Abstract
The Mekong Delta, situated between Cambodia and Vietnam, is one of the most productive aquifer systems in the region. In recent years, however, several studies have shown that groundwater in several areas of the delta is highly contaminated with arsenic (As). Although more than 80% of the total area of the Mekong Delta is situated in Vietnam, most of the studies have been conducted on the Cambodian-side of the delta. In this study, borehole core samples were collected around the Tien and Hau Rivers, the two main branches of the Mekong River as it enters Vietnam. We present a raw data collection of the chemical and mineralogical composition of distinct lithological features from six borehole core samples drilled up to a depth of 40 m. The data also include the pH, Eh, EC, As, Si, Al, DOC, dissolved heavy metals (Fe and Mn) and major coexisting ions of leachates obtained by leaching the 34 selected sediment samples in deionized water. The information provided in this paper would be useful as a baseline for reactive transport or geochemical modeling to understand and predict As migration in naturally contaminated aquifers under various conditions. For more insights, the reader is referred to our paper entitled “The solid-phase partitioning of arsenic in unconsolidated sediments of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam and its modes of release under various conditions” Huyen et al., 2019.
Subject area | Geology, Geochemistry |
More specific subject area | Environmental geochemistry, sediment lithology and composition, leaching and speciation of arsenic |
Type of data | Table, image (SEM-EDX), figure (Eh-pH diagram) |
How data was acquired | Geological survey, SEM-EDX, XRD, XRF, ICP-AES, TOC Analyzer, LOI, ion chromatography |
Data format | Raw, analyzed |
Experimental factors | Standard preservation procedures until the analyses |
Experimental features | Chemical composition, total organic carbon, mineralogical composition of sediments and pH, Eh, dissolved Fe, Mn, Al, Si, DOC, major cations (Ca2+, Na+and K+) and major anions (SO42−, Cl−, HCO3−and NO3−) of the leachates were measured |
Data source location | An Giang and Dong Thap Provinces of Vietnam |
Data accessibility | Data is included in this article |
Related research article | Huyen, D.T., Tabelin, C.B., Thuan, H.M., Dang, D.H., Truong, P.T., Vongphuthone, B., Kobayashi, M. and Igarashi, T., 2019. The solid-phase partitioning of arsenic in unconsolidated sediments of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam and its modes of release under various conditions. Chemosphere 233, 512–523.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.235 |
Value of the data
|
1. Data
The dataset describes the chemical and mineralogical properties of distinct geological features found in six borehole cores collected up to a depth of 40 m in the Vietnamese-side of the Mekong Delta (Fig. 1; Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5). It also includes scanning electron photomicrographs and energy dispersive spectra and/or elemental maps of phyllosilicates like muscovite and Clinochlore, including iron/aluminum oxyhydroxides, framboidal pyrite and soluble salts containing arsenic (As) as illustrated in Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5. Thirty-four sediment samples from the six borehole cores were leached and the geochemical properties of the leachates were determined including the concentrations of major cations and anions, dissolved heavy metals and organic matter, arsenic, and other important components like aluminum (Al), dissolved Si and nitrate (NO3−) (Table 6). Finally, arsenic speciation is described using an Eh-pH diagram created from the measured solute activities of As in the leachates (Fig. 6).
Table 1.
Sample name | Lithology |
---|---|
LS-1 | Grey clayey silt |
LS-2 | Dark grey fine sand with thin brownish grey clayey silt |
LS-3 | Alternating dark grey fine sand and brownish grey clayey silt (ratio 1:1) |
LS-4 | Brownish grey clayey silt |
LS-5 | Grey fine sand (distributed sample) |
LS-6 | Brownish grey clayey silt |
Ph-1 | Brownish grey clayey silt |
Ph-2 | Brownish grey clayey silt, partly including sand |
Ph-3 | Brownish grey fine sand with thin clayey silt layers |
Ph-4 | Brownish grey clayey silt |
Ph-5 | Brownish grey clayey silt, some parts with grey fine sand layers |
Ph-6 | Brownish grey clayey silt |
P-Hu-1 | Brownish grey clayey silt and sandy silt |
P-Hu-2 | Brownish grey clayey silt and sandy silt with a thin grey fine sand layer |
P-Hu-3 | Grey fine sand (distributed sample) |
P-Hu-4 | Grey fine sand |
PT-1 | Grey brownish to reddish clayey silt |
PT-2 | Dark grey clay with some reddish clayey silt layers |
PT-3 | Dark grey clay with thin sand layers with some organic matter |
PT-4 | Dark grey clay with thin sand layers |
PT-5 | Dark grey clay with fine sand layers |
PT-6 | Black clayey peat |
PT-7 | Dark grey fine sand |
PT-8 | Black clayey peat |
PT-9 | Reddish-grey clayey containing laterite |
PT-10 | Dark grey coarse sand |
TL-1 | Grey clayey silt |
TL-2 | Dark grey fine sand |
TL-3 | Dark grey coarse sand |
TT-1 | Grey-yellowish clayey silt with dark-grey clayey silt layers |
TT-2 | Dark-grey clayey silt |
TT-3 | Grey fine sand |
TT-4 | Grey medium sand |
TT-5 | Grey coarse sand |
Table 2.
Sample | SiO2 |
Al2O3 |
Fe2O3 |
MnO |
MgO |
CaO |
Na2O |
K2O |
P2O5 |
S |
As |
TOC |
LOI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
wt.% | wt.% | wt.% | wt.% | wt.% | wt.% | wt.% | wt.% | wt.% | mg/kg | mg/kg | wt.% | wt.% | |
LS-1 | 51.4 | 15.2 | 4.64 | 0.02 | 1.06 | 0.23 | 0.16 | 2.45 | 0.02 | 14 | 17.7 | 1.13 | 6.21 |
LS-2 | 58.0 | 9.18 | 4.94 | 0.11 | 1.13 | 0.54 | <0.13 | 2.13 | 0.02 | 4.56 | 10.3 | 1.07 | 4.05 |
LS-3 | 53.8 | 10.3 | 4.86 | 0.09 | 1.29 | 0.60 | 0.20 | 2.14 | 0.03 | 3.18 | 9.20 | 0.85 | 4.18 |
LS-4 | 46.6 | 14.0 | 7.01 | 0.14 | 1.69 | 0.57 | <0.12 | 2.52 | 0.05 | 4.41 | 19.1 | 1.40 | 7.10 |
LS-5 | 68.2 | 6.02 | 2.52 | 0.03 | 0.71 | 0.35 | 0.30 | 1.88 | 0.01 | 1.49 | 4.10 | 0.17 | 1.41 |
LS-6 | 47.0 | 14.7 | 6.95 | 0.13 | 1.75 | 0.47 | 0.18 | 2.68 | 0.06 | 2.21 | 15.5 | 1.11 | 6.79 |
Ph-1 | 42.6 | 13.1 | 9.55 | 0.08 | 1.19 | 1.26 | <0.12 | 2.28 | 0.08 | 0.49 | 16.6 | 0.28 | 5.30 |
Ph-2 | 50.9 | 11.9 | 5.36 | 0.10 | 1.12 | 0.63 | 0.17 | 2.11 | 0.05 | 0.71 | 12.7 | 0.97 | 4.91 |
Ph-3 | 57.8 | 9.45 | 4.13 | 0.05 | 0.96 | 0.41 | 0.29 | 1.99 | 0.03 | 1.54 | 7.20 | 0.49 | 2.73 |
Ph-4 | 55.0 | 10.9 | 4.70 | 0.09 | 1.06 | 0.52 | <0.12 | 2.09 | 0.04 | 1.87 | 12.4 | 0.78 | 4.18 |
Ph-5 | 49.6 | 13.3 | 5.85 | 0.11 | 1.26 | 0.54 | <0.12 | 2.29 | 0.05 | 0.82 | 15.8 | 1.08 | 5.75 |
Ph-6 | 48.2 | 13.0 | 6.03 | 0.11 | 1.26 | 0.59 | 0.37 | 2.23 | 0.05 | 0.94 | 13.0 | 1.04 | 5.82 |
P-Hu-1 | 49.1 | 13.2 | 6.43 | 0.12 | 1.49 | 0.91 | 0.30 | 2.49 | 0.06 | 0.55 | 15.4 | 1.03 | 5.72 |
P-Hu-2 | 48.2 | 13.7 | 6.74 | 0.15 | 1.35 | 0.58 | <0.12 | 2.56 | 0.06 | 0.77 | 15.9 | 1.05 | 5.71 |
P-Hu-3 | 71.2 | 4.41 | 2.35 | 0.03 | 0.37 | 0.29 | <0.13 | 1.68 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 4.40 | 0.04 | 0.90 |
P-Hu-4 | 70.7 | 3.60 | 2.13 | 0.02 | 0.29 | 0.23 | 0.40 | 1.64 | 0.01 | 0.44 | 5.70 | 0.02 | 0.77 |
PT-1 | 70.8 | 23.2 | 4.42 | 0.06 | 2.10 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 1.70 | 0.12 | 340 | 7.65 | 0.36 | 4.24 |
PT-2 | 66.2 | 24.3 | 7.45 | 0.01 | 1.48 | 0.18 | 0.41 | 2.59 | 0.03 | 1251 | 16.9 | 0.40 | 6.44 |
PT-3 | 72.4 | 17.1 | 4.94 | 0.08 | 2.10 | 0.55 | 0.78 | 2.26 | 0.06 | 12240 | 11.7 | 0.96 | 4.75 |
PT-4 | 66.2 | 22.1 | 7.17 | 0.15 | 2.69 | 0.72 | 0.61 | 2.88 | 0.13 | 2316 | 14.0 | 0.89 | 6.31 |
PT-5 | 86.3 | 9.61 | 2.34 | 0.03 | 1.33 | 0.43 | 1.05 | 1.82 | 0.08 | 819 | 4.38 | 0.16 | 1.01 |
PT-6 | 62.9 | 22.8 | 7.74 | 0.05 | 3.54 | 0.74 | 1.33 | 2.68 | 0.15 | 39420 | 32.5 | 12.8 | 28.6 |
PT-7 | 84.0 | 11.6 | 2.00 | 0.03 | 1.95 | 0.46 | 1.58 | 1.62 | 0.11 | 607 | 2.78 | 0.22 | 26.5 |
PT-8 | 64.9 | 25.4 | 4.48 | 0.02 | 2.58 | 0.42 | 0.86 | 3.24 | 0.10 | 5415 | 33.0 | 6.61 | 16.2 |
PT-9 | 67.7 | 21.6 | 7.43 | 0.12 | 2.17 | 0.45 | 0.77 | 2.77 | 0.11 | 169 | 13.1 | 0.18 | 5.13 |
PT-10 | 90.0 | 7.28 | 2.03 | 0.02 | 0.92 | 0.33 | 0.96 | 1.58 | 0.06 | 189 | 2.70 | 0.07 | 1.14 |
TL-1 | 71.5 | 19.1 | 5.84 | 0.13 | 2.30 | 0.88 | 0.73 | 2.55 | 0.17 | 312 | 15.8 | 0.77 | 4.67 |
TL-2 | 81.6 | 12.5 | 3.49 | 0.05 | 1.71 | 0.54 | 1.24 | 2.20 | 0.09 | 65.9 | 7.39 | 0.08 | 1.85 |
TL-3 | 91.3 | 6.87 | 1.73 | 0.03 | 0.72 | 0.25 | 0.83 | 1.37 | 0.07 | 9.38 | 4.97 | 0.04 | 0.84 |
TT-1 | 68.4 | 21.8 | 4.77 | 0.03 | 2.22 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 2.18 | 0.08 | 67.7 | 12.1 | 0.07 | 5.29 |
TT-2 | 75.8 | 17.8 | 3.79 | 0.03 | 1.84 | 0.44 | 0.76 | 2.39 | 0.08 | 835 | 16.0 | 0.68 | 3.66 |
TT-3 | 89.4 | 8.27 | 1.83 | 0.02 | 0.99 | 0.26 | 0.98 | 1.30 | 0.04 | 52.8 | 3.49 | 0.05 | 1.14 |
TT-4 | 90.2 | 7.68 | 1.74 | 0.02 | 0.83 | 0.22 | 1.00 | 1.41 | 0.06 | 39.1 | 2.32 | 0.05 | 1.07 |
TT-5 | 84.2 | 9.50 | 4.55 | 0.11 | 0.89 | 0.26 | 0.92 | 1.93 | 0.11 | 147 | 10.4 | 0.14 | 1.72 |
Table 3.
Sample | Depth (m) | Relative abundance (wt.%) |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qz | An | Ab | Kln | Ms | Clc | Cal | Dol | Py | Gt | Hem | Gp | ||
Ph-1 | 2.8–3.0 | 60.9 | 13.1 | 0.6 | 6.8 | 4.8 | 10.2 | 2.8 | – | 0.3 | 0.5 | – | – |
Ph-2 | 7.2–7.4 | 64.7 | 14.4 | – | 2.4 | 9.7 | 6.9 | – | 1.5 | – | 0.1 | 0.3 | – |
Ph-3 | 11.6–11.8 | 79 | 13.1 | – | 2.4 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.5 | – | 1.6 | – | – |
Ph-4 | 14.7–14.9 | 71.9 | 17.9 | – | 0.4 | 6 | 2.7 | – | 0.3 | – | 0.2 | 0.7 | – |
Ph-5 | 16.2–16.4 | 68.1 | 8.3 | 1.6 | 4.8 | 12.2 | 4.3 | – | 0.2 | 0.1 | – | 0.3 | – |
Ph-6 | 19.1–19.3 | 68.4 | 10.3 | 1.1 | 5 | 11.3 | 3 | – | – | – | 0.7 | 0.3 | – |
P-Hu-1 | 3.2–3.4 | 58.4 | 11.7 | 0.2 | 5.2 | 13.6 | 7 | – | 1.9 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1 | – |
P-Hu-2 | 6.2–6.4 | 59 | 10.7 | 1.5 | 6.4 | 16 | 4.2 | – | 1.4 | – | – | 0.8 | – |
P-Hu-3 | 10.7–10.9 | 73.5 | 10.3 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 3 | 9.2 | – | 1.1 | – | – | 0.1 | – |
P-Hu-4 | 16.7–16.9 | 86.4 | 10.4 | – | 1 | 2.2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Note: Qz: Quartz; An: Anorthite; Ab: Albite; Ms: Muscovite; Kln: Kaolinite; Clc: Clinochlore; Cal: Calcite; Dol: Dolomite; Py: Pyrite; Gt: Goethite; Hem: Hematite; Gp: Gypsum; "–": Not detected.
Table 4.
Sample | Depth (m) | Relative abundance (wt.%) |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qz | An | Ab | Kln | Ms | Clc | Cal | Dol | Py | Gt | Hem | Gp | ||
LS-1 | 3.2–3.4 | 64.1 | 8.3 | – | 5.4 | 14.1 | 3.7 | – | – | 2.2 | 1.9 | – | 0.3 |
LS-2 | 5.8–6.0 | 73.9 | 8.2 | 7.6 | – | 6.6 | 2.6 | – | – | – | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
LS-3 | 7.7–7.9 | 72.2 | 18.9 | – | 3.1 | 1.1 | 3.8 | 0.3 | – | 0.6 | – | – | – |
LS-4 | 10.2–10.7 | 59.8 | 8 | – | 8.5 | 14.5 | 5.7 | – | 1.4 | – | – | 1.7 | 0.4 |
LS-5 | 13.7–13.9 | 72.9 | 18.6 | 1.2 | 3.3 | 3.8 | – | – | – | 0.2 | – | – | |
LS-6 | 18.7–18.9 | 56.9 | 5.7 | 1.9 | 7.2 | 18 | 5.7 | – | 2.4 | – | 1.7 | – | 0.5 |
PT-1 | 1.2–1.3 | 61.6 | 7.5 | 2.8 | 6.1 | 13.8 | 5.5 | – | – | – | 2.7 | – | – |
PT-2 | 4.2–4.3 | 57.2 | 5.7 | 2.9 | 10.3 | 7.4 | 12.4 | 1.1 | – | – | 1.7 | – | 1.1 |
PT-3 | 6.4–6.5 | 71.6 | 15.3 | – | 4.8 | 0.7 | 4.8 | 0.7 | – | 1 | 1.1 | – | – |
PT-4 | 11.2–11.3 | 57.2 | 13.8 | – | 10.1 | 0.8 | 9 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 2 | 0.7 | – |
PT-5 | 17.6–17.7 | 81.2 | 17.4 | – | 0.3 | 1.1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
PT-6 | 19.2–19.3 | 39.8 | 10.1 | 6.6 | 11.7 | 6 | 15.2 | 0.8 | – | 6 | – | 1.2 | 4.3 |
PT-7 | 21.6–21.7 | 80.1 | 16.1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | – | 0.1 | – | – | – | – | 1.4 | – |
PT-8 | 24.5–24.6 | 41.2 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 14.2 | 22.1 | 11 | 0.5 | 2.4 | 2.3 | – | – | 0.9 |
PT-9 | 28.3–28.4 | 59.5 | 14.8 | – | 12.3 | 3.8 | 5.6 | – | 2.7 | 1.3 | – | – | – |
PT-10 | 38.1–38.2 | 82.4 | 15.4 | – | 1 | 1.2 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Note: Qz: Quartz; An: Anorthite; Ab: Albite; Ms: Muscovite; Kln: Kaolinite; Clc: Clinochlore; Cal: Calcite; Dol: Dolomite; Py: Pyrite; Gt: Goethite; Hem: Hematite; Gp: Gypsum; "–": Not detected.
Table 5.
Sample | Depth (m) | Relative abundance (wt.%) |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qz | An | Ab | Kln | Ms | Clc | Cal | Dol | Py | Gt | Hem | Gp | ||
TL-1 | 3.4–3.5 | 60.3 | 16.3 | 0.1 | 6.6 | 2.9 | 12.6 | 0.6 | – | 0.6 | – | – | – |
TL-2 | 9.5–9.6 | 64.8 | 17.8 | – | 5 | 3.1 | 4.8 | 0.7 | 3.3 | 0.6 | – | – | – |
TL-3 | 16.5–16.6 | 88.9 | 4 | 6.2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.8 | – |
TT-1 | 2.4–2.5 | 61.1 | 6.2 | – | 7.7 | 19.5 | 2.9 | 0.8 | – | – | 0.1 | 1.6 | – |
TT-2 | 3.4–3.5 | 76.5 | 13.7 | – | 4.5 | 0.8 | 4.1 | 0.1 | – | 0.1 | – | 0.2 | – |
TT-3 | 12.4–12.5 | 87.4 | 9.4 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 0.8 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
TT-4 | 25.3–25.4 | 85.2 | 12.3 | 1 | – | 1.1 | – | 0.4 | – | – | – | – | – |
TT-5 | 37.7–37.8 | 85.2 | 12.2 | – | – | 2.6 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Note: Qz: Quartz; An: Anorthite; Ab: Albite; Ms: Muscovite; Kln: Kaolinite; Clc: Clinochlore; Cal: Calcite; Dol: Dolomite; Py: Pyrite; Gt: Goethite; Hem: Hematite; Gp: Gypsum; "–": Not detected.
Table 6.
Sample | pH | EC |
Eh |
Temp. |
Na |
K |
Mg |
Ca |
Fe |
Al |
Si |
As |
Cl |
NO3− |
SO42- |
HCO3− |
DOC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mS/m | mV | °C | mg/l | mg/l | mg/l | mg/l | mg/l | mg/l | mg/l | μg/l | mg/l | mg/l | mg/l | mg/l | mg/l | ||
LS-1 | 4.45 | 37.5 | 511 | 19.2 | 3.78 | 3.74 | 11.8 | 48.1 | 1.14 | 1.25 | 1.68 | 3.26 | 2.72 | 0.41 | 179 | – | 4.86 |
LS-2 | 6.88 | 23.3 | 377 | 19.1 | 3.92 | 4.07 | 12.9 | 21.0 | 0.52 | 1.84 | 3.88 | 0.82 | 2.72 | 0.17 | 91.9 | 14.6 | 2.70 |
LS-3 | 7.41 | 21.3 | 372 | 16.0 | 5.00 | 8.22 | 11.8 | 14.5 | 3.29 | 9.84 | 14.7 | 0.67 | 11.4 | 0.34 | 62.7 | 17.7 | 3.67 |
LS-4 | 7.76 | 21.1 | 357 | 19.7 | 12.9 | 8.75 | 15.2 | 6.24 | 11.1 | 33.5 | 50.0 | 3.0 | 6.74 | 0.48 | 66.6 | 20.7 | 9.78 |
LS-5 | 7.09 | 11.9 | 373 | 15.3 | 1.67 | 2.32 | 7.43 | 8.97 | 1.55 | 4.54 | 7.48 | 0.13 | 1.74 | – | 43.6 | 6.71 | 3.49 |
LS-6 | 8.06 | 28.2 | 336 | 19.6 | 41.4 | 18.3 | 12.1 | 2.26 | 38.8 | 10.9 | 158 | 6.36 | 20.9 | 11.7 | 63.7 | 28.7 | 20.2 |
Ph-1 | 8.80 | 12.7 | 371 | 10.3 | 3.41 | 0.72 | 5.06 | 16.7 | 0.19 | 0.36 | 2.40 | 0.62 | 1.63 | 3.05 | 3.20 | 72.6 | 4.49 |
Ph-2 | 7.66 | 6.83 | 390 | 10.2 | 2.54 | 3.28 | 1.62 | 3.01 | 7.58 | 24.0 | 28.4 | 4.50 | 4.14 | 0.21 | 3.58 | 22.6 | 15.0 |
Ph-3 | 7.33 | 4.77 | 406 | 9.80 | 1.64 | 2.58 | 2.57 | 4.58 | 7.91 | 18.9 | 23.6 | 2.22 | 4.34 | 0.32 | 7.88 | 8.54 | 6.16 |
Ph-4 | 7.56 | 5.06 | 416 | 11.1 | 4.54 | 2.62 | 1.91 | 3.43 | 6.32 | 17.0 | 21.1 | 3.24 | 3.39 | 0.36 | 5.07 | 14.6 | 10.8 |
Ph-5 | 7.68 | 6.08 | 406 | 11.4 | 10.0 | 3.75 | 2.18 | 1.88 | 11.9 | 28.9 | 39.8 | 5.92 | 1.96 | 0.33 | 7.28 | 14.0 | 17.1 |
Ph-6 | 7.68 | 9.84 | 404 | 10.3 | 10.1 | 3.50 | 3.83 | 6.18 | 9.19 | 23.1 | 32.4 | 4.08 | 12.7 | 0.26 | 10.5 | 19.5 | 10.7 |
P-Hu-1 | 8.30 | 11.6 | 389 | 11.5 | 5.84 | 3.16 | 2.62 | 12.4 | 3.85 | 10.6 | 13.4 | 3.35 | 3.90 | 0.73 | 5.01 | 60.4 | 10.5 |
P-Hu-2 | 7.62 | 7.37 | 410 | 11.3 | 5.01 | 2.42 | 1.54 | 3.20 | 5.04 | 11.8 | 15.7 | 2.58 | 7.79 | 1.90 | 5.69 | 13.4 | 11.7 |
P-Hu-3 | 7.07 | 2.16 | 387 | 15.3 | 1.26 | 0.89 | 0.41 | 1.88 | 0.88 | 0.66 | 1.76 | 1.08 | 2.21 | – | 1.69 | 9.76 | 2.63 |
P-Hu-4 | 6.64 | 1.39 | 398 | 15.5 | 0.98 | 0.60 | 0.19 | 1.00 | 0.38 | 0.28 | 1.40 | 0.11 | 1.57 | – | 1.11 | 5.49 | 2.98 |
PT1-1 | 7.72 | 0.24 | 146 | 26.0 | 30.6 | 10.9 | 8.03 | 8.09 | 34.8 | 66.5 | 92.1 | 9.27 | 30.1 | – | 50.5 | 18.1 | 6.04 |
PT1-2 | 4.72 | 0.30 | 322 | 25.2 | 17.0 | 2.18 | 11.7 | 16.6 | 0.45 | 1.10 | 4.34 | 1.08 | 14.5 | – | 112 | 1.46 | 1.42 |
PT1-3 | 6.50 | 0.55 | 155 | 24.6 | 15.5 | 4.26 | 31.7 | 42.6 | – | 0.16 | 2.56 | 0.66 | 6.32 | – | 228 | 9.76 | 2.99 |
PT1-4 | 8.07 | 0.23 | 119 | 24.6 | 22.0 | 14.1 | 13.5 | 7.85 | 26.0 | 74.4 | 118 | 4.52 | 13.1 | 10.3 | 42.9 | 39.1 | 13.0 |
PT1-5 | 7.60 | 0.13 | 130 | 24.9 | 7.48 | 6.07 | 4.65 | 6.72 | 5.71 | 12.0 | 18.8 | 2.19 | 8.03 | – | 33.5 | 11.2 | 3.96 |
PT1-6 | 4.61 | 2.17 | 255 | 24.4 | 128 | 22.4 | 149 | 125 | 1.14 | 0.19 | 6.88 | 44.2 | 51.0 | – | 1134 | N.D. | 15.4 |
PT1-7 | 7.97 | 0.13 | 122 | 24.4 | 8.75 | 5.56 | 3.93 | 6.47 | 5.84 | 12.2 | 18.3 | 3.18 | 9.87 | – | 27.4 | 15.6 | 5.20 |
PT1-8 | 6.60 | 0.56 | 158 | 24.7 | 84.0 | 42.5 | 21.3 | 6.62 | 65.1 | 301 | 424 | 49.1 | 62.3 | 17.1 | 119 | 13.2 | 56.1 |
PT1-9 | 7.89 | 0.15 | 91 | 24.9 | 27.9 | 42.6 | 22.2 | 5.46 | 121 | 343 | 491 | 14.7 | 18.0 | 22.1 | 4.72 | 36.1 | 11.8 |
PT1-10 | 7.59 | 0.08 | 132 | 24.6 | 5.24 | 2.89 | 2.14 | 4.04 | 1.75 | 1.85 | 3.99 | 0.98 | 7.74 | – | 15.5 | 9.76 | 4.80 |
TL2-1 | 7.86 | 0.08 | 95 | 25.0 | 4.61 | 2.78 | 2.22 | 8.87 | 5.37 | 11.4 | 17.5 | 6.14 | 7.70 | – | 4.78 | 34.2 | 6.04 |
TL2-2 | 8.05 | 0.03 | 88 | 25.0 | 0.93 | 1.52 | 0.74 | 3.35 | 3.23 | 2.63 | 4.70 | 2.64 | 1.05 | 1.22 | 2.46 | 17.1 | 2.24 |
TL2-3 | 7.48 | 0.03 | 151 | 25.0 | 1.26 | 1.66 | 0.85 | 2.84 | 3.31 | 2.38 | 4.59 | 4.43 | 2.54 | – | 2.06 | 14.2 | 1.72 |
TT3-1 | 9.49 | 0.24 | 50 | 24.5 | 49.5 | 40.4 | 23.2 | 9.37 | 138 | 289 | 411 | 45.9 | 3.20 | 1.06 | 9.59 | 132 | 6.06 |
TT3-2 | 7.62 | 0.09 | 116 | 24.5 | 18.3 | 12.8 | 6.69 | 4.94 | 33.4 | 100 | 145 | 31.2 | 9.19 | – | 17.3 | 17.1 | 44.1 |
TT3-3 | 7.28 | 0.14 | 159 | 24.9 | 19.3 | 2.45 | 1.01 | 1.21 | 3.33 | 3.23 | 5.76 | 2.36 | 36.1 | – | 4.52 | 8.30 | 43.4 |
TT3-4 | 4.36 | 0.16 | 170 | 24.8 | 18.6 | 2.04 | 0.59 | 0.94 | 0.66 | 0.80 | 2.81 | 0.81 | 39.4 | – | 3.51 | N.D. | 88.5 |
TT3-5 | 8.12 | 0.14 | 95 | 24.9 | 19.2 | 5.42 | 2.92 | 1.08 | 42.8 | 40.1 | 63.4 | 20.0 | 31.0 | – | 3.18 | 15.6 | 4.41 |
Note: “–” means not detected.
2. Experimental design, materials, and methods
2.1. Study area, sampling locations, and a brief description of sediment samples
The study area is located in the An Giang and Dong Thap Provinces of Vietnam, which are notorious for their As-contaminated groundwater. Fig. 1 is a map of Vietnam showing where the six borehole cores with depths of 20–40 m were collected, and Table 1 provides lithological descriptions of the sediments with depth. A total of 34 samples were obtained from each distinct lithological feature of the borehole cores. The particle size distribution of sediments varied with depth and ranged from clayey silt to coarse sand. Two peat layers were also observed in one of the borehole cores (PT). Groundwater levels (GWL) in the borehole core sampling locations were shallow (0.3–3.6 m below the surface), and the groundwater samples were predominantly under oxidizing conditions (Eh values measured on-site were between +0.18 and +0.45 V vs SHE).
2.2. Chemical and mineralogical compositions of distinct lithological features in the borehole cores
Thirty-four sediment samples were air-dried in the laboratory, sealed in polypropylene (PP) bottles and then shipped to Hokkaido University, Japan for analyses. The chemical and mineralogical analyses were carried out on pressed powders of samples ground to <50 μm with an agate mortar. The chemical analysis was determined by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF) (SpectroXepos, Rigaku Corporation, Japan) while the mineral components were identified by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) (MultiFlex, Rigaku Corporation, Japan). All 34 XRD patterns were analyzed using Match!® (Crystal Impact, Germany) to identify minerals and semi-quantitatively determine their relative abundances in the samples. Loss on ignition (LOI) was determined by gravimetry, which was done by heating a known amount of sample in a muffle furnace at 750 °C for 1 h after drying at 110 °C in an oven for 24 h. The loss in mass of the sample corresponded to LOI. The total organic carbon (TOC) of the sediments was measured using a solid sample combustion unit attached to a total carbon analyzer (TOC-VCSH-SSM-5000A, Shimadzu Corporation, Japan). Selected samples that have exceptionally high As were also examined using a scanning electron microscope with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopic capability (SEM-EDX) (Superscan SSX-550, Shimadzu Corporation, Japan). The chemical compositions of the sediments are listed in Table 2 while the identified minerals and their approximate relative abundances in the sediments are summarized in Table 3, Table 4, Table 5
Photomicrographs of minerals and phases important in the geochemical evolution of groundwater and As mobility like clays [1], phyllosilicates (Fig. 2), organic matter [1], iron oxyhydroxides (Fig. 3), iron-titanium oxyhydroxides (Fig. 4) as well as pyrite and soluble salts (Fig. 5) are also shown [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11].
2.3. Geochemical properties and chemical compositions of leachates from the sediments
The leaching experiment was based on the standard Japanese leaching test for contaminated soils (Environmental Agency of Japan Notification No. 46) [12] and was done by mixing 15 g of sediment samples (<2 mm) with 150 ml of deionized (DI) water at 200 rpm using a reciprocal shaker for 6 h. The temperature, pH, Eh and electrical conductivity (EC) of suspensions were measured after 6 h and the liquid (supernatant) and solid (residue) were separated by centrifugation for 30 minutes at 3500 rpm. The supernatant was decanted and filtered through 0.45 μm Millex® membrane filters (Merck Millipore, USA) prior to the chemical analyses. The concentrations of dissolved iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), silicon (Si) and aluminum (Al) were determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES, ICPE-9000, Shimadzu Corporation, Japan) while the concentrations of major coexisting cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+ and K+) and anions (Cl−, NO3−, SO42−) were quantified by ion chromatography (ICS-90 and ICS-1000, Dionex Corporation, USA). Dissolved As concentrations greater than 0.1 mg/l were analyzed directly by ICP-AES while leachates with less than 0.1 mg/l of As were first pretreated and then analyzed using a hydride-vapor generation unit connected to an ICP-AES (detection limit: 0.1 μg/l; uncertainty = ±5%). For the pretreatment of leachates with As concentrations less than 0.1 mg/l, 10 ml of leachate was mixed with 5 ml of 12 M HCl, 0.67 ml of 20% potassium iodide (KI), 0.67 ml of DI water, and 0.33 ml of 10% ascorbic acid solution, and this mixture was allowed to equilibrate for 3 h prior to the chemical analysis [13]. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) was measured by a total carbon analyzer (TOC-VCSH, Shimadzu Corporation, Japan) while HCO3− concentrations were estimated from the alkalinity and pH using PHREEQC [14]. The alkalinity was measured by titration of a known volume of leachate with 0.02 N sulfuric acid (H2SO4) solution until pH 4.8 [15], [16]. The standard ICP-AES and ion chromatography have margins of error of around 2%.
The geochemical properties of the leachates, including the concentrations of As, Si, Al, dissolved heavy metals, DOC, and coexisting ions, are summarized in Table 6. The pH ranged from 4 to 10 and the concentrations of coexisting ions varied with depth and sampling location. The speciation of As in the leachates is plotted in an Eh-pH diagram created by the Geochemist's Workbench® [17] based on the measured solute activities (Fig. 7). Except for one sample from TT, As in the leachates exist as various oxyanions of arsenate (AsV).
Acknowledgment
This study was financially supported by the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) through the AUN-Seed Net Collaborative Research Program for Common Regional Issues (CRC) in ASEAN (Grant number: HCMUT CRC16-01).
Contributor Information
Dang Thuong Huyen, Email: dthuyenus1982@gmail.com.
Carlito Baltazar Tabelin, Email: carlito.tabelin@gmail.com.
Huynh Minh Thuan, Email: hmthuan07@gmail.com.
Dang Hai Dang, Email: danghaidang531994@gmail.com.
Phan Thi Truong, Email: truongthiphan94@gmail.com.
Banthasith Vongphuthone, Email: typapao@gmail.com.
Masato Kobayashi, Email: kitamimaki@live.jp.
Toshifumi Igarashi, Email: tosifumi@eng.hokudai.ac.jp.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
- 1.Huyen D.T., Tabelin C.B., Thuan H.M., Dang D.H., Truong P.T., Vongphuthone B., Kobayashi M., Igarashi T. The solid-phase partitioning of arsenic in unconsolidated sediments of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam and its modes of release under various conditions. Chemosphere. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Beaulieu B.T., Savage K.S. Arsenate adsorption structures on aluminum oxide and phyllosilicate mineral surfaces in smelter-impacted soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005;39:3571–3579. doi: 10.1021/es048836f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fendorf S., Eick M.J., Grossl P., Sparks D.L. Arsenate and chromate retention mechanisms on goethite. 1. Surface structure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1997;31:315–320. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Raven K.P., Jain A., Loeppert R.H. Arsenite and arsenate adsorption on ferrihydrite: kinetics, equilibrium, and adsorption envelopes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998;32:344–349. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tabelin C.B., Igarashi T., Arima T., Sato D., Tatsuhara T., Tamoto S. Characterization and evaluation of arsenic and boron adsorption onto natural geologic materials, and their application in the disposal of excavated altered rock. Geoderma. 2014;213:163–172. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tabelin C.B., Sasaki R., Igarashi T., Park I., Tamoto S., Arima T., Ito M., Hiroyoshi N. Simultaneous leaching of arsenite, arsenate, selenite, and selenate, and their migration in tunnel-excavated sedimentary rocks: I. Column experiments under intermittent and unsaturated flow. Chemosphere. 2017;186:558–569. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.07.145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tabelin C.B., Sasaki R., Igarashi T., Park I., Tamoto S., Arima T., Ito M., Hiroyoshi N. Simultaneous leaching of arsenite, arsenate, selenite, and selenate, and their migration in tunnel-excavated sedimentary rocks: II. Kinetic and reactive transport modeling. Chemosphere. 2017;188:444–454. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tabelin C.B., Igarashi T., Villacorte-Tabelin M., Park I., Opiso E.M., Ito M., Hiroyoshi N. Arsenic, selenium, boron, lead, cadmium, copper, and zinc in naturally contaminated rocks: a review of their sources, modes of enrichment, mechanisms of release, and mitigation strategies. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;645:1522–1553. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang S., Mulligan C.N. Natural attenuation processes for remediation of arsenic contaminated soils and groundwater. J. Hazard Mater. 2006;B138:459–470. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.09.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Waychunas G.A., Rea B.A., Davis J.A., Fuller C.C. Surface chemistry of ferrihydrite: I. EXAFS studies of the geometry of coprecipitated and adsorbed arsenate. Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta. 1993;57:2251–2269. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Waychunas G.A., Trainor T., Eng P., Catalano J., Brown G., Davis J., Rogers J., Bargar J. Surface complexation studied via combined grazing-incidence EXAFS and surface diffraction: arsenate on hematite (0001) and (1012) Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2005;383:12–27. doi: 10.1007/s00216-005-3393-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tabelin C.B., Hashimoto A., Igarashi T., Yoneda T. Leaching of boron, arsenic and selenium from sedimentary rocks: I. Effects of contact time, mixing speed and liquid-to-solid ratio. Sci. Total Environ. 2014;472:620–629. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tabelin C.B., Igarashi T., Yoneda T., Tamamura S. Utilization of natural and artificial adsorbents in the mitigation of arsenic leached from hydrothermally altered rock. Eng. Geol. 2013;156:58–67. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Parkhurst D.L., Appelo C.A.J. User's guide to PHREEQC (version 2) – a computer program for speciation, batch-reactions, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations. U.S. Department of the Interior and U.S. Geological Survey. Water Resour. Invest. Rep. 1999:99–4259. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Eang K.E., Igarashi T., Fujinaga R., Kondo M., Tabelin C.B. Groundwater monitoring of an open-pit limestone quarry: groundwater characteristics, evolution and their connections to rock slopes. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2018;190(4):193. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6561-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Eang K.E., Igarashi T., Kondo M., Nakatani T., Tabelin C.B., Fujinaga R. Groundwater monitoring of an open-pit limestone quarry: water-rock interaction and mixing estimation within the rock layers by geochemical and statistical analyses. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2018;28:849–857. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bethke C.M., Yeakel S. Aqueous Solutions LLC; Urbana, Illinois: 2011. The Geochemist's Workbench® – a User's Guide to GSS, Rxn, Act2, Tact, Spec8, React, Gtplot, X1t, X2t and Xtplot. [Google Scholar]