Summary
Fifty-one yellow-necked mice from the Obedska bara locality were analysed for the presence of intestinal nematode parasites in order to assert whether there was a host sex bias in infection. Previous research indicated that males would be the more infected sex, either due to the immunosuppressive effect of testosterone or their different allocation of resources towards immune defence. Quantitative infection parameters were compared between host sexes for all nematode species and nematodes in general. In addition, the influence of host sex, age, total body length, body mass and presence of other nematode species on parasite abundance was analysed. No statistically significant differences between males and females were noted for any of the studied quantitative parameters, leading to an absence of sex-biased parasitism in this study.
Keywords: nematodes, sex-biased parasitism, immunocompetence, host behaviour, Serbia
Introduction
Studies of sex-biased parasitism (SBP) date as far back as the beginning of the 20th century (Zuk & McKean, 1996), but the full extent of the phenomenon and the factors that underlie it remain open questions. In parasitological literature, studies generally report a male-biased infection (Poulin, 1996; Zuk & McKean, 1996; Krasnov et al., 2005). The two main groups of hypotheses explaining this refer to the immunosuppressive effect of the male sex hormone testosterone (Zuk & McKean, 1996; Schalk & Forbes, 1997; Zuk, 2009; Krasnov et al., 2012) and, more broadly, the differential effect of natural selection on males and females of the same host species (Zuk & McKean, 1996; Rolff, 2002; Nunn et al., 2009; Zuk, 2009). The main takeaway from both groups of hypotheses is that males trade off immunity for reproductive success, and thus become more susceptible to parasite infections.
The yellow-necked mouse, Apodemus flavicollis, is a rodent species that is a host of a number of ectoparasites and helminths. Experimental studies and mathematical modelling have shown that males play a crucial role in the transmission and maintenance of the nematode Heligmosomoides polygyrus in its populations (Ferrari et al., 2004, 2007), but to this date no prior study found evidence of sex-biased parasitism in this rodent species (Krasnov et al., 2012). The aim of the present study was to determine whether a host sex bias in intestinal nematode infection exists in a population of yellow-necked mice at Obedska bara pond. This preliminary analysis is the first study of sex-biased nematode parasitism to be carried out on this host species in Serbia.
Materials and Methods
A total of 51 individuals (30 males, 21 females) of the yellow-necked mouse were captured at Obedska bara locality, near the Sava river (44.746° N, 20.006° E) in October 2011. Obedska bara is a protected wetland and forest habitat situated on the Sava river, in the Srem (Syrmia) region of the northern autonomous province of Vojvodina, Serbia. Sampling of hosts was carried out in a mixed deciduous forest, consisting of trees such as English oak (Quercus robur), manna ash (Fraxinus ornus), black poplar (Populus nigra) and common hornbeam (Carpinus betulus). Trapping was carried out over three nights using 200 Longworth traps with bait and bedding supplied. Biometric data (body and tail length, body mass) were collected for all captured mice. In addition, host age was determined based on dry eye lens weight (Nabaglo & Pachinger, 1979).
All of the captured animals were sacrificed and kept in a freezer until dissection. Part of the intestinal tract (small intestine, caecum, colon and rectum) was removed from each animal and cut longitudinally in order to release its content into a Petri dish that was then emptied into a larger conical glass filled with tap water. Water was refilled and decanted in the conical glass until the supernatant was clear. All helminths were fished out under a stereomicroscope and conserved in 70 % ethanol. Identification was carried out based on morphological and morphometric characters using keys by Ryzhikov et al. (1979) and Genov (1984). The parasites were deposited in the collection of the Laboratory for animal ecology at the University of Novi Sad, protocol numbers 3391-3438, 3450-3451 and 3457.
Prevalence, mean and median intensity, and mean abundance for each nematode species and nematode parasites in total were calculated in accordance to Bush et al. (1997) for each host sex and for the total sample. Comparison of prevalence between host sexes was carried out via the exact unconditional test. Mean abundances and intensities were compared with a bootstrap test with 20000 replications, and median intensities were compared with Mood’s median test. The null hypothesis was that there were no statistically significant differences between sexes with regards to the analysed parameters. All calculations and statistical tests were performed in Quantitative Parasitology software, version 3.0 (Rózsa et al., 2000).
Parasite abundance was further analysed by fitting abundance data in a generalized linear model (GLM). For the total sample, host age (with dry eye lens weight as a proxy), sex, total length and body mass were used as terms predicting the numerical response. Abundance data of each nematode species was also fitted, with host age, host sex, total length, body mass and abundances of the remaining species used as factors. The full models incorporated all of the terms and their two-way interactions. Factors and interactions below significance level (p=0.05) were excluded step by step until a minimal model was obtained. Calculations were performed in R software, version 3.2.1 (R Core Team, 2015) in standard packages.
Ethical Approval and/or Informed Consent
The research was conducted under permits issued by the Ministry of Natural Resources, Mining and Spatial Planning, Republic of Serbia (number: 353-03-250/2010-04). The mice were treated according to Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. All animal procedures were approved by the Ethical Committee for the Use of Laboratory Animals of the Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, University of Belgrade.
Results and Discussion
Of the fifty-one examined mice, forty (78.4 %) were infected with intestinal nematodes. Nematode prevalence was higher in male (83.3 %) than in female mice (71.4 %). Five roundworm species were recovered from the sample: Aonchotheca annulosa, Heligmosomoides polygyrus, Syphacia frederici, S. stroma and Trichuris muris (Table 1). Three of them were present in both host sexes, with H. polygyrus only recorded from a single female and S. frederici from a single male. Thus, the species richness of nematode parasitic community was identical, with four species found in each host sex. The average number of nematode species carried by infected individuals was 1.35. Infections with one nematode species were most common (70 % of infected hosts), with two (25 %) and three (5 %) species infections less frequently observed. While raw data seemed to suggest that males were more heavily infected (Table 2), statistical tests found no significant differences in infection between sexes. Comparisons of prevalence, mean intensity, mean abundance and median intensity between male and female total samples yielded no evidence of sex-biased parasitism. Furthermore, abundance data fitting showed no influence of host sex or any other analysed factor. The results of these analyses aren’t shown but are available from the authors upon request.
Table 1.
Parasitological parameters of infection for individual nematode species and intestinal nematodes as a group in the total sample of fifty-one mice from Obedska bara. 95 % confidence intervals in brackets, where applicable.
| I | P% | MI | MA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. annulosa | 12 | 23.5 (13.4 – 37.2) | 8.1 (1.8 – 30.3) | 1.9 (0.5 – 8.2) |
| H. polygyrus | 1 | 2 (0.1 – 10.4) | 1 | 0.02 (0 – 0.06) |
| S. frederici | 1 | 2 (0.1 – 10.4) | 13 | 0.3 (0 – 0.8) |
| S. stroma | 30 | 58.8 (45.1 – 71.7) | 29.2 (18.2 – 54.2) | 17.2 (10.2 – 33.3) |
| T. muris | 10 | 19.6 (10.5 – 33.2) | 2.7 (1.5 – 4.9) | 0.5 (0.2 – 1.2) |
| Nematodes | 40 | 78.4 (64.8 – 87.9) | 25.4 (16.4 – 44.8) | 19.9 (12.4 – 35.5) |
I – number of infected hosts, P% – prevalence, MI – mean intensity, MA– mean abundance
Table 2.
Values of prevalence (P%), mean intensity (MI) and mean abundance (MA) for all nematode species and total intestinal nematodes in male and female yellow-necked mice from Obedska bara, Serbia. 95 % confidence intervals in brackets, where applicable.
| Males (30) | Females (21) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P% | MI | MA | P% | MI | MA | |
| Aa | 30 (16.3 – 48.3) | 10.33 (1.7 – 34.1) | 3.1 (0.5 – 12.7) | 14.3 (4 – 35.4) | 1.3 (1 – 1.7) | 0.2 (0 – 0.5) |
| Hp | – | – | – | 4.8 (0.3 – 23.3) | 1 | 0.1 (0 – 0.14) |
| Sf | 3.3 (0.2 – 17.7) | 13 | 0.4 (0 – 1.3) | – | – | – |
| Ss | 63.3 (45 – 78.6) | 32.2 (16.8 – 73.1) | 20.4 (10.1 – 47.1) | 52.4 (30.5 – 72.4) | 24.1 (11.9 – 42.6) | 12.6 (5.5 – 25.8) |
| Tm | 23.3 (11.2 – 41.6) | 3.3 (1.6 – 5.9) | 0.8 (0.3 – 1.8) | 14.3 (4 – 35.4) | 1.3 (1 – 1.7) | 0.2 (0 – 0.5) |
| nem | 83.3 (65.3 – 93.2) | 29.6 (16.8 – 58.4) | 24.7 (13.7 – 50.8) | 71.4 (49.4 – 86.8) | 18.3 (8.8 – 34.4) | 13.1 (5.9 – 25.5) |
Aa – Aonchotheca annulosa, Hp – Heligmosomoides polygyrus, Sf – Syphacia frederici, Ss – S. stroma, Tm – Trichuris muris, nem – nematodes
Sex-biased parasitism in A. flavicollis has not been sufficiently addressed in the past and to the best of our knowledge no study that deals with it specifically exists for this rodent species. When such studies were performed on its close relative, the wood mouse (A. sylvaticus), the general conclusion was an absence of SBP (Goüy de Bellocq et al., 2003; Fuentes et al., 2004, 2007, 2010; Milazzo et al., 2010). Abu-Madi et al. (2000) state that intrinsic factors such as host sex, as well as host age, have a comparatively weak influence on the helminth fauna of A. sylvaticus. In light of previous data for the wood mouse, it may be possible that sex-biased parasitism as a whole does not occur, or is not common, in European Apodemus mice. However, an important conclusion reached by Ferrari et al. (2007) is that the sexes may differ in their relative contribution to parasite release and dispersal even in the absence of a bias in parasite levels, males and females having different roles in parasite dynamics. Males, due to being less immunocompetent and having wider ranges, generate a higher number of successful infective stages of parasites than females.
The present study found no evidence for sex-biased parasitism in the yellow-necked mouse at the Obedska bara locality, but it must be emphasized that this is a complicated and still incompletely understood phenomenon driven by a large assemblage of factors. More localities and more host/parasite combinations need to be studied, with the host sample structured with respect to age, habitat, trapping season and other relevant factors aside from sex. This preliminary study could possibly mark the beginning of such efforts, and lead to a better understanding of the mechanisms behind sex-biased parasitism not only in Serbia but also in general.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest
Authors state no conflict of interest.
References
- Abu-madi M.A., Behnke J.M., Lewis J.W., Gilbert F.S.. Seasonal and site specific variation in the component community structure of intestinal helminths in Apodemus sylvaticus from three contrasting habitats in south-east England. J. Helminthol. 2000;74(1):7–15. doi: 10.1017/s0022149x00000020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bush A.O., Lafferty K.D., Lotz J.M., Shostak A.W.. Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al revisited. J. Parasitol. 1997;83(4):575–583. doi: 10.2307/3284227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferrari N., Cattadori I.M., Nespereira J., Rizzoli A., Hudson P.J.. The role of host sex in parasite dynamics: field experiments on the yellow-necked mouse Apodemus flavicollis. Ecol. Lett. 2004;7(2):88–94. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00552.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ferrari N., Rosà R., Pugliese A., Hudson P.J.. The role of sex in parasite dynamics: model simulations on transmission of Heligmosomoides polygyrus in populations of yellow-necked mice, Apodemus flavicollis. Int. J. Parasitol. 2007;37(3 – 4):341–349. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fuentes M.V., Sáez S., Trelis M., Galán-puchades M.T., Esteban J.G.. The helminth community of the wood mouse, Apodemus sylvaticus in the Sierra Espuña, Murcia, Spain. J. Helminthol. 2004;78(3):219–223. doi: 10.1079/joh2003226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fuentes M.V., Sainz-elipe S., Galán-puchades M.T.. Ecological study of the wood mouse helminth community in a burned Mediterranean ecosystem in regeneration five years after a wildfire. Acta Parasitol. 2007;52(4):403–413. doi: 10.2478/s11686-007-0056-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fuentes M.V., Sainz-elipe S., Sáez-durán S., Galán-puchades M.T.. The helminth community of the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus in a Mediterranean ecosystem in regeneration ten years after a wildfire. J. Helminthol. 2010;84(1):39–48. doi: 10.1017/s0022149x09990277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Genov T. Helminths of insectivorous mammals and rodents in Bulgaria. Sofia, Bulgaria: Publishing house of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences; 1984. p. 348. [Google Scholar]
- Goüy de bellocq J., Sará M., Casanova J.C., Feliu C., Morand S.. A comparison of the structure of helminth communities in the woodmouse, Apodemus sylvaticus on islands of the western Mediterranean and continental Europe. Parasitol. Res. 2003;90(1):64–70. doi: 10.1007/s00436-002-0806-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krasnov B.R., Morand S., Hawlena H., Khokhlova I.S., Shenbrot G.I.. Sex-biased parasitism, seasonality and sexual size dimorphism in desert rodents. Oecologia. 2005;146(2):209–217. doi: 10.1007/s00442-005-0189-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krasnov B.R., Bordes F., Khokhlova I.S., Morand S.. Gender-biased parasitism in small mammals: patterns, mechanisms, consequences. Mammalia. 2012;76(1):1–13. doi: 10.1515/mammalia-2011-0108. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Milazzo C., Di bella C., Casanova J.C., Ribas A., Cagnin M.. Helminth communities of wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus on the river Avena (Calabria, southern Italy) Hystrix. 2010;21(2):171–176. doi: 10.4404/hystrix-21.2-4477. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nabaglo L., Pachinger K.. Eye lens weight as an age indicator in yellow-necked mice. Acta Theriol. 1979;24(11):119–122. doi: 10.4098/at.arch.79-15. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nunn C.L., Lindenfors P., Pursall E.R., Rolff J.. On sexual dimorphism in immune function. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B. 2009;364(1513):61–69. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poulin R.. Sexual inequalities in helminth infections: a cost of being a male? Am. Nat. 1996;147(2):287–295. doi: 10.1086/285851. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- R CORE TEAM. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, Version 3.2.1 [computer software] Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Rolff J.. Bateman’s principle and immunity. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio. 2002;269(1493):867–872. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rózsa L., Reiczigel J., Majoros G.. Quantifying parasites in samples of hosts. J. Parasitol. 2000;86(2):228–232. doi: 10.2307/3284760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryzhikov K.M., Gvozdev E.V., Tokobaev M.M., Shaldybin L.S., Matsaberidze G.V., Merkusheva I.V., Nadtochiy E.V., Khokhlova I.G., Sharpilo L.D. Key to the helminth parasites of rodents from the fauna of the USSR. Roundworms and acanthocephalans. Moscow: USSR, Izdatelstvo „Nauka“; 1979. p. 279. [Google Scholar]
- Schalk G., Forbes M.R.. Male biases in parasitism of mammals: effects of study type, host age and parasite taxon. Oikos. 1997;78(1):67–74. doi: 10.2307/3545801. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zuk M.. The sicker sex. PLoS Pathogens. 2009;5(1):e1000267. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zuk M., Mckean K.. Sex differences in parasite infections: patterns and processes. Int. J. Parasitol. 1996;26(10):1009–1024. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(96)00086-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
