Shigella spp. are the most common cause of dysentery in developing countries and the second leading cause of diarrheal deaths worldwide. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Shigella spp. are a serious threat to global health. Herein, we report draft genome sequences for three MDR Shigella isolates from Pakistan, two Shigella flexneri isolates and one Shigella sonnei isolate.
ABSTRACT
Shigella spp. are the most common cause of dysentery in developing countries and the second leading cause of diarrheal deaths worldwide. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Shigella spp. are a serious threat to global health. Herein, we report draft genome sequences for three MDR Shigella isolates from Pakistan, two Shigella flexneri isolates and one Shigella sonnei isolate.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Among the Enterobacteriaceae, the genus Shigella is composed of four species (Shigella dysenteriae, Shigella flexneri, Shigella boydii, and Shigella sonnei) that cause severe diarrhea (1). Shigellosis is the most common cause of dysentery in developing countries and the second leading cause of diarrheal deaths worldwide (1). Rarely, Shigella spp. can also cause bacteremia, usually in children and immunocompromised adults (2, 3). The emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among Shigella spp. increasingly threatens the clinical management of shigellosis (4, 5). Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Shigella spp. are a serious threat to global health (6).
We report the draft genome sequences of three MDR Shigella isolates from Pakistan. The S. flexneri isolates were acquired from blood in 2015 (CFSAN059650) or stool (CFSAN059651 [original collection date unavailable]). The S. sonnei isolate (CFSAN059652) was obtained from stool in 2016. The isolates were obtained using standard culture methods, including growth on MacConkey agar, and identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed with the API 20E system and disk diffusion method (both bioMérieux), respectively (7). The results were confirmed with the Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux) and conventional broth microdilution (8). All isolates were resistant to ampicillin, cefazolin, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline. CFSAN059651 was resistant to cefepime, aztreonam, ampicillin-sulbactam, and chloramphenicol. CFSAN059650 and CFSAN059652 exhibited intermediate resistance against ciprofloxacin and ampicillin-sulbactam or against aztreonam and ceftazidime, respectively. Isolates were grown overnight in lysogeny broth (Lennox) at 37°C prior to DNA extraction using the DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen). DNA libraries were prepared via the Nextera XT DNA library kit (Illumina). Sequencing was performed on an Illumina MiSeq platform using the MiSeq reagent kit v2 (2 × 250-bp paired-end reads). Minimum average coverage (>50×) and read 1 (R1)/read 2 (R2) Q scores (>26) were set to ensure sequence quality. Sequence integrity (i.e., absence of contamination) was evaluated with Kraken (9, 10). Unless otherwise noted, default parameters were used in all analyses. De novo genome assemblies were created with Shovill 0.9 (https://github.com/tseemann/shovill), available in GalaxyTrakr (https://www.galaxytrakr.org) (11). The “trim reads” option was selected, and the minimum contig length was set at 500 bp. The draft genomes were submitted for annotation to the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (12). The number of reads, number of contigs, genome size, and GC content for each isolate are listed in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Species and CFSAN IDb | NCBI BioSample accession no. | Yr of isolation | No. of contigs | Total length (bp) | N50 (bp) | GC content (%) | Genome coverage (×) | Coverage read count | Avg read quality (Q score [R1, R2]) | SRR accession no. | WGS accession no.c |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shigella flexneri | |||||||||||
CFSAN059650 | SAMN10086692 | 2015 | 356 | 4,629,951 | 33,749 | 50.55 | 52 | 1,021,504 | 32, 26.6 | SRR8836963 | SSML00000000 |
CFSAN059651 | SAMN10086664 | NAd | 359 | 4,620,515 | 31,916 | 50.45 | 69 | 1,373,334 | 32, 27 | SRR8836950 | SSMK00000000 |
Shigella sonnei | |||||||||||
CFSAN059652 | SAMN10086663 | 2016 | 384 | 4,528,736 | 25,093 | 50.85 | 71 | 1,388,868 | 32, 26.9 | SRR8837012 | SSMJ00000000 |
All three clinical isolates belong to NCBI BioProject number PRJNA342326.
ID, identifier.
WGS, whole-genome sequencing.
NA, not available.
ResFinder (13) was used to determine isolate sequence types (STs) based on in silico multilocus sequence typing (MLST) (14) and to identify AMR genes showing >99% identity to the reference gene sequences. The two S. flexneri isolates belonged to ST245, and the S. sonnei isolate belonged to ST152. CFSAN059650, CFSAN059651, and CFSAN059652 were found to harbor 10, 8, and 7 known AMR genes, respectively. All Shigella isolates carried drfA1, sul2, a CTX-M gene, and a tet gene. All isolates possessed AMR genes conferring resistance to β-lactams, aminoglycosides, trimethoprim, sulfonamides, and tetracyclines. Additional genes involved in resistance to fluoroquinolones (CFSAN059650 and CFSAN059652) or phenicol (CFSAN059651) were also observed. The data provided here offer a comparative genetic context for AMR in Shigella spp. that will inform infectious diseases epidemiology and be useful in public health monitoring.
Data availability.
The genome assemblies described herein are available in DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under accession numbers SSMJ00000000, SSMK00000000, and SSML00000000. The versions here are the first versions. Other accession number data are presented in Table 1.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
S.L. received support by appointment to the Research Participation Program at the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (https://orise.orau.gov/) through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. This work was also supported by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Science and Technology Directorate (interagency agreement contract number HSHQPM-17-X-00057). M.A.C. and M.A.H. received additional support from U.S. National Institutes of Health grant R21 AI139947.
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.
REFERENCES
- 1.Kotloff KL, Riddle MS, Platts-Mills JA, Pavlinac P, Zaidi A. 2018. Shigellosis. Lancet 391:801–812. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33296-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sharma S, Arora A. 2012. Shigella flexneri bacteremia in adult. J Lab Physicians 4:65–66. doi: 10.4103/0974-2727.98682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shogbesan O, Rettew A, Shaikh B, Abdulkareem A, Donato A. 2017. Shigella sonnei bacteremia presenting with profound hepatic dysfunction. Case Rep Gastrointest Med 2017:7293281. doi: 10.1155/2017/7293281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ashkenazi S, Levy I, Kazaronovski V, Samra Z. 2003. Growing antimicrobial resistance of Shigella isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother 51:427–429. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schwartz KL, Morris SK. 2018. Travel and the spread of drug-resistant bacteria. Curr Infect Dis Rep 20:29. doi: 10.1007/s11908-018-0634-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.CDC. 2013. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2013. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, Atlanta, GA: https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/ar-threats-2013-508.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Khan E, Ejaz M, Zafar A, Jabeen K, Shakoor S, Inayat R, Hasan R. 2010. Increased isolation of ESBL producing Klebsiella pneumoniae with emergence of carbapenem resistant isolates in Pakistan: report from a tertiary care hospital. J Pak Med Assoc 60:186–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.CLSI. 2017. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 27th informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S. CLSI, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Timme RE, Sanchez Leon M, Allard MW. 2019. Utilizing the public GenomeTrakr database for foodborne pathogen traceback In Bridier A. (ed), Foodborne bacterial pathogens. Methods in molecular biology, vol 1918. Humana Press, New York, NY. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wood DE, Salzberg SL. 2014. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol 15:R46. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Afgan E, Baker D, Batut B, van den Beek M, Bouvier D, Čech M, Chilton J, Clements D, Coraor N, Grüning BA, Guerler A, Hillman-Jackson J, Hiltemann S, Jalili V, Rasche H, Soranzo N, Goecks J, Taylor J, Nekrutenko A, Blankenberg D. 2018. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W537–W544. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, Lund O, Aarestrup FM, Larsen MV. 2012. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2640–2644. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Larsen MV, Cosentino S, Rasmussen S, Friis C, Hasman H, Marvig RL, Jelsbak L, Sicheritz-Pontén T, Ussery DW, Aarestrup FM, Lund O. 2012. Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 50:1355–1361. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06094-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The genome assemblies described herein are available in DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under accession numbers SSMJ00000000, SSMK00000000, and SSML00000000. The versions here are the first versions. Other accession number data are presented in Table 1.