Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2019 May 24;75(Pt 6):872–874. doi: 10.1107/S2056989019007175

Crystal structure of butane-1,4-diyl bis­(furan-2-carboxyl­ate)

Mitsutoshi Hoshide a, Hyuma Masu b, Yuji Sasanuma a,*
PMCID: PMC6658970  PMID: 31391985

The asymmetric unit of the title compound consists of one half-mol­ecule, the whole all-trans mol­ecule being generated by an inversion centre. In the crystal, the mol­ecules inter­connected by C—H⋯O and C—H⋯π inter­actions.

Keywords: crystal structure; model compound of poly(butyl­ene 2,5-furandi­carboxyl­ate); all-trans structure; C—H⋯O hydrogen bond; C—H⋯π inter­action

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C14H14O6, a monomeric compound of poly(butyl­ene 2,5-furandi­carboxyl­ate), consists of one half-mol­ecule, the whole all-trans mol­ecule being generated by an inversion centre. In the crystal, the mol­ecules are inter­connected via C—H⋯O inter­actions, forming a mol­ecular sheet parallel to (10Inline graphic). The mol­ecular sheets are further linked by C—H⋯π inter­actions.

Chemical context  

To suppress global warming, materials derived from fossil fuels have been attempted to be replaced with plant-based products. For example, plant-derived furan-2,5-di­carb­oxy­lic acid is expected to be substituted for terephthalic acid, raw materials of aromatic polyesters such as poly(ethyl­ene terephthalate) and poly(butyl­ene terephthalate) (abbreviated herein as PBT) (Gandini et al., 2016); therefore, in the future, the substitute for PBT will possibly be poly(butyl­ene 2,5-furandi­carboxyl­ate) (PBF), the alternate copolymer of furan-2,5-di­carb­oxy­lic acid and butane-1,4-diol.

The ultimate mechanical stiffness of polymers mostly corresponds to the crystalline modulus in the chain-axis direction at 0 K and depends largely on the chain conformation (Kurita et al., 2018). Therefore, it is of significance to determine conformations of polymers in crystal and to relate such structural information to their mechanical properties. PBT is known to exhibit two crystal structures of α and β forms (Yokouchi et al., 1976; Desborough & Hall, 1977). The α form adopts gauche + (g +), gauche + (g +), trans (t), gauche (g ) and gauche (g ) conformations in the O—CH2—CH2—CH2—CH2—O unit (referred hereafter to as the spacer), while the β form has a near all-trans spacer. It is known that mechanical stresses induce the α-to-β transformation, which will absorb impact and avoid fracture. Owing to such remarkable structural characteristics, PBT has been used for engineering plastics superior in impact resistance.

Single crystal X-ray structure analysis of butane-1,4-diyl dibenzoate (BT), a model compound of PBT, showed that its spacer lies in a tgttt conformation different from that of PBT (Palmer et al., 1985). A powder X-ray diffraction study on PBF (Zhu et al., 2013) has estimated dihedral angles of its spacer to be 180° (trans), 66° (+synclinal), 99° (+anti­clinal), 124° (+anti­clinal) and 148° (+anti­clinal) and hence quite different from those of PBT and BT. In this study, we have conducted a single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiment on a model compound of PBF, butane-1,4-diyl bis­(furan-2-carboxyl­ate) (BF), to investigate its spacer conformation and inter­molecular inter­actions and compare them with those of PBF, BT and PBT.graphic file with name e-75-00872-scheme1.jpg

Structural commentary  

The BF spacer of the title compound adopts an all-trans conformation (Fig. 1), which is different from those of PBF as well as PBT and BT. The unit cell includes four mol­ecules, each of which is located on an inversion centre, and hence one half-mol­ecule corresponds to the asymmetric unit. The furan O1/C1–C4 ring is planar, while the carb­oxy O2/C5/O3 plane is slightly twisted form the furan ring, with a dihedral angle of 4.00 (15)°.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, showing the atom-labelling scheme. Atoms with suffix a are generated by the symmetry operation (−x + Inline graphic, −y + Inline graphic, −z). Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms are represented by spheres of arbitrary size.

Supra­molecular features  

In the crystal, the BF mol­ecules are inter­connected by C—H⋯O inter­actions (Table 1) to form a mol­ecular sheet parallel to (10Inline graphic) (Fig. 2). The sheets are further linked via a C—H⋯π inter­action (Table 1 and Fig. 3), forming a three-dimensional network. In the BT crystal (Palmer et al., 1985), the benzene rings face to each other to form inter­molecular π–π inter­actions with centroid–centroid distances of 4.169 (2) and 3.910 (2) Å. In addition, the benzene rings act as donors in C—H⋯π inter­actions. As stated above, BF seems to prefer the C—H⋯O inter­actions and adopt a spacer conformation so as to fulfill the C—H⋯O inter­actions efficiently, whereas BT and PBT (Yokouchi et al., 1976; Desborough & Hall, 1977) tend to adapt a spacer conformation to form π–π inter­actions.

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

Cg1 is the centroid of the O1/C1–C4 ring.

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C3—H3⋯O2i 0.95 2.41 3.3526 (15) 174
C4—H4⋯O1ii 0.95 2.60 3.4142 (18) 145
C4—H4⋯O2ii 0.95 2.49 3.317 (2) 146
C6—H6BCg1iii 0.99 2.66 3.5869 (16) 156

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A packing diagram of the title compound, showing the mol­ecular sheet formed by C—H⋯O inter­actions (blue lines).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

A packing diagram of the title compound, showing the inter­molecular C—H⋯π inter­actions (blue dotted lines) between the mol­ecular sheets.

Database survey  

A search in the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.40, last update February 2019; Groom et al., 2016) for BF itself gave only one similar compound, PBF (Zhu et al., 2013), mentioned above. Although a search for dimethyl furan-2,5-di­carboxyl­ate (DMF-2,5-DC) gave no hits, 20 compounds related to furan-2,5-di­carb­oxy­lic acid (FDCA) were suggested as similar compounds. They are FDCA itself (Martuscelli & Pedone, 1968) and complexes including FDCA. The crystal structure of dimethyl furan-2,4-di­carboxyl­ate (DMF-2,4-DC) was reported (Thiyagarajan et al., 2013). DMF-2,4-DC forms π–π inter­actions between the furan rings with centroid–centroid distances of 3.6995 (12) and 3.7684 (14) Å, and C—H⋯O inter­actions [C⋯O = 3.333 (2), 3.276 (3) and 3.465 (2) Å]. The dihedral angles between the carb­oxy group and the furan ring are 1.11–5.86°.

Synthesis and crystallization  

Furan-2-carbonyl chloride (2.2 ml, 22 mmol) was added dropwise under a nitro­gen atmosphere to butane-1,4-diol (0.89 ml, 10 mmol) and pyridine (6.0 ml) put in a three-necked flask dipped in ice–water and stirred at room temperature for 28 h. The reaction mixture was extracted with chloro­form (10 ml) and water (10 ml), and the organic layer was washed thrice with aqueous sodium bicarbonate (10%), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate overnight and filtrated. The filtrate was condensed on a rotary evaporator, and the residue was dried in vacuo and identified by 1H and 13C NMR as BF (yield 73%).

A small amount of BF was dissolved in benzene in a small phial, which was put in a larger phial including a small volume of n-hexane. The outer vessel was capped and stood still. After a few weeks, single crystals were found to precipitate at the bottom of the inner phial.

Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. All H atoms were geometrically positioned with C—H = 0.95 and 0.99 Å for the aromatic and methyl­ene groups, respectively, and were refined as riding with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C).

Table 2. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula C14H14O6
M r 278.25
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K) 173
a, b, c (Å) 16.1298 (17), 7.8773 (8), 13.5247 (14)
β (°) 123.6698 (12)
V3) 1430.2 (3)
Z 4
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.10
Crystal size (mm) 0.40 × 0.20 × 0.20
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker APEXII CCD area detector
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
T min, T max 0.94, 0.98
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 3968, 1625, 1254
R int 0.038
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.650
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.041, 0.098, 1.03
No. of reflections 1625
No. of parameters 91
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.40, −0.25

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2013), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL2013 (Sheldrick, 2015), XSHEL (Bruker, 2013), PLATON (Spek, 2009) and XCIF (Bruker, 2013).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019007175/is5514sup1.cif

e-75-00872-sup1.cif (134.3KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019007175/is5514Isup3.hkl

e-75-00872-Isup3.hkl (131.4KB, hkl)

CCDC reference: 1916720

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

C14H14O6 F(000) = 584
Mr = 278.25 Dx = 1.292 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 16.1298 (17) Å Cell parameters from 1288 reflections
b = 7.8773 (8) Å θ = 3.0–26.3°
c = 13.5247 (14) Å µ = 0.10 mm1
β = 123.6698 (12)° T = 173 K
V = 1430.2 (3) Å3 Prismatic, colourless
Z = 4 0.40 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD area detector diffractometer 1625 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1254 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.038
Detector resolution: 8.3333 pixels mm-1 θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.0°
φ and ω scans h = −20→19
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) k = −9→10
Tmin = 0.94, Tmax = 0.98 l = −17→16
3968 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 0 restraints
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.098 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0485P)2 + 0.4241P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.03 (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1625 reflections Δρmax = 0.40 e Å3
91 parameters Δρmin = −0.25 e Å3

Special details

Experimental. SADABS (Sheldrick, 1996)
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C1 1.06223 (8) 0.66487 (14) 0.16074 (10) 0.0256 (3)
C2 1.01643 (9) 0.81730 (15) 0.13072 (12) 0.0327 (3)
H2 0.9468 0.8379 0.0893 0.039*
C3 1.09319 (10) 0.94116 (16) 0.17360 (12) 0.0374 (3)
H3 1.085 1.0609 0.1664 0.045*
C4 1.17928 (10) 0.85557 (16) 0.22604 (12) 0.0362 (3)
H4 1.243 0.907 0.2627 0.043*
C5 1.02744 (8) 0.48957 (14) 0.14292 (10) 0.0246 (3)
C6 0.88565 (9) 0.31465 (14) 0.06770 (11) 0.0287 (3)
H6A 0.9159 0.2497 0.1427 0.034*
H6B 0.8977 0.2524 0.0132 0.034*
C7 0.77555 (9) 0.33626 (15) 0.01192 (12) 0.0318 (3)
H7A 0.7459 0.3994 −0.0637 0.038*
H7B 0.7646 0.4033 0.0656 0.038*
O1 1.16329 (6) 0.68497 (10) 0.21987 (8) 0.0318 (2)
O2 1.08020 (6) 0.36607 (10) 0.17085 (8) 0.0341 (2)
O3 0.92865 (6) 0.48359 (10) 0.09086 (8) 0.0318 (2)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
C1 0.0210 (6) 0.0253 (6) 0.0304 (6) −0.0036 (4) 0.0142 (5) −0.0020 (5)
C2 0.0278 (6) 0.0268 (6) 0.0433 (7) 0.0012 (5) 0.0198 (6) 0.0003 (5)
C3 0.0427 (8) 0.0207 (6) 0.0519 (8) −0.0041 (5) 0.0281 (7) −0.0042 (5)
C4 0.0341 (7) 0.0272 (7) 0.0473 (8) −0.0128 (5) 0.0225 (6) −0.0096 (6)
C5 0.0222 (6) 0.0245 (6) 0.0273 (6) −0.0033 (4) 0.0139 (5) −0.0009 (4)
C6 0.0254 (6) 0.0240 (6) 0.0351 (7) −0.0087 (4) 0.0157 (5) −0.0029 (5)
C7 0.0247 (6) 0.0305 (7) 0.0362 (7) −0.0065 (5) 0.0144 (5) 0.0005 (5)
O1 0.0225 (4) 0.0247 (5) 0.0435 (5) −0.0055 (3) 0.0154 (4) −0.0040 (4)
O2 0.0270 (5) 0.0219 (5) 0.0486 (6) −0.0008 (3) 0.0180 (4) −0.0007 (4)
O3 0.0216 (5) 0.0248 (5) 0.0450 (5) −0.0056 (3) 0.0160 (4) −0.0008 (4)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

C1—C2 1.3490 (16) C5—O2 1.2070 (14)
C1—O1 1.3698 (14) C5—O3 1.3390 (14)
C1—C5 1.4594 (15) C6—O3 1.4524 (13)
C2—C3 1.4230 (17) C6—C7 1.5054 (17)
C2—H2 0.95 C6—H6A 0.99
C3—C4 1.3394 (18) C6—H6B 0.99
C3—H3 0.95 C7—C7i 1.528 (2)
C4—O1 1.3622 (14) C7—H7A 0.99
C4—H4 0.95 C7—H7B 0.99
C2—C1—O1 110.40 (10) O3—C6—C7 107.10 (9)
C2—C1—C5 134.13 (11) O3—C6—H6A 110.3
O1—C1—C5 115.46 (10) C7—C6—H6A 110.3
C1—C2—C3 106.27 (11) O3—C6—H6B 110.3
C1—C2—H2 126.9 C7—C6—H6B 110.3
C3—C2—H2 126.9 H6A—C6—H6B 108.5
C4—C3—C2 106.44 (11) C6—C7—C7i 110.71 (13)
C4—C3—H3 126.8 C6—C7—H7A 109.5
C2—C3—H3 126.8 C7i—C7—H7A 109.5
C3—C4—O1 111.02 (11) C6—C7—H7B 109.5
C3—C4—H4 124.5 C7i—C7—H7B 109.5
O1—C4—H4 124.5 H7A—C7—H7B 108.1
O2—C5—O3 124.28 (10) C4—O1—C1 105.87 (9)
O2—C5—C1 124.83 (10) C5—O3—C6 115.62 (9)
O3—C5—C1 110.89 (10)
O1—C1—C2—C3 −0.07 (14) O1—C1—C5—O3 176.33 (9)
C1—C2—C3—C4 0.03 (15) C1—C5—O3—C6 179.42 (9)
C2—C3—C4—O1 0.02 (15) C7—C6—O3—C5 178.85 (10)
C3—C4—O1—C1 −0.06 (14) O3—C6—C7—C7i −178.14 (12)
C2—C1—O1—C4 0.08 (14) C5—C1—C2—C3 −179.47 (13)
O1—C1—C5—O2 −3.87 (17) C5—C1—O1—C4 179.61 (10)
C2—C1—C5—O2 175.50 (14) O2—C5—O3—C6 −0.38 (17)
C2—C1—C5—O3 −4.3 (2)

Symmetry code: (i) −x+3/2, −y+1/2, −z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

Cg1 is the centroid of the O1/C1–C4 ring.

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
C3—H3···O2ii 0.95 2.41 3.3526 (15) 174
C4—H4···O1iii 0.95 2.60 3.4142 (18) 145
C4—H4···O2iii 0.95 2.49 3.317 (2) 146
C6—H6B···Cg1iv 0.99 2.66 3.5869 (16) 156

Symmetry codes: (ii) x, y+1, z; (iii) −x+5/2, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (iv) −x+2, −y+1, −z.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science grant 16K05906.

References

  1. Bruker (2013). APEX2, SAINT, XCIF and XSHEL. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Desborough, I. J. & Hall, I. H. (1977). Polymer, 18, 825–830.
  3. Gandini, A., Lacerda, T. M., Carvalho, A. J. F. & Trovatti, E. (2016). Chem. Rev. 116, 1637–1669. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Kurita, T., Fukuda, Y., Takahashi, M. & Sasanuma, Y. (2018). ACS Omega, 3, 4824–4835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Martuscelli, E. & Pedone, C. (1968). Acta Cryst. B24, 175–179.
  7. Palmer, A., Poulin-Dandurand, S. & Brisse, F. (1985). Can. J. Chem. 63, 3079–3088.
  8. Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany.
  9. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  11. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  12. Thiyagarajan, S., Pukin, A., van Haveren, J., Lutz, M. & van Es, D. S. (2013). RSC Adv. 3, 15678–15686.
  13. Yokouchi, M., Sakakibara, Y., Chatani, Y., Tadokoro, H., Tanaka, T. & Yoda, K. (1976). Macromolecules, 9, 266–273.
  14. Zhu, J., Cai, J., Xie, W., Chen, P.-H., Gazzano, M., Scandola, M. & Gross, R. A. (2013). Macromolecules, 46, 796–804.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019007175/is5514sup1.cif

e-75-00872-sup1.cif (134.3KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019007175/is5514Isup3.hkl

e-75-00872-Isup3.hkl (131.4KB, hkl)

CCDC reference: 1916720

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES