Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Jul 29;9:10943. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47514-9

Novel biotechnological glucosylation of high-impact aroma chemicals, 3(2H)- and 2(5H)-furanones

Isabelle Effenberger 1, Thomas Hoffmann 1, Rafal Jonczyk 1, Wilfried Schwab 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6662797  PMID: 31358872

Abstract

Glucosyltransferases are versatile biocatalysts to chemically modify small molecules and thus enhance their water solubility and structural stability. Although the genomes of all organisms harbor a multitude of glucosyltransferase genes, their functional characterization is hampered by the lack of high-throughput in-vivo systems to rapidly test the versatility of the encoded proteins. We have developed and applied a high-throughput whole cell biotransformation system to screen a plant glucosyltransferase library. As proof of principle, we identified 25, 24, 15, and 18 biocatalysts transferring D-glucose to sotolone, maple furanone, furaneol and homofuraneol, four highly appreciated flavor compounds, respectively. Although these 3(2H)- and 2(5H)-furanones have extremely low odor thresholds their glucosides were odorless. Upscaling of the biotechnological process yielded titers of 5.3 and 7.2 g/L for the new to nature β-D-glucopyranosides of sotolone and maple furanone, respectively. Consequently, plant glucosyltransferase show stunning catalytic activities, which enable the economical production of novel and unexplored chemicals with exciting new functionalities by whole-cell biotransformation.

Subject terms: Bioinspired materials, Expression systems

Introduction

Sotolone (4,5-dimethyl-3-hydroxy-2(5H)-furanone) is a naturally occurring chiral lactone of industrial significance and is considered a high impact aroma chemical (Fig. 1)1. The 2(5H)-furanone shows characteristic organoleptic properties with the typical smell of curry and fenugreek at high concentration and caramel, or burnt sugar at lower concentration and has an extremely low odor threshold of 0.8 and 89 ppb for the (+)-(S)- and (−)-(R)-enantiomer, respectively2–4. Sotolone was first described as a breakdown product of the amino acid threonine5 and was later proposed as the flavor principle of seasonings prepared from plant protein hydrolysates6. It has since been identified in many foods, including coffee, aged sake and rum, flor sherry, and wines7–12. Besides, sotolone is the key aroma component of fenugreek and lovage13 and has been found in the dried fruiting bodies of the mushroom Lactarius helvus14. The remarkable contribution of sotolone to the aroma of different foods explains the numerous studies that focused on identifying the generation pathways of this exceptional aroma chemical15,16. Both, enzymatic and chemical reactions are responsible for the formation17,18.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Chemical structures of substrates and glucosides.

The ethyl analogue of sotolone, 5-ethyl-3-hydroxy-4-methyl-2(5H)-furanone (maple furanone, adhexon; Fig. 1) is one of the key contributors to the aroma of roasted coffee and occurs naturally in fruits such as blackberry, raspberry and blueberry and was found in wines and beers19–21. Maple furanone was initially synthesized in 1957 and later identified in hydrolyzed soy protein in 1980, and has been named after its powerful maple-caramel aroma and taste, which is reminiscent of maple syrup22. The odor thresholds were assessed at 0.02−0.04 ng/L in air and 0.1 μg/L in water. Thus, it is one of the most outstanding modern flavor materials. Maple furanone is a key organoleptic note in soy sauce and one of the most powerful flavor chemicals known to man. It is thought to arise from the reaction between α-ketobutyric acid and propanal20.

Aroma glycosides are a class of compounds, which have recently attracted much attention from the industry as they can function as proflavor and profragrances in a number of food and cosmetics applications, respectively23–25. They constitute novel and important delivery systems for the controlled release of volatile compounds. Aroma glycosides consist of an aroma component (aglycone) linked to a carbohydrate moiety (glycone) and are formed by uridine diphosphate-sugar dependent glycosyltransferases in cells (UGTs)26. Aroma glycosides are abundant in nature and have been isolated from plants (flowers, leaves, roots and fruits), insects and microorganism27–34.

The chemical synthesis of glycosides is well established, but is still a labor-intensive task, which involves multiple protection and deprotection steps to reduce the formation of unwanted side products. In all organisms, however, UGTs selectively catalyse the transfer of a sugar from activated nucleotide-sugar donor molecules (usually UDP glucose in plants) to an acceptor molecule without the need for protective groups. Biocatalytic processes involving UGTs thus represent an interesting alternative to chemical synthesis of glycosides24,25,35,36.

Sugar conjugation results in increased stability and water solubility as consequence of enhanced polarity and has also a major impact on biological activity and toxicity37. Because of their sessile life style, plants have evolved different mechanisms to cope with environmental threats involving a large gene family of UGTs for detoxification of endogenous and exogenous substances38,39. Consequently, plants are a particular rich source of unexplored UGT genes.

Recently, the first furaneol/homofuraneol glucosyltransferases from grapevine and strawberry were reported40–42. Due to the structural similarity of the furaneols with sotolone, and maple furanone (Fig. 1) we assumed that UGTs acting on 3(2H)-furanones might also be able to glucosylate 2(5H)-furanones. Thus, the aim of this study was to develop a rapid screening system for the testing of plant UGTs in vivo. As proof-of-principle, we selected the four highly appreciable flavor compounds as substrates to identify UGTs acting on furanones.

Here, we describe the systematic search for plant UGTs of different origins that are able to convert intensely smelling aroma compounds into nonvolatile proflavors. The identification of numerous biocatalysts enabled the establishment of the first biotechnological process for the production of furanone ß-D-glucosides.

Results and Discussion

Identification of 3(2H)- and 2(5H)-furanone:UDP-glucose glucosyltransferases

Since furanones are potent flavoring agents, we envisioned the development of a biocatalytic process for the production of furanone glucosides based on E. coli whole-cell biocatalysts expressing recombinant plant UGTs. To find efficient enzymes a UGT library consisting of 49 plant enzymes including catalytically active proteins from grapevine (Vitis vinifera), strawberry (Fragaria spp), raspberry (Rubus idaeus), tobacco (Nicotiana benthamina), and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), were screened in 24-well plate format (Fig. 2). Due to the fast growth of E. coli and high specific oxygen consumption rates, the oxygen-transfer rate is a major criterium when choosing the type of microplate, culture volume, and shaking conditions. The use of a 5-ml bacterial solution in 25-ml wells allowed the cultivation of E. coli without affecting the growth of the bacteria by oxygen deprivation. Expression of recombinant enzymes in the E. coli cells harboring the UGT genes was induced with isopropyl ß-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and furanone substrates were added to initiate the biotransformation experiment. Glucoside products were identified in the supernatant by LC-UV-MS analysis (Fig. 3; Supplementary Fig. S1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Workflow of the high-throughput screen to identify glucoside producing UGTs by biotransformation.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Production of glucosides by biotransformation using UGT-transformed E. coli W cells. Sotolone (A), maple furanone (B), furaneol (C) and homofuraneol (D) were used as substrates. Glucoside formation was monitored by LC-UV-MS (negative mode). UV-chromatograms of substrates and products after biotransformation using E. coli W wild-type (A–D), UGT84A45- (A1), UGT71K3 transformed cells (B1), and UGT72B27-transformed cells (C1,D1). Mass spectra, product ion spectra and UV spectra of sotolone glucoside (A2,A3), maple furanone glucoside (B2,B3), furaneol glucoside (C2,C3), and homofuraneol glucoside (D2,D3).

Out of 49 different plant UGTs, used as E. coli whole-cell biocatalyst, 25 and 24 transformed sotolone and maple furanone, respectively (Fig. 4) while furaneol and homofuraneol were converted by 15 and 18 UGTs, respectively. UGTs of families 71, 72, 73, 76, 84, 85, and 92 glucosylated the 2(5H)-furanones and enzymes of families 71, 72, 73, 75, 76, 84, 85, and 92 transferred D-glucose onto 3(2H)-furanones. While a number of UGTs transformed sotolone and maple furanone equally efficiently, especially those of family 84, one enzyme UGT72B27 stood out for furaneol and homofuraneol glucosylation (Fig. 4). With few exceptions, the structural homologues sotolone and maple furanone as well as furaneol and homofuraneol showed similar reactivities towards the individual biocatalysts.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Relative biotransformation rate of UGTs in % towards sotolone (A, black bars), maple furanone (A, grey bars), furaneol (B, black bars) and homofuraneol (B, grey bars) using a UGT library transformed in E. coli W cells. Glucoside formation was monitored by LC-UV-MS (negative mode). Peak areas at 232 nm (sotolone and maple furanone glucoside) and 280 nm (furaneol and homofuraneol glucoside) were used and the UGT with the highest value was set to 100%; co, codon-optimized.

Glycosyltransferases of the UGT84A clade are known to produce glucose esters from benzoic and cinnamic acid derivatives and are involved, among others in the production of galloylated plant metabolites43,44. Therefore, it was unexpected that members of this class efficiently formed glucosides of sotolone and maple furanone. UGT71K3a and UGT71K3b catalyzed the glucosylation of diverse hydroxycoumarins, naphthols, flavonoids, phloroglucinols and pelargonidin45 as well as furaneol in strawberry fruit41. UGT72B72, which was a superior biocatalyst for the production of furaneol and homofuraneol in this study, glucosylated the natural stilbene trans-resveratrol and the smoke-derived volatiles guaiacol, syringol, methylsyringol, and methylguaiacol in Vitis vinifera46.

Characterization of furanone glucosides

The pseudo-molecular ions of the transfer products from sotolone were observed at m/z 335 [M + HCOOH-H]− and 289 [M-H]− (Fig. 3) while products formed from maple furanone showed pseudo-molecular ions at m/z 349 [M + HCOOH-H]−, 339 [M + Cl]−, and 303 [M-H]−. Similarly, [M-H]− and [M + Cl]− ions were observed at m/z 289 and 325 for the transfer product from furaneol, respectively and m/z 303 and 339 for homofuraneol products, respectively. Remarkably, the product ion spectra (MS2) of the furanone glucoside products showed a neutral loss of the aglycone resulting in [glucose-H]− and [glucose-H2O-H]− ions for the 2(5H)- and 3(2H)-furanone glucosides, respectively. Generally, MS2 spectra of glucosides are characterized by a neutral loss of the glucose moiety47.

The structures of the transglucosylated products were proposed considering the racemic forms of the substrates and the tautomerism of homofuraneol (Fig. 1) and their details analyzed by NMR spectroscopy (Supplementary Tables S1–S3). For analyses of the products by NMR, glucosides were produced on larger scale in 2 L shaking flasks and purified by solid phase extraction. 1H- and 13C-NMR signals of the products were assigned by studies of 1H-1H COSY, HMQC, and HMBC spectra. The 1H-NMR spectra of the glucosylated furanones showed the characteristic signals due to β-D-glucopyranosyl residues and the 13C-NMR spectra exhibited signals for the anomeric carbons from 100.79 ppm (sotolone glucoside, C1’) to 105.63 ppm (homofuraneol glucoside, C1”). The signals for the anomeric carbons of the furanone glucosides were split into two signals. Since all furanones were racemates22, the signals were considered to reflect the production of two diastereomers by conjunction with β-D-glucopyranose. The similar 13C signal intensities for the anomeric carbons showed that the substrate enantiomers were only slightly discriminated. Splitted signals were also observed for almost all carbons. Additionally, there were two sets of signals for homofuraneol glucoside, which derived from two tautomeric isoforms, 2-ethyl-4-hydroxy-5-methyl-3(2H)-furanone (2-EHMF) and 5-ethyl-4-hydroxy-2-methyl-3(2H)-furanone glucoside (5-EHMF; Supplementary Tables S3). The 1H-NMR signals of the homofuraneol moieties were separately detected, and their correlation with the carbon signals were determined in the HMQC spectrum. However, the signals of the glucosyl residues strongly overlapped. Based on the NMR data, the products formed by the UGT whole-cell biocatalysts were established to be furanone β-D-glucopyranosides.

Although numerous attempts have been undertaken to identify sotolone glucoside by LC-MS analysis in extracts of plants known to produce the aglycone, all investigations have failed (not shown). Up to date, sotolone and maple furanone glucoside can be considered as new-to-nature products while furaneol glucoside has been isolated from a variety of fruits including strawberry and grapes41. The tautomeric homofuraneol α-D-glucopyranosides have been synthesized by sucrose phosphorylase48 but the β-D-glucopyranosides have not been found in nature until to date.

Biocatalytic large-scale production of sotolone β-D-glucopyranoside

To explore the potential of E. coli for large-scale production of sotolone and maple furanone glucosides, UGT-expressing bacterial cells were used as whole-cell biocatalysts in 2-L-shaking flasks. UGT84A45 and UGT71K3a were chosen for the production of sotolone and maple furanone, respectively. The screening experiments (Fig. 4) had shown maximum activity of the selected enzymes for the target molecules. More and more furanones were glucosylated in the course of the reaction. The yields of β-D-glucopyranosides of sotolone and maple furanone in the supernatant at 8 days after IPTG induction were 5.3 and 7.2 g/L, respectively (Fig. 5). The glucosides produced by the whole-cell biocatalysts could be readily purified by solid phase extraction from the supernatant of the cultures. The furanone glucosides were completely recovered by methanol elution of the resin and colored impurities were removed by activated carbon as described for the purification of sugars49.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Batch fermentation for the production of sotolone glucoside (A) and maple furanone glucoside (B). UGT84A45 and UGT71K3a were used for the production of sotolone glucoside and maple furanone glucoside, respectively. Mean values of two replicates are shown.

A comprehensive overview of whole-cell systems for UDP-sugar based glycosylation focusing on small molecules has been shown that UGTs have only been successfully applied for the production of oligosaccharides in terms of titers (up to 188 g/L). To date, glycosides derived from low-molecular weight metabolites were produced about three orders of magnitude lower50. Thus, whole-cell biotransformation of furanones by E. coli cells harboring plant UGTs offer an interesting alternative for chemicals synthesis. One probable explanation of the relatively high titers of the furanone glucosides is the high water solubility and low toxicity of the substrates, which do not hinder the efficient production of the corresponding glucosides. As further improvements are possible, an economic bioprocess is within reach.

Enzymatic hydrolysis

As furanones show excellent organoleptic properties and controlled release of the aglycones is important when their glucosides are used as slow-release aroma chemicals enzymatic hydrolysis of furanone was analyzed. Since Rapidase is known to rapidly hydrolyze aroma glycosides51, this enzyme was used to test the stability of furanone β-D-glucopyranosides (Fig. 6). The glucosides (1 mg/l) were readily degraded by the hydrolase (1 mg/ml) whereby 400 µg of sugar derivatives were completely hydrolyzed by 400 µg of the enzyme within 360 min. Thus, Rapidase efficiently degraded furanone glucosides but probably due to the known instability of the furanones, the theoretical concentrations of the aglycones were not fully recovered.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Enzymatic digestion of glucosides by Rapidase. The substrates and products were analyzed by LC-MS. Enzymatic digestion of sotolone glucoside (A) and maple furanone glucoside (B) by Rapidase and formation of sotolone (A) and maple furanone (B), respectively over time.

Conclusion

Plant glucosyltransferases, because of their pronounced substrate promiscuity are versatile biocatalysts that transfer sugar molecules from activated donor substrates to a range of acceptor molecules. The use of whole-cell UGT biocatalysts is the method of choice to glucosylate small molecules such as aroma chemicals as cofactors are recycled by the cells’ metabolism. This system allows the transformation of a number of low molecular weight compounds at large scale and the production of new-to-nature glycosides, which find promising applications in cosmetics, food, and pharmaceutical industry as profragrances, proflavors, and prodrugs, respectively.

Methods

Chemicals

Sotolone (3-hydroxy-4,5-dimethyl-2(5H)-furanone), maple furanone (5-ethyl-3-hydroxy-4-methyl-2(5H)-furanone), furaneol (4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone) and homofuraneol (mixture of 5-ethyl-4-hydroxy-2-methyl-3(2H)-furanone and 2-ethyl-4-hydroxy-5-methyl-3(2H)-furanone) and other reagents were purchased in analytical grade from Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim (Germany).

UGT-library

The UGT library consisted of the following 49 UGTs: UGT71A33, UGT71A34a, UGT71A35, UGT71A44, UGT71AJ1, UGT71K3a, UGT71K3b, UGT71W2, UGT72AY1, UGT72B27, UGT730A1, UGT73A15, UGT73AR2, UGT73B23, UGT73C5, UGT73E12, UGT73E13, UGT73E14, UGT73E15, UGT73E16, UGT75L22, UGT75L24, UGT75T1, UGT76Q2, UGT76Q3, UGT76Q4, UGT84A14, UGT84A16, UGT84A41, UGT84A42, UGT84A43, UGT84A44, UGT84A45, UGT84A46, UGT84A49, UGT85A69a, UGT85A69co, UGT85A70, UGT85A72, UGT88A12, UGT88A20, UGT88A21, UGT88A22, UGT88A23, UGT88A24, UGT88A25, UGT88A26, UGT88A27, and UGT92G6 (http://prime.vetmed.wsu.edu/resources/udp-glucuronsyltransferase-homepage). The corresponding genes were cloned into pGEX-4T1 and transferred into Escherichia coli W52.

Screening of UGTs

For the initial screening of the enzymatic activity of the UGT-library towards the substrates sotolone, maple furanone, furaneol and homofuraneol in a small scale biotransformation process, a 50 ml overnight culture of E. coli W:pGEX-4T1:UGT in M9 minimal media containing 1% sucrose with 50 mg/L ampicillin was prepared. After measuring the OD600, 25 ml of the bacterial culture was centrifuged at 5,292 × g, and RT, for 15 min and the pellet was resuspended in M9 minimal media containing 0.2 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to OD600 1. Five ml of the bacterial suspension was transferred to a 25 ml deep well microtiter plate (HJ-BIOANALYTIK GmbH, Erkelenz, Germany), and incubated for 3 hr at 18 °C and 300 rpm. The biotransformation was started by adding substrate at a final concentration of 1 g/L. After one day of incubation with shaking at RT, 0.5% sucrose was added to the culture. On the second day, the culture supernatant was centrifuged at 12,045 × g for 2 min, diluted 1:10 and analyzed for glucoside formation by LC-UV-MS. For relative quantification, the UV-peak areas at 232 nm for sotolon glucoside and maple furanone glucoside and 280 nm for furaneol glucoside and homofuraneol glucoside were used and the UGT with the highest product formation (peak area) was set to 100% (relative biotransformation rate).

Enzymatic digestion of glucosides

Four hundred µg purified glucoside (1 mg/ml glucoside solution) was incubated with 400 µg Rapidase AR 2000 (DSM Food Specialties Beverage Ingredients, MA Delft, The Netherlands) in water at RT. Aliquots of 20 µl were taken over the time (0–360 min) and the hydrolysis reaction was stopped by heating the mixture for 10 min at 75 °C. The glucoside and aglycone concentration was determined with standard curves by LC-UV-MS.

Product identification using LC-UV-MS

The glycosides were identified according to the method described in53. The LC System (quaternary pump and variable wavelength detector) were all from Agilent 1100 (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). The glycosides were separated by a LUNA C18 100 A 150 × 2 mm (Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany) with a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min. Sotolone and maple furanone were monitored at 232 nm, furaneol and homofuraneol at 280 nm. The binary gradient system consisted of solvent A, water with 0.1% formic acid and solvent B, 100% methanol with 0.1% formic acid with following gradient program: 0–3 min: 0–50% B; 3–6 min: 50–100% B; 6–14 min: 100% B; 14–14.1 min: 100–0% B; 14.1–25 min: 0% B. The mass spectra was monitored by a Bruker esquire 3000 plus mass spectrometer with an ESI interface. The ionization voltage of the capillary was 4000 V and the end plate was set to −500 V.

Whole cell biotransformation on large scale

For the large scale production of sotolone and maple furanone glucosides, 1 L M9 minimal media containing 1% sucrose (50 mg/L ampicillin) was inoculated with E. coli W:pGEX-4T1:UGT84A45 (sotolone)/UGT71K3a (maple furanone) in a 2 L shaking flask and incubated at 37 °C by shaking at 150 rpm overnight. The UGT expression was induced with 0.2 mM IPTG at an OD600 of 1.5–2. Additionally, 1% sucrose and 1× M9 salts were given to the culture and incubated at least for 4 hr at 18 °C by shaking. The biotransformation was started by adding 3 g/L sotolone (or maple furanone) to the culture. The flask was incubated for 8 days at RT by shaking at 150 rpm. Aliquots for OD600 measurement and LC-MS analysis were taken at several time points and 0.5% sucrose was fed daily. The biotransformation was completed when the OD600 reached its maximum and almost all of the aglycon was transformed. At maximum product level the bacterial cells were removed by centrifugation and the resulting supernatant used for product isolation by solid phase extraction.

Purification of glucosides

After centrifugation of the biotransformation culture for 40 min at 5,292 × g (RT), the supernatant was incubated with an appropriate amount of the Purosorb PAD600 (Purolite Ltd, Llantrisant, UK) over night by shaking. The resin was then thoroughly washed with water and the glucosides were eluted with 5 volumes of methanol by vacuum filtration. The methanol was evaporated and the residue was dissolved in water, followed by a liquid- liquid extraction with ethyl acetate (in total 3 times) to remove remaining aglycone. After evaporation, the residue was dissolved in methanol and treated with activated carbon (1 g/ 100 ml) to remove colored impurities. Finally, the glucosides were dried by evaporation and stored for further experiments at 4 °C.

NMR analysis

Thirty mg purified glucoside or 15 mg aglycone were solved in 200 µl methanol-d4 (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany), centrifuged at maximum speed for 2 min und evaporated. The residue was solved in 400 µl methanol-d4 containing 0.03% (v/v) TMS (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany), transferred to a treated NMR tube und filled up to a final volume of 600 µl. NMR spectra were recorded with a Bruker DRX 500 spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany). The chemical shifts were referred to the solvent signal. The one-dimensional and two-dimensional COSY, HMQC, and HMBC spectra were acquired and processed with standard Bruker software (XWIN-NMR) and MestreNova software (mestrelab.com).

Supplementary information

Supplemental data (417.2KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank Timo Stark (Chair of Food Chemistry and Molecular Sensory Science) for acquiring the NMR spectra. This work was funded by Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, ZIM-program (ZF4025012SL6) and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG (634/32-1).

Author Contributions

I.E., W.S. and T.H. conceived the study and participated in its design, I.E. drafted the manuscript, T.H. participated in the coordination of the study and maintenance of the equipment, I.E. and R.J. performed the experiments, I.E. and R.J. analyzed the data, W.S. wrote the manuscript. All of the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-47514-9.

References

  • 1.Rowe, D. J. In Advances in Flavours and Fragrances, edited by K. A. D. Swift (Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 2002), pp. 202–226.
  • 2.Pons A, Lavigne V, Landais Y, Darriet P, Dubourdieu D. Distribution and organoleptic impact of sotolon enantiomers in dry white wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008;56:1606–1610. doi: 10.1021/jf072337r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Colin Slaughter J. The naturally occurring furanones: formation and function from pheromone to food. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 1999;74:259–276. doi: 10.1017/S0006323199005332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Taga A, Sato A, Suzuki K, Takeda M, Kodama S. Simple determination of a strongly aromatic compound, sotolon, by capillary electrophoresis. J. Oleo Sci. 2012;61:45–48. doi: 10.5650/jos.61.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sulser H, DePizzol J, Büchi W. A Probable Flavoring Principle in Vegetable-Protein Hydrolysates. J. Food Sci. 1967;32:611–615. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1967.tb00846.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sulser H, Habegger M, Büchi W. Synthese und Geschmackspruefungen von 3,4-disubstituierten 2-Hydroxy-2-buten-1,4-oliden. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch. 1972;148:215–221. doi: 10.1007/BF01116049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Blank I, Sen A, Grosch W. Potent odorants of the roasted powder and brew of Arabica coffee. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch. 1992;195:239–245. doi: 10.1007/BF01202802. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Câmara JS, Marques JC, Alves MA, Silva Ferreira AC. 3-Hydroxy-4,5-dimethyl-2(5H)-furanone levels in fortified Madeira wines: relationship to sugar content. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004;52:6765–6769. doi: 10.1021/jf049547d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Silva Ferreira AC, Barbe J-C, Bertrand A. 3-Hydroxy-4,5-dimethyl-2(5H)-furanone: a key odorant of the typical aroma of oxidative aged Port wine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003;51:4356–4363. doi: 10.1021/jf0342932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Masuda M, Okawa E-I-C, Nishimura K-I-C, Yunome H. Identification of 4,5-Dimethyl-3-hydroxy-2(5 H)-furanone (Sotolon) and Ethyl 9-Hydroxynonanoate in Botrytised Wine and Evaluation of the Roles of Compounds Characteristic of It. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1984;48:2707–2710. doi: 10.1080/00021369.1984.10866580. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Freitas J, et al. A fast and environment-friendly MEPSPEP/UHPLC-PDA methodology to assess 3-hydroxy-4,5-dimethyl-2(5H)-furanone in fortified wines. Food Chem. 2017;214:686–693. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.07.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gabrielli M, Fracassetti D, Tirelli A. UHPLC quantification of sotolon in white wine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014;62:4878–4883. doi: 10.1021/jf500508m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Blank I, Schieberle P. Analysis of the seasoning-like flavour substances of a commercial lovage extract (Levisticum officinale Koch.) Flavour Fragr. J. 1993;8:191–195. doi: 10.1002/ffj.2730080405. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rapior S, Fons F, Bessiere J-M. The Fenugreek Odor of Lactarius helvus. Mycologia. 2000;92:305–308. doi: 10.2307/3761565. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pons A, Lavigne V, Landais Y, Darriet P, Dubourdieu D. Identification of a sotolon pathway in dry white wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010;58:7273–7279. doi: 10.1021/jf100150q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Scholtes C, Nizet S, Collin S. How sotolon can impart a Madeira off-flavor to aged beers. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015;63:2886–2892. doi: 10.1021/jf505953u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Blank I, Lin J, Fumeaux R, Welti DH, Fay LB. Formation of 3-Hydroxy-4,5-dimethyl-2(5 H)-furanone (Sotolone) from 4-Hydroxy- l -isoleucine and 3-Amino-4,5-dimethyl-3,4-dihydro-2(5 H)-furanone. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996;44:1851–1856. doi: 10.1021/jf9506702. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.König T, et al. 3-Hydroxy-4,5-dimethyl-2(5 H)-furanone (Sotolon) Causing an Off-Flavor: Elucidation of Its Formation Pathways during Storage of Citrus Soft Drinks. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999;47:3288–3291. doi: 10.1021/jf981244u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Czerny M, Mayer F, Grosch W. Sensory Study on the Character Impact Odorants of Roasted Arabica Coffee. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999;47:695–699. doi: 10.1021/jf980759i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Collin S, Nizet S, Claeys Bouuaert T, Despatures P-M. Main odorants in Jura flor-sherry wines. Relative contributions of sotolon, abhexon, and theaspirane-derived compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012;60:380–387. doi: 10.1021/jf203832c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Scholtes C, Nizet S, Collin S. Occurrence of sotolon, abhexon and theaspirane-derived molecules in Gueuze beers. Chemical similarities with ‘yellow wines’. J. Inst. Brew. 2012;118:223–229. doi: 10.1002/jib.34. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nakahashi A, Yaguchi Y, Miura N, Emura M, Monde K. A vibrational circular dichroism approach to the determination of the absolute configurations of flavorous 5-substituted-2(5H)-furanones. J. Nat. Prod. 2011;74:707–711. doi: 10.1021/np1007763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Herrmann A. Controlled release of volatiles under mild reaction conditions: from nature to everyday products. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2007;46:5836–5863. doi: 10.1002/anie.200700264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schwab W, Fischer T, Wüst M. Terpene glucoside production: Improved biocatalytic processes using glycosyltransferases. Eng. Life Sci. 2015;15:376–386. doi: 10.1002/elsc.201400156. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schwab W, Fischer TC, Giri A, Wüst M. Potential applications of glucosyltransferases in terpene glucoside production: impacts on the use of aroma and fragrance. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015;99:165–174. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-6229-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bönisch F, et al. Activity-based profiling of a physiologic aglycone library reveals sugar acceptor promiscuity of family 1 UDP-glucosyltransferases from grape. Plant Physiol. 2014;166:23–39. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.242578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.He W-J, et al. Terpene and lignan glycosides from the twigs and leaves of an endangered conifer, Cathaya argyrophylla. Phytochemistry. 2012;83:63–69. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sun W, et al. Terpene Glycosides from the Roots of Sanguisorba officinalis L. and Their Hemostatic Activities. Molecules. 2012;17:7629–7636. doi: 10.3390/molecules17077629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hjelmeland AK, Ebeler SE. Glycosidically Bound Volatile Aroma Compounds in Grapes and Wine: A Review. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2015;66:1–11. doi: 10.5344/ajev.2014.14104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu J, Zhu X-L, Ullah N, Tao Y-S. Aroma Glycosides in Grapes and Wine. J. Food Sci. 2017;82:248–259. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Baden CU, Franke S, Dobler S. Host dependent iridoid glycoside sequestration patterns in Cionus hortulanus. J. Chem. Ecol. 2013;39:1112–1114. doi: 10.1007/s10886-013-0323-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yun K, Kondempudi CM, Leutou AS, Son BW. New Production of a Monoterpene Glycoside, 1- O -(α-D-Mannopyranosyl)geraniol, by the Marine-derived Fungus Thielavia hyalocarpa. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2015;36:2391–2393. doi: 10.1002/bkcs.10451. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Oka N, et al. Citronellyl disaccharide glycoside as an aroma precursor from rose flowers. Phytochemistry. 1998;47:1527–1529. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(97)00526-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Oka N, Ohki M, Ikegami A, Sakata K, Watanabe N. First Isolation of Geranyl Disaccharide Glycosides as Aroma Precursors from Rose Flowers. Nat. Prod. Lett. 1997;10:187–192. doi: 10.1080/10575639708041193. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gutmann Alexander, Lepak Alexander, Diricks Margo, Desmet Tom, Nidetzky Bernd. Glycosyltransferase cascades for natural product glycosylation: Use of plant instead of bacterial sucrose synthases improves the UDP-glucose recycling from sucrose and UDP. Biotechnology Journal. 2017;12(7):1600557. doi: 10.1002/biot.201600557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hayes Marc, Pietruszka Jörg. Synthesis of Glycosides by Glycosynthases. Molecules. 2017;22(9):1434. doi: 10.3390/molecules22091434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tian Y, et al. Detoxification of Deoxynivalenol via Glycosylation Represents Novel Insights on Antagonistic Activities of Trichoderma when Confronted with Fusarium graminearum. Toxins. 2016;8:335. doi: 10.3390/toxins8110335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gachon CMM, Langlois-Meurinne M, Saindrenan P. Plant secondary metabolism glycosyltransferases: the emerging functional analysis. Trends Plant Sci. 2005;10:542–549. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Staniek A, et al. Natural products – learning chemistry from plants. Biotechnol. J. 2014;9:326–336. doi: 10.1002/biot.201300059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sasaki K, Takase H, Kobayashi H, Matsuo H, Takata R. Molecular cloning and characterization of UDP-glucose: furaneol glucosyltransferase gene from grapevine cultivar Muscat Bailey A (Vitis labrusca × V. vinifera) J. Exp. Bot. 2015;66:6167–6174. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Song C, et al. Glucosylation of 4-Hydroxy-2,5-Dimethyl-3(2H)-Furanone, the Key Strawberry Flavor Compound in Strawberry Fruit. Plant Physiol. 2016;171:139–151. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yamada A, Ishiuchi K, Makino T, Mizukami H, Terasaka K. A glucosyltransferase specific for 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone in strawberry. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2018;83:106–113. doi: 10.1080/09168451.2018.1524706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Schulenburg K, et al. Formation of β-glucogallin, the precursor of ellagic acid in strawberry and raspberry. J. Exp. Bot. 2016;67:2299–2308. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ono NN, Qin X, Wilson AE, Li G, Tian L. Two UGT84 Family Glycosyltransferases Catalyze a Critical Reaction of Hydrolyzable Tannin Biosynthesis in Pomegranate (Punica granatum) PloS one. 2016;11:e0156319. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Song C, et al. A UDP-glucosyltransferase functions in both acylphloroglucinol glucoside and anthocyanin biosynthesis in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) Plant J. 2016;85:730–742. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Härtl K, et al. Glucosylation of Smoke-Derived Volatiles in Grapevine (Vitis vinifera) is Catalyzed by a Promiscuous Resveratrol/Guaiacol Glucosyltransferase. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017;65:5681–5689. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b01886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jia C, et al. Identification of Glycoside Compounds from Tobacco by High Performance Liquid Chromatography/Electrospray Ionization Linear Ion-Trap Tandem Mass Spectrometry Coupled with Electrospray Ionization Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2016;28:629–640. doi: 10.21577/0103-5053.20160211. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kitao S, Matsudo T, Sasaki T, Koga T, Kawamura M. Enzymatic synthesis of stable, odorless, and powdered furanone glucosides by sucrose phosphorylase. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2000;64:134–141. doi: 10.1271/bbb.64.134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Nobre C, Teixeira JA, Rodrigues LR. Fructo-oligosaccharides purification from a fermentative broth using an activated charcoal column. N. Biotechnol. 2012;29:395–401. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2011.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bruyn F, de, Maertens J, Beauprez J, Soetaert W, Mey M. de. Biotechnological advances in UDP-sugar based glycosylation of small molecules. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015;33:288–302. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Garcia CV, Quek S-Y, Stevenson RJ, Winz RA. Characterisation of bound volatile compounds of a low flavour kiwifruit species: Actinidia eriantha. Food Chem. 2012;134:655–661. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.02.148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Archer CT, et al. The genome sequence of E. coli W (ATCC 9637): comparative genome analysis and an improved genome-scale reconstruction of E. coli. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Huang F-C, et al. Structural and Functional Analysis of UGT92G6 Suggests an Evolutionary Link Between Mono- and Disaccharide Glycoside-Forming Transferases. Plant Cell Physiol. 2018;59:857–870. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcy028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental data (417.2KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES