Abstract
Our knowledge of epidemiologic risk factors for ovarian cancer supports a role for androgens in the pathogenesis of this disease; however, few studies have examined associations between circulating androgens and ovarian cancer risk. Using highly sensitive LC-MS/MS assays, we evaluated associations between pre-diagnostic serum levels of 12 androgens, including novel androgen metabolites that reflect androgen activity in tissues, and ovarian cancer risk among postmenopausal women in a nested case-control study in the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) Observational Study (OS). We frequency-matched 169 ovarian cancer cases to 410 controls from women enrolled in WHI-OS who were not using menopausal hormones at enrollment/blood draw. We estimated associations overall and by subtype (n=102 serous/67 non-serous) using multivariable adjusted logistic regression. Androgen/androgen metabolite levels were not associated with overall ovarian cancer risk. In analyses by subtype, women with increased levels of androsterone-glucuronide (ADT-G) and total 5-α reduced glucuronide metabolites (markers of tissue-level androgenic activity) were at increased risk of developing non-serous ovarian cancer: ADT-G tertile (T)3 versus T1 odds ratio [OR] (95% confidence interval [CI]) 4.36 (1.68–11.32), p-heterogeneity 0.002; total glucuronide metabolites 3.63 (1.47–8.95), 0.002. Risk of developing serous tumors was unrelated to these markers.
ADT-G and total glucuronide metabolites, better markers of tissue-level androgenic activity in women than testosterone, were associated with an increased risk of developing non-serous ovarian cancer. Our work demonstrates that sex steroid metabolism is important in the etiology of non-serous ovarian cancers and supports a heterogeneous hormonal etiology across histologic subtypes of ovarian cancer.
Keywords: Endogenous androgens, androgen metabolites, androgenic activity, ovarian cancer risk, nested case-control study, heterogeneity
INTRODUCTION
An understanding of the etiology of ovarian cancer remains elusive. However, experimental and epidemiologic data suggest a role for hormone-related exposures and risk factor differences by histologic subtype1. A role for androgens stimulating epithelial cell proliferation has been suggested in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer. Epidemiologic studies demonstrate that factors associated with high androgen levels, such as testosterone treatments, are related to increased ovarian cancer risk2; while oral contraceptives, which suppress testosterone,3 are associated with reduced risk4.
In postmenopausal women, elevated levels of prediagnostic circulating androgens or androgen precursors (androstenedione, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and its metabolite dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS)), have been associated with ovarian cancer risk inconsistently across studies5–11. In a recent pooled analysis of these studies, testosterone was associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer overall and androstenedione was associated with increased ovarian cancer risk in premenopausal women, but not in postmenopausal women11. Furthermore, testosterone and androstenedione results suggested heterogeneity by subtype, with increased risks for endometrioid and mucinous tumors, and null associations for clear cell and serous tumors11. At present, it is unclear whether the androgens measured in these studies (e.g., testosterone, androstenedione, DHEA, DHEAS) adequately reflect underlying androgenic activity and local tissue production of bioactive androgens12, and for postmenopausal women, whether they simply reflect a reservoir of precursor substrates for estrogens.
In postmenopausal women, metabolism of androgens and their precursors occurs in tissues primarily via 5α-reductase13; the derived 5α-reduced metabolites (Figure 1), including dihydrotestosterone (DHT), are potent local bioactive agents. However, serum DHT is difficult to measure at the low levels found in postmenopausal women, and recent studies suggest that it may not adequately reflect the activity of more distant 5α-reduced androgen metabolites. Studies of prostate cancer, as well as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and hirsutism in women, have measured androsterone glucuronide (ADT-G), a distal metabolite of DHT, as a marker of peripheral androgen activity14, 15. These studies suggested that circulating levels of ADT-G plus androstanediol glucuronide (found as two isomers: 5α-androstane-3α,17β diol-3-glucuronide (3α-diol-3G) and 5α-androstane-3α,17β diol-17-glucuronide (3α-diol-17G)) taken together may be a better marker of androgenic activity in tissue than their precursors (testosterone and androstenedione) alone12, 13. Further, they estimated that ADT-G accounts for 93% of the total 5α-reduced androgen glucuronide derivatives and proposed that this metabolite alone could replace measures of serum testosterone as a circulating measure of androgenicity in postmenopausal women12. Another potentially important androgen conjugate is dihydrotestosterone sulfate (DHTS), which may form an inactive reservoir for the highly potent DHT. As such, the measurement of 5α-reduced glucuronide metabolites may be relevant in the study of ovarian carcinogenesis.
Figure 1.
The synthesis of androgens and estrogens occurs from the adrenal androgenic precursor, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA). Androgen metabolites are formed from androstenedione and testosterone via 5α-reductase (top pathway framed by solid outline) or 5β-reductase (bottom pathway framed by dotted outline). The current assay measures the 12 androgens/androgen metabolites in dark grey16; those in light grey were not measured. Alternatively, androstenedione and testosterone can be converted to estrone and estradiol (in black) via aromatase. Estrogens were measured previously, using an independent assay17.
To date, no epidemiologic studies have evaluated measures of the 5α-reduced androgen metabolites in relation to ovarian cancer risk. Therefore, we conducted a nested case-control study within the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI)-Observational Study (OS), to evaluate the associations between the 5α-reduced androgen metabolites, other major androgens, and their adrenal precursors,16 and ovarian cancer risk--with the goal of evaluating the glucuronide derivates as better markers of tissue-level androgenic activity than their precursors. Existing data on estrogens17 enabled further evaluation of whether the associations with androgens are independent of their influence on parent estrogen production. Given increasing evidence of etiologic heterogeneity of epithelial ovarian cancers—especially with respect to the associations with hormonal risk factors (e.g. body mass index (BMI), menopausal hormone therapy use1)—we also evaluated associations by tumor subtype.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study population
Details of the WHI-OS18, 19 and the nested case-control study of ovarian cancer used in these analyses17 have been described previously. Briefly, the WHI-OS is a prospective cohort that enrolled 93,676 postmenopausal women ages 50 to 79 years at 40 centers throughout the United States between 1993 and 199818, 19. Women were excluded from the OS if they were participating in a WHI clinical trial; if they had medical conditions with a predicted survival of less than 3 years; or if they had retention issues. The nested case-control study included incident ovarian cancer cases (diagnoses of incident primary epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer) that were diagnosed between study initiation and May 2012; we refer to this case group collectively as “ovarian cancers” throughout the remainder of the manuscript. All cancer diagnoses were centrally adjudicated at the WHI Clinical Coordinating Center according to SEER guidelines. Both cases and controls met the following criteria to be eligible: no history of cancer at baseline other than non-melanoma skin cancer; no current use of exogenous hormones; no history of bilateral oophorectomy; and at least 1.1 mL of available pre-diagnostic serum.
Among the cases, the mean time from serum collection to diagnosis was 6.9 years (standard deviation = 3.8 years; range = 352 days – 14.8 years). Controls were eligible WHI-OS cohort members selected from strata defined by age at blood draw (5-year categories), year at blood draw (1993–1996, 1997–1998), race/ethnicity (white, black, Hispanic, other/unknown), hysterectomy status at baseline or during follow-up (yes/no), and time since last menopausal hormone use (≤1 year, >1 year/never). Controls were drawn from the set of eligible cohort members in each stratum containing ovarian cancer cases that were alive at the time of diagnosis of their matched case, and were selected with a ratio of at least 2 controls per case per stratum.
We excluded women with unconjugated estrone concentrations greater than or equal to 184 pmol/L (~50 pg/mL; n=10), which is typically indicative of exogenous hormone use, as well as 2 control women who did not have sufficient serum to measure circulating androgens after estrogen metabolites were measured in a prior analysis17. The present study included 169 ovarian cancer cases and 410 matched controls. Among ovarian cancer cases, 102 had serous tumors and the remaining 67 had non-serous cancers (13 endometrioid, 11 clear cell, 9 mucinous, and 34 other-epithelial subtypes). Approval for conducting WHI was obtained from human subjects review at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (WHI Clinical Coordinating Center) and all 40 clinical centers. The current project was reviewed and exempted by the Office of Human Subjects Research at the U.S. National Cancer Institute. Written informed consent was obtained from study participants.
Laboratory assays
Stable isotope dilution high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used to quantify 12 androgens and androgen metabolites (Figure 1) including the principal androgens secreted by the adrenals (DHEA and DHEAS) and the ovaries (androstenedione and testosterone), as well as their 5α-reduced androgen metabolites: 5α-androstane-3,17-dione (5α-androstanedione), DHT, androsterone (ADT), DHTS, 3α-diol-3G, 3α-diol-17G, and ADT-G; and the 5β-reduced metabolite etiocholanolone-glucuronide. Details of the method have been published previously16. We included etiocholanolone-glucuronide in our assay since it is recognized, along with ADT-G, as one of the major inactive metabolites of testosterone; it also serves as a marker of 5β-reduced androgen levels. The other 5β-reduced androgen metabolites were not included either because of low abundance in serum, lack of internal standards, or because they do not bind to or bind only weakly to the androgen receptor (e.g., 5β-DHT). LC-MS/MS analysis was performed using updated instrumentation, a Thermo TSQ™ Quantiva triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, San Jose, CA) coupled with a NexeraXR LC system (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Columbia, MD). Both the chromatographer and mass spectrometer were controlled by Xcalibur™ software (Thermo Fisher, San Jose, CA). Nine stable isotope labeled unconjugated and conjugated androgens were used to account for losses during sample preparation and analysis, which included: dehydroepiandrosterone-2,2,3,4,4-d5 (d5-DHEA), androstenedione-2,3,4-13C3 (13C3-A), testosterone-2,3,4-13C3 (13C3-T), dihydrotestosterone-16,16,17-d3 (d3-DHT), androsterone-2,2,4,4-d4 (d4-ADT), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate-2,2,3,4,4-d5 (d5-DHEAS), dihydrotestosterone sulfate-16,16,17-d3 (d3-DHTS), and androsterone glucuronide-2,2,4,4-d4 (d4-ADT-G) obtained from Cerilliant Corporation (Round Rock, TX); 5α-androstane-3α,17β-diol-17-glucuronide-16,16,17-d3 (d3-3α-diol-17G) was purchased from 13C Molecular, Inc. (Fayetteville, NC). Estrogens were previously quantified using an independent LC-MS/MS assay17.
The limits of quantitation for the unconjugated androgens and conjugated androgens were as follows: 0.01 ng/mL for A and T; 0.05 ng/mL for DHEA, DHT, and ADT; 0.1 ng/mL for 5α-A; 0.05 ng/mL for DHEAS and DHTS; 0.1 ng/mL for 3α-diol-3G, 3α-diol-17G, ADT-G, and etiocholanolone-glucuronide. No samples in the current study had undetectable levels for any of the hormones measured. Laboratory coefficients of variation (CVs) of blinded duplicate samples within and across batches were <11.0% for all hormones measured. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranged from 0.77–0.997 with a mean value of 0.94 (median 0.99).
Statistical analysis
Androgens and androgen metabolites were analyzed individually and as ratios. We calculated a measure of the total (5α-reduced) glucuronide metabolites as the sum of ADT-G, 3α-diol-3G, and 3α-diol-17G, as described by Labrie and colleagues20. All androgen measures (individual androgens, ratios, measure of total glucuronide metabolites) were categorized into tertiles based on the distribution in controls. First, we estimated overall associations (all ovarian cancer cases) and then those stratified by subtype (serous/non-serous). Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for ovarian cancer risk conditioning on matching factors: age at blood draw, calendar year of blood draw, race/ethnicity, hysterectomy status, and time since last menopausal hormone use, and further adjusted for potential confounding factors chosen a priori, based on knowledge of the literature: gravidity (ever, never), BMI (<25, 25–29.9, ≥30 kg/m2), cigarette smoking status (never, former, current), and duration of oral contraception use (never, <5, 5-<10, ≥10 years). Tests for trend were based on the Wald statistic using the median concentrations from each tertile of a given androgen as a continuous variable.
For analyses stratified by case characteristics (subtype and time between blood draw and diagnosis) we used multinomial logistic regression models, with the controls as the reference group and adjusted for matching factors and the a priori selected potential confounding factors. In these models, time since menopausal hormone therapy use was modeled as: never, ≤1 year, >1 year. Chi-square p-values for heterogeneity across subgroup associations were estimated from models that treated the largest subgroup as the reference and excluded non-cases. We also evaluated associations stratified by age at blood draw (<65 years old, ≥65 years old). We conducted the following sensitivity analyses: 1) excluding potential outliers (concentrations greater than five standard deviations above the median; median number of excluded subject per hormone measure n=6 (min-max: 2–19)), 2) excluding women who reported a history of diabetes at baseline (n=28), and 3) excluding women who reported prior use of menopausal hormones (n=209). All p-values were based on two-sided tests and a p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Participants were on average 64 years of age at blood draw and predominantly white (90%). Women who developed serous cancers were slightly older (average age at blood draw, 64.7 years) than women who developed non-serous cancers (average 63.2 years) (Table 1). Median androgen and androgen metabolite levels were not substantially different among women who developed cancer or did not (Table 2). There were some differences in median concentrations across histologic subtypes. We observed higher circulating levels of ADT-G and total glucuronide metabolites among women who developed non-serous cancers than in women who developed serous cancers or among control women, levels of DHEAS, DHEA, and androstenedione were also higher in case women than control women.
Table 1.
Demographic and health characteristics of controls and ovarian cancer cases overall and by serous/non-serous subtype, nested case-control study within the Women’s Health Initiative-Observational Study.
Controls (n=410) | Ovarian Cancer Cases (n=169) | Serous cases (n=102) | Non-serous cases (n=67) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Characteristics | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD |
Age | 64.3 | 7.2 | 64.1 | 7.2 | 64.7 | 7.2 | 63.2 | 7.1 |
Year of blood draw | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % |
1993–1996 | 253 | 61.7 | 108 | 63.9 | 62 | 60.8 | 46 | 68.7 |
1997–1998 | 157 | 38.3 | 61 | 36.1 | 40 | 39.2 | 21 | 31.3 |
Race/ethnicity | ||||||||
White | 369 | 90.0 | 151 | 89.3 | 96 | 94.1 | 55 | 82.1 |
Black | 17 | 4.1 | 8 | 4.7 | 3 | 2.9 | 5 | 7.5 |
Hispanic | 12 | 2.9 | 6 | 3.6 | 2 | 2.0 | 4 | 6.0 |
Other | 12 | 2.9 | 4 | 2.4 | 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 4.5 |
Hysterectomy (baseline or follow-up prior to event) | ||||||||
No | 338 | 82.4 | 140 | 82.8 | 83 | 81.4 | 57 | 85.1 |
Yes | 72 | 17.6 | 29 | 17.2 | 19 | 18.6 | 10 | 14.9 |
Time since last menopausal hormone therapy use | ||||||||
>1 year | 398 | 97.1 | 163 | 96.4 | 97 | 95.1 | 66 | 98.5 |
≤1 year | 12 | 2.9 | 6 | 3.6 | 5 | 4.9 | 1 | 1.5 |
Smoking status | ||||||||
Never | 203 | 49.5 | 81 | 47.9 | 51 | 50.0 | 30 | 44.8 |
Former | 166 | 40.5 | 76 | 45.0 | 43 | 42.2 | 33 | 49.3 |
Current | 38 | 9.3 | 12 | 7.1 | 8 | 7.8 | 4 | 6.0 |
BMI (kg/m2) | ||||||||
<25 | 179 | 43.7 | 66 | 39.1 | 43 | 42.2 | 23 | 34.3 |
25–29.9 | 127 | 31.0 | 52 | 30.8 | 31 | 30.4 | 21 | 31.3 |
30+ | 103 | 25.1 | 51 | 30.2 | 28 | 27.5 | 23 | 34.3 |
Age at menarche | ||||||||
<12 | 100 | 24.4 | 37 | 21.9 | 24 | 23.5 | 13 | 19.4 |
12–13 | 219 | 53.4 | 100 | 59.2 | 59 | 57.8 | 41 | 61.2 |
14+ | 88 | 21.5 | 32 | 18.9 | 19 | 18.6 | 13 | 19.4 |
Ever pregnant | ||||||||
No | 54 | 13.2 | 25 | 14.8 | 13 | 12.7 | 12 | 17.9 |
Yes | 356 | 86.8 | 144 | 85.2 | 89 | 87.3 | 55 | 82.1 |
Duration oral contraceptive use (years) | ||||||||
Never | 254 | 62.0 | 106 | 62.7 | 65 | 63.7 | 41 | 61.2 |
<5 | 83 | 20.2 | 36 | 21.3 | 23 | 22.5 | 13 | 19.4 |
5-<10 | 39 | 9.5 | 14 | 8.3 | 5 | 4.9 | 9 | 13.4 |
10+ | 34 | 8.3 | 13 | 7.7 | 9 | 8.8 | 4 | 6.0 |
History of tubal ligation | ||||||||
No | 338 | 82.4 | 151 | 89.3 | 89 | 87.3 | 62 | 92.5 |
Yes | 71 | 17.3 | 18 | 10.7 | 13 | 12.7 | 5 | 7.5 |
Age at menopause | ||||||||
<40 | 17 | 4.1 | 4 | 2.4 | 3 | 2.9 | 1 | 1.5 |
40–44 | 33 | 8.0 | 14 | 8.3 | 11 | 10.8 | 3 | 4.5 |
45–49 | 89 | 21.7 | 34 | 20.1 | 18 | 17.6 | 16 | 23.9 |
50–54 | 183 | 44.6 | 83 | 49.1 | 52 | 51.0 | 31 | 46.3 |
55+ | 66 | 16.1 | 22 | 13.0 | 14 | 13.7 | 8 | 11.9 |
Menopausal hormone therapy use | ||||||||
Never | 242 | 59.0 | 129 | 76.3 | 74 | 72.5 | 55 | 82.1 |
Former | 170 | 41.4 | 40 | 23.7 | 28 | 27.5 | 12 | 17.9 |
Table 2.
Median concentrations and interdecile ranges (IDR) of androgens, androgen metabolites, and parent estrogens (and ratios of relevant hormone concentrations) among controls and ovarian cancer cases, overall and by serous/non-serous subtype.
Controls (n=410) | All ovarian cancer cases (n=169) | Serous cases (n=102) | Non-serous cases (n=67) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pro-androgens/androgens | Median | (IDR) | Median | (IDR) | Pa | Median | (IDR) | Median | (IDR) | Pb |
dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), nmol/L | 4.9 | (2.0–10.4) | 4.9 | (1.9–10.3) | 0.94 | 4.7 | (1.7–8.3) | 5.4 | (2.4–11.1) | 0.10 |
DHEA sulfate (DHEAS), nmol/L | 1113 | (411–2511) | 1118 | (448–2398) | 0.60 | 1044 | (428–2119) | 1221 | (564–2792) | 0.05 |
Androstenedione, nmol/L | 1.3 | (0.7–2.3) | 1.3 | (0.8–2.3) | 0.74 | 1.2 | (0.8–2.0) | 1.4 | (0.8–2.6) | 0.08 |
Testosterone, nmol/L | 0.6 | (0.3–1.0) | 0.6 | (0.3–1.1) | 0.17 | 0.6 | (0.3–1.0) | 0.6 | (0.3–1.1) | 0.26 |
5α-reduced androgens | ||||||||||
5α-androstanedione, nmol/L | 1.2 | (0.7–2.3) | 1.3 | (0.7–2.3) | 0.55 | 1.3 | (0.8–2.1) | 1.3 | (0.7–2.6) | 0.78 |
Dihydrotestosterone (DHT), nmol/L | 0.2 | (0.1–0.3) | 0.2 | (0.1–0.3) | 0.77 | 0.2 | (0.1–0.3) | 0.2 | (0.1–0.3) | 0.55 |
DHT sulfate (DHTS), nmol/L | 1.0 | (0.4–2.1) | 1.1 | (0.5–2.2) | 0.45 | 1.0 | (0.5–2.1) | 1.2 | (0.5–2.3) | 0.24 |
Androsterone (ADT), nmol/L | 0.5 | (0.3–0.9) | 0.5 | (0.3–0.8) | 0.42 | 0.5 | (0.3–0.8) | 0.5 | (0.4–0.8) | 0.68 |
ADT glucuronide (ADT-G), nmol/L | 19.3 | (7.0–52.3) | 19.4 | (8.1–60.0) | 0.59 | 16.5 | (6.4–45.6) | 22.1 | (13.3–69.4) | 0.01 |
5α-androstane-3α,17β diol-3-glucuronide (3α-diol-3G), nmol/L | 1.3 | (0.5–3.6) | 1.2 | (0.5–3.7) | 0.69 | 1.2 | (0.5–3.6) | 1.5 | (0.6–4.1) | 0.16 |
3α-diol-17-glucuronide (3α-diol-17G), nmol/L | 1.2 | (0.4–3.0) | 1.2 | (0.5–3.0) | 0.80 | 1.2 | (0.5–2.3) | 1.4 | (0.5–4.3) | 0.14 |
Total 5α-reduced glucuronide metabolites | ||||||||||
Σ(ADT-G, 3α-diol-3G, 3α-diol-17G), nmol/L | 22.1 | (8.3–57.7) | 21.9 | (9.3–64.2) | 0.70 | 19.2 | (8.0–52.5) | 25.2 | (14.8–77.9) | 0.01 |
5β-reduced androgen | ||||||||||
Etiocholanolone-glucuronide, nmol/L | 32.1 | (11.9–84.9) | 30.4 | (13.6–80.2) | 0.72 | 28.5 | (11.9–71.4) | 34.1 | (16.8–85.6) | 0.16 |
Parent estrogens | ||||||||||
Unconjugated Estrone, pmol/L | 55.4 | (29.0–112) | 58.9 | (29.6–154) | 0.20 | 52.0 | (30.7–133) | 65.5 | (28.6–174) | 0.03 |
Unconjugated estradiol, pmol/L | 11.6 | (4.0–37.4) | 12.2 | (4.2–42.7) | 0.19 | 10.4 | (4.3–38.3) | 15.8 | (4.2–70.1) | 0.01 |
Ratios of parent estrogens to androgens | ||||||||||
Unconjugated estradiol/Androstenedione | 8.6 | (3.3–29.0) | 9.4 | (3.9–33.1) | 0.24 | 8.3 | (4.0–27.0) | 10.3 | (3.9–47.2) | 0.10 |
Unconjugated estradiol/Testosterone | 19.8 | (7.6–68.7) | 21.2 | (8.2–82.9) | 0.61 | 18.6 | (7.8–68.3) | 26.0 | (9.6–117) | 0.06 |
P value from Wilcoxon test comparing two groups (controls and all ovarian cancer cases)
P value from Kruskal-Wallis test comparing three groups (controls, serous cases, and non-serous cases)
The individual androgens and androgen metabolites as well as the ratios of androgens/metabolites were not associated with overall ovarian cancer risk (Table 3). We noted statistically significant heterogeneity in the associations for ADT-G as well as the circulating measure of total glucuronide metabolites across histologic subtypes of ovarian cancer (Table 3). Women with increased levels of ADT-G or total glucuronide metabolites were at increased risk of developing non-serous ovarian cancers [ADT-G OR (95% CI) for the highest versus lowest tertile (T3 vs. T1): 4.36 (1.68–11.32), p-het 0.002; total glucuronide metabolites: 3.63 (1.47–8.95), p-het 0.002], while risk of developing serous ovarian cancers was unrelated to levels of these two markers (Table 3). Given almost complete correlation between levels of ADT-G and total glucuronide metabolites (see Supplementary Table S1), associations with these two markers of androgenic activity are likely dependent. Although not statistically significant, there were notable elevations in OR estimates for non-serous tumors for the pro- androgens (DHEA, DHEAS, androstenedione, and testosterone), and 5-α reduced androgens (DHTS and 3α-diol-3G), while ORs for serous tumors at or less than 1.0 for these markers.
Table 3.
Odds Ratios (ORs) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) for risk of epithelial ovarian cancer overall and by subtypes for individual androgens/androgen metabolites and relevant ratios, nested case-control study within the WHI-OS.
Tertile Median | Controls | Cases | All ovarian cancer cases | Serous | Non-Serous | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHEA | n (%) | n (%) | ORa | 95% CI | n (%) | ORb | 95% CI | n (%) | ORb | 95% CI | P hetc | |
Tertile (T)1 | 2.4 | 135 (32.8) | 50 (29.6) | 1.00 | 35 (34.3) | 1.00 | 15 (22.4) | 1.00 | 0.14 | |||
T2 | 4.8 | 135 (32.8) | 65 (38.5) | 1.22 | (0.78, 1.91) | 41 (40.2) | 1.14 | (0.67, 1.92) | 24 (35.8) | 1.40 | (0.69, 2.83) | |
T3 | 8.7 | 140 (34.0) | 54 (32.0) | 1.00 | (0.62, 1.62) | 26 (25.5) | 0.70 | (0.39, 1.26) | 28 (41.8) | 1.56 | (0.78, 3.14) | |
DHEAS | ||||||||||||
T1 | 518 | 135 (32.8) | 48 (28.4) | 1.00 | 37 (36.3) | 1.00 | 11 (16.4) | 1.00 | 0.05 | |||
T2 | 1109 | 135 (32.8) | 67 (39.6) | 1.32 | (0.84, 2.08) | 37 (36.3) | 1.08 | (0.64, 1.84) | 30 (44.8) | 2.78 | (1.32, 5.87) | |
T3 | 2045 | 140 (34.0) | 54 (32.0) | 1.00 | (0.62, 1.62) | 28 (27.5) | 0.74 | (0.42, 1.31) | 26 (38.8) | 1.97 | (0.91, 4.27) | |
Androstenedione | ||||||||||||
T1 | 0.8 | 134 (32.5) | 49 (29.0) | 1.00 | 36 (35.3) | 1.00 | 13 (19.4) | 1.00 | 0.09 | |||
T2 | 1.3 | 136 (33.0) | 63 (37.3) | 1.29 | (0.82, 2.03) | 37 (36.3) | 1.08 | (0.64, 1.85) | 26 (38.8) | 1.91 | (0.92, 3.94) | |
T3 | 2.0 | 140 (34.0) | 57 (33.7) | 1.12 | (0.70, 1.79) | 29 (28.4) | 0.78 | (0.45, 1.38) | 28 (41.8) | 1.86 | (0.91, 3.82) | |
Testosterone | ||||||||||||
T1 | 0.3 | 134 (32.5) | 47 (27.8) | 1.00 | 28 (27.5) | 1.00 | 19 (28.4) | 1.00 | 0.09 | |||
T2 | 0.5 | 134 (32.5) | 57 (33.7) | 1.17 | (0.74, 1.84) | 40 (39.2) | 1.48 | (0.85, 2.57) | 17 (25.4) | 0.86 | (0.42, 1.75) | |
T3 | 0.9 | 142 (34.5) | 65 (38.5) | 1.32 | (0.84, 2.07) | 34 (33.3) | 1.12 | (0.63, 1.99) | 31 (46.3) | 1.47 | (0.77, 2.79) | |
5α-androstanedione | ||||||||||||
T1 | 0.8 | 135 (32.8) | 56 (33.1) | 1.00 | 33 (32.4) | 1.00 | 23 (34.3) | 1.00 | 0.57 | |||
T2 | 1.2 | 134 (32.5) | 46 (27.2) | 0.83 | (0.52, 1.32) | 32 (31.4) | 0.97 | (0.56, 1.68) | 14 (20.9) | 0.60 | (0.29, 1.22) | |
T3 | 2.0 | 141 (34.2) | 67 (39.6) | 1.19 | (0.77, 1.84) | 37 (36.3) | 1.18 | (0.69, 2.02) | 30 (44.8) | 1.37 | (0.74, 2.53) | |
DHT | ||||||||||||
T1 | 0.1 | 134 (32.5) | 56 (33.1) | 1.00 | 34 (33.3) | 1.00 | 22 (32.8) | 1.00 | 0.04 | |||
T2 | 0.2 | 133 (32.3) | 59 (34.9) | 1.05 | (0.67, 1.63) | 29 (28.4) | 0.84 | (0.48, 1.47) | 30 (44.8) | 1.42 | (0.77, 2.63) | |
T3 | 0.3 | 143 (34.7) | 54 (32.0) | 0.86 | (0.55, 1.35) | 39 (38.2) | 1.08 | (0.64, 1.83) | 15 (22.4) | 0.67 | (0.33, 1.35) | |
DHTS | ||||||||||||
T1 | 0.5 | 134 (32.5) | 50 (29.6) | 1.00 | 36 (35.3) | 1.00 | 14 (20.9) | 1.00 | 0.16 | |||
T2 | 1.0 | 136 (33.0) | 54 (32.0) | 1.12 | (0.71, 1.77) | 30 (29.4) | 0.80 | (0.46, 1.40) | 24 (35.8) | 1.59 | (0.77, 3.25) | |
T3 | 1.8 | 140 (34.0) | 65 (38.5) | 1.22 | (0.78, 1.91) | 36 (35.3) | 0.88 | (0.52, 1.51) | 29 (43.3) | 1.76 | (0.87, 3.55) | |
Androsterone (ADT) | ||||||||||||
T1 | 0.4 | 131 (31.8) | 62 (36.7) | 1.00 | 41 (40.2) | 1.00 | 21 (31.3) | 1.00 | 0.08 | |||
T2 | 0.5 | 139 (33.7) | 51 (30.2) | 0.73 | (0.46, 1.14) | 25 (24.5) | 0.59 | (0.33, 1.03) | 26 (38.8) | 1.16 | (0.61, 2.21) | |
T3 | 0.8 | 140 (34.0) | 56 (33.1) | 0.81 | (0.53, 1.25) | 36 (35.3) | 0.76 | (0.45, 1.28) | 20 (29.9) | 0.80 | (0.41, 1.57) | |
ADT-G | ||||||||||||
T1 | 8.8 | 135 (32.8) | 43 (25.4) | 1.00 | 37 (36.3) | 1.00 | 6 (9) | 1.00 | 0.002 | |||
T2 | 18.9 | 135 (32.8) | 74 (43.8) | 1.65 | (1.04, 2.62) | 40 (39.2) | 1.15 | (0.68, 1.96) | 34 (50.7) | 5.97 | (2.37, 15.05) | |
T3 | 42.6 | 140 (34.0) | 52 (30.8) | 1.06 | (0.64, 1.76) | 25 (24.5) | 0.68 | (0.37, 1.24) | 27 (40.3) | 4.36 | (1.68, 11.32) | |
3αdiol-3G | P trendd = 0.08 | |||||||||||
T1 | 0.6 | 135 (32.8) | 59 (34.9) | 1.00 | 41 (40.2) | 1.00 | 18 (26.9) | 1.00 | 0.32 | |||
T2 | 1.3 | 135 (32.8) | 55 (32.5) | 0.86 | (0.55, 1.35) | 32 (31.4) | 0.81 | (0.47, 1.39) | 23 (34.3) | 1.24 | (0.62, 2.47) | |
T3 | 2.9 | 140 (34.0) | 55 (32.5) | 0.80 | (0.50, 1.28) | 29 (28.4) | 0.70 | (0.39, 1.23) | 26 (38.8) | 1.31 | (0.66, 2.63) | |
3αdiol-17G | ||||||||||||
T1 | 0.6 | 135 (32.8) | 50 (29.6) | 1.00 | 31 (30.4) | 1.00 | 19 (28.4) | 1.00 | 0.05 | |||
T2 | 1.2 | 135 (32.8) | 67 (39.6) | 1.24 | (0.78, 1.96) | 46 (45.1) | 1.49 | (0.87, 2.56) | 21 (31.3) | 0.96 | (0.48, 1.92) | |
T3 | 2.3 | 140 (34.0) | 52 (30.8) | 0.89 | (0.55, 1.45) | 25 (24.5) | 0.78 | (0.42, 1.43) | 27 (40.3) | 1.17 | (0.60, 2.29) | |
Total 5α-reduced glucuronide metabolites (Σ(ADT-G, 3αdiol-3G, 3αdiol-17G)) | ||||||||||||
T1 | 10.4 | 135 (32.8) | 45 (26.6) | 1.00 | 38 (37.3) | 1.00 | 7 (10.4) | 1.00 | 0.002 | |||
T2 | 21.8 | 135 (32.8) | 73 (43.2) | 1.54 | (0.98, 2.44) | 40 (39.2) | 1.09 | (0.64, 1.85) | 33 (49.3) | 4.99 | (2.07, 11.98) | |
T3 | 47.6 | 140 (34.0) | 51 (30.2) | 1.00 | (0.60, 1.65) | 24 (23.5) | 0.61 | (0.34, 1.12) | 27 (40.3) | 3.63 | (1.47, 8.95) | |
Etiocholanolone-glucuronide | ||||||||||||
T1 | 15.9 | 135 (32.8) | 62 (36.7) | 1.00 | 41 (40.2) | 1.00 | 21 (31.3) | 1.00 | 0.25 | |||
T2 | 31.6 | 135 (32.8) | 50 (29.6) | 0.75 | (0.48, 1.17) | 31 (30.4) | 0.81 | (0.47, 1.38) | 19 (28.4) | 0.93 | (0.47, 1.84) | |
T3 | 63.6 | 140 (34.0) | 57 (33.7) | 0.84 | (0.54, 1.32) | 30 (29.4) | 0.77 | (0.44, 1.32) | 27 (40.3) | 1.32 | (0.69, 2.50) | |
Unconjugated Estrone | P trendd = 0.10 | |||||||||||
T1 | 35.2 | 135 (32.8) | 51 (30.2) | 1.00 | 35 (34.3) | 1.00 | 16 (23.9) | 1.00 | 0.04 | |||
T2 | 55.0 | 136 (33.0) | 53 (31.4) | 0.95 | (0.59, 1.52) | 35 (34.3) | 0.92 | (0.54, 1.59) | 18 (26.9) | 0.96 | (0.46, 2.00) | |
T3 | 90.4 | 140 (34.0) | 64 (37.9) | 1.06 | (0.65, 1.75) | 31 (30.4) | 0.71 | (0.39, 1.29) | 33 (49.3) | 1.79 | (0.88, 3.62) | |
Unconjugated Estradiol | ||||||||||||
T1 | 5.0 | 135 (32.8) | 50 (29.6) | 1.00 | 37 (36.3) | 1.00 | 13 (19.4) | 1.00 | 0.01 | |||
T2 | 11.6 | 136 (33.0) | 52 (30.8) | 0.96 | (0.60, 1.55) | 32 (31.4) | 0.83 | (0.47, 1.44) | 20 (29.9) | 1.54 | (0.72, 3.31) | |
T3 | 27.1 | 140 (34.0) | 66 (39.1) | 1.09 | (0.65, 1.84) | 32 (31.4) | 0.68 | (0.36, 1.27) | 34 (50.7) | 2.57 | (1.18, 5.60) | |
Unconjugated estradiol/Androstenedione | ||||||||||||
T1 | 3.9 | 135 (32.8) | 51 (30.2) | 1.00 | 39 (38.2) | 1.00 | 12 (17.9) | 1.00 | 0.01 | |||
T2 | 8.5 | 135 (32.8) | 54 (32.0) | 0.99 | (0.61, 1.59) | 27 (26.5) | 0.67 | (0.38, 1.20) | 27 (40.3) | 2.41 | (1.13, 5.13) | |
T3 | 20.7 | 140 (34.0) | 63 (37.3) | 1.06 | (0.64, 1.76) | 35 (34.3) | 0.78 | (0.43, 1.42) | 28 (41.8) | 2.30 | (1.03, 5.13) | |
Unconjugated estradiol/Testosterone | ||||||||||||
T1 | 9.9 | 135 (32.8) | 58 (34.3) | 1.00 | 43 (42.2) | 1.00 | 15 (22.4) | 1.00 | 0.02 | |||
T2 | 19.7 | 135 (32.8) | 50 (29.6) | 0.76 | (0.47, 1.23) | 25 (24.5) | 0.54 | (0.30, 0.96) | 25 (37.3) | 1.55 | (0.75, 3.18) | |
T3 | 46.3 | 140 (34.0) | 60 (35.5) | 0.77 | (0.45, 1.32) | 33 (32.4) | 0.60 | (0.32, 1.13) | 27 (40.3) | 1.66 | (0.75, 3.66) |
OR from conditional logistic model, conditioned on matching factors (age at baseline, year of blood draw, race/ethnicity, hysterectomy status, and time since last menopausal hormone use) and additionally adjusted for body mass index, smoking status, gravidity, and duration of oral contraceptive use.
OR from model adjusting for matching factors (age at baseline, year of blood draw, race/ethnicity, hysterectomy status, and time since last menopausal hormone use), and body mass index, smoking status, gravidity, and duration of oral contraceptive use.
P heterogeneity
P values for trend across tertile (median value of category), all other P trend>0.10
After mutual adjustment of both ADT-G and estradiol, the increased risk of developing non-serous cancer with higher levels of ADT-G remained [OR (95% CI) for T3 vs. T1 ADT-G: 4.02 (1.53–10.55)] as did the association between increased levels of unconjugated estradiol and non-serous tumors [OR (95% CI) T3 vs T1 unconjugated estradiol without adjustment for ADT-G: 2.57 (1.18–5.60) and with adjustment for ADT-G: 2.25 (1.01–4.99)] (results not tabled).
Results did not differ by time between blood draw and diagnosis (Supplementary Table S2) or by age at blood draw (Supplementary Table S3). Median androgen and androgen metabolite levels were generally consistent across non-serous tumor subtypes (Supplementary Table S4). In sensitivity analyses excluding outliers for individual androgen measurements, excluding individuals with a history of diabetes at baseline, or excluding former hormone users, effect estimates were largely unchanged (results not shown).
DISCUSSION
There is strong in vitro and in vivo evidence21–23, as well as some epidemiologic data11, 17, demonstrating that sex steroids play a role in ovarian carcinogenesis. Androgenic activity via androgen receptor signaling is responsible for healthy functioning of many organs in women. Data from experimental studies link androgen-related signalling to ovarian cancer through increased cellular proliferation and reduced apoptotic rates21–23. However, previous epidemiologic studies have not consistently shown associations between circulating androgens and overall ovarian cancer risk. In the current study, we identified significant heterogeneity in associations by ovarian cancer subtype for ADT-G and total glucuronide metabolites—markers of androgenic activity in tissues as opposed to increased estrogenic activity, because androgens cannot be aromatized into estrogens after they are metabolized via 5α-reductase. We did not find associations with serous cancers, the most common and fatal subtype, which explains the lack of association with overall ovarian cancer risk. To our knowledge, we are the first to provide evidence suggesting that ADT-G and total glucuronide metabolites--circulating markers of tissue-level androgenic activity in postmenopausal women--are associated with increased risk of developing non-serous ovarian cancer. ORs were elevated for non-serous ovarian cancers for a number of other androgens measured, including other 5-α reduced metabolites: DHTS and 3α-diol-3G, which further support the plausibility of a role for androgens in the etiology of non-serous ovarian cancer. Associations with serous cancers for these markers were null. Finally, the increased risk of non-serous ovarian cancer associated with androgens was independent of circulating estrogen levels17. Taken together, the current work and our prior research evaluating estrogen metabolites in the same study population17 suggests a role for both androgenic and estrogenic metabolites in the development of non-serous ovarian tumors.
In a recent pooled analysis of cohort studies, higher levels of testosterone were related to increased risk of ovarian cancer11. Also, high-levels of testosterone and androstenedione were associated with increased risks of specific non-serous subtypes, namely endometrioid and mucinous tumors. The OR for the highest versus lowest tertiles of testosterone levels and ovarian cancer risk in our study (1.32) was similar to that in the pooled analysis (1.25)11. Further, the pattern of elevated risk for non-serous subtypes with higher levels of androstenedione and testosterone in our study was consistent (albeit imprecise) with that in the pooled analysis11.
We detected substantial increased risk of non-serous ovarian cancers with increasing levels of androgen biomarkers previously unmeasured in ovarian cancer studies: ADT-G and total glucuronide metabolites, both of which are proposed to better reflect tissue level androgen activity than either testosterone or androstenedione12. The findings from the prior studies (summarized in Ose et al.11) are not all directly comparable to our results that were restricted to postmenopausal women, given their inclusion of both pre- and perimenopausal women as well as postmenopausal women. Further some of the prior studies measured androgens using direct RIA or chemiluminescent immunoassays5, 6, 8, 9, which have recognized limitations in terms of sensitivity and specificity.
The current study has several important strengths. The WHI-OS cohort is a large prospective study with standardized pre-diagnostic specimen collection. The androgens and androgen metabolites measured in circulation provide a novel phenotypic characterization of individual patterns of androgen metabolism—including 5α-reduced androgen metabolites and better markers of androgenic activity in postmenopausal women than measuring DHEA, testosterone, or androstenedione alone. We were able to measure a wide range of androgens in our study population, including those with relatively low levels, using an LC-MS/MS assay with high sensitivity16. Limitations of our study include the low power, which affected our ability to evaluate specific subtypes of non-serous tumors but our results for the commonly measured androgens align with those previously reported11. Additional investigation in a larger prospective study is needed to clarify the risk of individual ovarian cancer subtypes with improved markers of androgenic activity, namely ADT-G and total glucuronide metabolites. We also measured circulating androgens in a single baseline serum sample, which may not accurately reflect long-term androgen levels. Ongoing research by our group suggests that among postmenopausal women, temporal stability was moderate-to-high for most of the androgens and androgen metabolites; 2-year ICCs across the androgens/androgen metabolites averaged 0.78 (ranging from 0.34 for 5α-A to >0.96 for ADT-G, 3αdiol-17G, and the measure of total glucuronide metabolites) (unpublished data).
Our work shows that sex steroid metabolism is important in the etiology of non-serous ovarian cancers and supports a heterogeneous hormonal etiology across histologic subtypes of ovarian cancer. We observed increased risks for these tumors with both relatively high levels of estrogens17 and in the present analysis, with relatively high levels of biomarkers of increased androgenic activity in tissues. Our study provides novel molecular data that support a role for one such marker, ADT-G, in the development of non-serous ovarian cancer. Combined with other accumulating evidence that there is substantial etiologic heterogeneity across subtypes of ovarian cancer--particularly for hormonally-related risk factors--the subtype-specific associations we observed for ADT-G as well as for estrogen metabolites measured in our prior study17, support the evaluation of other circulating sex steroid hormones by ovarian cancer subtypes. Such work will further clarify the hormonal mechanisms that underlie the development of ovarian cancer.
Supplementary Material
Novetly and Impact:
The circulating androgen metabolites measured in the current study provide a novel phenotypic characterization of individual patterns of androgen metabolism associated with ovarian cancer risk—including 5α-reduced androgen metabolites (e.g., androsterone-glucuronide (ADT-G)) that have been shown to reflect tissue level androgen activity. ADT-G was associated with increased risk of non-serous ovarian cancer while a null association was indicated for serous tumors; as ADT-G cannot be converted to estrogen, this data suggests a unique role for androgen metabolism in non-serous tumors.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to also acknowledge the following short list of WHI investigators:
Program Office: (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland) Jacques Rossouw, Shari Ludlam, Dale Burwen, Joan McGowan, Leslie Ford, and Nancy Geller
Clinical Coordinating Center: (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA) Garnet Anderson, Ross Prentice, Andrea LaCroix, and Charles Kooperberg. Investigators and Academic Centers: (Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) JoAnn E. Manson; (MedStar Health Research Institute/Howard University, Washington, DC) Barbara V. Howard; (Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford, CA) Marcia L. Stefanick; (The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH) Rebecca Jackson; (University of Arizona, Tucson/Phoenix, AZ) Cynthia A. Thomson; (University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY) Jean Wactawski-Wende; (University of Florida, Gainesville/Jacksonville, FL) Marian Limacher; (University of Iowa, Iowa City/Davenport, IA) Robert Wallace; (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA) Lewis Kuller; (Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC) Sally Shumaker
Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study: (Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC) Sally Shumaker
For a list of all the investigators who have contributed to WHI science, please visit: https://www.whi.org/researchers/Documents%20%20Write%20a%20Paper/WHI%20Investigator%20Long%20List.pdf
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
This work was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute (B. Trabert, L.A. Brinton, R.T. Falk, A.M. Geczik, K.A. Michels, R.M. Pfeiffer, N. Wentzensen). National Cancer Institute funding (K22 CA193860 to H.R. Harris). The WHI program is funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services through contracts HHSN268201100046C, HHSN268201100001C, HHSN268201100002C, HHSN268201100003C, HHSN268201100004C, and HHSN271201100004C (G.L. Anderson).
Abbreviations
- WHI
Women’s Health Initiative
- OS
Observational Study
- ADT
androsterone
- ADT-G
androsterone-glucuronide
- DHEA
dehydroepiandrosterone
- DHEAS
metabolite dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate
- DHT
dihydrotestosterone
- DHTS
dihydrotestosterone sulfate
- 3α-diol-3G
5α-androstane-3α,17β diol-3-glucuronide
- 3α-diol-17G
5α-androstane-3α,17β diol-17-glucuronide
- 5α-androstanedione
5α-androstane-3,17-dione
- LC-MS/MS
liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
- OR
odds ratio
- CI
confidence interval
- CV
coefficient of variation
- ICC
intraclass correlation coefficient
- BMI
body mass index
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest: All authors declare they have no conflicts of interest
Availability of data: The data that support the findings of this study are available from https://www.whi.org/researchers/SitePages/Home.aspx. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study.
REFERENCES
- 1.Wentzensen N, Poole EM, Trabert B, White E, Arslan AA, Patel AV, Setiawan VW, Visvanathan K, Weiderpass E, Adami HO, Black A, Bernstein L, et al. Ovarian Cancer Risk Factors by Histologic Subtype: An Analysis From the Ovarian Cancer Cohort Consortium. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2016;34:2888–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dizon DS, Tejada-Berges T, Koelliker S, Steinhoff M, Granai CO. Ovarian cancer associated with testosterone supplementation in a female-to-male transsexual patient. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2006;62:226–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zimmerman Y, Eijkemans MJ, Coelingh Bennink HJ, Blankenstein MA, Fauser BC. The effect of combined oral contraception on testosterone levels in healthy women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human reproduction update 2014;20:76–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Michels KA, Brinton LA, Pfeiffer RM, Trabert B. Oral Contraceptive Use and Risks of Cancer in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. American journal of epidemiology 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 5.Helzlsouer KJ, Alberg AJ, Gordon GB, Longcope C, Bush TL, Hoffman SC, Comstock GW. Serum gonadotropins and steroid hormones and the development of ovarian cancer. Jama 1995;274:1926–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lukanova A, Lundin E, Akhmedkhanov A, Micheli A, Rinaldi S, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Lenner P, Muti P, Biessy C, Krogh V, Berrino F, Hallmans G, et al. Circulating levels of sex steroid hormones and risk of ovarian cancer. International journal of cancer. Journal international du cancer 2003;104:636–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tworoger SS, Lee IM, Buring JE, Hankinson SE. Plasma androgen concentrations and risk of incident ovarian cancer. American journal of epidemiology 2008;167:211–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rinaldi S, Dossus L, Lukanova A, Peeters PH, Allen NE, Key T, Bingham S, Khaw KT, Trichopoulos D, Trichopoulou A, Oikonomou E, Pera G, et al. Endogenous androgens and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology 2007;16:23–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ose J, Fortner RT, Rinaldi S, Schock H, Overvad K, Tjonneland A, Hansen L, Dossus L, Fournier A, Baglietto L, Romieu I, Kuhn E, et al. Endogenous androgens and risk of epithelial invasive ovarian cancer by tumor characteristics in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. International journal of cancer. Journal international du cancer 2015;136:399–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schock H, Surcel HM, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Grankvist K, Lakso HA, Fortner RT, Kaaks R, Pukkala E, Lehtinen M, Toniolo P, Lundin E. Early pregnancy sex steroids and maternal risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Endocrine-related cancer 2014;21:831–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ose J, Poole EM, Schock H, Lehtinen M, Arslan AA, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Visvanathan K, Helzlsouer K, Buring JE, Lee IM, Tjonneland A, Dossus L, et al. Androgens Are Differentially Associated with Ovarian Cancer Subtypes in the Ovarian Cancer Cohort Consortium. Cancer research 2017;77:3951–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Labrie F, Belanger A, Belanger P, Berube R, Martel C, Cusan L, Gomez J, Candas B, Castiel I, Chaussade V, Deloche C, Leclaire J. Androgen glucuronides, instead of testosterone, as the new markers of androgenic activity in women. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2006;99:182–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Labrie F Intracrinology in action: Importance of extragonadal sex steroid biosynthesis and inactivation in peripheral tissues in both women and men. J Steroid Biochem.Mol.Biol 2015;145:131–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kiddy DS, Sharp PS, White DM, Scanlon MF, Mason HD, Bray CS, Polson DW, Reed MJ, Franks S. Differences in Clinical and Endocrine Features between Obese and Non-Obese Subjects with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome - an Analysis of 263 Consecutive Cases. Clin Endocrinol 1990;32:213–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Stanczyk FZ, Azen CG, Pike MC. Effect of finasteride on serum levels of androstenedione, testosterone and their 5 alpha-reduced metabolites in men at risk for prostate cancer. J Steroid Biochem 2013;138:10–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Trabert B, Xu X, Falk RT, Guillemette C, Stanczyk FZ, McGlynn KA. Assay reproducibility of serum androgen measurements using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2016;155:56–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Trabert B, Brinton LA, Anderson GL, Pfeiffer RM, Falk RT, Strickler HD, Sliesoraitis S, Kuller LH, Gass ML, Fuhrman BJ, Xu X, Wentzensen N. Circulating Estrogens and Postmenopausal Ovarian Cancer Risk in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology 2016;25:648–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Design of the Women’s Health Initiative clinical trial and observational study. The Women’s Health Initiative Study Group. Control Clin.Trials 1998;19:61–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Langer RD, White E, Lewis CE, Kotchen JM, Hendrix SL, Trevisan M. The Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study: baseline characteristics of participants and reliability of baseline measures. Ann.Epidemiol 2003;13:S107–S21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Labrie F, Bélanger A, Bélanger P, Bérubé R, Martel C, Cusan L, Gomez J, Candas B, Castiel I, Chaussade V, Deloche C, Leclaire J Androgen glucuronides, instead of testosterone, as the new markers of androgenic activity in women. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2006;99:182–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Risch HA. Hormonal etiology of epithelial ovarian cancer, with a hypothesis concerning the role of androgens and progesterone. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1998;90:1774–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Modugno F, Laskey RA, Smith AL, Andersen CL, Haluska P, Oesterreich S. Hormone response in ovarian cancer: time to reconsider as a clinical target? Endocrine-related cancer 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 23.Edmondson RJ, Monaghan JM, Davies BR. The human ovarian surface epithelium is an androgen responsive tissue. Br J Cancer 2002;86:879–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.