Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS. 2019 Sep 1;33(11):1789–1794. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002287

Homelessness at Diagnosis is Associated with Death among People with HIV in a Population-Based Study of a U.S. City

Matthew A SPINELLI a, Nancy A HESSOL b, Sandy SCHWARCZ c, Ling HSU c, Maree-Kay PARISI c, Sharon PIPKIN c, Susan SCHEER c, Diane HAVLIR a, Susan P BUCHBINDER c
PMCID: PMC6663574  NIHMSID: NIHMS1532843  PMID: 31259765

Abstract

Objective:

San Francisco (SF), California, has experienced a 44% reduction in new HIV diagnoses since 2013 supported by its “Getting to Zero” initiative; however, the age-adjusted mortality rate in people with HIV (PWH) has not decreased. We sought to identify factors associated with death among PWH in SF.

Design:

Population-based incidence-density case-control study

Methods:

Among PWH in the SF HIV surveillance registry, a random sample of 48 decedents from July 1, 2016 to May 31, 2017 were each matched to 2-3 controls who were alive at the date of death (108 controls matched on age and time since diagnosis). Covariates included demographics, substance use, housing status, medical conditions, and care indicators from the study population. We used matched-pair conditional logistic regression to examine factors associated with mortality.

Results:

Of the 156 PWH in the study, 14% were African-American, 14% Latino, and 8% female sex. In adjusted analysis, factors associated with higher odds of death included: homelessness at HIV diagnosis [adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=27.4 95% confidence interval (CI)=3.0-552.1], prior-year injection drug use (AOR=10.2 95% CI=1.7-128.5), prior-year tobacco use (AOR=7.2 95% CI=1.7-46.9), being off ART at any point in the prior year (AOR=6.8; 95% CI=1.1-71.4), and being unpartnered vs. married/partnered (AOR=4.7; 95% CI=1.3-22.0).

Conclusions:

People homeless at HIV diagnosis had 27-fold higher odds of death compared to those with housing; substance use and retention on ART in the prior year are other important intervenable factors. New strategies to address these barriers, and continued investment in supportive housing and substance use treatment, are needed.

Keywords: Mortality, HIV, homelessness, substance use, antiretroviral therapy, preventable mortality

Introduction:

Getting to Zero San Francisco (GTZ-SF), a multisector consortium formed in 2013, seeks to dramatically reduce HIV-associated deaths among people with HIV (PWH), new HIV infections, and HIV-related stigma [13]. Although SF has experienced a 44% reduction in HIV diagnoses and a 25% decline in HIV-related fatality rate since 2013, the overall age-adjusted mortality rate did not change among PWH over this period, likely related to increasing deaths from non-HIV related cancers and substance use [35]. Furthermore, given the association between homelessness and poor HIV outcomes,[6] there is concern that limited progress on homelessness in SF and nationally could also limit the impact of GTZ-SF, and future impact of U.S. End the HIV Epidemic programs, on the health of PWH [1, 7, 8].

The goal of this investigation was to identify factors associated with death among PWH using an incidence-density case-control study, to inform programs designed to meet the GTZ-SF goal of reducing preventable deaths among PWH. We hypothesized that substance use, housing status, and mental health would contribute to increased odds of HIV mortality.

Methods:

Sampling and data collection

Among PWH in the SF Department of Public Health surveillance registry July 1, 2016 to May 31, 2017, a random sample of 50 decedents was drawn from the overall total of 171 decedents for enhanced mortality review. Then, 2-3 persons living with HIV were selected as controls using incidence-density sampling to match to decedents based on age +/−three years and date of diagnosis +/−six months [911]. The death date of the matched decedent was defined as the “index date” for both decedents and matched controls. Of this sample, two individuals (>90 years-old) were excluded due to not having matched any living controls. Two percent of potential controls were also not able to be sampled due to receiving care at a site at which surveillance staff did not have access.

Demographics, transmission group, housing status at diagnosis, and CD4-counts and HIV viral load (both prior year) were extracted from the surveillance database. Surveillance definitions categorized PWH in transmission groups [3]. Chart review was performed starting three years prior to the index date for cases and controls. Substance use and current housing status was extracted in the 12-months prior. Individuals were classified as unpartnered vs. partnered/married in the prior year. Mental health diagnoses and comorbid medical conditions were extracted based on ICD 9/10 codes or chart documentation by the provider. Being off ART was defined as any time off ART in the 12-months prior to the index date. Missed visits were defined as a no-show visit without cancelling in advance [12]. Retained in care was defined as having attended two in-person visits at least 90 days apart over 12-months[13]. The underlying cause of death was obtained from the National Death Index-Plus [14].

Analysis

Unadjusted and adjusted conditional logistic regression was performed to assess risk factors for mortality. The adjusted model was initially constructed using all prognostic covariates that were significantly associated with death at the p<0.05 level in the unadjusted models. A manual forward stepwise process was employed, and covariates were retained in the multivariate model at the p<0.10 level.

In-depth chart-review of the contribution of substance use, mental health, or housing to circumstances of death

In addition to the case-control study’s assessment of factors associated with increased odds of death, an in-depth chart review was performed to understand the absolute proportion of deaths in which three specific factors contributed to the circumstances of death: substance use (including tobacco), mental health, and/or unstable housing. Two HIV physicians independently reviewed each record and evaluated if these conditions contributed to the circumstances of the individual’s death, with discrepancies going to a third review.

Results:

The study population included 156 individuals, 48 decedents and 108 matched controls. Overall, 14% of the sample were African-American, 14% Latino; 8% were female sex. The median time from HIV diagnosis was 228 months (interquartile range (IQR): 152-304), median CD4 prior to death was 398 (IQR: 180-617), and median CD4 at diagnosis was 417 (IQR: 224-612). Overall, 25% of the decedents compared with 4% of the controls were homeless at diagnosis. (Table 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of decedents and matched controls among persons with HIV, San Francisco, CA, July 1, 2016-May 31, 2017.

Characteristic Decedents N=48 (%) Controls N= 108 (%)
Female sex at birth 5 (10) 7 (6)
Race/ethnicity: White 31 (65) 65 (60)
        African-American 8 (17) 14 (13)
        Latino 4 (8) 17 (16)
        Other/Multiple 5 (10) 12 (11)
Age (at death or at index date):* <40 2 (4) 6 (6)
             40-49 9 (19) 16 (15)
             50-59 15 (31) 34 (31)
             60-69 15 (31) 37 (34)
             70+ 7 (15) 15 (14)
Months since diagnosis (median, IQR)* 243 (168-318) 214 (136-292)
CD4 count at diagnosis (median, IQR) 437 (274-600) 407 (204-610)
HIV Transmission group: MSM 23 (48) 84 (78)
            PWID 8 (17) 5 (5)
            MSM-PWID 13 (27) 11 (10)
            Heterosexual 3 (3) 6 (6)
            None reported 1 (2) 2 (2)
Homeless at any point (prior year) 11 (23) 3 (3)
Homeless at diagnosis 12 (25) 4 (4)
Unpartnered vs. married/partnered 18 (31) 18 (17)
Alcohol use disorder (prior year) 12 (25) 7 (6)
Tobacco use (prior year) 23 (48) 22 (20)
Injection drug use (prior year) 6 (13) 2 (2)
Non-injection illicit drug use (prior year) 19 (40) 10 (9)
Schizophrenia 8 (17) 1(1)
Bipolar Disorder 7 (15) 3 (3)
Depressive disorder (active prior year) 17 (35) 33 (31)
Not retained in care1 28 (58) 46 (43)
Missed primary care visits in prior year (median, IQR)2 1 (0-2) 0 (0-0)
CD4 count prior to death; median (IQR) 398 (180-617) 581 (426-795)
Not on ART at any time in prior year 13 (27) 10 (10)

MSM: men who have sex with men; PWID: people who inject drugs; ART: antiretroviral therapy; IQR: interquartile range

*

Matching criteria

1

Attending two visits per year at least 90 days apart

2

Missed visits indicates a scheduled visit to which the patient no-showed without cancelling

Causes of death

In the decedents, 27% had an HIV-related condition as the underlying cause of death, 15% non-AIDS cancer, 15% overdose/substance use, 10% cardiovascular disease, 4% trauma/accident, 4% suicide, 4% hepatitis B or C, 4% other liver disease, 4% non-AIDS infectious disease, 2% chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2% renal disease, and 9% other.

Factors associated with death in case-control analysis

The factors associated with death in unadjusted analysis are listed in Table 2. Factors associated with death in the unadjusted but not adjusted analysis included: non-injection illicit drug use [unadjusted odds ratio (OR)=8.6 95% confidence interval (CI)=3.2-37.8], alcohol use disorder (OR=3.3 95% CI=1.5-7.7), people who inject drugs (PWID) vs. men who have sex with men (MSM; OR=6.3; 95%CI=1.5-31.5) and MSM-PWID vs. MSM (OR 4.6; 95% CI=1.5-15.7), homeless in the prior year (OR 9.5; 95% CI=1.9-90.9), schizophrenia (OR=18.5 95% CI=2.4-828.2), bipolar disorder (OR=5.7; 95% CI=1.3-34.6), and missing a primary care visit in the prior year (OR=4.6; 95% CI=1.9-12.3).

Table 2:

Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for death among people with HIV, San Francisco, CA, July 1, 2016-May 31, 20171

Characteristic Unadjusted OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Female sex at birth 1.85 (0.43-7.54) -
Race/ethnicity: White Ref. -
        African-American 1.58 (0.46-5.58) -
        Latino 0.54 (0.13-1.80) -
        Other/Multiple 0.81 (0.20-1.82) -
HIV transmission group: MSM Ref. -
            PWID 6.28 (1.53-31.52) -
            MSM-PWID 4.58 (1.50-15.68) -
            Heterosexual 2.13 (0.30-12.58) -
            None 2.81 (0.05-56.84) -
Homeless at any point (prior year) 9.45 (1.94-90.87) -
Homeless at diagnosis 13.47 (2.94-125.44) 27.36 (3.03-552.14)
Unpartnered vs. married/partnered 2.71 (1.18-6.42) 4.70 (1.28-21.96)
Tobacco use (prior year) 6.00 (2.24-20.26) 7.22 (1.67-46.90)
Injection drug use (prior year) 10.95 (3.18-37.79) 10.18 (1.65-128.50)
Non-injection illicit drug use (prior year) 8.64 (3.19-29.31) -
Alcohol use disorder (prior year) 3.29 (1.48-7.74) -
Schizophrenia 18.49 (2.44-828.20) -
Bipolar disorder 5.69 (1.28-34.58) -
Active depressive disorder (prior year) 0.84 (0.41-1.71) -
Not retained in care2 1.85 (0.87-4.05) -
Any missed primary care visits3 4.61 (1.92-12.25) -
CD4 count <200 within year of death 3.61 (0.95-15.40) -
CD4 count at diagnosis per 100 cells 1.01 (0.93-1.30)
Not on ART at any point in prior year 3.86 (1.30-12.82) 6.80 (1.05-71.43)
Unsuppressed HIV viral load (prior year) 1.84 (0.41-8.26) -

Bold text indicates p<0.05; OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval; MSM: men who have sex with men; PWID: people who inject drugs; ART: antiretroviral therapy

1

Among people with HIV in San Francisco, a random sample of decedents was matched to controls based on age +/− 3 years and date of diagnosis +/− 6 months.

2

Attending two visits per year at least 90 days apart in the prior 12-months

3

Missed visits indicate a missed scheduled visit that the patient did not attend or cancel in the prior 12-months.

In adjusted analysis, factors associated with death included: homelessness at diagnosis [adjusted OR (AOR)=27.4 95% CI=3.0-552.1], past-year injection drug-use (IDU; AOR=10.2 95% CI=1.7-128.5), tobacco use (AOR=7.2 95% CI=1.7-46.9), not using ART at any point in the prior year (AOR=6.8; 95% CI=1.1-71.4), and being unpartnered/living alone vs. married/partnered (AOR=4.7; 95% CI=1.3-22.0) (Table 2). In an alternate modelling strategy including transmission group rather than current IDU, homelessness at diagnosis remained associated (AOR 18.3; 95%CI=2.6-271.6). When excluding homelessness at diagnosis from the adjusted model, the AOR for current homelessness was 3.4 (95% CI=0.47-40.1).

In-depth chart-review for contribution of substance use, mental health, or housing to death

After performing an in-depth review of circumstances that may have contributed to death, substance use contributed for 60% of the decedents, mental illness for 34%, and housing status for 30%. At least one of the factors contributed to death for 65% of the decedents.

Discussion:

In a contemporary population-based study in a U.S. city, homelessness at diagnosis was associated with 27-fold higher independent odds of death. In the in-depth chart review, housing status contributed to the circumstances of death for 30% of decedents, echoing other cohorts[1517]. Supportive housing improves care outcomes across the disease course and is associated with lower mortality among PWH [1618]. “Housing First,” a policy that prioritizes provision of supportive housing prior to substance use abstinence, first implemented in SF in 2004, increases long-term housing stability and decreases substance use [19]. However, housing supply remains far too limited [18]. Given the independent association of both homelessness and substance use with death, increasing supportive housing may be particularly effective. The intersection of mental health, housing, and substance use on the pathway to preventable deaths is complex and may be best addressed by multi-component interventions. For instance, an intervention that combined housing, case management, and behavioral interventions decreased hospitalizations in adults with chronic medical illnesses [20], and a comprehensive housing program for PWH and severe mental illness was associated with improved AIDS-free survival [21]. Housing is a key social determinant of health for PWH:[1618] continued investment in supportive housing will likely be needed to meet the U.S. End the Epidemic goals.

Tobacco use’s association with mortality is supported by increasing deaths from tobacco-related cancers such as lung and oropharyngeal cancer among PWH [3, 22]. U.S. PWH on ART are more likely to smoke than the general population and smoking cessation interventions reduce mortality [23]. IDU’s association with mortality mirrors the findings of prior cohorts, contributing to death via overdose, hepatitis C, and decreased care engagement [2426]. In the in-depth review, substance use contributed to the circumstances of death for a majority (60%). Opioid use disorder treatment is associated with decreased mortality in the general population, and improved viral suppression and ART initiation among PWH [5, 2730]. Stimulant use is increasing among San Francisco MSM [3], and interventions to treat stimulant use disorder merit additional research.

Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder were associated with mortality in unadjusted, but not adjusted analyses; while in the in-depth review, mental illness contributed to the circumstances of death for greater than a third of decedents. The impact of severe mental illness (SMI) on mortality may have been mediated by increased substance use and/or decreased ART use in the adjusted analysis. Death due to substance use outpaces suicide in its contribution to excess mortality among people with schizophrenia [31]. Smoking cessation and substance use treatment can reduce mortality among people with SMI[31, 32].

The association between being unpartnered and mortality has been noted in studies in the general population and among PWH [3335]. Provision of social support services may particularly benefit older PWH living alone, who may suffer health consequences of geriatric conditions such as falls and neurocognitive issues without additional support [36].

Finally, not using ART in the prior year was associated with death. Retaining PWH on ART remains a challenge across the United States, particularly in populations with severe mental illness, substance use challenges, and housing instability, with new strategies needed [37]. Continued investment in reengagement programs, such as the Getting to Zero-SF navigation program, particularly for individuals who miss or do not attend primary care visits, can potentially improve ART persistence in this population [3, 38, 39].

The limitations of this study included the inability to access records at some sites, although this affected a small subset. Assessment of covariates was limited by provider documentation, and therefore the prevalence of factors and their impact on mortality, such as substance use and homelessness, may have been underestimated. Another limitation is the time elapsed between homelessness at diagnosis and death. Current homelessness was also associated with near ten-fold higher odds of mortality in unadjusted analysis although confidence intervals were wide in adjusted analysis. Homelessness at diagnosis, which was assessed through proactive questioning rather than chart review, yielded more precise estimates, and thus was favored in this analysis. Although it is likely that homelessness across the disease courses negatively impacts the health of PWH, it is also possible that the time of diagnosis may be a critical period for homelessness’ impact on health, such as through delayed ART initiation [3]. In addition, the sample size was small and may not be generalizable to other populations.

In conclusion, despite progress supported by Getting to Zero programs, potentially preventable deaths occurred for more than half of participants (i.e. HIV, substance use, suicide, violence, Hepatitis B/C, and potentially-preventable cancers). The intersection of housing, substance use, and mental illness contribute to challenges in maintaining PWH on treatment and demonstrate the HIV epidemic’s disproportionate impact on vulnerable populations. In addition to continued investment in medical interventions, implementation of comprehensive social services with known efficacy such as supportive housing, substance use and mental health treatment, as well as investment in developing new strategies, will be needed to dramatically reduce preventable deaths.

Acknowledgements:

The authors would like to acknowledge the San Francisco Department of Public Health (SFDPH) surveillance staff for data collection and entry, Signy Toquinto for training staff and reviewing records, Diane Jones for assistance developing data collection procedures, and the SFDPH HIV surveillance unit for programmatic support, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s support for the Enhanced HIV/AIDS Reporting System PS18-1802. We would also like to acknowledge Drs. Daniel Wlodarczyk, Meg Newman, and Jacqueline Tulsky for their medical record review of the decedents. This work was also supported by National Institute of Health T32AI060530.

Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Work supported by 5T32AI060530 (recipient: M.A.S.) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention enhanced HIV/AIDS Reporting System grant number PS18-1802.

References:

  • 1.Scheer S, Hsu L, Schwarcz S, Pipkin S, Havlir D, Buchbinder S, et al. Trends in the San Francisco Human Immunodeficiency Virus Epidemic in the “Getting to Zero” Era. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 66(7):1027–1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kirby T Aiming to end San Francisco’s HIV epidemic. Lancet HIV 2019; 6(2):e77–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.San Francisco Department of Public Health. San Francisco HIV Epidemiology Annual Report 2017. In. San Francisco: Department of Public Health HIV Epidemiology Section; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schwarcz SK, Vu A, Hsu LC, Hessol NA. Changes in causes of death among persons with AIDS: San Francisco, California, 1996-2011. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2014; 28(10):517–523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Low AJ, Mburu G, Welton NJ, May MT, Davies CF, French C, et al. Impact of Opioid Substitution Therapy on Antiretroviral Therapy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 63(8):1094–1104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Clemenzi-Allen A, Geng E, Christopoulos K, Hammer H, Buchbinder S, Havlir D, et al. Degree of Housing Instability Shows Independent “Dose-Response” With Virologic Suppression Rates Among People Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus. Open Forum Infect Dis 2018; 5(3):ofy035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shover C, Javanbakht M, Shoptaw S, Bolan R, Gorbach P. High Discontinuation of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis within Six Months of Initiation [#1009]. In: Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections Boston; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fauci AS, Redfield RR, Sigounas G, Weahkee MD, Giroir BP. Ending the HIV Epidemic: A Plan for the United States. JAMA 2019; 321(9):844–645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chow FC, Bacchetti P, Kim AS, Price RW, Hsue PY. Effect of CD4+ cell count and viral suppression on risk of ischemic stroke in HIV infection. AIDS 2014; 28(17):2573–2577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Greenland S, Thomas DC. On the need for the rare disease assumption in case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol 1982; 116(3):547–553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pearce N Classification of epidemiological study designs. Int J Epidemiol 2012; 41(2):393–397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mugavero MJ, Westfall AO, Cole SR, Geng EH, Crane HM, Kitahata MM, et al. Beyond core indicators of retention in HIV care: missed clinic visits are independently associated with all-cause mortality. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 59(10):1471–1479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.vanderStraten A, Katz A, Balan I, Reddy K, Etima J, Woeber K, et al. A qualitative evaluation of women’s experience receiving drug feedback in MTN-025/HOPE - an HIV prevention open-label trial of the dapivirine vaginal ring AIDS Amsterdam 2018. June 23–17 [#THPEC334]. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Spinelli MA, Scott HM, Vittinghoff E, Liu A, Gonzalez R, Gandhi M, et al. Examining PrEP interruptions in a safety-net primary care network: missed opportunities to reengage PrEP users accessing non-PrEP services HIV Research For Prevention Madrid. 2018. October 21–25 [#OA19.02]. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Khanijow K, Hirozawa A, Ancock B, Hsu LC, Bamberger J, Schwarcz SK. Difference in Survival between Housed and Homeless individuals with HIV, San Francisco, 2002-2011. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2015; 26(3):1005–1018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schwarcz SK, Hsu LC, Vittinghoff E, Vu A, Bamberger JD, Katz MH. Impact of housing on the survival of persons with AIDS. BMC Public Health 2009; 9:220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Buchanan D, Kee R, Sadowski LS, Garcia D. The health impact of supportive housing for HIV-positive homeless patients: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health 2009; 99 Suppl 3:S675–680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bay Area Council Economic Institute. Bay Area Homelessness. A Regional View of a Regional Crisis. San Francisco, CA: Bay Area Council Economic Institute; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tsemberis S, Gulcur L, Nakae M. Housing First, consumer choice, and harm reduction for homeless individuals with a dual diagnosis. Am J Public Health 2004; 94(4):651–656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sadowski LS, Kee RA, VanderWeele TJ, Buchanan D. Effect of a housing and case management program on emergency department visits and hospitalizations among chronically ill homeless adults: a randomized trial. JAMA 2009; 301(17):1771–1778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hall G, Singh T, Lim SW. Supportive Housing Promotes AIDS-Free Survival for Chronically Homeless HIV Positive Persons with Behavioral Health Conditions. AIDS Behav 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hessol NA, Ma D, Scheer S, Hsu LC, Schwarcz SK. Changing temporal trends in non-AIDS cancer mortality among people diagnosed with AIDS: San Francisco, California, 1996-2013. Cancer Epidemiol 2018; 52:20–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Reddy KP, Parker RA, Losina E, Baggett TP, Paltiel AD, Rigotti NA, et al. Impact of Cigarette Smoking and Smoking Cessation on Life Expectancy Among People With HIV: A US-Based Modeling Study. J Infect Dis 2016; 214(11):1672–1681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort C, Zwahlen M, Harris R, May M, Hogg R, Costagliola D, et al. Mortality of HIV-infected patients starting potent antiretroviral therapy: comparison with the general population in nine industrialized countries. Int J Epidemiol 2009; 38(6):1624–1633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.May MT, Justice AC, Birnie K, Ingle SM, Smit C, Smith C, et al. Injection Drug Use and Hepatitis C as Risk Factors for Mortality in HIV-Infected Individuals: The Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort Collaboration. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2015; 69(3):348–354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Weber R, Huber M, Battegay M, Stahelin C, Castro Batanjer E, Calmy A, et al. Influence of noninjecting and injecting drug use on mortality, retention in the cohort, and antiretroviral therapy, in participants in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. HIV Med 2015; 16(3):137–151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Springer SA, Di Paola A, Azar MM, Barbour R, Biondi BE, Desabrais M, et al. Extended-Release Naltrexone Improves Viral Suppression Among Incarcerated Persons Living With HIV With Opioid Use Disorders Transitioning to the Community: Results of a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2018; 78(1):43–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Altice FL, Bruce RD, Lucas GM, Lum PJ, Korthuis PT, Flanigan TP, et al. HIV treatment outcomes among HIV-infected, opioid-dependent patients receiving buprenorphine/naloxone treatment within HIV clinical care settings: results from a multisite study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011; 56 Suppl 1:S22–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nolan S, Hayashi K, Milloy MJ, Kerr T, Dong H, Lima VD, et al. The impact of low-threshold methadone maintenance treatment on mortality in a Canadian setting. Drug Alcohol Depend 2015; 156:57–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Larochelle MR, Bernson D, Land T, Stopka TJ, Wang N, Xuan Z, et al. Medication for Opioid Use Disorder After Nonfatal Opioid Overdose and Association With Mortality: A Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169(3):137–145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Olfson M, Gerhard T, Huang C, Crystal S, Stroup TS. Premature Mortality Among Adults With Schizophrenia in the United States. JAMA Psychiatry 2015; 72(12):1172–1181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Barber S, Thornicroft G. Reducing the Mortality Gap in People With Severe Mental Disorders: The Role of Lifestyle Psychosocial Interventions. Front Psychiatry 2018; 9:463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Udell JA, Steg PG, Scirica BM, Smith SC Jr., Ohman EM, Eagle KA, et al. Living alone and cardiovascular risk in outpatients at risk of or with atherothrombosis. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172(14):1086–1095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pimouguet C, Rizzuto D, Schon P, Shakersain B, Angleman S, Lagergren M, et al. Impact of living alone on institutionalization and mortality: a population-based longitudinal study. Eur J Public Health 2016; 26(1):182–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lieb S, Brooks RG, Hopkins RS, Thompson D, Crockett LK, Liberti T, et al. Predicting death from HIV/AIDS: a case-control study from Florida public HIV/AIDS clinics. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2002; 30(3):351–358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Greene M, Hessol NA, Perissinotto C, Zepf R, Hutton Parrott A, Foreman C, et al. Loneliness in Older Adults Living with HIV. AIDS Behav 2018; 22(5):1475–1484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gardner EM, McLees MP, Steiner JF, Del Rio C, Burman WJ. The spectrum of engagement in HIV care and its relevance to test-and-treat strategies for prevention of HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52(6):793–800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gardner LI, Giordano TP, Marks G, Wilson TE, Craw JA, Drainoni ML, et al. Enhanced personal contact with HIV patients improves retention in primary care: a randomized trial in 6 US HIV clinics. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 59(5):725–734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zinski A, Westfall AO, Gardner LI, Giordano TP, Wilson TE, Drainoni ML, et al. The Contribution of Missed Clinic Visits to Disparities in HIV Viral Load Outcomes. Am J Public Health 2015; 105(10):2068–2075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES