Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Jul 29;9:10957. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47459-z

Astrocyte Specific Remodeling of Plasmalemmal Cholesterol Composition by Ketamine Indicates a New Mechanism of Antidepressant Action

Eva Lasič 1, Marjeta Lisjak 1, Anemari Horvat 1,2, Mićo Božić 1, Aleksandra Šakanović 3, Gregor Anderluh 3, Alexei Verkhratsky 2,4,5,6, Nina Vardjan 1,2, Jernej Jorgačevski 1,2, Matjaž Stenovec 1,2, Robert Zorec 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC6662760  PMID: 31358895

Abstract

Ketamine is an antidepressant with rapid therapeutic onset and long-lasting effect, although the underlying mechanism(s) remain unknown. Using FRET-based nanosensors we found that ketamine increases [cAMP]i in astrocytes. Membrane capacitance recordings, however, reveal fundamentally distinct mechanisms of effects of ketamine and [cAMP]i on vesicular secretion: a rise in [cAMP]i facilitated, whereas ketamine inhibited exocytosis. By directly monitoring cholesterol-rich membrane domains with a fluorescently tagged cholesterol-specific membrane binding domain (D4) of toxin perfringolysin O, we demonstrated that ketamine induced cholesterol redistribution in the plasmalemma in astrocytes, but neither in fibroblasts nor in PC 12 cells. This novel mechanism posits that ketamine affects density and distribution of cholesterol in the astrocytic plasmalemma, consequently modulating a host of processes that may contribute to ketamine’s rapid antidepressant action.

Subject terms: Astrocyte, Membrane lipids, Membrane fusion, Membrane fission

Introduction

Major depressive disorder (MDD) affects up to 20% of the population and is the leading cause of disability worldwide1; therapeutic containment is frequently unsuccessful. Most current antidepressants target the monoaminergic system, which reflects the research focus on monoamines in recent decades. However, this direction is not fully justified given the widely acknowledged discrepancy between rapid modulation of monoaminergic targets and long-lasting delay of therapeutically relevant responses2.

Ketamine, an anesthetic and psychotomimetic, has gained much attention due to its rapid and long-lasting antidepressant effects3. Ketamine is considered as a non-competitive N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonist; its antidepressant action is in agreement with the glutamatergic hypothesis of MDD4. It postulates that NMDAR antagonism increases the synthesis of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)5, which results in an antidepressant effect. Unlike classic antidepressants, a single administration of ketamine exerts fast and long-lasting effects, indicating a fundamentally distinct mechanism6. Ketamine treatment has a singularly wide impact on nervous tissue; it increases synaptogenesis, elevates the density of dendritic spines, and boosts the expression of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors5,7. Furthermore, other NMDAR antagonists, in contrast to ketamine, do not produce antidepressant effects8,9, indicating that ketamine may affect targets other than NMDAR. Of note, the antidepressant effects of (R)-ketamine are more potent over a longer period compared to (S)-ketamine10, indicating specific ketamine enantiomer-mediated antidepressant activity.

The complexity of ketamine-mediated antidepressant effects has been further highlighted by a finding that ketamine modulates cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) signaling in the absence of NMDAR11. Signaling through cAMP is reduced in patients with depression, whereas treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) increases cAMP levels12. Thus, ketamine may act similarly to SSRIs, since it potentiates adrenergic receptor-mediated increases in cAMP in C6 glioma cells11.

Ketamine also modifies presynaptic exo-/endocytotic machinery by altering the protein levels of SNARE (soluble NSF-attachment protein receptor) complex, as well as expression of vesicle-fusing ATPase, synaptotagmin-1, syntaxin-1A, synapsin-1, and syndapin-113–15. Ketamine suppresses Ca2+ transients in astrocytes16, and aberrant astrocytic Ca2+ homeostasis may have an impact on vesicle dynamics and astroglial secretion17. Our previous experiments demonstrated that ketamine modulates the interaction between the vesicle and the plasmalemma by stabilizing the fusion pore in a narrow configuration18. This effect is reminiscent of the action of cAMP in secretory pituitary cells where cAMP promotes fusion pore flickering19. Hence, ketamine may act on exocytosis by affecting the cAMP signaling cascade.

cAMP may regulate synaptic activity by increasing secretion of BDNF and catecholamines20; in addition cAMP stimulates cellular differentiation and increases regulated exocytosis in astrocytes21. In other secretory cells, cAMP regulates exocytosis22 by acting directly on the secretory machinery23, increasing vesicle docking efficiency24 or the sensitivity of secretory proteins to Ca2+ 23, enhancing vesicle mobility25, or promoting homotypic intracellular vesicle-to-vesicle fusion26.

We tested the hypothesis that ketamine modifies astroglial secretion through cAMP signaling and confirmed that ketamine does stimulate cAMP production in astrocytes. Nonetheless, we also found that ketamine does not modulate exocytosis through cAMP, but via different mechanism(s). Ketamine is an amphipathic molecule capable of direct interaction with the plasmalemma27. Hence, we hypothesized that the ketamine-mediated increase in cAMP signaling may involve structural membrane changes, leading to the translocation of G-proteins in lipid rafts11. By visualizing cholesterol-rich plasmalemmal domains, we demonstrated that ketamine redistributes these domains in the plasmalemma of astrocytes, but not in PC12 cells and fibroblasts. This novel mechanism, capable of modulating multiple cellular functions, may well contribute to ketamine’s powerful antidepressant effect.

Results

Ketamine Increases [cAMP]i in Astrocytes

We monitored the effects of ketamine on the dynamics of [cAMP]i in astrocytes expressing the cAMP FRET nanosensor Epac1-camps28 (Fig. 1a). Application of 25 μM ketamine elicited a significant (>20 µM) increase in [cAMP]i that persisted throughout the recording time (900 s; Fig. 1b, right), with an average amplitude of the CFP/YFP (FRET) signal of 13.6 ± 5.7% (n = 9) and an initial rate of increase in the FRET signal indicating a rate of cAMP production, of 1.7 ± 0.8%/min (n = 9). The increase in the FRET signal started with a delay of 219 ± 52 s (n = 9) after onset of ketamine application. The amplitude and the initial rate of the FRET signal change in ketamine-stimulated cells differed from controls (13.6 ± 5.7% vs. −0.4 ± 0.6%; P < 0.01, n = 15) and 1.7 ± 0.8%/min vs. −0.1 ± 0.1%/min (P < 0.05, n = 15), respectively; Fig. 1). Ketamine thus increases astrocytic [cAMP]i.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Ketamine increases [cAMP]i in cultured rat astrocytes. (a) Schematic representation of the FRET-based Epac1-camps nanosensor activity (top) and pseudocolour FRET signal images of an astrocyte expressing the FRET-based nanosensor Epac1-camps before (−41 s) and after (+600 s) exposure to 25 µM ketamine (bottom) and the corresponding normalized time course of the Epac1-camps FRET signal (YFP/CFP). The pseudocolour scale depicts the YFP/CFP ratio values. Scale bar, 20 µm. (b) Time courses (left panel) and mean time course (±SE; right panel) of the Epac1-camps FRET signal in cells stimulated with ketamine (n = 9) at t = 0 s (black arrows). Data are expressed as the inverse FRET signal (CFP/YFP). The increase in the FRET signal after the addition of ketamine reflects an increase in [cAMP]i. The initial rate of change in [cAMP]i (red line; right panel) was determined by fitting the regression line to the initial FRET signal increase (k = 2.2 ± 0.6%/min). Ordinate on the right shows the values of [cAMP]i estimated from equation: [cAMP]i = EC50 × ((R − Rmin)/(Rmax − R))1/n 73. (c) Mean amplitude (±SE; ΔFRET; left panel) and initial rate of the FRET signal change (ΔFRET/Δtime; right panel) in controls (white bars) and in cells stimulated with ketamine (black bars). Changes in the FRET signal are expressed as percentages of the initial values. Numbers above the error bars depict the number of cells analyzed. Mann-Whitney U test: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

cAMP Facilitates Full Fusion of Larger Non-synaptic-like Vesicles

Next, we examined how membrane-permeable cAMP-AM that increases [cAMP]i modulates vesicle dynamics in astrocytes by measuring unitary fusion and fission membrane capacitance steps, the amplitude of which permits vesicle size estimation29–31. The mean diameter of vesicles that transiently fused with the plasmalemma was smaller (P < 0.001) in cAMP-treated (187 ± 6 nm, n = 202) than in control astrocytes (233 ± 10 nm, n = 221) (Fig. 2a). The proportion of transiently fusing vesicles with capacitance larger than 1 fF was accordingly smaller in cAMP-treated cells (41% [n = 83/202] vs. 62% [n = 138/221]). Conversely, the mean diameter of vesicles undergoing full fusion was significantly larger (P < 0.01) in cAMP-treated astrocytes (419 ± 36 nm, n = 48) than in controls (285 ± 24 nm, n = 40; Fig. 2b). Similarly, the proportion of full fusion of vesicles with capacitance >1 fF was larger in cAMP-treated cells (85% [n = 41/48] vs. 70% [n = 28/40]). Consistent with studies on endocrine cells19, our results indicate that astroglial vesicles that exhibit transient interactions with the plasmalemma (Fig. 2a, top right) in control conditions likely undergo full fusion after cAMP treatment (Fig. 2b, bottom right).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

cAMP causes larger non-synaptic-like vesicles to transit to full fusion in astrocytes. (a–c) Electrophysiological recordings of the imaginary (Im) and real (Re) parts of the admittance signals (bottom) and the corresponding diagrams of vesicle interactions with the plasmalemma (top). * denote calibration pulses. (a) The diameter of vesicles undergoing transient fusion/fission with the plasmalemma is smaller in cAMP-treated cells (middle). Frequency distributions of Cv (right) reveal a greater proportion (%) of larger vesicles in untreated than in cAMP-treated cells. (b) The diameter of exocytotic vesicles undergoing full fusion is larger in cAMP-treated cells (middle). Frequency distributions (right) reveal a greater proportion (%) of larger vesicles undergoing full fusion in cAMP-treated cells. (c) The diameter of endocytotic vesicles undergoing full fission in untreated cells and in cAMP-treated cells is similar (middle), as are the frequency distributions (right). Values displayed in the graphs (%) denote the proportion of vesicles larger than 1 fF (vertical dotted line). Numbers in the bars denote vesicle number. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 (Mann-Whitney U test).

These findings were corroborated by microscopic measurements revealing that the size (surface area) and number of ANP-positive vesicles (Supplementary Fig. 1a, left), decreased after cAMP treatment (Supplementary Fig. 1a, right, and Supplementary Fig. 1b). After cAMP treatment, similar decreases were observed in vesicles immunopositive for VAMP2/3 (Supplementary Fig. 1c–f), and LC3-immunopositive autophagosomes32–37 (Supplementary Fig. 1g,h). These results suggest that cAMP stimulates exocytotic secretion of large non-synaptic vesicles, without affecting small synaptic-like secretory vesicles.

cAMP did not affect vesicles that underwent full fission from the plasmalemma. The mean diameter and the relative proportion of larger endocytotic vesicles were comparable in untreated and cAMP-treated cells (204 ± 14 nm [n = 102] vs. 192 ± 8 nm [n = 175] and 33% [n = 34/102] vs. 42% [n = 74/175]; Fig. 2c). In contrast, immunolabelling of early endosomes with the antibody against early endosomal marker EEA1 and vesicle loading with fluorescent dextrans revealed a cAMP-mediated effect on early endosomes. EEA1-positive endosomes were significantly larger after cAMP treatment (Supplementary Fig. 2a–c). Similarly, significantly larger dextran-loaded vesicles were observed after cAMP treatment when compared to controls; after 15 min (Supplementary Fig. 2d–f) and 3 h incubation, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 2g–i). These results suggest that cAMP stimulates intracellular fusion between early endosomes, similar to the cAMP-mediated intracellular vesicle-to-vesicle fusion reported in endocrine cells26.

cAMP Favors an open fusion pore state of astroglial vesicles

In vesicles undergoing transient fusion/fission, the dwell time of an open or closed fusion pore can be determined (Fig. 3a); the open pore dwell time defines the time during which exocytotic cargo can be released from the vesicle lumen, whereas the closed pore dwell time defines the time of no release. Figure 3a depicts a representative recording of transient fusion and transient fission that can be interpreted as follows: at first, the baseline (dotted line) represents a state where vesicle “1” has a closed pore and vesicle “2” has an open pore. During the transient fusion, vesicle “1” opens and then closes its fusion pore to return to “baseline”. Later on in the recording, vesicle “2” closes its pore during transient fission and then reopens it to return to the “baseline”. The dwell times measured in this study ranged from 0.016 to 12.3 s. The open pore dwell time of 0.404 ± 0.087 s (n = 95) in controls was (P < 0.001) shorter than in cAMP-treated cells (1.03 ± 0.167 s, n = 106; Fig. 3b); this change may facilitate vesicle cargo discharge. The closed pore dwell time of 0.673 ± 0.161 s (n = 126) in controls was longer (P < 0.05) than in cAMP-treated cells (0.341 ± 0.079 s, n = 96; Fig. 3c). cAMP prolongs the open fusion pore configuration and shortens the closed fission pore configuration, which most likely facilitates vesicle cargo discharge. Although prolonged fusion dwell times could be related to an increase in full fusion events, our analysis indicated that cAMP had no effect on the frequency of full (or transient) fusions.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

cAMP treatment favors an open fusion pore state of vesicles transiently interacting with the plasmalemma. (a) An electrophysiological recording of the imaginary (Im) and real (Re) parts of the admittance signal measured in a cAMP-treated astrocyte where vesicles exhibited a longer transient fusion dwell time and a shorter transient fission dwell time. The baseline is denoted by a gray dotted line. The two vesicles undergoing transient fusion and fission are denoted by the numbers “1” and “2”, respectively. * denotes a calibration pulse. (b) The transient fusion dwell time of an open fusion pore is increased in cAMP-treated cells. (c) The transient fission dwell time of a closed fusion pore is decreased in cAMP-treated cells. Numbers in the bars denote the number of transient fusions (b) and fissions (c). *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 (Mann-Whitney U test).

In contrast to ketamine18, cAMP increases vesicle fusion pore conductance that can be measured when discrete events in the imaginary admittance signal (Im) are projected to the real admittance signal (Re)38. The projection is the result of the formation of a narrow fusion pore that acts as an additional resistive element in the equivalent electrical circuit. Due to the detection limit39, the electrophysiological method enabled us to record fusion pores with conductance between 16.6 and 4201 pS, i.e. fusion pores with estimated diameter between 0.5 and 8.7 nm (Fig. 4a,b). Fusion pores with diameter >8.7 nm did not cause projections to Re and were thus undetectable. In controls, the proportion of transient projected exocytotic events was 84% (n = 185/221), whereas in cAMP-treated cells, this proportion was reduced to 66% (n = 133/202) (Fig. 4c). Thus, the proportion of transient fusion pores with diameter >8.7 nm increased from 16% in controls to 34% in cAMP-treated cells. Correspondingly, the relative conductance of fusion pores (normalized to vesicle capacitance) was significantly larger (P < 0.01) in cAMP-treated cells (81.8 ± 3.7 pS/fF, n = 290) than in controls (72.6 ± 3.4 pS/fF, n = 285; Fig. 4d). These results demonstrate that cAMP widens the fusion pore, opposite to the action of ketamine18, which indicates that ketamine-induced vesicle fusion pore modulation is not mediated by ketamine-induced increases in [cAMP]i (Fig. 1).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

cAMP widens the vesicle fusion pore. (a,b) Electrophysiological recordings of the imaginary (Im) and real (Re) parts of the admittance signal. * denote calibration pulses. (a) An event in Im that is projected to Re in an untreated cell (left) and an unprojected event in a cAMP-treated cell (right). (b) A projected event with a smaller relative fusion pore conductance (Gp) (38 pS/1.4 fF = 27 pS/fF) in an untreated cell (left) and a projected event with a larger relative Gp (52 pS/0.7 fF = 74 pS/fF) in a cAMP-treated cell (right). The amplitudes of the events in Im and Re enable calculation of vesicle capacitance (Cv) and Gp (insert). (c) The proportion (%) of projected events. After cAMP treatment, a smaller proportion of events are projected to Re, indicating that a larger proportion of fusion pores are wider in cAMP-treated cells. (d) The relative Gp (pS/fF) is larger in cAMP-treated cells. Numbers in the bars denote the number of cells (c) and projected events (d). **P < 0.01 (Mann-Whitney U test).

Ketamine Increases the Density of Cholesterol Domains in the Astroglial Plasmalemma

As the increase in [cAMP]i did not mimic the effects of ketamine on vesicle fusion/fission described previously18, we considered a possible direct interaction between ketamine, an amphipathic molecule, and the plasmalemma. We monitored cholesterol-rich domains in the plasmalemma of different cell types with a fluorescently tagged cholesterol-specific membrane-binding domain of perfringolysin O (D4)40,41. Confocal microscopy revealed a punctate D4 fluorescence pattern, representing cholesterol-rich domains to which CT-B-labelled ganglioside monosialic acid (GM1), a marker of sphingolipid- and cholesterol-rich lipid rafts, co-localized substantially (Fig. 5a); 45.6 ± 2.4% (n = 47) as determined by quantitative fluorescence co-localization analysis (CT-B vs. mCherry-D4). Super-resolution microscopy further revealed that the density of D4 domains, relative to the imaged cell area, increased after ketamine treatment in astrocytes (Fig. 5b), but not in PC12 cells and fibroblasts (Fig. 5c). In astrocytes (P < 0.001), the average density of D4-positive domains increased by 54% after treatment with 2.5 µM ketamine (0.57 ± 0.03 D4/µm2, n = 13) and by 41% after treatment with 25 µM ketamine (0.52 ± 0.03 D4/µm2, n = 12), compared with controls (0.37 ± 0.03 D4/µm2, n = 12). The density of D4-positive domains in astrocytes (0.37 ± 0.03 D4/µm2, n = 12) was 62% to 73% higher (P < 0.001) than in PC12 cells (0.14 ± 0.01 D4/µm2, n = 21) and fibroblasts (0.10 ± 0.01 D4/µm2, n = 27), respectively. Although the size of individual D4-positive domains differed (P < 0.001) in the cell types studied (PC12 cells, 0.080 ± 0.009 µm2; astrocytes, 0.056 ± 0.001 µm2; fibroblasts, 0.037 ± 0.001 µm2), these appeared unaffected by ketamine (Fig. 5d). These results indicate that ketamine alters the membrane structure selectively in astrocytes.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Ketamine (KM) induces an increase in the density of cholesterol-rich domains in the plasmalemma of cultured rat astrocytes. (a) Confocal images of cultured astrocytes double-labelled with mCherry-D4 (D4, left) that stains cholesterol-rich domains in the extracellular leaflet of the plasma membrane, and with the non-toxic B subunit toxin from Vibrio cholerae (CT-B, middle) conjugated to Alexa Fluor488, that interacts with the penta-saccharide chain of ganglioside monosialic acid (GM1), a constituent of sphingolipid- and cholesterol-enriched lipid rafts. Mask image (right) displays substantial localization of GM1 in mCherry-D4-labelled lipid rafts in astrocytes. (b) SIM images displaying representative mCherry-D4-labelling in non-treated astrocytes (con) and astrocytes treated with ketamine (2.5 µM KM and 25 µM KM, respectively). Insets show mCherry-D4 domains at a higher magnification. Scale bar (inset), 10 µm (1 µm). (c) The density of the membrane cholesterol domains (the number of cholesterol domains (D4) normalized to the cell surface area) significantly increased in astrocytes after treatment with 2.5 µM KM (0.57 ± 0.03 D4/µm2) and 25 µM ketamine (0.52 ± 0.03 D4/µm2) compared with controls (0.37 ± 0.03 D4/µm2) (***P < 0.001, Holm-Sidak one-way ANOVA). Ketamine did not affect the density of the cholesterol-rich domains in the PC12 cell line and fibroblasts. The density of the D4-positive domains was significantly higher in astrocytes (0.37 ± 0.03 D4/µm2) compared with PC12 cells (0.14 ± 0.01 D4/µm2) and fibroblasts (0.10 ± 0.01 D4/µm2) (***P < 0.001, Kruskal-Wallis test). (d) The average area of cholesterol-rich domains, measured in controls (treated with vehicle) and in cells treated with ketamine (2.5 µM and 25 µM) did not significantly differ in the PC12 cell line, fibroblasts and astrocytes, but it differed between different cell types. The average area of D4-positive domains was significantly higher in the PC12 cell line (0.080 ± 0.009 µm2) and astrocytes (0.056 ± 0.001 µm2) than in fibroblasts (0.037 ± 0.001 µm2) (***P < 0.001, Kruskal-Wallis test). The data in the graphs are reported as mean ± SEM. Numbers above the bars represent the number of cells analyzed.

Discussion

Understanding the mechanisms of the antidepressant action of ketamine is crucial for improving therapeutic strategies for MDD, a worldwide burden1. The clinical effects of ketamine consist of a rapid (hours) and a sustained (1–2 weeks) phases; the latter substantially outlasts the metabolic half-life of ketamine (~6 h)3. Although the rapid molecular pharmacology of ketamine activity is generally ascribed to NMDAR antagonism5, alternative pathways (such as ketamine modulation of cAMP-dependent cascades in the human brain) have been considered12. These pathways likely modulate brain function by primarily affecting the activity of astrocytes42.

Astrocytes are the primary homeostatic cells in the central nervous system that control homeostasis of major neurotransmitters, including glutamate, GABA, adenosine, and noradrenaline43. Major psychiatric disorders are associated with substantial decreases in astroglial density and in loss of astroglial functions, which arguably results in an imbalance in neurotransmitter homeostasis and hence in aberrant information processing in neuronal networks44–50. At the molecular level, mood disorders are associated with astroglia-specific changes in serotonin receptors and intracellular signaling pathways51. Pharmacological approaches that could specifically target astrocytes in the context of neuropsychiatric disorders have not yet been developed. Nonetheless, we present results that indicate that ketamine exerts astroglial-specific effects, which can arguably be linked to its antidepressant potential.

Ketamine, a drug with multiple targets, affects several cellular signaling cascades, including exo- and endocytosis18,52. Therefore, we first tested the hypothesis that ketamine regulates exo-/endocytosis through intracellular cAMP. We based this supposition on the recent finding that ketamine amplifies adrenergic receptor-mediated cAMP signaling in C6 glioma cells11. This in turn instigates the translocation of Gαs-proteins from lipid rafts, allowing them to interact with and activate adenylyl cyclase11. It is conceivable that Gαs-protein translocation could lead to an increase in [cAMP]i even in the absence of G-protein receptor stimulation. If ketamine-induced changes in the plasmalemmal structure are mirrored as lipid raft restructuring11, these may activate adenylyl cyclase and increase [cAMP]i. Indeed, we found that ketamine increased astroglial [cAMP]i (Fig. 1) in the absence of G-protein-activating neurotransmitters.

The ketamine-induced increase in [cAMP]i prompted us to compare the effects of both agents on vesicle fusion. It is generally accepted that cAMP potentiates exocytotic secretion22 by regulating fusion of vesicles with the plasmalemma through the cAMP sensor cAMP-GEFII (Epac2)53–55. Protein kinases can also regulate exocytosis by increasing the population of vesicles sensitive to Ca2+ 56 with cAMP-dependent potentiation being associated with protein kinase A22. It was also proposed that fusion pore flickering depends on protein kinases57 as well as cAMP19. As ketamine was reported to induce fusion pore flickering18, this led us to question whether these effects may be mediated via cAMP.

Our in-depth analysis of vesicle fusion in astrocytes reveals a clear difference between the effects of cAMP and ketamine. Whereas cAMP increases the probability of vesicular secretion (Figs 2–4, Supplementary Fig. 1), ketamine inhibits secretion of astroglial BDNF52. We found no effect of cAMP on the frequency of full vesicle fusions; instead, cAMP facilitates widening of fusion pores and prolongs their open configuration (Figs 3 and 4), as was previously described in pituitary cells19. The ratio between fusion pore conductance and vesicle size (Gp/Cv) represents a measure of exocytotic secretion58, and cAMP increases this ratio in astrocytes. An increase in astrocyte [cAMP]i promotes transient fusion of small synaptic-like vesicles (Fig. 2), as observed in pituitary cells19 in which Ca2+-dependent regulated exocytosis mediates the release of prolactin59. This suggests that cAMP preferentially stimulates full fusion of large non-synaptic-like vesicles60, whereas small vesicles remain attached to the plasmalemma with a narrow fusion pore (transient events). Consistent with this, immunocytochemical studies revealed that vesicles labelled with an antibody against VAMP2, a target of cAMP signaling and a marker of secretory vesicles21, are less abundant and of smaller diameter after cAMP treatment, indicating that cAMP prompts full fusion of larger secretory vesicles with the plasmalemma (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Our results also demonstrate that cAMP treatment results in the formation of larger early endosomes (Supplementary Fig. 2), suggesting homotypic vesicle-to-vesicle fusion between endosomal organelles, consistent with other studies that have suggested cAMP-evoked vesicle-to-vesicle fusion26. Homotypic fusion between vesicles also explains the amperometry results, which demonstrated that cAMP increased the quantal size of secretory vesicles60–62. We have observed a similar effect with capacitance measurements in this study, which revealed more full fusions of larger vesicles in cAMP-treated astrocytes. Our results have now demonstrated that cAMP stimulates full fusion of larger (non-synaptic-like) vesicles, widens the fusion pore and prolongs the open fusion pore dwell time, thus increasing secretory activity. Therefore, the action of cAMP contrasts with the previously reported ketamine-mediated fusion pore stabilization in a narrow state, which inhibits vesicle cargo discharge18,52.

This study has demonstrated that, although ketamine increases [cAMP]i, ketamine and cAMP have a distinct effect on vesicle fusion. Hence, we tested an alternative hypothesis whether ketamine directly alters the structure of the plasmalemma.

We visualized the cholesterol-rich plasmalemmal domains with a fluorescent cholesterol-specific peptide D4 from the toxin perfringolysin O40,41 that labels the outer leaflet of the plasmalemma. D4-positive punctate structures thus represent cholesterol-rich domains in the astrocyte plasmalemma (Fig. 5). The domain density, relative to the imaged cell area, increased significantly after ketamine treatment, yet the size of individual D4-positive domains remained the same (Fig. 5). Therefore, a relatively short exposure of cells to ketamine (30 min) results in a visible change in membrane structure. These changes are specific to astrocytes, because they were not observed in neural-like PC12 cells or in non-excitable fibroblasts (Fig. 5). Although it is unclear how ketamine specifically affects the density of cholesterol-rich domains in the plasmalemma (Fig. 6), the overall increase in cholesterol production is unlikely, since no increase in serum level of cholesterol was observed even after application of a high ketamine dose (120 and 140 mg/kg) to male Wistar rats that were sacrificed 20 min after the administration of ketamine63. Moreover, intraperitoneal administration of ketamine to male Wistar rats (1 mg/kg) for 6 days did not affect the cholesterol synthesis64. Supporting the notion that vesicle-based mechanism may be affected by ketamine through affecting the distribution of cholesterol in the plasma membrane, are experiments where the fusion of single vesicles with the plasmalemma was studied in the presence and absence of ketamine; the results revealed a robust stabilization of the fusion-pore in a narrow state, suggesting that endocytotic vesicles may not transfer from the transient fission to full fission state18. This may contribute to an increased density of cholesterol at the plasmalemma, since cholesterol-rich membrane domains may not be internalized via endocytosis. The availability of cholesterol appears to impair upon synapse development65, and our results suggest an important role of astrocytes in cholesterol homeostasis in the central nervous system. Astrocytes provide cholesterol to neurons, where it is needed for shaping neuronal structures which is particularly critical for synaptogenesis. The ketamine-induced increase in the density of cholesterol-rich domains in the astroglial plasmalemma may thus enable more intense flux of cholesterol molecules from astrocytes to neurons. We may therefore speculate that ketamine boosts plasticity in neural networks, although such a proposal requires further experimentation.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

A graphical representation of the ketamine-mediated increase in density of cholesterol-rich domains in the plasmalemma of cultured rat astrocytes. Note that the fluorescent construct mCherry-D4, a specific cholesterol marker, labels cholesterol-rich domains on the outer leaflet (OUT) of the plasmalemma.

In conclusion, we here revealed that ketamine induces visible structural changes in the outer leaflet of the astroglial plasmalemma, observed as redistribution of cholesterol-rich domains. This action appears astroglia specific and may affect diverse homeostatic responses that could modulate the functional activity and plasticity of neuronal networks. In particular, these changes may influence the flux of cholesterol from astrocytes to neurons that is critical for morphological plasticity of synaptic connections65. In addition, structural changes of the astroglial plasmalemma likely affect adenylyl cyclase, with consequent increases in [cAMP]i in the absence of G-protein-coupled receptor stimulation11. This new mechanism of ketamine action may explain its multiple effects on depressive behavior and highlights the role of astrocytes in the search for new antidepressants.

Methods

Cell Culture and Transfection

Cell cultures of primary astrocytes were prepared and enriched from the neocortex of 2–3-day-old female Wistar rats as described52. The care for experimental animals was in accordance with the International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals developed by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences and the Animal Protection Act (Official Gazette RS, no. 38/13). All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Specifically, we have followed the rules of Three R’s to reduce the impact of research on animals. The ex vivo experiments on Wistar rats were approved by the Veterinary Administration of the Republic of Slovenia (Apr. No. 3440-29/2006 and 34401-29/2009/2).

PC12 cells (ATCC CRL-1721) and fibroblasts were grown at 37 °C, in 95% air/5% CO2 in growth medium containing high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 5% horse serum (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD) and 25 µg/ml penicillin/streptomycin (PC12 cells) and α-MEM, supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine and 25 µg/ml penicillin/streptomycin (fibroblasts). When cells reached the 70–80% confluence, they were plated on coverslips and used within 3 days.

The acetoxymethyl ester of cAMP (cAMP-AM, A022, BIOLOG Life Science Institute) was applied to cells in serum-free medium. To optimize cAMP-AM loading, cells were pre-incubated for 15 min in DMEM without FBS; cAMP-AM (60 µM) or DMSO (0.2%; vehicle) were applied for 30 min.

Astrocytes were transfected with the genetically encoded fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based cAMP nanosensor Epac1-camps28 as described66. Secretory vesicles were visualized by transfecting astrocytes with pANP.emd as described67. The culture medium was changed after 16 h; 48–72 h after transfection, cells were incubated in serum-free medium (15 min), and with 0.2% DMSO (vehicle) or 60 µM cAMP-AM (30 min), transferred to extracellular solution (ECS) with 0.2% DMSO or 60 µM cAMP-AM for microscopic observation. Unless otherwise noted, all chemicals were from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany).

Solutions

The extracellular bath and pipette solution consisted of (in mM): 131.8 NaCl, 5 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 d-glucose, and 10 HEPES/NaOH (pH 7.2). When intracellular cAMP was monitored, the bath solution consisted of (in mM) 1.8 CaCl2 and 2 MgCl2. Osmolality of the solution (300 ± 5 mOsm) was measured with a freezing-point osmometer (Osmomat030, Gonotech, Germany). cAMP-AM (60 µM) and DMSO (0.2%) were kept on ice and pipetted onto the coverslip (once a patch was established).

FRET Measurements of Cytosolic cAMP and Data Analysis

Astrocytes expressing the Epac1-camps28 were examined 24–48 h after transfection with a Plan NeoFluoar 40×/1.3 NA oil differential interference contrast (DIC) immersion objective using a LSM510 META confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Real-time Epac1-camps FRET signal acquisition was performed as described66.

Unless stated otherwise, the FRET signal is reported as the ratio of the CFP/YFP fluorescence after subtracting the background fluorescence using Excel (Microsoft, Seattle, WA). The values of the FRET signals were normalized to 1.0. An increase in the FRET signal reflects an increase in the [cAMP]i.

Initially, astrocytes were kept in ECS and treated with 25 µM ketamine (Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, UK) for 900 s following a 100-s baseline. Control cells were treated with ECS (vehicle). The amplitude of the FRET signal (ΔFRET (%)) was determined for individual recordings by subtracting the mean FRET signal of the signal spanning the last 100 s before treatment from the first 100 s of the recording (baseline). The initial rate of the FRET signal change (ΔFRET/Δtime) was calculated for each recording as the slope of the linear regression function (ΔFRET (%) = slope (%/min) × Δtime (min)) fitting the initial FRET signal change.

Electrophysiology

Astrocyte-coated coverslips maintained in ECS were mounted on an inverted microscope (Zeiss Axio Observer.A1). Compensated cell-attached patch-clamp recordings were performed to measure discrete step-like changes in membrane capacitance (Cm)68 and fusion pore conductance31. Full vesicle fusion/fission was defined as a discrete upward/downward step in imaginary (Im) part of the admittance signal30 that was not followed by a step of similar amplitude (±15%) and opposite direction within 15 s, whereas transient vesicle fusion/fission was defined as a step in Im that was followed within 15 s, as reported previously18. As Cm is proportional to the membrane area, the vesicle surface area and diameter (d) were determined assuming spherical vesicle geometry and a specific membrane capacitance of 10 fF/μm2 31.

Immunocytochemistry

Immunocytochemical staining of astrocytes treated with 0.2% DMSO or 60 µM cAMP-AM (30 min) was performed as described52. The following primary antibodies were used: mouse monoclonal anti-EEA1 (1:100, 610456, BD Laboratories), mouse monoclonal anti-LC3 (1:100, M152-3, MBL), mouse monoclonal anti-VAMP2 (1:2000, 104211, Synaptic Systems), and rabbit polyclonal anti-VAMP3 (1:1000, ab5789, Abcam).

Dextran labelling

Astrocytes were incubated with 10 µM dextrans Alexa Fluor488 10,000 MW (D22910, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 15 min or 3 h and subsequently in serum-free medium (15 min) containing 0.2% DMSO or 60 µM cAMP-AM (30 min), followed by washing in PBS and fixing with 2% formaldehyde (10 min). After washing in PBS, coverslips were mounted onto glass slides using Slow Fade Gold Antifade agent (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

mCherry-D4-PFO and EGFP-D4-PFO expression and purification

For the construction of a plasmid encoding a His-Tag-eGFP-D4 or His-Tag-mCherry-D4 fusion proteins, a DNA fragment containing eGFP or mCherry coding region was first cloned into the pGA2.1 bacterial expression vector69 after removing Equinatoxin II coding sequence using XhoI and MluI sites. Flexible Gly-Ser linker and additional AvrII restriction site were created at 3′ end of the gene encoding fluorescent protein as non-complementary ends of the amplification primers. In the next step, DNA fragment encoding for D4 domain of PFO was introduced into the prepared vector using AvrII and MluI restriction sites. The tagged D4-PFO variants were expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) cells, which were grown in 1 l of LB medium supplemented with 100 µg/ml ampicillin (LBA) to an A600 of 0.5–0.7, induced with 0.5 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and incubated overnight at 20 °C, with shaking at 180 rmp. The bacteria were harvested by centrifugation for 15 min at 4 000 g and 4 °C, resuspended in 10 ml/g wet mass of lysis buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, pH 8.0) and lysed by sonication. Cellular remnants were removed by centrifugation at 50 000 g for 1 hour at 4 °C. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.2-µm cellulose-acetate filter, added to the 0.5 ml 50% Ni-NTA slurry (Ni-NTA Superflow, Qiagen) and incubated at 4 °C on a rotary shaker for 60 minutes. Lysate-Ni-NTA mixture was loaded on polypropylene columns, washed twice with 10 ml wash buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, pH 8.0) and the protein was eluted with 2 ml of elution buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 250 mM imidazole, pH 8.0). Purified protein was dialyzed (Slide-a-lyzer from Thermo Scientific, 10 000 MWCO) against 0.5 l of a buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 200 mM NaCl, 5% (v/v) glycerol, pH 7.4).

Cholesterol and Ganglioside Monosialic Acid (GM1) Staining

Astrocytes, PC12 cells and fibroblasts were exposed to 2.5 or 25 µM ketamine for 30 min at 37 °C in culture medium; controls were exposed only to ECS. Cells were washed with ECS at room temperature (RT) and mCherry-D4 (0.25 µM) was applied for 30 min at RT. Then cells were washed with ECS 3× for 3 min at RT, fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 10 min at RT, and washed with ECS 3× for 3 min at RT. Samples were mounted onto glass slides with Slow Fade Gold Antifade agent. In a subset of experiments, astrocytes were first labelled by mCherry-D4 (0.25 µM) and then by the non-toxic B-subunit toxin from Vibrio cholerae (CT-B) conjugated to Alexa Fluor488 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) that interacts with the penta-saccharide chain of ganglioside monosialic acid (GM1), as described70.

Structured Illumination Microscopy and Image Analysis

Astrocytes labelled with dextrans, antibodies or mCherry-D4 were imaged with a Zeiss ELYRA PS.1 super-resolution microscope with an oil-immersion plan apochromatic DIC objective (63×/NA 1.4), an EMCCD camera (andor iXon 885, Andor Technology, Belfast, UK), and 5 different grating directions for SIM.

Alexa Fluor488 and Alexa Fluor546/mCherry-D4 were excited by 488 nm argon and 561 nm DPSS laser lines, respectively, and emission fluorescence was filtered with 495–575 nm or 570–650 nm bandpass filters. The number and surface area of fluorescent vesicles were obtained by exporting tiff images to ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD). To identify individual vesicles, the intensity threshold was set to 20% of the maximum fluorescence, and the minimum fluorescent spot size considered to be a vesicle was five adjacent pixels (5 × 0.04 × 0.04 µm); the minimum surface area covered by a vesicle was 0.008 µm2.

In mCherry-D4-stained cells, we acquired 500-nm thick z-stacked images that were analyzed in Fiji71. Individual cells were cropped and auto-thresholded with IsoData method to measure number and the area of D4-labelled entities in the range of 7–3000 pixels (0.01–4.80 µm2).

Confocal Microscopy and Image Analysis

Z-stacked confocal images of astrocytes expressing ANP.emd were obtained with a Zeiss LSM 780 as described17. The number and surface area of ANP.emd-positive vesicles were obtained by ImageJ. The intensity threshold was set to 20% of the maximum fluorescence and the minimum spot size considered to be an individual vesicle was four pixels (4 × 0.088 × 0.088 μm); the minimum surface area covered by a vesicle was 0.031 µm2. Double-fluorescent (mCherry-D4- and CT-B-labelled) cells were observed by a plan-apochromatic oil-immersion objective 63×/NA 1.4. Z-stacked images were obtained with a 488-nm argon laser and 561-nm diode-pumped solid-state laser excitation; the emission fluorescence was bandpass filtered at 500–550 nm and 590–640 nm, respectively. Fluorescence co-localization between green-emitting Alexa Fluor488 and red-emitting mCherry-D4 was quantified in 8-bit TIFF files exported to ColocAna software72 as described70.

Statistics

Data analysis was performed with SigmaPlot (Systat Software, San Jose, CA). The parameters are presented as mean ± SE. Unless stated otherwise, Student’s t test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to determine statistical significance; P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (3.6MB, doc)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants P3 310, J3 6790, J3 6789, and J3 7605 from the Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS), CipKeBip, COST Action BM1002, EU COST Action CM1207-GLISTEN, and EU COST Action CM1207 - EuroCellNet. The authors thank the F. Platt laboratory, University of Oxford, UK for providing fibroblasts.

Author Contributions

E.L., A.V., N.V., J.J., M.S. and R.Z. conceived the study. A.Š. and G.A. produced, expressed and purified the mCherry-D4. A.H. conducted cAMP measurements, collected and analyzed the data. E.L. conducted membrane capacitance measurements, collected and analyzed the data. E.L. and M.S. conducted cell immunolabelling, cell transfection and dextran labelling, collected and analyzed the data, M.L. conducted cell labelling with mCherry-D4, collected and analyzed the data. M.L. and M.B. conducted cell labelling with mCherry-D4 and CT-B. All the authors participated in the scientific discussions, interpretation of the data and manuscript preparation.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information files or are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-47459-z.

References

  • 1.Kessler RC, Bromet EJ. The epidemiology of depression across cultures. Annu Rev Public Health. 2013;34:119–138. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031912-114409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rush AJ, et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:1905–1917. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Berman RM, et al. Antidepressant effects of ketamine in depressed patients. Biol Psychiatry. 2000;47:351–354. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00230-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sanacora G, Treccani G, Popoli M. Towards a glutamate hypothesis of depression: an emerging frontier of neuropsychopharmacology for mood disorders. Neuropharmacology. 2012;62:63–77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.07.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Li N, et al. mTOR-dependent synapse formation underlies the rapid antidepressant effects of NMDA antagonists. Science. 2010;329:959–964. doi: 10.1126/science.1190287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kavalali ET, Monteggia LM. How does ketamine elicit a rapid antidepressant response? Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2014;20:35–39. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2014.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Maeng S, et al. Cellular mechanisms underlying the antidepressant effects of ketamine: role of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid receptors. Biol Psychiatry. 2008;63:349–352. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.05.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Newport DJ, et al. Ketamine and Other NMDA Antagonists: Early Clinical Trials and Possible Mechanisms in Depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172:950–966. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15040465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zanos P, et al. NMDAR inhibition-independent antidepressant actions of ketamine metabolites. Nature. 2016;533:481–486. doi: 10.1038/nature17998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yang C, et al. R-ketamine: a rapid-onset and sustained antidepressant without psychotomimetic side effects. Transl Psychiatry. 2015;5:e632. doi: 10.1038/tp.2015.136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wray, N. H., Schappi, J. M., Singh, H., Senese, N. B. & Rasenick, M. M. NMDAR-independent, cAMP-dependent antidepressant actions of ketamine. Mol Psychiatry, 10.1038/s41380-018-0083-8 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 12.Fujita M, et al. cAMP signaling in brain is decreased in unmedicated depressed patients and increased by treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Mol Psychiatry. 2017;22:754–759. doi: 10.1038/mp.2016.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Akinfiresoye L, Tizabi Y. Antidepressant effects of AMPA and ketamine combination: role of hippocampal BDNF, synapsin, and mTOR. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2013;230:291–298. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3153-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Muller HK, et al. Ketamine regulates the presynaptic release machinery in the hippocampus. J Psychiatr Res. 2013;47:892–899. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wesseling H, Rahmoune H, Tricklebank M, Guest PC, Bahn S. A targeted multiplexed proteomic investigation identifies ketamine-induced changes in immune markers in rat serum and expression changes in protein kinases/phosphatases in rat brain. J Proteome Res. 2014;14:411–421. doi: 10.1021/pr5009493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Thrane AS, et al. General anesthesia selectively disrupts astrocyte calcium signaling in the awake mouse cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:18974–18979. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1209448109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Stenovec M, Trkov S, Kreft M, Zorec R. Alterations of calcium homoeostasis in cultured rat astrocytes evoked by bioactive sphingolipids. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2014;212:49–61. doi: 10.1111/apha.12314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lasic E, et al. Subanesthetic doses of ketamine stabilize the fusion pore in a narrow flickering state in astrocytes. J Neurochem. 2016;138:909–917. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Calejo AI, et al. cAMP-mediated stabilization of fusion pores in cultured rat pituitary lactotrophs. J Neurosci. 2013;33:8068–8078. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5351-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Boulanger L, Poo MM. Gating of BDNF-induced synaptic potentiation by cAMP. Science. 1999;284:1982–1984. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5422.1982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Paco S, et al. Regulation of exocytotic protein expression and Ca2+-dependent peptide secretion in astrocytes. J Neurochem. 2009;110:143–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06116.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Seino S, Shibasaki T. PKA-dependent and PKA-independent pathways for cAMP-regulated exocytosis. Physiol Rev. 2005;85:1303–1342. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00001.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sikdar SK, Zorec R, Mason WT. cAMP directly facilitates Ca-induced exocytosis in bovine lactotrophs. FEBS Lett. 1990;273:150–154. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(90)81072-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fujita-Yoshigaki J. Divergence and convergence in regulated exocytosis: the characteristics of cAMP-dependent enzyme secretion of parotid salivary acinar cells. Cell Signal. 1998;10:371–375. doi: 10.1016/S0898-6568(97)00178-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hisatomi M, Hidaka H, Niki I. Ca2+/calmodulin and cyclic 3,5′ adenosine monophosphate control movement of secretory granules through protein phosphorylation/dephosphorylation in the pancreatic beta-cell. Endocrinology. 1996;137:4644–4649. doi: 10.1210/endo.137.11.8895328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cochilla AJ, Angleson JK, Betz WJ. Differential regulation of granule-to-granule and granule-to-plasma membrane fusion during secretion from rat pituitary lactotrophs. J Cell Biol. 2000;150:839–848. doi: 10.1083/jcb.150.4.839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jain MK, Jahagirdar DV, Van Linde M, Roelofsen B, Eibl H. Solute-induced acceleration of transbilayer movement and its implications on models of blood-brain barrier. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1985;818:356–364. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(85)90010-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nikolaev VO, Bünemann M, Hein L, Hannawacker A, Lohse MJ. Novel single chain cAMP sensors for receptor-induced signal propagation. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2004;279:37215–37218. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C400302200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zorec R, Sikdar SK, Mason WT. Increased cytosolic calcium stimulates exocytosis in bovine lactotrophs. Direct evidence from changes in membrane capacitance. J Gen Physiol. 1991;97:473–497. doi: 10.1085/jgp.97.3.473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Neher E, Marty A. Discrete changes of cell membrane capacitance observed under conditions of enhanced secretion in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982;79:6712–6716. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.21.6712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rituper B, et al. High-resolution membrane capacitance measurements for the study of exocytosis and endocytosis. Nat Protoc. 2013;8:1169–1183. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kabeya Y, et al. LC3, a mammalian homologue of yeast Apg8p, is localized in autophagosome membranes after processing. EMBO J. 2000;19:5720–5728. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.21.5720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Karim MR, et al. Cytosolic LC3 ratio as a sensitive index of macroautophagy in isolated rat hepatocytes and H4-II-E cells. Autophagy. 2007;3:553–560. doi: 10.4161/auto.4615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mizushima N, Yoshimori T. How to interpret LC3 immunoblotting. Autophagy. 2007;3:542–545. doi: 10.4161/auto.4600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gao W, et al. Biochemical isolation and characterization of the tubulovesicular LC3-positive autophagosomal compartment. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:1371–1383. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.054197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Monastyrska I, Rieter E, Klionsky DJ, Reggiori F. Multiple roles of the cytoskeleton in autophagy. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2009;84:431–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00082.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Klionsky DJ, et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition. Autophagy. 2016;12:1–222. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Spruce AE, Breckenridge LJ, Lee AK, Almers W. Properties of the fusion pore that forms during exocytosis of a mast cell secretory vesicle. Neuron. 1990;4:643–654. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90192-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jorgacevski J, et al. Fusion pore stability of peptidergic vesicles. Mol Membr Biol. 2010;27:65–80. doi: 10.3109/09687681003597104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Liu SL, et al. Orthogonal lipid sensors identify transbilayer asymmetry of plasma membrane cholesterol. Nat Chem Biol. 2017;13:268–274. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ohno-Iwashita Y, Iwamoto M, Ando S, Mitsui K, Iwashita S. A modified theta-toxin produced by limited proteolysis and methylation: a probe for the functional study of membrane cholesterol. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1990;1023:441–448. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(90)90137-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cui Y, et al. Astroglial Kir4.1 in the lateral habenula drives neuronal bursts in depression. Nature. 2018;554:323–327. doi: 10.1038/nature25752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Verkhratsky A, Nedergaard M. Physiology of Astroglia. Physiol Rev. 2018;98:239–389. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00042.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Verkhratsky A, Rodriguez JJ, Steardo L. Astrogliopathology: a central element of neuropsychiatric diseases? Neuroscientist. 2014;20:576–588. doi: 10.1177/1073858413510208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Peng L, Li B, Verkhratsky A. Targeting astrocytes in bipolar disorder. Expert Rev Neurother. 2016;16:649–657. doi: 10.1586/14737175.2016.1171144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cobb JA, et al. Density of GFAP-immunoreactive astrocytes is decreased in left hippocampi in major depressive disorder. Neuroscience. 2016;316:209–220. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.12.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rajkowska G, et al. Astrocyte pathology in the ventral prefrontal white matter in depression. J Psychiatr Res. 2018;102:150–158. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Rajkowska G, Stockmeier CA. Astrocyte pathology in major depressive disorder: insights from human postmortem brain tissue. Curr Drug Targets. 2013;14:1225–1236. doi: 10.2174/13894501113149990156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Papouin T, Dunphy JM, Tolman M, Dineley KT, Haydon PG. Septal Cholinergic Neuromodulation Tunes the Astrocyte-Dependent Gating of Hippocampal NMDA Receptors to Wakefulness. Neuron. 2017;94:840–854. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Windrem MS, et al. Human iPSC Glial Mouse Chimeras Reveal Glial Contributions to Schizophrenia. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;21:195–208. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2017.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Peng, L., Song, D., Li, B. & Verkhratsky, A. Astroglial 5-HT2B receptor in mood disorders. Expert Rev Neurother, 1–8, 10.1080/14737175.2018.1458612 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 52.Stenovec M, et al. Ketamine Inhibits ATP-Evoked Exocytotic Release of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor from Vesicles in Cultured Rat Astrocytes. Mol Neurobiol. 2016;53:6882–6896. doi: 10.1007/s12035-015-9562-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ozaki N, et al. cAMP-GEFII is a direct target of cAMP in regulated exocytosis. Nat Cell Biol. 2000;2:805–811. doi: 10.1038/35041046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Fujimoto K, et al. Piccolo, a Ca2+ sensor in pancreatic beta-cells. Involvement of cAMP-GEFII.Rim2. Piccolo complex in cAMP-dependent exocytosis. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:50497–50502. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M210146200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Seino S, Takahashi H, Fujimoto W, Shibasaki T. Roles of cAMP signalling in insulin granule exocytosis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009;11(Suppl 4):180–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01108.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wan QF, et al. Protein kinase activation increases insulin secretion by sensitizing the secretory machinery to Ca2+ J Gen Physiol. 2004;124:653–662. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200409082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Henkel AW, Meiri H, Horstmann H, Lindau M, Almers W. Rhythmic opening and closing of vesicles during constitutive exo- and endocytosis in chromaffin cells. EMBO J. 2000;19:84–93. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.1.84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Calejo AI, et al. Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels and cAMP-dependent modulation of exocytosis in cultured rat lactotrophs. J Neurosci. 2014;34:15638–15647. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5290-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Akerman SN, et al. Fura-2 imaging of thyrotropin-releasing hormone and dopamine effects on calcium homeostasis of bovine lactotrophs. Endocrinology. 1991;129:475–488. doi: 10.1210/endo-129-1-475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Tang KS, Wang N, Tse A, Tse FW. Influence of quantal size and cAMP on the kinetics of quantal catecholamine release from rat chromaffin cells. Biophys J. 2007;92:2735–2746. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.088997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Machado JD, Morales A, Gomez JF, Borges R. cAmp modulates exocytotic kinetics and increases quantal size in chromaffin cells. Mol Pharmacol. 2001;60:514–520. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tang KS, Tse A, Tse FW. Differential regulation of multiple populations of granules in rat adrenal chromaffin cells by culture duration and cyclic AMP. J Neurochem. 2005;92:1126–1139. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02944.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Saranteas T, et al. Mechanisms of ketamine action on lipid metabolism in rats. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005;22:222–226. doi: 10.1097/00003643-200503000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kritchevsky D, Tepper SA, Davidson LM, Story JA. Influence of ketamine, phenylcyclidine, and phenobarbital on cholesterol metabolism in rats. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1976;151:445–447. doi: 10.3181/00379727-151-39231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Mauch DH, et al. CNS synaptogenesis promoted by glia-derived cholesterol. Science. 2001;294:1354–1357. doi: 10.1126/science.294.5545.1354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Vardjan N, Kreft M, Zorec R. Dynamics of β-adrenergic/cAMP signaling and morphological changes in cultured astrocytes. Glia. 2014;62:566–579. doi: 10.1002/glia.22626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Stenovec M, et al. Expression of familial Alzheimer disease presenilin 1 gene attenuates vesicle traffic and reduces peptide secretion in cultured astrocytes devoid of pathologic tissue environment. Glia. 2016;64:317–329. doi: 10.1002/glia.22931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Kreft M, Zorec R. Cell-attached measurements of attofarad capacitance steps in rat melanotrophs. Pflugers Arch. 1997;434:212–214. doi: 10.1007/s004240050387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Anderluh G, Pungercar J, Strukelj B, Macek P, Gubensek F. Cloning, sequencing, and expression of equinatoxin II. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996;220:437–442. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1996.0391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Goncalves PP, et al. Prolactin secretion sites contain syntaxin-1 and differ from ganglioside monosialic acid rafts in rat lactotrophs. Endocrinology. 2008;149:4948–4957. doi: 10.1210/en.2008-0096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Schindelin J, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kreft M, Milisav I, Potokar M, Zorec R. Automated high through-put colocalization analysis of multichannel confocal images. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2004;74:63–67. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2607(03)00071-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Borner S, et al. FRET measurements of intracellular cAMP concentrations and cAMP analog permeability in intact cells. Nat Protoc. 2011;6:427–438. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary information (3.6MB, doc)

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information files or are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES