GraphPad) for graphing and group comparisons. All statistical methods are described in the corresponding figure legends. Color overlays and final figures were prepared in Illustrator CC 2017 (Adobe).

Data availability.

All genomes used in this study have been deposited into the NCBI Whole Genome Shotgun Database associated with BioProject accession no. PRJNA504667.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the staff of the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Microbiology Laboratory for their ongoing efforts to serve our patients. We thank the Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences & Systems Biology staff Eric Martin, Brian Koebbe, Jess Hoisington-Lopez, and MariaLynn Jaeger for operation of the High Throughput Computing Facility and performing the Illumina sequencing.

This study was supported in part by internal funding to C.-A.D.B. and G.D. and in part by awards to G.D. through the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers R01AI123394 and R01HD092414, respectively. R.F.P. was supported by a National Institute of General Medical Sciences training grant through award T32 GM007067 (principal investigator [PI], James Skeath) and the Monsanto/Bayer Excellence Fund graduate fellowship.

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies.

We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2016. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2016. Division of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
  • 2.Turner CF, Rogers SM, Miller HG, Miller WC, Gribble JN, Chromy JR, Leone PA, Cooley PC, Quinn TC, Zenilman JM. 2002. Untreated gonococcal and chlamydial infection in a probability sample of adults. JAMA 287:726–733. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.6.726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Whittington WL, Knapp JS. 1988. Trends in resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to antimicrobial agents in the United States. Sex Transm Dis 15:202–210. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198810000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schwarcz SK, Zenilman JM, Schnell D, Knapp JS, Hook EW III, Thompson S, Judson FN, Holmes KK. 1990. National surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. The Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project. JAMA 264:1413–1417. doi: 10.1001/jama.1990.03450110059027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2012. Update to CDC’s Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines, 2010: oral cephalosporins no longer a recommended treatment for gonococcal infections. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 61:590–594. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Workowski KA, Bolan GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2015. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep 64:1–137. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2013. Antibiotic resistant threats in the United States, 2013. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Johnson RE, Newhall WJ, Papp JR, Knapp JS, Black CM, Gift TL, Steece R, Markowitz LE, Devine OJ, Walsh CM, Wang S, Gunter DC, Irwin KL, DeLisle S, Berman SM. 2002. Screening tests to detect Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections–2002. MMWR Recomm Rep 51:1–38, quiz CE1-4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2014. Recommendations for the laboratory-based detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae–2014. MMWR Recomm Rep 63:1–19. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2015. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2015: gonococcal isolate surveillance project (GISP) supplements and profiles. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yin YP, Han Y, Dai XQ, Zheng HP, Chen SC, Zhu BY, Yong G, Zhong N, Hu LH, Cao WL, Zheng ZJ, Wang F, Zhi Q, Zhu XY, Chen XS. 2018. Susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to azithromycin and ceftriaxone in China: a retrospective study of national surveillance data from 2013 to 2016. PLoS Med 15:e1002499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grad YH, Harris SR, Kirkcaldy RD, Green AG, Marks DS, Bentley SD, Trees D, Lipsitch M. 2016. Genomic epidemiology of gonococcal resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones in the United States, 2000-2013. J Infect Dis 214:1579–1587. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Barbee LA, Soge OO, Katz DA, Dombrowski JC, Holmes KK, Golden MR. 2018. Increases in Neisseria gonorrhoeae with reduced susceptibility to azithromycin among men who have sex with men in Seattle, King County, Washington, 2012-2016. Clin Infect Dis 66:712–718. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Katz AR. 2018. Ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Canada, 2017. Emerg Infect Dis 24:608. doi: 10.3201/eid2403.171892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Unemo M, Shafer WM. 2014. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the 21st century: past, evolution, and future. Clin Microbiol Rev 27:587–613. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00010-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lainhart W, Burnham CA. 2018. Enhanced recovery of fastidious organisms from urine culture in the setting of total laboratory automation. J Clin Microbiol 56:e00546-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00546-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lancaster JW, Mahoney MV, Mandal S, Lawrence KR. 2015. Update on treatment options for gonococcal infections. Pharmacotherapy 35:856–868. doi: 10.1002/phar.1627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Unemo M, Golparian D, Sánchez-Busó L, Grad Y, Jacobsson S, Ohnishi M, Lahra MM, Limnios A, Sikora AE, Wi T, Harris SR. 2016. The novel 2016 WHO Neisseria gonorrhoeae reference strains for global quality assurance of laboratory investigations: phenotypic, genetic and reference genome characterization. J Antimicrob Chemother 71:3096–3108. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Löytynoja A. 2014. Phylogeny-aware alignment with PRANK. Methods Mol Biol 1079:155–170. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-646-7_10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bhatti AA, Allan-Blitz LT, Castrejon M, Humphries RM, Hemarajata P, Klausner JD. 2017. Epidemiology of Neisseria gonorrhoeae gyrase A genotype, Los Angeles, California, USA. Emerg Infect Dis 23:1581–1584. doi: 10.3201/eid2309.170215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Belland RJ, Morrison SG, Ison C, Huang WM. 1994. Neisseria gonorrhoeae acquires mutations in analogous regions of gyrA and parC in fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates. Mol Microbiol 14:371–380. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb01297.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Biedenbach DJ, Jones RN. 1996. Comparative assessment of Etest for testing susceptibilities of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to penicillin, tetracycline, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, and ciprofloxacin: investigation using 510(k) review criteria, recommended by the Food and Drug Administration. J Clin Microbiol 34:3214–3217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu H, Taylor TH, Pettus K, Trees D. 2014. Assessment of Etest as an alternative to agar dilution for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Clin Microbiol 52:1435–1440. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02131-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jönsson A, Jacobsson S, Foerster S, Cole MJ, Unemo M. 2018. Performance characteristics of newer MIC gradient strip tests compared with the Etest for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. APMIS 126:822–827. doi: 10.1111/apm.12887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Buono SA, Watson TD, Borenstein LA, Klausner JD, Pandori MW, Godwin HA. 2015. Stemming the tide of drug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae: the need for an individualized approach to treatment. J Antimicrob Chemother 70:374–381. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Allan-Blitz LT, Hemarajata P, Humphries RM, Kimble M, Elias S, Klausner JD. 2018. Ciprofloxacin may be efficacious in treating wild-type gyrase A genotype Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections. Sex Transm Dis 45:e18. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ilina EN, Vereshchagin VA, Borovskaya AD, Malakhova MV, Sidorenko SV, Al-Khafaji NC, Kubanova AA, Govorun VM. 2008. Relation between genetic markers of drug resistance and susceptibility profile of clinical Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:2175–2182. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01420-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wong LK, Hemarajata P, Soge OO, Humphries RM, Klausner JD. 2017. Real-time PCR targeting the penA mosaic XXXIV type for prediction of extended-spectrum-cephalosporin susceptibility in clinical Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e01339-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01339-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nicol M, Whiley D, Nulsen M, Bromhead C. 2015. Direct detection of markers associated with Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial resistance in New Zealand using residual DNA from the Cobas 4800 CT/NG NAAT assay. Sex Transm Infect 91:91–93. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2014-051632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2019. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 29th ed. CLSI supplement M100. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 2018. Clinical breakpoints – bacteria (v8.1). European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST).
  • 32.Potter RF, D’Souza AW, Wallace MA, Shupe A, Patel S, Gul D, Kwon JH, Beatty W, Andleeb S, Burnham C-AD, Dantas G. 2018. Superficieibacter electus gen. nov., sp. nov., an extended-spectrum β-lactamase possessing member of the Enterobacteriaceae family, isolated from intensive care unit surfaces. Front Microbiol 9:1629. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Baym M, Kryazhimskiy S, Lieberman TD, Chung H, Desai MM, Kishony R. 2015. Inexpensive multiplexed library preparation for megabase-sized genomes. PLoS One 10:e0128036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Schmieder R, Edwards R. 2011. Fast identification and removal of sequence contamination from genomic and metagenomic datasets. PLoS One 6:e17288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MT, Fookes M, Falush D, Keane JA, Parkhill J. 2015. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 31:3691–3693. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Letunic I, Bork P. 2007. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Bioinformatics 23:127–128. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, Lund O, Aarestrup FM, Larsen MV. 2012. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2640–2644. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

TABLE S1

Information on antimicrobial susceptibility testing performed in this study. Download Table S1, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (10.8KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2019 Bailey et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S2

Genomes analyzed in this study. Download Table S2, XLSX file, 0.07 MB (73.1KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2019 Bailey et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S3

Quality metrics for genomic assemblies in this study. Download Table S3, XLSX file, 0.04 MB (36.2KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2019 Bailey et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Data Availability Statement

All genomes used in this study have been deposited into the NCBI Whole Genome Shotgun Database associated with BioProject accession no. PRJNA504667.


Articles from mSphere are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES