Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2019 May 28;11(5):e4769. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4769

Losartan-induced Severe Hepatic Injury: A Case Report and Literature Review

Ravikaran Patti 1,, Ankur Sinha 2, Shaurya Sharma 1, Taek Sang Yoon 3, Yizhak Kupfer 3
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC6663042  PMID: 31363450

Abstract

Medications have been known to cause adverse drug reactions that affect various organs; these are mostly reversible reactions that improve with the cessation of the culprit medication. Losartan is an angiotensin-one receptor blocker which has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of arterial hypertension. Fatigue, anemia, weakness, and cough are some of the common adverse effects of losartan. Acute hepatic injury has rarely been reported as an adverse effect of losartan. We report a case of a 61-year-old female with severe hepatic injury secondary to losartan use. None of the cases reported so far had such a high elevation of liver enzymes as seen in our patient.

Keywords: losartan, severe acute liver injury

Introduction

Losartan is an angiotensin two type one (AT1) receptor antagonist which has been approved for the management of arterial hypertension. Losartan is also used in diabetics to prevent renal damage, and in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Commonly reported side effects of losartan are dry cough, hyperkalemia, and muscle cramps. Losartan-induced acute liver injury has rarely been reported. We report a case of acute fulminant liver injury due to losartan, which has never been reported before to the best of our knowledge. 

Case presentation

A 61-year-old woman with a history of hypertension, diabetes, and hypothyroidism presented to the emergency room with a high-grade fever, lethargy, and loss of appetite for the past couple of days. The patient had taken an over-the-counter Chinese cold preparation containing tylenol and diphenhydramine but without much relief. On the day of admission, she also vomited twice and was extremely dizzy. On initial presentation in the emergency room, the patient was febrile to 101.1 °F, respiratory rate was 18 breaths per minute, and blood pressure was 112/59 mm Hg. Blood work was significant for an abnormal liver profile with alanine transaminase (ALT) level of 1371 IU/L (normal 6-47 IU/L) and aspartate transaminase (AST) level of 1315 IU/L (normal 10-33 IU/L). Total and direct bilirubin was 0.7 mg/dl and 0.1 mg/dl respectively. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level of 75 IU/L was within normal limits. Computed tomographic (CT) scan of the abdomen and pelvis without oral or intravenous contrast revealed only mild hepatic steatosis as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Computed tomographic scan of the abdomen showing mild hepatic steatosis.

Figure 1

Due to elevated transaminitis, the patient was started on N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and liver function was closely monitored. All the home medications, including losartan and amlodipine, was held. On further blood work-up, serum amylase and lipase level were within the normal range, negative hepatitis panel (including A, B, and C), negative anti-mitochondrial and anti-smooth muscle antibodies and normal levels of serum alpha-one anti-trypsin and serum ceruloplasmin level. With ongoing treatment, the patient started improving clinically with down trending of AST and ALT level to 215 IU/L and 444 IU/L, respectively. The trend of the patient’s liver enzymes shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Course of patient’s liver enzymes.

ALT: Alanine transaminase; AST: Aspartate transaminase; ALP: Alkaline phosphatase

       Liver enzymes    Day 1     Day 2     Day 3     Day 4
          ALT (IU/L)     1,371      958      479       444
          AST (IU/L)     1,315      831      308       215
          ALP (IU/L)       75       65       80       101
    Total Bilirubin (mg/dl)      0.7      0.4       0.3        0.3

The patient was discharged on day five, with down-trending of the liver enzymes. Losartan was among the differentials of the acute liver insult and the patient and the family were counseled to refrain from its further use.

The patient was brought back to the emergency room two days later with severe lethargy vomiting. Laboratory work-up showed ALT 3444 IU/L and AST 5232 IU/L. On further questioning, the patient’s family mentioned that they gave two doses of 100mg of losartan. NAC was immediately initiated and losartan was stopped on readmission. Over the course of a few days in the hospital, liver enzymes started trending down as shown in Table 2

Table 2. Course of patient’s liver enzymes on re-admission .

ALT: alanine transaminase; AST: aspartate transaminase; ALP: alkaline phosphatase

        Liver enzymes     Day 1     Day 2     Day 3     Day 4
           ALT (IU/L)      2,838      3,444      4,137     2,855
           AST (IU/L)      3,600      5,232      5,677     2,905
           ALP (IU/L)       161       62      161      133
   Total bilirubin (mg/dl)       0.7      1.2       2.5       3.0

The patient and the family were counseled to strictly refrain from any more use of losartan. 

Discussion

Losartan is a competitive antagonist and blocks angiotensin-one receptors. In 1995, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved losartan for the treatment of arterial hypertension [1]. It was also approved for reducing risks of cerebrovascular accidents in patients with hypertension or left ventricular hypertrophy, and for slowing the progression of diabetic nephropathy by improving proteinuria [1]. Losartan has been studied extensively for the management of the aforementioned conditions. Losartan also has had a modest uricosuric effect and is used as a first-line agent for managing hypertension in patients with gout. 

The oral bioavailability of losartan is around 33% and it has a great first-pass metabolism [2]. Cytochrome P450 enzymes, CYP2C9 and CYP3A4, are involved in activating losartan to its active metabolite [2]. Losartan is mainly eliminated through feces and urine. The half-life of losartan is around two hours while the terminal half-life of its active metabolites is around six to nine hours. 

Drug-induced adverse reactions have been reported since the advent of the medication. Many drugs have been known to cause acute liver injury, and it has been labelled as one of the prime causes of liver failure in the country, requiring liver transplantation in over 75% of these patients [3]. The incidence of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is around one to two cases per 1,00,000 person-years in the general population [4]. Abnormalities in the liver enzymes, especially alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), and total and direct bilirubin are important tools for diagnosing a patient with DILI. Patients usually complain of malaise and jaundice upon initial presentation. Drug-induced liver injury can be hepatocellular, cholestatic, or mixed. Hepatocellular injury can result in a marked elevation of only the aminotransferases without significantly affecting the ALP or the total or direct bilirubin, while in cholestatic injury, the ALP is mainly affected and rises disproportionately to AST/ALT. In a mixed pattern, usually, a mixture of both the hepatocellular and cholestatic injury is observed. The 'R ratio', which is the ratio of serum ALT to serum ALP results with respect to their upper limits of normal (ULN), can also be used to label the type of liver injury [4]. An R ratio of five or more implies hepatocellular injury, two or lesser points towards cholestatic damage and values between two to five are labelled as mixed [4]. The use of the R ratio is often advised at the initial presentation. Liver biopsy is the gold standard for accurately classifying the type of injury. The results of the liver biopsy may vary with the timing of the biopsy as hepatocellular damage is more pronounced in the initial days/weeks while cholestatic damage becomes evident a little later [4].

To the best of our knowledge, 18 cases of angiotensin receptor blocker causing liver injury has been reported. Out of those, six cases were due to losartan, five were with Irbesartan, four with candesartan, and three cases were due to valsartan use as listed in Table 3 [1,5-10].

Table 3. All reported cases of liver injury due to angiotensin receptor blockers.

ALT: alanine transaminase; AST: aspartate transaminase

Case Age/Sex Drug/dose Timing AST (IU/L) ALT (IU/L) Re-exposure Biopsy
1. 65 female Losartan 50 mg 4 months 1,018 1,184 No No
2. 46 male Losartan 50 mg 1 month 2,042 2,547 No No
3. 46 female Losartan 50 mg 3 months 300 311 No No
4. 55 female Losartan 50 mg 3 weeks 635 650 No No
5. 52 female Losartan 50 mg 5 months 1,093 941 Yes Yes
6. 77 male Losartan 150 mg 3 weeks 115 410 No Yes
7. 69 male Irbesartan 300 mg 1 month 821 1,449 No Yes
8. 59 NA Irbesartan 300 mg 20 days 1,347 1,378 No No
9. 51 female Irbesartan 150 mg 3 weeks 237 890 No No
10. 62 female Irbesartan 300 mg 1 month 177 NA No Yes
11. 56 male Irbesartan 300 mg 8 days 1,438 2,646 No Yes
12. 41 female Candesartan 16 mg 6 months 1,600 2,700 No No
13. 61 female Candesartan 16 mg 1 month 1,367 918 No Yes
14. 82 male Candesartan 16 mg 3 weeks 111 272 No No
15. 70 female Candesartan NA 2 weeks 441 244 No No
16. 52 female Valsartan NA 1 month 1292 780 No No
17. 54 female Valsartan 80 mg 5 months 738 1,664 No Yes
18. 47 male Valsartan 80 mg 2 weeks 360 776 No No
OUR CASE 61 female Losartan 100 mg 16 days 5,677 4,137 Yes No

Although hepatocellular injury was the most common type of damage in the cases reported, cholestatic as well as mixed injury patterns were observed as well. 

We are reporting the seventh case of losartan-associated severe liver injury. Our patient also had hepatocellular injury as was evident by the elevated transaminases to around 30 times the upper limit of the normal range without any increase in serum ALP or bilirubin. Upon subsequent presentation 48 hours later, our patient was noted to be very lethargic. The family had mentioned that the patient took two doses of losartan 100 mg; the liver enzymes were found to be elevated to around 75-100 times the upper limit of the normal range with AST of 5,677 IU/L and ALT of 4,137 IU/L. This degree of elevation has never been reported before to the best of our knowledge. As per the Naranjo algorithm, the event scored a nine, which solidifies losartan as the 'definite cause' of acute liver injury. The usual cause of such high elevation in aminotransferases is shock liver. Other causes like viral hepatitis, tylenol toxicity, biliary blockage, and sepsis should also be ruled out. Disorders like Wilson’s disease, hemochromatosis, and autoimmune hepatitis can also lead to an elevation in aminotransferases.

Stopping the offending agent should be the first step as soon as the drug has been labelled as the cause of liver injury. N-acetyl cysteine can be used if the aminotransferase has been dangerously high or is not trending down. Usually, the improvement in the liver enzymes happen within hours to days but in a minority of patients, the liver damage progresses to necessitate liver transplantation. The degree of liver injury is usually worse when the patient is re-exposed to the same drug. The patient should be strictly counseled to not use the drug again. 

Conclusions

Losartan and other angiotensin receptor blockers have very rarely been reported to cause acute liver injury. By reporting this case, we aim to increase awareness among physicians to always rule out losartan as a cause of unexplained elevation in aminotransferases. We also want to emphasize that once these drugs have been found to be the causative agent for the insult, patients should be strictly counselled not to use them again, as the acute liver injury may advance unto the need for liver transplantation. 

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained by all participants in this study

References

  • 1.Losartan-induced ischemic hepatocellular hepatotoxicity: a case report and literature review. Moh’d ZAH, Thawabi M, Asslo F, Shaaban H, Shamoon F, Baddoura WJ. J Family Med Prim Care. 2014;3:272–274. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.141635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fifteen years of losartan: what have we learned about losartan that can benefit chronic kidney disease patients? Ripley E, Hirsch A. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2010;3:93–98. doi: 10.2147/ijnrd.s7038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Drug-induced hepatotoxicity. Lee Lee, WM WM. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:474–485. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra021844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Standardization of nomenclature and causality assessment in drug-induced liver injury: summary of a clinical research workshop. Fontana R J, Seeff L B, Andrade RJ, et al. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20564754. Hepatology. 2010;52:730–742. doi: 10.1002/hep.23696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Marked hepatotoxicity associated with losartan treatment. Nygaard B, Strandgaard S. Blood Press. 1996;5:190–191. doi: 10.3109/08037059609062128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Losartan-induced hepatotoxicity. Bosch X. JAMA. 1997;278:1572. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Losartan-induced hepatic injury. Tabak F, Mert A, Ozaras R, et al. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002;34:585–586. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200205000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hepatic injury associated with losartan. Andrade RJ, Lucena MI, Santalla F. Ann Pharmacother. 1998;32:1371. doi: 10.1345/aph.18087a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Drug points: prolonged cholestasis associated with irbesartan. Hariraj R, Stoner E, Jader S, Preston DM. BMJ. 2000;321:547. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7260.547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cholestatic hepatitis related to use of irbesartan: a case report and a literature review of angiotensin II antagonist-associated hepatotoxicity. Andrade RJ, Lucena MI, Fernández MC, et al. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;14:887–890. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200208000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES