Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Oncol Nurs. 2019 Jun 20;35(4):380–383. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2019.06.012

Family Caregivers’ Unmet Needs in Long-term Cancer Survivorship

Youngmee Kim 1, Charles S Carver 1, Amanda Ting 1
PMCID: PMC6660396  NIHMSID: NIHMS1532482  PMID: 31230929

Abstract

Objectives:

To review the family caregivers’ unmet needs in the long-term phase of survivorship to identify unique challenges faced by family caregivers.

Data Sources:

Research-based articles and published reports.

Conclusion:

Family caregivers diverge into three distinct groups in the long-term survivorship phase: those remaining in care, those whose patients have survived and where care is no longer needed, and those whose patients have died. Their primary unmet needs vary by the different caregivership trajectories.

Implications for Nursing Practice:

Comprehensive understanding of family caregivers’ unmet needs is required to develop family caregiver care plans in long-term survivorship.

Keywords: unmet needs, caregivers, long-term survivorship, long-term cancer care, bereavement


Improved 5-year survival during the past four decades and accumulating evidence on long-term mental and physical sequelae of cancer treatment have informed survivorship care plans for cancer survivors for years after completion of cancer treatment.1-3 Studies have also found psychological distress and poor quality of life among family caregivers,4-7 but these studies focus mainly on the time of initial treatment and end-of-life phases and most are cross-sectional. To date, efforts to address these problems are lagging. An important initial step is to identify the extent to which family caregivers’ poor quality of life is attributable to their needs not being fulfilled during their patients’ long-term survivorship.

Given the reduction in cancer recurrence during the first 5 years following diagnosis,8 approximately two thirds of cancer patients are alive 5 years after the initial diagnosis, some are in remission, others are in cancer care; one-third have passed away.2,3,9 Family members experience the same passages. By 5 years after their relative’s cancer diagnosis, family caregivers who were once actively involved in cancer care diverge to different paths: some become former caregivers whose patients no longer need their care (former caregivers–remission), others continue or resume cancer care to the patient (current caregivers), and others become bereaved (bereaved caregivers).10,11 Family caregivers’ needs presumably vary at 5 years after the survivors’ initial diagnosis, depending on their patients’ prognostic status. Unmet needs of these three distinct groups of caregivers may be critical determinants of their quality of life. Table 1 is a summary of the unmet needs of these distinct groups of caregivers.

Table 1.

Caregivers unmet needs.

Group of Caregivers Unmet Needs
Former caregivers - remission Managing emotional distress
Concerns about cancer coming back
Managing interpersonal relationships
Reducing patient stress associated with cancer
Psychosocial
Medical
Financial
Daily activities
Current caregivers Meeting patient’s complex care demands
Communication with medical health care professionals,family, and friends
Managing daily activities
Maintaining intimacy with partner
Responding to potential change in patient condition
Managing emotions about prognosis
Balancing own needs and patient’s needs
Impact of caring on work
Making decisions in the context of uncertainty
Materials and information
Financial
Bereaved caregivers Managing psychological distress
Reintegrating daily life
Managing the loss of the patient

Former Caregivers - Remission

The majority of family members are no longer involved in cancer care for the relative with cancer by 5 years after the initial diagnosis. Although these former caregivers’ cancer-related needs decrease by 2- and 5-year marks, some unmet needs remain highly endorsed. Those are needs for managing emotional distress and concerns about cancer coming back, reducing the patients’ stress that is associated with the cancer experience in daily life, managing interpersonal relationships, and balancing various other needs with health care needs.12-16 Psychosocial unmet needs remained the most prevalent during the first 5 years.14

During the first 2 years, younger caregivers reported greater unmet needs in psychosocial, medical, financial, and daily activity domains. Caregivers with higher income reported greater unmet needs in financial and daily activity domains. Caregivers’ ethnicity was not significantly associated with their unmet needs.14 At the 5-year mark, however, younger caregivers reported greater unmet needs only in the daily activity domain. Caregivers with higher income reported less financial unmet needs and greater daily activity unmet needs. White caregivers reported less unmet needs in psychosocial, medical, and financial domains.14 In another study, greater number of unmet needs among younger caregivers was also reported. However, those associations did not differ by the time since diagnosis.17

Former caregivers’ psychosocial unmet needs were associated with poorer mental health, beyond the contribution of demographic factors, which was the case throughout the first 5 years since the diagnosis.14 At 2- and 5-year marks, only financial unmet needs were associated with their poorer mental health.14 Unmet needs that remained highly prevalent during the first 5 years since the diagnosis were related to concurrent heightened anxiety but not to depression.16 On the other hand, caregivers’ unmet needs were not significantly associated with their physical health.14

Current Caregivers

Although cancer is increasingly considered as a chronic disease, family caregivers’ current caregivers caregiving status during the long-term survivorship phase is rarely assessed. Thus, we speculate that the patterns of unmet needs and their associations with quality of life observed for former caregivers whose patients no longer need their cancer care at the 5-year mark may be similar to some degree among family caregivers who are actively providing care to the index patients at the 5-year mark. In addition, caregiving challenges during the time of initial diagnosis and treatment may repeat when the patients continue to need, or resume needing, cancer care during the long-term survivorship phase, including the needs to meet patients’ complex care demands, communicate with various medical health care professionals and family and friends, manage daily activities, etc 18-23

On the other hand, palliative or end-of-life care studies may be informative in providing insights on current caregivers’ unmet needs years after the initial diagnosis, although the time since diagnosis is often not examined in such studies. For example, some new needs pertaining to the end-of-life care period can arise for long-term caregivers, such as the need to maintain intimacy with the patient and the need to reconstruct the relationship with the patient to face impending death.24 Managing emotions about prognosis, fear of cancer spread, balancing one’s own and the patient’s needs, impact of caring on work, and making decisions in the context of uncertainty were highest unmet needs of the caregivers in the last 6 months of the ovarian cancer patient’s life (who were diagnosed on average 31 months prior to study participation) during the 2-year follow-up period.25 Other needs for materials and information,26 and financial burden that were highly prevalent at the early survivorship phase and that had once decreased could become prevalent again as patients require extended treatment.

Bereaved Caregivers

Although the 5-year survival rate has improved for a all cancers combined, from 49% in 1975 to 69% in 2013,27,28 cancer remains the second leading cause of death in the US and more than 609,000 die from cancer each year in the US.28 This results in a substantial number of families experiencing bereavement because of cancer. Although some bereaved family members have displayed relatively stable levels of psychological distress, levels that are comparable to those of non-bereaved counterparts,29 the majority of bereaved family members have shown clinical levels of psychological distress, not only some months but years after the death.30-35 While elevated distress shortly after the loss is considered normative, professional intervention is recommended when it is prolonged for years, as prolonged distress compromises not only daily functioning but also long-term health.36-39 Thus, it is a substantial concern, particularly when the bereaved caregivers’ psychological distress remains elevated for years after the loss.

Needs for balancing between full grieving about the loss and adjusting to life without the deceased are primary challenges bereaved caregivers face.15,40,41 During the first 6 months after the death, younger age and female gender, premorbid mental health conditions, and lack of preparedness for the death were found to relate to poorer bereavement outcomes.30 Unrelieved pain and anxiety of the patient before the death, and caregivers being unprepared for the impending death were related to several psychological and physical morbidities of the surviving caregivers.30

The majority of studies describe bereavement outcomes cross-sectional and caregiving experiences retrospectively after the patients’ death, limiting adequate evaluation of the impact of bereavement that occurred in the long-term phase of survivorship.41,42 However, one study reported that a substantial number of caregivers (15% to 30%) showed pathological levels of anticipatory grief symptoms during the end-of-life care period, whereas none of the caregivers showed complicated grief using the same measure after the care recipients passed away.43 Another study40 revealed that caregivers’ demographic and earlier caregiving characteristics are strongly related to the caregivers’ unmet needs pertaining to the loss years later. Namely, younger adults (mean age was 56) reported greater unmet needs for reintegrating their daily lives and managing the loss. In addition, the stress of the caregiving that occurred 3 to 6 years earlier was significantly related to bereaved caregivers’ unmet needs. An important point here is that the caregiving stress in question was the caregivers’ subjective evaluation that providing care to the index patient was overwhelming, not an objective evaluation of how severe was the cancer the index patient had. Ethnicity was also a significant predictor of bereaved caregivers’ unmet needs for reintegration at the 8-year mark. Non-white caregivers, compared with non-Hispanic whites, reported greater unmet needs for reintegrating their lives after the loss.

Unmet needs regarding the loss were in turn related to the caregivers’ adjustment to bereavement during the long-term survivorship phase.40 Specifically, unmet needs for managing the loss were a strong predictor of intense emotional reaction to the loss, prolonged complicated grief, and post-traumatic stress disorder-like symptoms that are related to the loss, which were present years, not months, after the loss. Such associations were significant beyond what a host of demographic and earlier caregiving characteristics could account for. The findings call for more studies bridging cancer survivorship with bereavement research, which are currently scarce.

Conclusion

Cancer caregivers’ needs are complex, as is cancer care itself. Cancer caregivers’ needs in the period of long-term survivorship add more complexity because their needs diverge as their patients’ survivorship trajectory does so. Around the 5-year mark, when the probability of cancer recurrence plateaues, studies have found that family caregivers who are no longer involved in cancer care to the index patient reported that many of their needs were unmet. Their primary unmet needs were managing the concerns that the cancer may return and readjusting to the “new normal” because this large group of family caregivers, particularly for the patients who do not need cancer care anymore, remain “lost in transition” in the health care system.

Another critical group of family caregivers, who are often unrecognized, is those who are actively involved in cancer care many years after the relative’s initial diagnosis. The reasons they are involved in cancer care in the long-term survivorship phase could depend upon the patients’ continued or the resumption of their care needs, following treatment for recurrence or newly emerged care needs arising from end-of-life care. Studies reviewed here in the current caregivers section focused mainly on the end-of-life care phase, which could occur anywhere from weeks to decades after the initial diagnosis. Despite their limited applicability to the longterm survivorship phase, these findings suggest that actively engaging in cancer care for years, or resuming such caregiver role years after the initial diagnosis, is highly likely to be associated with greater needs in all aspects of caregiving. Unknown is the degree to which such current caregiving in the long-term survivorship phase differs from that in the early survivorship phase. Also unknown is the extent to which needs of caregivers providing continued, resumed, or newly emergent care, differ from those engaged in end-of-life care. Identifying the unique needs that are unfulfilled among current caregivers in the long-term survivorship phase is crucial for optimal patient care plans.

Finally, although cancer is the second leading cause of death, disproportionate attention has been paid to bereavement because of cancer. Existing studies mainly document substantial degree of psychosocial adjustment difficulties that bereaved caregivers face, implying the majority of caregivers’ psychological needs to adjust to their lives after the loss not being fulfilled. Similar to current caregiver studies, bereavement studies often do not consider earlier survivorship phases, hindering proper evaluation of the findings in the long-term survivorship phase. Nonetheless, bereaved caregivers’ needs are broadly grouped in two categories: managing the loss and reintegrating one’s life, supporting general adaptation theory to bereavement.44

Future Research Considerations

Identifying demographic correlates of unmet needs among the three distinct groups of family caregivers in the long-term survivorship phase will provide useful information about how to best target sub-groups of caregivers who may be most in need of assistance. Furthermore, information about which unmet needs are more likely to relate to poor quality-of life-indicators will also be useful in guiding researchers and clinicians as to how to best design and develop programs to reduce caregivers’ unmet needs, which will in turn improve their quality of life.15

The nuanced contributions of caregivers’ unmet needs to their specific aspects of quality of life should also be investigated. For example, although spiritual challenges have been fairly consistently mentioned among both caregivers in the end-of-life period and bereaved caregivers, comparable information among other types of long-term cancer caregivers and former caregivers-remission has not been systematically documented.40 Identifying not only the levels of spiritual needs but also the predictors and consequences of unmet spiritual needs of family caregivers may be warranted, providing important information for mitigating caregivers’ burdens and improving their quality of life. Another area that needs further investigation is the long-term impact of unmet needs on various aspects of caregivers’ broader quality of life, as the majority of existing studies focus on psychological aspects. For example, owing to the worldwide trend of aging populations, investigating how unmet needs and burdens of cancer caregiving may contribute to physical health in particular, such as higher rates of morbidity and mortality,45,46 particularly among older caregivers, will be essential.

The majority of studies have small sample sizes and their findings are mainly cross-sectional. Prospective information that begins from the cancer diagnosis of the care recipient and follows through for years is valuable in precisely documenting the cancer trajectory, not only from the care recipients’ perspective during the survivorship phases, but also more importantly bridging the survivorship with bereavement phases from caregivers’ perspective. The importance of considering the caregivers’ place in their life course should also be underscored because the severity of unmet needs and distress varied by the caregivers’ age and familial relationship to the patient.30 Furthermore, larger comparative studies47 with longitudinal design are needed for systematic investigations of the trajectories of cancer-specific and general caregivers’ unmet needs and how their identification influences caregivers’ health outcomes. Cost-effective programs and tools that are readily accessible are also needed to measure the multiple, complex concerns of a large number of caregivers.48,49

These are substantial concerns that must be incorporated in future studies as the first step to develop evidence-based guidance for programs and policies aimed at reducing family caregivers’ unmet needs and improving their quality of life at key transition points across diverse illness trajectories that may span many years. Addressing each of these concerns in future studies will help not only in advancing the science but also in bettering public health by improving family caregivers’ health by improving family caregivers’ health.

Implications for Nursing Practice

Findings thus far, despite their limitations, support the premise that family caregivers’ unmet needs diverge in the long-term survivorship phase by their patients’ prognostic status. Psychosocial unmet needs in particular are a critical concern because they link to poorer mental functioning across different trajectories of family caregivership. Findings suggest that nurse-led stress management interventions for cancer caregivers50,51 should be cognizant of the complex dynamic of family caregivers’ needs being associated with their quality of life, which vary by their patients’ prognostic status. In long-term survivorship, caregiver interventions must address the needs for managing caregivers’ fear that their patient’s cancer may return for caregivers who no longer are involved in cancer care; the needs for managing the patients’ symptoms for an extended period or for providing end-of-life care for caregivers who are actively involved in cancer care; and finally, the needs for managing the loss of a loved one while attempting to reintegrate their lives for bereaved caregivers.

Nurses can support family caregivers by identifying at-risk subgroups of caregivers based on their demographic characteristics, such as age, household income, spousal status to the patient, as well as the assessment of their stress evaluation of the new cancer caregiver role and appraisal of the patients’ cancer severity earlier in the cancer survivorship phases. Also, nurses must be involved in survivorship care plans that include plans for family caregivers, and be equipped to deliver support to family caregivers who are at different places in the cancer journey many years after their patients’ initial cancer diagnosis, because needs differ at different places on that journey.

Acknowledgment

Youngmee Kim dedicates this research to the memory of Heekyoung Kim.

This study was funded by the American Cancer Society National Home Office, intramural research. Writing of this manuscript was supported by National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR016838, to Y.K.) and by the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Graduate Student Research Assistant Fellowship (to A.T.).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Shapiro CL. Cancer survivorship. New Engl J Med. 2018;379:2438–2450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:271–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.National Cancer Institute. Office of Cancer Survivorship. Updated February 8, 2019. Available at: http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/ocs/ (Accessed February 18, 2019).
  • 4.Mitchell AJ, Ferguson DW, Gill J, Paul J, Symonds P. Depression and anxiety in long-term cancer survivors compared with spouses and healthy controls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:721–732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kim Y, Given BA. Quality of life of family caregivers of cancer survivors across the trajectory of the illness. Cancer. 2008;112(suppl ll):2556–2568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Northouse LL, Williams Al, Given B, McCorkle R. Psychosocial care for family caregivers of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1227–1234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kent EE, Rowland JH, Northouse L, et al. Caring for caregivers and patients: research and clinical priorities for informal cancer caregiving. Cancer. 2016;122:1987–1895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Curtis RE, Freedman DM, Ron E, et al. , editors. New malignancies among cancer survivors: SEER cancer registries, 1973-2000. NIH Publ. No. 05-5302. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2018. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kim Y, Spillers RL. Quality of life of family caregivers at 2 years after a relative’s cancer diagnosis. Psychooncology. 2010;19:431–440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kim Y, Spillers RL, Hall DL. Quality of life of family caregivers 5 years after a relative’s cancer diagnosis: Follow-up of the National Quality of Life Survey for Caregivers. Psychooncology. 2012;21:273–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Balfe M, O’Brien K, Timmons A, et al. The unmet supportive care needs of long-term head and neck cancer caregivers in the extended survivorship period. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25:1576–1586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Girgis A, Lambert SD, McElduff P, et al. Some things change, some things stay the same: a longitudinal analysis of cancer caregivers’ unmet supportive care needs. Psychooncology. 2013;22:1557–1564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kim Y, Kashy DA, Spillers RL, Evans TV. Needs assessment of family caregivers of cancer survivors: three cohorts comparison. Psychooncology. 2010;19:573–582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim Y, Carver CS. Recognizing the value and needs of the caregiver in oncology. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2012;6:280–288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lambert SD, Hulbert-Williams N, Belzile E, Ciampi A, Girgis A. Beyond using composite measures to analyze the effect of unmet supportive care needs on caregivers’ anxiety and depression. Psychooncology. 2018;27:1572–1579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Friðriksdóttir N, Saevarsdóttir T, Halfdánardóttir Sí, et al. Family members of cancer patients: needs, quality of life and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Acta Oncologica. 2011;50:252–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Given BA, Given CW, Sherwood P. The challenge of quality cancer care for family caregivers. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2012;28:205–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stenberg U, Ruland CM, Miaskowski C. Review of the literature on the effects of caring for a patient with cancer. Psychooncology. 2010;19:1013–1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brazil K, Bainbridge D, Rodriguez C. The stress process in palliative cancer care: a qualitative study on informal caregiving and its implication for the delivery of care. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2010;27:111–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.DuBenske LL, Chih MY, Gustafson DH, Dinauer S, Cleary JF. Caregivers’ participation in the oncology clinic visit mediates the relationship between their information competence and their need fulfillment and clinic visit satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;81(suppl):S94–S99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kenny PM, Hall JP, Zapart S, Davis PR. Informal care and home-based palliative care: the health-related quality of life of carers. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010;40:35–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Park SM, Kim YJ, Kim S, et al. Impact of caregivers’ unmet needs for supportive care on quality of terminal cancer care delivered and caregiver’s workforce performance. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18:699–706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mori H, Fukuda R, Hayashi A, Yamamoto K, Misago C, Nakayama T. Characteristics of caregiver perceptions of end-of-life caregiving experiences in cancer survivorship: in-depth interview study. Psychoonocology. 2012;21:666–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Butow PN, Price MA, Bell ML, et al. Caring for women with ovarian cancer in the last year of life: a longitudinal study of caregiver quality of life, distress and unmet needs. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132:690–697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Scaratti C, Leonardi M, Saladino A, et al. Needs of neuro-oncological patients and their caregivers during the hospitalization and after discharge: results from a longitudinal study. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25:2137–2145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Noone AM, Howlader N, Krapcho M, et al. , eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review (CSR), 1975-2015. Based on November 2017 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER Web site, April 2018. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2015/ Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:7–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang B, El-Jawahri A, Prigerson HG. Update on bereavement research: Evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of complicated bereavement. J Palliat Med. 2006;9:1188–1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kim Y, Carver CS, Spiegel D, Mitchell HR, Cannady RS. Role of family caregivers’ self-perceived preparedness for the death of the cancer patient in long-term adjustment to bereavement. Psychooncology. 2017;26:484–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Schulz R, Hebert R, Boerner K. Bereavement after caregiving. Geriatrics. 2008;63:20–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chiu YW, Huang CT, Yin SM, Huang YC, Chien CH, Chuang HY. Determinants of complicated grief in caregivers who cared for terminal cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18:1321–1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tomarken A, Roth A, Holland J, et al. Examining the role of trauma, personality, and meaning in young prolonged grievers. Psychooncology. 2012;21:771–777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Elklit A, Reinholt N, Nielsen LH, Blum A, Lasgaard M. Posttraumatic stress disorder among bereaved relatives of cancer patients. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2010;28:399–412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kristensen TE, Elklit A, Karstoft Kl. Posttraumatic stress disorder after bereavement: Early psychological sequelae of losing a close relative due to terminal cancer. J Loss Trauma. 2012; 17508–521. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Aranda S, Milne D. Guidelines for the assessment of complicated bereavement risk in family members of people receiving palliative care. Melbourne: Centre for Palliative Care; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Schut H, Stroebe MS. Interventions to enhance adaptation to bereavement. J Palliat Med 2005;8(suppl 1):S140–S147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Prigerson HG, Bierhals AJ, Kasl SV, et al. Traumatic grief as a risk factor for mental and physical morbidity. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154:616–623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ott CH. The impact of complicated grief on mental and physical health at various points in the bereavement process. Death Stud. 2003;27:249–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kim Y, Carver CS, Cannady RS. Bereaved family cancer caregivers’ unmet needs. Manuscript under review. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Prigerson HG, Maciejewski PK, Reynolds CF III, et al. Inventory of complicated grief: a scale to measure maladaptive symptoms of loss. Psychiatry Res. 1995;59:65–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Weiss DS. The impact of event scale-revised In: Wilson JP, Keane TM, eds. Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD: a practitioner’s handbook. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2004: pp 168–189. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Schildmann EK, Higginson IJ. Evaluating psycho-educational interventions for informal carers of patients receiving cancer care or palliative care: strengths and limitations of different study designs. Palliat Med. 2011;25:345–356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Stroebe MS, Hansson RO, Schut H, Stroebe W. Handbook of bereavement research and practice: advances in theory and intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Damjanovic AK, Yang Y, Glaser R, et al. Accelerated telomere erosion is associated with a declining immune function of caregivers of Alzheimer’s disease patients. J Immunol. 2007;179:4249–4254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Gouin JP, Weng NP, Malarkey WB, Beversdorf DQ, Glaser R. Childhood adversity heightens the impact of later-life caregiving stress on telomere length and inflammation. Psychosom Med. 2011;73:16–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Alfano CM, Leach CR, Smith TG, et al. Equitably improving outcomes for cancer survivors and supporting caregivers: a blueprint for care delivery,research,education,and policy. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:35–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Heckel L, Fennell KM, Orellana L, Boltong A, Byrnes M, Livingston PM. A telephone outcome program to support caregivers of people diagnosed with cancer: utility, changes in levels of distress, and unmet needs. Supp Care Cancer. 2018;26:3789–3799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Longacre ML, Applebaum AJ, Buzaglo JS, et al. Reducing informal caregiver burden in cancer: evidence-based programs in practice. Trans Behav Med. 2018;8:145–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Northouse LL, Katapodi MC, Song L, Zhang L, Mood DW. Interventions with family caregivers of cancer patients: meta-analysis of randomized trials. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:317–339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ferrell B, Wittenberg E. A review of family caregiving intervention trials in oncology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:318–325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES