Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2019 Jul 11;25:104230. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104230

Geological and geochemical characterizations of sediments in six borehole cores from the arsenic-contaminated aquifer of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam

Dang Thuong Huyen a, Carlito Baltazar Tabelin b,, Huynh Minh Thuan a, Dang Hai Dang a, Phan Thi Truong a, Banthasith Vongphuthone c, Masato Kobayashi c, Toshifumi Igarashi d
PMCID: PMC6661390  PMID: 31384642

Abstract

The Mekong Delta, situated between Cambodia and Vietnam, is one of the most productive aquifer systems in the region. In recent years, however, several studies have shown that groundwater in several areas of the delta is highly contaminated with arsenic (As). Although more than 80% of the total area of the Mekong Delta is situated in Vietnam, most of the studies have been conducted on the Cambodian-side of the delta. In this study, borehole core samples were collected around the Tien and Hau Rivers, the two main branches of the Mekong River as it enters Vietnam. We present a raw data collection of the chemical and mineralogical composition of distinct lithological features from six borehole core samples drilled up to a depth of 40 m. The data also include the pH, Eh, EC, As, Si, Al, DOC, dissolved heavy metals (Fe and Mn) and major coexisting ions of leachates obtained by leaching the 34 selected sediment samples in deionized water. The information provided in this paper would be useful as a baseline for reactive transport or geochemical modeling to understand and predict As migration in naturally contaminated aquifers under various conditions. For more insights, the reader is referred to our paper entitled “The solid-phase partitioning of arsenic in unconsolidated sediments of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam and its modes of release under various conditions” Huyen et al., 2019.


Specifications table

Subject area Geology, Geochemistry
More specific subject area Environmental geochemistry, sediment lithology and composition, leaching and speciation of arsenic
Type of data Table, image (SEM-EDX), figure (Eh-pH diagram)
How data was acquired Geological survey, SEM-EDX, XRD, XRF, ICP-AES, TOC Analyzer, LOI, ion chromatography
Data format Raw, analyzed
Experimental factors Standard preservation procedures until the analyses
Experimental features Chemical composition, total organic carbon, mineralogical composition of sediments and pH, Eh, dissolved Fe, Mn, Al, Si, DOC, major cations (Ca2+, Na+and K+) and major anions (SO42−, Cl, HCO3and NO3) of the leachates were measured
Data source location An Giang and Dong Thap Provinces of Vietnam
Data accessibility Data is included in this article
Related research article Huyen, D.T., Tabelin, C.B., Thuan, H.M., Dang, D.H., Truong, P.T., Vongphuthone, B., Kobayashi, M. and Igarashi, T., 2019. The solid-phase partitioning of arsenic in unconsolidated sediments of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam and its modes of release under various conditions. Chemosphere 233, 512–523.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.235
Value of the data
  • The dataset could be compared with those obtained from the Cambodian-side of the Mekong Delta to further understand not only the extent of arsenic contamination but also the migration of this toxic element through the aquifer.

  • The dataset could be used as a benchmark for other researchers engaged in the reactive transport or geochemical modeling of arsenic in aquifer systems.

  • The dataset could help explain why certain parts of the Mekong Delta are highly contaminated with arsenic and help local agencies to identify high-risk areas.

1. Data

The dataset describes the chemical and mineralogical properties of distinct geological features found in six borehole cores collected up to a depth of 40 m in the Vietnamese-side of the Mekong Delta (Fig. 1; Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5). It also includes scanning electron photomicrographs and energy dispersive spectra and/or elemental maps of phyllosilicates like muscovite and Clinochlore, including iron/aluminum oxyhydroxides, framboidal pyrite and soluble salts containing arsenic (As) as illustrated in Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5. Thirty-four sediment samples from the six borehole cores were leached and the geochemical properties of the leachates were determined including the concentrations of major cations and anions, dissolved heavy metals and organic matter, arsenic, and other important components like aluminum (Al), dissolved Si and nitrate (NO3) (Table 6). Finally, arsenic speciation is described using an Eh-pH diagram created from the measured solute activities of As in the leachates (Fig. 6).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

A map of Vietnam superimposed with the locations of borehole cores used in this study [1].

Table 1.

The lithology of sediment samples from the six borehole cores.

Sample name Lithology
LS-1 Grey clayey silt
LS-2 Dark grey fine sand with thin brownish grey clayey silt
LS-3 Alternating dark grey fine sand and brownish grey clayey silt (ratio 1:1)
LS-4 Brownish grey clayey silt
LS-5 Grey fine sand (distributed sample)
LS-6 Brownish grey clayey silt
Ph-1 Brownish grey clayey silt
Ph-2 Brownish grey clayey silt, partly including sand
Ph-3 Brownish grey fine sand with thin clayey silt layers
Ph-4 Brownish grey clayey silt
Ph-5 Brownish grey clayey silt, some parts with grey fine sand layers
Ph-6 Brownish grey clayey silt
P-Hu-1 Brownish grey clayey silt and sandy silt
P-Hu-2 Brownish grey clayey silt and sandy silt with a thin grey fine sand layer
P-Hu-3 Grey fine sand (distributed sample)
P-Hu-4 Grey fine sand
PT-1 Grey brownish to reddish clayey silt
PT-2 Dark grey clay with some reddish clayey silt layers
PT-3 Dark grey clay with thin sand layers with some organic matter
PT-4 Dark grey clay with thin sand layers
PT-5 Dark grey clay with fine sand layers
PT-6 Black clayey peat
PT-7 Dark grey fine sand
PT-8 Black clayey peat
PT-9 Reddish-grey clayey containing laterite
PT-10 Dark grey coarse sand
TL-1 Grey clayey silt
TL-2 Dark grey fine sand
TL-3 Dark grey coarse sand
TT-1 Grey-yellowish clayey silt with dark-grey clayey silt layers
TT-2 Dark-grey clayey silt
TT-3 Grey fine sand
TT-4 Grey medium sand
TT-5 Grey coarse sand

Table 2.

The chemical compositions of sediment samples from the six borehole cores.

Sample SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
MnO
MgO
CaO
Na2O
K2O
P2O5
S
As
TOC
LOI
wt.% wt.% wt.% wt.% wt.% wt.% wt.% wt.% wt.% mg/kg mg/kg wt.% wt.%
LS-1 51.4 15.2 4.64 0.02 1.06 0.23 0.16 2.45 0.02 14 17.7 1.13 6.21
LS-2 58.0 9.18 4.94 0.11 1.13 0.54 <0.13 2.13 0.02 4.56 10.3 1.07 4.05
LS-3 53.8 10.3 4.86 0.09 1.29 0.60 0.20 2.14 0.03 3.18 9.20 0.85 4.18
LS-4 46.6 14.0 7.01 0.14 1.69 0.57 <0.12 2.52 0.05 4.41 19.1 1.40 7.10
LS-5 68.2 6.02 2.52 0.03 0.71 0.35 0.30 1.88 0.01 1.49 4.10 0.17 1.41
LS-6 47.0 14.7 6.95 0.13 1.75 0.47 0.18 2.68 0.06 2.21 15.5 1.11 6.79
Ph-1 42.6 13.1 9.55 0.08 1.19 1.26 <0.12 2.28 0.08 0.49 16.6 0.28 5.30
Ph-2 50.9 11.9 5.36 0.10 1.12 0.63 0.17 2.11 0.05 0.71 12.7 0.97 4.91
Ph-3 57.8 9.45 4.13 0.05 0.96 0.41 0.29 1.99 0.03 1.54 7.20 0.49 2.73
Ph-4 55.0 10.9 4.70 0.09 1.06 0.52 <0.12 2.09 0.04 1.87 12.4 0.78 4.18
Ph-5 49.6 13.3 5.85 0.11 1.26 0.54 <0.12 2.29 0.05 0.82 15.8 1.08 5.75
Ph-6 48.2 13.0 6.03 0.11 1.26 0.59 0.37 2.23 0.05 0.94 13.0 1.04 5.82
P-Hu-1 49.1 13.2 6.43 0.12 1.49 0.91 0.30 2.49 0.06 0.55 15.4 1.03 5.72
P-Hu-2 48.2 13.7 6.74 0.15 1.35 0.58 <0.12 2.56 0.06 0.77 15.9 1.05 5.71
P-Hu-3 71.2 4.41 2.35 0.03 0.37 0.29 <0.13 1.68 0.00 0.44 4.40 0.04 0.90
P-Hu-4 70.7 3.60 2.13 0.02 0.29 0.23 0.40 1.64 0.01 0.44 5.70 0.02 0.77
PT-1 70.8 23.2 4.42 0.06 2.10 0.30 0.31 1.70 0.12 340 7.65 0.36 4.24
PT-2 66.2 24.3 7.45 0.01 1.48 0.18 0.41 2.59 0.03 1251 16.9 0.40 6.44
PT-3 72.4 17.1 4.94 0.08 2.10 0.55 0.78 2.26 0.06 12240 11.7 0.96 4.75
PT-4 66.2 22.1 7.17 0.15 2.69 0.72 0.61 2.88 0.13 2316 14.0 0.89 6.31
PT-5 86.3 9.61 2.34 0.03 1.33 0.43 1.05 1.82 0.08 819 4.38 0.16 1.01
PT-6 62.9 22.8 7.74 0.05 3.54 0.74 1.33 2.68 0.15 39420 32.5 12.8 28.6
PT-7 84.0 11.6 2.00 0.03 1.95 0.46 1.58 1.62 0.11 607 2.78 0.22 26.5
PT-8 64.9 25.4 4.48 0.02 2.58 0.42 0.86 3.24 0.10 5415 33.0 6.61 16.2
PT-9 67.7 21.6 7.43 0.12 2.17 0.45 0.77 2.77 0.11 169 13.1 0.18 5.13
PT-10 90.0 7.28 2.03 0.02 0.92 0.33 0.96 1.58 0.06 189 2.70 0.07 1.14
TL-1 71.5 19.1 5.84 0.13 2.30 0.88 0.73 2.55 0.17 312 15.8 0.77 4.67
TL-2 81.6 12.5 3.49 0.05 1.71 0.54 1.24 2.20 0.09 65.9 7.39 0.08 1.85
TL-3 91.3 6.87 1.73 0.03 0.72 0.25 0.83 1.37 0.07 9.38 4.97 0.04 0.84
TT-1 68.4 21.8 4.77 0.03 2.22 0.77 0.80 2.18 0.08 67.7 12.1 0.07 5.29
TT-2 75.8 17.8 3.79 0.03 1.84 0.44 0.76 2.39 0.08 835 16.0 0.68 3.66
TT-3 89.4 8.27 1.83 0.02 0.99 0.26 0.98 1.30 0.04 52.8 3.49 0.05 1.14
TT-4 90.2 7.68 1.74 0.02 0.83 0.22 1.00 1.41 0.06 39.1 2.32 0.05 1.07
TT-5 84.2 9.50 4.55 0.11 0.89 0.26 0.92 1.93 0.11 147 10.4 0.14 1.72

Table 3.

The relative abundances of minerals in sediments from borehole cores Ph and P-Hu.

Sample Depth (m) Relative abundance (wt.%)
Qz An Ab Kln Ms Clc Cal Dol Py Gt Hem Gp
Ph-1 2.8–3.0 60.9 13.1 0.6 6.8 4.8 10.2 2.8 0.3 0.5
Ph-2 7.2–7.4 64.7 14.4 2.4 9.7 6.9 1.5 0.1 0.3
Ph-3 11.6–11.8 79 13.1 2.4 1.7 1.7 0.4 0.5 1.6
Ph-4 14.7–14.9 71.9 17.9 0.4 6 2.7 0.3 0.2 0.7
Ph-5 16.2–16.4 68.1 8.3 1.6 4.8 12.2 4.3 0.2 0.1 0.3
Ph-6 19.1–19.3 68.4 10.3 1.1 5 11.3 3 0.7 0.3
P-Hu-1 3.2–3.4 58.4 11.7 0.2 5.2 13.6 7 1.9 0.2 0.7 1
P-Hu-2 6.2–6.4 59 10.7 1.5 6.4 16 4.2 1.4 0.8
P-Hu-3 10.7–10.9 73.5 10.3 2.4 0.4 3 9.2 1.1 0.1
P-Hu-4 16.7–16.9 86.4 10.4 1 2.2

Note: Qz: Quartz; An: Anorthite; Ab: Albite; Ms: Muscovite; Kln: Kaolinite; Clc: Clinochlore; Cal: Calcite; Dol: Dolomite; Py: Pyrite; Gt: Goethite; Hem: Hematite; Gp: Gypsum; "–": Not detected.

Table 4.

The relative abundances of minerals in sediment samples from borehole cores LS and PT.

Sample Depth (m) Relative abundance (wt.%)
Qz An Ab Kln Ms Clc Cal Dol Py Gt Hem Gp
LS-1 3.2–3.4 64.1 8.3 5.4 14.1 3.7 2.2 1.9 0.3
LS-2 5.8–6.0 73.9 8.2 7.6 6.6 2.6 0.3 0.4 0.4
LS-3 7.7–7.9 72.2 18.9 3.1 1.1 3.8 0.3 0.6
LS-4 10.2–10.7 59.8 8 8.5 14.5 5.7 1.4 1.7 0.4
LS-5 13.7–13.9 72.9 18.6 1.2 3.3 3.8 0.2
LS-6 18.7–18.9 56.9 5.7 1.9 7.2 18 5.7 2.4 1.7 0.5
PT-1 1.2–1.3 61.6 7.5 2.8 6.1 13.8 5.5 2.7
PT-2 4.2–4.3 57.2 5.7 2.9 10.3 7.4 12.4 1.1 1.7 1.1
PT-3 6.4–6.5 71.6 15.3 4.8 0.7 4.8 0.7 1 1.1
PT-4 11.2–11.3 57.2 13.8 10.1 0.8 9 1.6 3.4 1.4 2 0.7
PT-5 17.6–17.7 81.2 17.4 0.3 1.1
PT-6 19.2–19.3 39.8 10.1 6.6 11.7 6 15.2 0.8 6 1.2 4.3
PT-7 21.6–21.7 80.1 16.1 1.2 1.2 0.1 1.4
PT-8 24.5–24.6 41.2 2.7 2.7 14.2 22.1 11 0.5 2.4 2.3 0.9
PT-9 28.3–28.4 59.5 14.8 12.3 3.8 5.6 2.7 1.3
PT-10 38.1–38.2 82.4 15.4 1 1.2  

Note: Qz: Quartz; An: Anorthite; Ab: Albite; Ms: Muscovite; Kln: Kaolinite; Clc: Clinochlore; Cal: Calcite; Dol: Dolomite; Py: Pyrite; Gt: Goethite; Hem: Hematite; Gp: Gypsum; "–": Not detected.

Table 5.

The relative abundances of minerals in sediment samples from borehole cores TL and TT.

Sample Depth (m) Relative abundance (wt.%)
Qz An Ab Kln Ms Clc Cal Dol Py Gt Hem Gp
TL-1 3.4–3.5 60.3 16.3 0.1 6.6 2.9 12.6 0.6 0.6
TL-2 9.5–9.6 64.8 17.8 5 3.1 4.8 0.7 3.3 0.6
TL-3 16.5–16.6 88.9 4 6.2 0.8
TT-1 2.4–2.5 61.1 6.2 7.7 19.5 2.9 0.8 0.1 1.6
TT-2 3.4–3.5 76.5 13.7 4.5 0.8 4.1 0.1 0.1 0.2
TT-3 12.4–12.5 87.4 9.4 1.9 0.5 0.8
TT-4 25.3–25.4 85.2 12.3 1 1.1 0.4
TT-5 37.7–37.8 85.2 12.2 2.6

Note: Qz: Quartz; An: Anorthite; Ab: Albite; Ms: Muscovite; Kln: Kaolinite; Clc: Clinochlore; Cal: Calcite; Dol: Dolomite; Py: Pyrite; Gt: Goethite; Hem: Hematite; Gp: Gypsum; "–": Not detected.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

(a) SEM photomicrograph and EDX area spectrum of muscovite, and (b) SEM photomicrograph and EDX point spectra of muscovite and clinochlore.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

SEM photomicrographs of Fe-oxyhydroxide/oxide (a-1) and the corresponding elemental maps of Fe (a-2), O (a-3), Si (a-4), and Al (a-5).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

SEM photomicrographs of a Fe-oxyhydroxide/oxide particle-containing Ti, Mn and As (a-1) and the corresponding elemental maps of Fe (a-2), Ti (a-3), Mn (a-4), and As (a-5).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

SEM photomicrographs of As-bearing soluble salt and framboidal pyrite (a-1) and the corresponding elemental maps of As (a-2), Ca (a-3), Na (a-4), S (a-5), and O (a-6), and SEM photomicrographs of a salt-like particle composed mainly of K and Cl (b-1), and the EDS spectrum of the particle (b-2).

Table 6.

Geochemical properties and chemical compositions of leachates from sediments of the six borehole cores.

Sample pH EC
Eh
Temp.
Na
K
Mg
Ca
Fe
Al
Si
As
Cl
NO3
SO42-
HCO3
DOC
mS/m mV °C mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l μg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l
LS-1 4.45 37.5 511 19.2 3.78 3.74 11.8 48.1 1.14 1.25 1.68 3.26 2.72 0.41 179 4.86
LS-2 6.88 23.3 377 19.1 3.92 4.07 12.9 21.0 0.52 1.84 3.88 0.82 2.72 0.17 91.9 14.6 2.70
LS-3 7.41 21.3 372 16.0 5.00 8.22 11.8 14.5 3.29 9.84 14.7 0.67 11.4 0.34 62.7 17.7 3.67
LS-4 7.76 21.1 357 19.7 12.9 8.75 15.2 6.24 11.1 33.5 50.0 3.0 6.74 0.48 66.6 20.7 9.78
LS-5 7.09 11.9 373 15.3 1.67 2.32 7.43 8.97 1.55 4.54 7.48 0.13 1.74 43.6 6.71 3.49
LS-6 8.06 28.2 336 19.6 41.4 18.3 12.1 2.26 38.8 10.9 158 6.36 20.9 11.7 63.7 28.7 20.2
Ph-1 8.80 12.7 371 10.3 3.41 0.72 5.06 16.7 0.19 0.36 2.40 0.62 1.63 3.05 3.20 72.6 4.49
Ph-2 7.66 6.83 390 10.2 2.54 3.28 1.62 3.01 7.58 24.0 28.4 4.50 4.14 0.21 3.58 22.6 15.0
Ph-3 7.33 4.77 406 9.80 1.64 2.58 2.57 4.58 7.91 18.9 23.6 2.22 4.34 0.32 7.88 8.54 6.16
Ph-4 7.56 5.06 416 11.1 4.54 2.62 1.91 3.43 6.32 17.0 21.1 3.24 3.39 0.36 5.07 14.6 10.8
Ph-5 7.68 6.08 406 11.4 10.0 3.75 2.18 1.88 11.9 28.9 39.8 5.92 1.96 0.33 7.28 14.0 17.1
Ph-6 7.68 9.84 404 10.3 10.1 3.50 3.83 6.18 9.19 23.1 32.4 4.08 12.7 0.26 10.5 19.5 10.7
P-Hu-1 8.30 11.6 389 11.5 5.84 3.16 2.62 12.4 3.85 10.6 13.4 3.35 3.90 0.73 5.01 60.4 10.5
P-Hu-2 7.62 7.37 410 11.3 5.01 2.42 1.54 3.20 5.04 11.8 15.7 2.58 7.79 1.90 5.69 13.4 11.7
P-Hu-3 7.07 2.16 387 15.3 1.26 0.89 0.41 1.88 0.88 0.66 1.76 1.08 2.21 1.69 9.76 2.63
P-Hu-4 6.64 1.39 398 15.5 0.98 0.60 0.19 1.00 0.38 0.28 1.40 0.11 1.57 1.11 5.49 2.98
PT1-1 7.72 0.24 146 26.0 30.6 10.9 8.03 8.09 34.8 66.5 92.1 9.27 30.1 50.5 18.1 6.04
PT1-2 4.72 0.30 322 25.2 17.0 2.18 11.7 16.6 0.45 1.10 4.34 1.08 14.5 112 1.46 1.42
PT1-3 6.50 0.55 155 24.6 15.5 4.26 31.7 42.6 0.16 2.56 0.66 6.32 228 9.76 2.99
PT1-4 8.07 0.23 119 24.6 22.0 14.1 13.5 7.85 26.0 74.4 118 4.52 13.1 10.3 42.9 39.1 13.0
PT1-5 7.60 0.13 130 24.9 7.48 6.07 4.65 6.72 5.71 12.0 18.8 2.19 8.03 33.5 11.2 3.96
PT1-6 4.61 2.17 255 24.4 128 22.4 149 125 1.14 0.19 6.88 44.2 51.0 1134 N.D. 15.4
PT1-7 7.97 0.13 122 24.4 8.75 5.56 3.93 6.47 5.84 12.2 18.3 3.18 9.87 27.4 15.6 5.20
PT1-8 6.60 0.56 158 24.7 84.0 42.5 21.3 6.62 65.1 301 424 49.1 62.3 17.1 119 13.2 56.1
PT1-9 7.89 0.15 91 24.9 27.9 42.6 22.2 5.46 121 343 491 14.7 18.0 22.1 4.72 36.1 11.8
PT1-10 7.59 0.08 132 24.6 5.24 2.89 2.14 4.04 1.75 1.85 3.99 0.98 7.74 15.5 9.76 4.80
TL2-1 7.86 0.08 95 25.0 4.61 2.78 2.22 8.87 5.37 11.4 17.5 6.14 7.70 4.78 34.2 6.04
TL2-2 8.05 0.03 88 25.0 0.93 1.52 0.74 3.35 3.23 2.63 4.70 2.64 1.05 1.22 2.46 17.1 2.24
TL2-3 7.48 0.03 151 25.0 1.26 1.66 0.85 2.84 3.31 2.38 4.59 4.43 2.54 2.06 14.2 1.72
TT3-1 9.49 0.24 50 24.5 49.5 40.4 23.2 9.37 138 289 411 45.9 3.20 1.06 9.59 132 6.06
TT3-2 7.62 0.09 116 24.5 18.3 12.8 6.69 4.94 33.4 100 145 31.2 9.19 17.3 17.1 44.1
TT3-3 7.28 0.14 159 24.9 19.3 2.45 1.01 1.21 3.33 3.23 5.76 2.36 36.1 4.52 8.30 43.4
TT3-4 4.36 0.16 170 24.8 18.6 2.04 0.59 0.94 0.66 0.80 2.81 0.81 39.4 3.51 N.D. 88.5
TT3-5 8.12 0.14 95 24.9 19.2 5.42 2.92 1.08 42.8 40.1 63.4 20.0 31.0 3.18 15.6 4.41

Note: “–” means not detected.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

The Eh-pH predominance diagram of As at 25 °C, 1.013 bars, and activity of As = 10−4. Data points represent the actual leachate pH and Eh values measured during the leaching experiments.

2. Experimental design, materials, and methods

2.1. Study area, sampling locations, and a brief description of sediment samples

The study area is located in the An Giang and Dong Thap Provinces of Vietnam, which are notorious for their As-contaminated groundwater. Fig. 1 is a map of Vietnam showing where the six borehole cores with depths of 20–40 m were collected, and Table 1 provides lithological descriptions of the sediments with depth. A total of 34 samples were obtained from each distinct lithological feature of the borehole cores. The particle size distribution of sediments varied with depth and ranged from clayey silt to coarse sand. Two peat layers were also observed in one of the borehole cores (PT). Groundwater levels (GWL) in the borehole core sampling locations were shallow (0.3–3.6 m below the surface), and the groundwater samples were predominantly under oxidizing conditions (Eh values measured on-site were between +0.18 and +0.45 V vs SHE).

2.2. Chemical and mineralogical compositions of distinct lithological features in the borehole cores

Thirty-four sediment samples were air-dried in the laboratory, sealed in polypropylene (PP) bottles and then shipped to Hokkaido University, Japan for analyses. The chemical and mineralogical analyses were carried out on pressed powders of samples ground to <50 μm with an agate mortar. The chemical analysis was determined by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF) (SpectroXepos, Rigaku Corporation, Japan) while the mineral components were identified by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) (MultiFlex, Rigaku Corporation, Japan). All 34 XRD patterns were analyzed using Match!® (Crystal Impact, Germany) to identify minerals and semi-quantitatively determine their relative abundances in the samples. Loss on ignition (LOI) was determined by gravimetry, which was done by heating a known amount of sample in a muffle furnace at 750 °C for 1 h after drying at 110 °C in an oven for 24 h. The loss in mass of the sample corresponded to LOI. The total organic carbon (TOC) of the sediments was measured using a solid sample combustion unit attached to a total carbon analyzer (TOC-VCSH-SSM-5000A, Shimadzu Corporation, Japan). Selected samples that have exceptionally high As were also examined using a scanning electron microscope with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopic capability (SEM-EDX) (Superscan SSX-550, Shimadzu Corporation, Japan). The chemical compositions of the sediments are listed in Table 2 while the identified minerals and their approximate relative abundances in the sediments are summarized in Table 3, Table 4, Table 5

Photomicrographs of minerals and phases important in the geochemical evolution of groundwater and As mobility like clays [1], phyllosilicates (Fig. 2), organic matter [1], iron oxyhydroxides (Fig. 3), iron-titanium oxyhydroxides (Fig. 4) as well as pyrite and soluble salts (Fig. 5) are also shown [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11].

2.3. Geochemical properties and chemical compositions of leachates from the sediments

The leaching experiment was based on the standard Japanese leaching test for contaminated soils (Environmental Agency of Japan Notification No. 46) [12] and was done by mixing 15 g of sediment samples (<2 mm) with 150 ml of deionized (DI) water at 200 rpm using a reciprocal shaker for 6 h. The temperature, pH, Eh and electrical conductivity (EC) of suspensions were measured after 6 h and the liquid (supernatant) and solid (residue) were separated by centrifugation for 30 minutes at 3500 rpm. The supernatant was decanted and filtered through 0.45 μm Millex® membrane filters (Merck Millipore, USA) prior to the chemical analyses. The concentrations of dissolved iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), silicon (Si) and aluminum (Al) were determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES, ICPE-9000, Shimadzu Corporation, Japan) while the concentrations of major coexisting cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+ and K+) and anions (Cl, NO3, SO42−) were quantified by ion chromatography (ICS-90 and ICS-1000, Dionex Corporation, USA). Dissolved As concentrations greater than 0.1 mg/l were analyzed directly by ICP-AES while leachates with less than 0.1 mg/l of As were first pretreated and then analyzed using a hydride-vapor generation unit connected to an ICP-AES (detection limit: 0.1 μg/l; uncertainty = ±5%). For the pretreatment of leachates with As concentrations less than 0.1 mg/l, 10 ml of leachate was mixed with 5 ml of 12 M HCl, 0.67 ml of 20% potassium iodide (KI), 0.67 ml of DI water, and 0.33 ml of 10% ascorbic acid solution, and this mixture was allowed to equilibrate for 3 h prior to the chemical analysis [13]. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) was measured by a total carbon analyzer (TOC-VCSH, Shimadzu Corporation, Japan) while HCO3 concentrations were estimated from the alkalinity and pH using PHREEQC [14]. The alkalinity was measured by titration of a known volume of leachate with 0.02 N sulfuric acid (H2SO4) solution until pH 4.8 [15], [16]. The standard ICP-AES and ion chromatography have margins of error of around 2%.

The geochemical properties of the leachates, including the concentrations of As, Si, Al, dissolved heavy metals, DOC, and coexisting ions, are summarized in Table 6. The pH ranged from 4 to 10 and the concentrations of coexisting ions varied with depth and sampling location. The speciation of As in the leachates is plotted in an Eh-pH diagram created by the Geochemist's Workbench® [17] based on the measured solute activities (Fig. 7). Except for one sample from TT, As in the leachates exist as various oxyanions of arsenate (AsV).

Acknowledgment

This study was financially supported by the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) through the AUN-Seed Net Collaborative Research Program for Common Regional Issues (CRC) in ASEAN (Grant number: HCMUT CRC16-01).

Contributor Information

Dang Thuong Huyen, Email: dthuyenus1982@gmail.com.

Carlito Baltazar Tabelin, Email: carlito.tabelin@gmail.com.

Huynh Minh Thuan, Email: hmthuan07@gmail.com.

Dang Hai Dang, Email: danghaidang531994@gmail.com.

Phan Thi Truong, Email: truongthiphan94@gmail.com.

Banthasith Vongphuthone, Email: typapao@gmail.com.

Masato Kobayashi, Email: kitamimaki@live.jp.

Toshifumi Igarashi, Email: tosifumi@eng.hokudai.ac.jp.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  • 1.Huyen D.T., Tabelin C.B., Thuan H.M., Dang D.H., Truong P.T., Vongphuthone B., Kobayashi M., Igarashi T. The solid-phase partitioning of arsenic in unconsolidated sediments of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam and its modes of release under various conditions. Chemosphere. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beaulieu B.T., Savage K.S. Arsenate adsorption structures on aluminum oxide and phyllosilicate mineral surfaces in smelter-impacted soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005;39:3571–3579. doi: 10.1021/es048836f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fendorf S., Eick M.J., Grossl P., Sparks D.L. Arsenate and chromate retention mechanisms on goethite. 1. Surface structure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1997;31:315–320. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Raven K.P., Jain A., Loeppert R.H. Arsenite and arsenate adsorption on ferrihydrite: kinetics, equilibrium, and adsorption envelopes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998;32:344–349. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tabelin C.B., Igarashi T., Arima T., Sato D., Tatsuhara T., Tamoto S. Characterization and evaluation of arsenic and boron adsorption onto natural geologic materials, and their application in the disposal of excavated altered rock. Geoderma. 2014;213:163–172. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tabelin C.B., Sasaki R., Igarashi T., Park I., Tamoto S., Arima T., Ito M., Hiroyoshi N. Simultaneous leaching of arsenite, arsenate, selenite, and selenate, and their migration in tunnel-excavated sedimentary rocks: I. Column experiments under intermittent and unsaturated flow. Chemosphere. 2017;186:558–569. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.07.145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tabelin C.B., Sasaki R., Igarashi T., Park I., Tamoto S., Arima T., Ito M., Hiroyoshi N. Simultaneous leaching of arsenite, arsenate, selenite, and selenate, and their migration in tunnel-excavated sedimentary rocks: II. Kinetic and reactive transport modeling. Chemosphere. 2017;188:444–454. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tabelin C.B., Igarashi T., Villacorte-Tabelin M., Park I., Opiso E.M., Ito M., Hiroyoshi N. Arsenic, selenium, boron, lead, cadmium, copper, and zinc in naturally contaminated rocks: a review of their sources, modes of enrichment, mechanisms of release, and mitigation strategies. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;645:1522–1553. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang S., Mulligan C.N. Natural attenuation processes for remediation of arsenic contaminated soils and groundwater. J. Hazard Mater. 2006;B138:459–470. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.09.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Waychunas G.A., Rea B.A., Davis J.A., Fuller C.C. Surface chemistry of ferrihydrite: I. EXAFS studies of the geometry of coprecipitated and adsorbed arsenate. Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta. 1993;57:2251–2269. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Waychunas G.A., Trainor T., Eng P., Catalano J., Brown G., Davis J., Rogers J., Bargar J. Surface complexation studied via combined grazing-incidence EXAFS and surface diffraction: arsenate on hematite (0001) and (1012) Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2005;383:12–27. doi: 10.1007/s00216-005-3393-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tabelin C.B., Hashimoto A., Igarashi T., Yoneda T. Leaching of boron, arsenic and selenium from sedimentary rocks: I. Effects of contact time, mixing speed and liquid-to-solid ratio. Sci. Total Environ. 2014;472:620–629. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tabelin C.B., Igarashi T., Yoneda T., Tamamura S. Utilization of natural and artificial adsorbents in the mitigation of arsenic leached from hydrothermally altered rock. Eng. Geol. 2013;156:58–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Parkhurst D.L., Appelo C.A.J. User's guide to PHREEQC (version 2) – a computer program for speciation, batch-reactions, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations. U.S. Department of the Interior and U.S. Geological Survey. Water Resour. Invest. Rep. 1999:99–4259. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Eang K.E., Igarashi T., Fujinaga R., Kondo M., Tabelin C.B. Groundwater monitoring of an open-pit limestone quarry: groundwater characteristics, evolution and their connections to rock slopes. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2018;190(4):193. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6561-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Eang K.E., Igarashi T., Kondo M., Nakatani T., Tabelin C.B., Fujinaga R. Groundwater monitoring of an open-pit limestone quarry: water-rock interaction and mixing estimation within the rock layers by geochemical and statistical analyses. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2018;28:849–857. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bethke C.M., Yeakel S. Aqueous Solutions LLC; Urbana, Illinois: 2011. The Geochemist's Workbench® – a User's Guide to GSS, Rxn, Act2, Tact, Spec8, React, Gtplot, X1t, X2t and Xtplot. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES