Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2019 Mar 15;23:103817. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.103817

Dataset for the spore surface proteome and hydrophobin A/RodA proteoforms of A.flavus

Mohammed Razeeth Shait Mohammed a, Muthu Kumar Balamurgan a, Rabbind Singh Amrathlal d, Priyadharshini Kannan a, Jeya Maheshwari Jayapal a, Venkatesh Prajna Namperumalsamy b, Lalitha Prajna c, Kuppamuthu Dharmalingam a,
PMCID: PMC6660596  PMID: 31372461

Abstract

Fungal keratitis is a major sight-threatening corneal infection: and mycotic keratitis is more common in tropical parts of the world including India. Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium are the predominant causative agents of corneal infection. We extracted conidial surface proteins of A. flavus from saprophyte and clinical isolates and analyzed the proteins using high resolution mass spectrometry. The data revealed ecotype specific alteration in surface proteome since the proteome profile of the clinical isolates and saprophyte showed significant differences. Detailed examination of the mass spec data of RodA proteins extracted from polyacrylamide gels revealed the presence of two proteoforms of this protein. We also identified the mechanism of formation of these two isoforms. Detailed analysis of this data and the conclusions derived are described in the article, “Identification of the proteoforms of surface localized Rod A of A. flavus and determination of the mechanism of proteoform generation” [1].


Specifications table

Subject area
More specific subject area Conidial surface proteome of Aspergillus flavus
Type of data Figures,.xlsx files
How data was acquired Tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) using Thermo Easy nLC 1000 (Thermo, USA) coupled to Orbitrap Velos Pro mass spectrometer (Thermo, USA)
Data format Raw, filtered, processed and analyzed,
Experimental factors Dry spores of the isolates were extracted, and the total proteins were analyzed. RodA protein and its proteoforms were examined in detail.
Experimental features Conidial surface protein prepared from the saprophyte (ATCC26) and two clinical isolates (CI 1698 and CI 1123) were pre-fractionated on 1D SDS-PAGE. Proteins in the gel pieces were processed, subjected to tryptic/gluC digestion and the extracted peptides after cleanup were analyzed in an Orbitrap mass spectrometer.
Data source location
Data accessibility Data is with this article
Related research article Shait Mohammed MR, Balamurugan M, Amrathlal RS, Kannan P, Jayapal JM, Namperumalsamy VP, Prajna L, Kuppamuthu D: Identification of the proteoforms of surface localized Rod A of Aspergillus flavus and determination of the mechanism of proteoform generation. J Proteomics 2019, 193:62–70 [1]
Value of the data
  • The data can be used for examining the in-depth profile of conidial surface proteins of A. flavus isolates.

  • The data demonstrates the difference in conidial surface proteome of saprophyte and clinical isolates.

  • The data can be used for examining the role of two proteoforms of RodA protein in the virulence of A. flavus

  • The data can be used for examining the mechanism of proteoform generation in fungi.

1. Data

Pairwise comparison of the rodA gene of Aspergillus flavus and the related strain Aspergillus oryzae are shown in Fig. 1. Fig. 2 shows the deduced hydrophobicity plot of the RodA protein and Rod B proteins. RT-PCR data of the transcripts of rodB from mycelia grown at two different temperature is shown in Fig. 3. Spore surface proteins of saprophyte, CI1123 and CI 1678 are listed in Supplementary Tables 1–3. Supplementary Table 4 shows the pattern of conserved cysteins in RodA and Rod B proteins of A. flavus.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Pairwise alignment of rodA gene of A. flavus and A. oryzae transcripts. Intron one and intron two sequences are highlighted.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Hydrophathy plot for seven hydrophobins identified in the spore surface proteome.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

RT PCR analysis of rodb transcripts from cultures grown for 24 hrs and 40 hrs at wo different temperatures. a and b cultures grown at 30 °C or 37 °C respectively for 24 hrs. c and d cultures grown at 30 °C or 37 °C respectively for 40 hrs.

2. Experimental design, materials and methods

2.1. Preparation of samples for mass spectrometry

Previous report showed selective extraction of spore surface RodA protein of Aspergillus fumigatus by formic acid [2]. This procedure has been optimized as described below to avoid extraction of other surface proteins from spores. Spores were collected from CZA plates and mixed with 400 μl for 100% formic acid and incubated at 4 °C on ice for 1 h. After incubation spore suspension was centrifuged at 5000 rpm at 4 °C for 10 min, and then the supernatant was dried under a stream of nitrogen. The dried spore extract was resuspended in lysis buffer. Proteins were separated using 16% SDS PAGE and the proteins were visualized using Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining.

2.2. Mass spectrometry of spore surface proteins

Analysis of in gel-digested proteins was done as described below. In brief, samples were electrophoresed until the dye reached 1 cm in to the separating gels. Stained gel pieces were washed twice with water and completely destained by repeated incubation in 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate prepared in 50% acetonitrile. Gels were dehydrated using 100% acetonitrile followed by reduction and alkylation [1]. After three washes in 100 μl of 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate gel pieces were dehydrated using 100% acetonitrile. Dehydrated gel pieces were dried under vacuum and were rehydrated for 30 min on ice with 600 ng of trypsin (Invitrogen) and 300 ng of glu-C (Promega) in 5 μl of 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate in 10% acetonitrile. Tryptic were then extracted from gel pieces using 25 μl of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in 60% acetonitrile and then with 20 μl of 100% acetonitrile. Extracted peptides were combined and desalted using C18 tips, and stored at 4 °C. Just before analysis, the peptides were suspended in 10 μl of 0.1% FA and analyzed using Obitrap Velos Pro mass spectrometer [3], [4]. The number of surface proteins identified in each strain were comparable, with 492, 469 and 477 proteins in ATCC (Supplementary Table 1), CI 1123 (Supplementary Table 2) and CI 1698 (Supplementary Table 3), respectively. Of these, only 289 proteins were common to all three isolates.

LC-MS/MS parameters were described in detail previously [3]. All MS/MS raw data acquired from Orbitrap Velos Pro Mass Spectrometer were analyzed by Proteome Discoverer v1.4 using Mascot (Matrix Science, London, UK; version 2.4.1.0) and the inbuilt Sequest HT algorithm. Both Sequest HT and Mascot were set up to search the database containing the complete human proteome including the isoforms downloaded from the Uniprot database on 31st July 2013 (141130 entries) and its Decoy database. In addition, Raw files were also searched using PEAKS software against A. flavus database from uniport. Protein products from mRNA with introns were identified using the in vitro translated protein sequence from the unspliced mRNA. A. flavus rodA gene sequence (NCBI gene ID 7910713) was downloaded from NCBI database and the sequence of unspliced and spliced mRNA were deduced, based on the data from closely related A. oryzae rodA sequence (Fig. 1). ExPASy Translate tool was used to convert the rodA mRNA sequences to amino acid sequence and used for the analysis of mass spectrometry data.

The genome of A. flavus encodes seven hydrophobin family proteins and their identity were confirmed by the presence of cysteine pattern and hydropathy plot (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 4). Data of RT PCR analysis of rodb mRNA was done as described in the main article [1] indicated the strain specific expression of rodB in cultures grown for 40 hrs at 30 °C (Fig. 3).

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the grant from the Department of Biotechnology BT/01/CEIB/11/VI/09 (Programme Support for Research on Human Mycotic Keratitis) and Indo French center for the promotion of advanced research (IFC/5403-A/2015/1012). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. M. Sujitha, M.P. Kalaiselvi for their help in mass spectrometry and T. Parameswari, G. Rekha for sample collection.

Footnotes

Transparency document associated with this article can be found in the online version at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.103817.

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.103817.

Transparency document

The following is the transparency document related to this article:

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.docx (11.1KB, docx)

Appendix ASupplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:

Multimedia compenent 2

List of conidial surface protein identified from ATCC 26.

mmc2.xlsx (80.3KB, xlsx)
Multimedia compenent 3

List of conidial surface protein identified from CI 1123.

mmc3.xlsx (80.2KB, xlsx)
Multimedia compenent 4

List of conidial surface protein identified from CI 1698.

mmc4.xlsx (81.4KB, xlsx)
Multimedia compenent 5

Conserved cysteines pattern of seven hydrophobin.

mmc5.xlsx (12.8KB, xlsx)

References

  • 1.Shait Mohammed Mohammed Razeeth, Kumar Muthu, Amrathlal Rabbind Singh, Kannan Priya, Jayapal Jeya Maheshwari, Namperumalsamy Venkatesh Prajna, Prajna Lalitha, Dharmalingam Kuppamuthu. Identification of the proteoforms of surface localized Rod A of Aspergillus flavus and determination of the mechanism of proteoform generation. J Proteomics. 2019;193:62–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2018.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Paris S., Debeaupuis J.P., Crameri R., Carey M., Charles F., Prevost M.C., Schmitt C., Philippe B., Latge J.P. Conidial hydrophobins of Aspergillus fumigatus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003;69:1581–1588. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.3.1581-1588.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Selvam R.M., Nithya R., Devi P.N., Shree R.S., Nila M.V., Demonte N.L., Thangavel C., Maheshwari J.J., Lalitha P., Prajna N.V., Dharmalingam K. Exoproteome of Aspergillus flavus corneal isolates and saprophytes: identification of proteoforms of an oversecreted alkaline protease. J Proteomics. 2015;115:23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kandhavelu J., Demonte N.L., Namperumalsamy V.P., Prajna L., Thangavel C., Jayapal J.M., Kuppamuthu D. Aspergillus flavus induced alterations in tear protein profile reveal pathogen-induced host response to fungal infection. J Proteomics. 2017;152:13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.docx (11.1KB, docx)
Multimedia compenent 2

List of conidial surface protein identified from ATCC 26.

mmc2.xlsx (80.3KB, xlsx)
Multimedia compenent 3

List of conidial surface protein identified from CI 1123.

mmc3.xlsx (80.2KB, xlsx)
Multimedia compenent 4

List of conidial surface protein identified from CI 1698.

mmc4.xlsx (81.4KB, xlsx)
Multimedia compenent 5

Conserved cysteines pattern of seven hydrophobin.

mmc5.xlsx (12.8KB, xlsx)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES