Skip to main content
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 2019 Jul 29;39(16):e00451-18. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00451-18

Impaired Ribosomal Biogenesis by Noncanonical Degradation of β-Catenin during Hyperammonemia

Gangarao Davuluri a,*,, Michela Giusto a, Rajeev Chandel a, Nicole Welch a, Khaled Alsabbagh a, Sashi Kant a, Avinash Kumar a, Adam Kim a, Mahesha Gangadhariah a, Prabar K Ghosh c, Uyen Tran c, Daniel M Krajcik c,*, Kommireddy Vasu c, Anthony J DiDonato c, Joseph A DiDonato c, Belinda Willard d, Satdarshan P Monga e,f, Yuxin Wang g, Paul L Fox c, George R Stark g, Oliver Wessely c, Karyn A Esser h, Srinivasan Dasarathy a,b,
PMCID: PMC6664607  PMID: 31138664

Increased ribosomal biogenesis occurs during tissue hypertrophy, but whether ribosomal biogenesis is impaired during atrophy is not known. We show that hyperammonemia, which occurs in diverse chronic disorders, impairs protein synthesis as a result of decreased ribosomal content and translational capacity.

KEYWORDS: β-catenin, GSK3β, IKKβ, hyperammonemia, protein synthesis, ribosomal biogenesis

ABSTRACT

Increased ribosomal biogenesis occurs during tissue hypertrophy, but whether ribosomal biogenesis is impaired during atrophy is not known. We show that hyperammonemia, which occurs in diverse chronic disorders, impairs protein synthesis as a result of decreased ribosomal content and translational capacity. Transcriptome analyses, real-time PCR, and immunoblotting showed consistent reductions in the expression of the large and small ribosomal protein subunits (RPL and RPS, respectively) in hyperammonemic murine skeletal myotubes, HEK cells, and skeletal muscle from hyperammonemic rats and human cirrhotics. Decreased ribosomal content was accompanied by decreased expression of cMYC, a positive regulator of ribosomal biogenesis, as well as reduced expression and activity of β-catenin, a transcriptional activator of cMYC. However, unlike the canonical regulation of β-catenin via glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β)-dependent degradation, GSK3β expression and phosphorylation were unaltered during hyperammonemia, and depletion of GSK3β did not prevent ammonia-induced degradation of β-catenin. Overexpression of GSK3β-resistant variants, genetic depletion of IκB kinase β (IKKβ) (activated during hyperammonemia), protein interactions, and in vitro kinase assays showed that IKKβ phosphorylated β-catenin directly. Overexpressing β-catenin restored hyperammonemia-induced perturbations in signaling responses that regulate ribosomal biogenesis. Our data show that decreased protein synthesis during hyperammonemia is mediated via a novel GSK3β-independent, IKKβ-dependent impairment of the β-catenin–cMYC axis.

INTRODUCTION

Increased ribosomal biogenesis and ribosome abundance are critical for augmented protein synthesis during cellular proliferation and hypertrophy (13). In contrast, whether and how ribosomal biogenesis is perturbed during tissue atrophy, especially in skeletal muscle, the major protein store in the body, are unclear (46). The rate of cellular protein synthesis depends on both translational capacity and translational efficiency, which in turn are determined by ribosomal content and function, respectively (6). The ribosome is a complex organelle that comprises rRNA and ribosomal proteins (RPs). Ribosomal biogenesis occurs by the coordinated assembly of rRNA and RPs. RNA polymerase I (PolI) transcribes the 47S precursor rRNA from clusters of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) tandem repeat genes, and RNA PolII transcribes the mRNA for the large subunits (RPLs) and small subunits (RPSs) and most regulatory, noncoding RNAs, while RNA PolIII transcribes tRNA and 5S rRNA (7). Of these, transcription of 47S pre-rRNA is believed to be a rate-limiting step in ribosome biogenesis (8). Expressions of ribosomal proteins and rRNA have been used as measures of ribosomal biogenesis (6), even though ribosomal proteins and rRNA incorporated into ribosomes may be relatively stable, but there are few studies on their perturbations during cellular stress and atrophy.

The transcription factor cMYC increases ribosomal biogenesis by regulating the expression of a number of ribosomal components that are transcribed by RNA polymerase II (6, 913). cMYC binds to rDNA and increases PolI-mediated transcription of rRNA (11). Transcription of upstream binding factor 1 (UBF1), RPS, and RPL is also regulated by cMYC (6, 14). Additional mechanisms by which cMYC regulates rDNA include PolI cofactor recruitment as well as transcription of PolIII subunits and components (9, 15). Consistent with the regulatory function of cMYC on multiple ribosomal components, overexpression of cMYC results in cell growth and hypertrophy with increased ribosomal biogenesis; whether reduced cMYC mediates muscle atrophy and decreased ribosomal biogenesis is currently unknown (16, 17). cMYC expression is regulated by a number of mechanisms, including activation of β-catenin, a transcriptional activator of cMYC. β-Catenin is a critical component of the Wnt signaling pathway and has been best studied in the context of cell proliferation and organ regeneration, two processes dependent on extensive protein synthesis (18, 19). β-Catenin also regulates protein synthesis in the skeletal muscle (18, 19), and expression of the β-catenin target cMYC is increased during skeletal muscle hypertrophy (18). Stabilization of skeletal muscle β-catenin has also been reported in rat muscle following exercise (20). Consistently, conditional inactivation of β-catenin in mice by targeted depletion resulted in small myotube size in a cell-autonomous manner (19); whether impaired β-catenin signaling is involved in muscle atrophy is, however, not known. In the canonical pathway, in the absence of Wnt ligand, β-catenin is phosphorylated at Ser33 by glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β), followed by ubiquitination and degradation in the proteasome (2125). More recently, IκB kinase β (IKKβ) has been reported to cause the phosphorylation and degradation of β-catenin in mesenchymal stem cell differentiation (26), but whether this pathway is relevant in mature skeletal muscle protein synthesis is also not known.

While there is fairly robust evidence supporting a regulatory role of the β-catenin–cMYC axis in increased ribosomal biogenesis and translational changes during skeletal muscle hypertrophy (46, 27), there are limited data as to whether decreased ribosomal biogenesis occurs during muscle atrophy. Ribosomal abundance, measured by total RNA quantity, and molecular regulators of ribosomal biogenesis were decreased in type II fibers in aged rats with muscle loss despite an increase in cMYC expression (28). The reduction in ribosomal biogenesis in this model was shown to be due to an increase in proteasomal activity, suggesting translational deficits rather than global transcriptional mechanisms as mediators of aging-related muscle loss (28). In contrast, others have reported unaltered or even increased skeletal muscle ribosomal biogenesis with aging (2931). These conflicting observations may be indicative of a compensatory increase in ribosome biogenesis during muscle atrophy or a context-dependent response. Despite muscle loss being frequent under conditions other than aging, such as chronic diseases, it is not known if skeletal muscle ribosomal biogenesis is altered under these conditions.

Despite a number of preclinical models of chronic disease, there have been limited mechanistic studies of muscle loss in chronic disease (3236). Hyperammonemia, which occurs in chronic diseases with muscle loss (37), is now increasingly recognized to initiate a sequence of perturbations that culminate in impaired protein synthesis and muscle loss (38, 39). Ammonia is a cytotoxic compound generated during cellular metabolic processes (40), and ammonia metabolism is disordered in cirrhosis of the liver, heart failure, and chronic lung disease (37, 41, 42), with muscle loss being frequent under all these conditions. Reduced muscle mass and hyperammonemia have been reported by others and us in patients with cirrhosis of the liver (39, 43, 44). The phenotype of lower muscle mass has also been reported in the hyperammonemic portacaval anastomosis (PCA) rat, and a sarcopenic phenotype has been reported in myotubes during hyperammonemia (38, 45, 46). We have also previously reported a myostatin-mediated impairment of mTORC1 signaling in response to hyperammonemia (38, 47). These studies show that the level of mTORC1, a critical regulator of translational efficiency, specifically translation initiation, is decreased during muscle atrophy (48, 49). Hyperammonemia induces muscle atrophy, anabolic resistance, decreased protein synthesis, and impaired mTORC1 signaling responses (37, 47, 50). However, whether hyperammonemia perturbs ribosomal biogenesis and the β-catenin–cMYC axis has not been evaluated. In these studies, we show that active β-catenin and its downstream signaling responses are decreased in myotubes and HEK cells as well as in skeletal muscle from patients with cirrhosis and the PCA rat. We also show that hyperammonemia-induced loss of β-catenin is caused by proteasomal degradation via a noncanonical GSK3β-independent, IKKβ-dependent pathway.

RESULTS

Decreased skeletal muscle protein synthesis and ribosomal biogenesis during hyperammonemia.

Consistent with data reported previously by us and others (51, 52), hyperammonemia impaired protein synthesis in myotubes, as determined by puromycin incorporation (Fig. 1A). RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) comparing untreated controls and myotubes exposed to hyperammonemia for 24 h identified a large number of differentially expressed genes. In particular, levels of mRNAs for ribosomal proteins were significantly decreased in ammonia-treated C2C12 myotubes only at 24 h (Fig. 1B and C). The lack of major differences between the transcriptome at 3 h and untreated controls, in contrast to the differences in those observed with 24-h hyperammonemic myotubes, may be due to an adaptive response in the early stages during hyperammonemia progressing to a maladaptive response with a longer duration of hyperammonemia. To determine the underlying molecular mechanism, the RNA sequence data were submitted for Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) core analysis, and differentially expressed genes were categorized based on the Ingenuity Pathway Knowledge Base (IPKB); the most enriched categories of the canonical pathway are listed in Fig. 1D, and the differentially expressed genes are provided in Table S1 in the supplemental material. In addition, networks built to connect key genes regulated by β-catenin showed downregulation of target genes, including those regulating ribosomal proteins (TCF-LEF, axin-2, and Frizzled), and that this pathway was perturbed during hyperammonemia (Fig. 1E). To further confirm that translation is indeed affected by hyperammonemia and to establish clinical relevance, we quantified total RNA as a measure of ribosomal abundance and translational capacity (28, 53). Hyperammonemic C2C12 myotubes, gastrocnemius muscle from PCA rat, and human skeletal muscle from patients with cirrhosis consistently had low expression levels of total RNA compared to controls (Fig. 1F). Also, expression levels of the 45S rRNA and the processed 28S and 18S rRNAs were reduced in myotubes and skeletal muscle from the hyperammonemic PCA rat and human patients with cirrhosis, compared to controls (Fig. 1G and H). We further used polysome fractionation to investigate the effects of hyperammonemia on ribosome density and assembly. Relative to control cells, hyperammonemia induced a reduction in absorbance in gradient fractions corresponding to polysomes, accompanied by a concomitant decrease in absorbance in the monosome fraction. The ratio of polysomes to the sum of polysomes and monosomes was 93.6% ± 2.1% of simultaneous untreated controls (n = 3; P < 0.05) (Fig. 1I).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Hyperammonemia impairs protein synthesis in myotubes. (A) Representative immunoblotting and densitometry of puromycin incorporation in untreated C2C12 myotubes (UnT) or those treated with 10 mM ammonium acetate (AmAc) for 6 h and 24 h. (B) Heat map of transcriptome analysis comparing untreated C2C12 myotubes to those treated with 10 mM AmAc for 3 or 24 h. (C) Heat map of C2C12 myotubes after 24 h of treatment with AmAc compared with untreated cells. (D) Ingenuity Pathway Knowledge Base (IPKB) analysis of the most enriched canonical pathways present in differentiated C2C12 myotubes after 24 h of hyperammonemia. (E) Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of the β-catenin (CTNNB1) node from the entire transcriptome (from panel B). Note that the majority of connections are downregulated upon AmAc treatment (indicated in red). (F) Cellular RNA levels from untreated myotubes or those treated with 10 mM AmAc for 6 or 24 h; from the gastrocnemius muscle of portocaval anastomosis (PCA) and sham-operated, pair-fed control (Sham) rats (n = 5 in each group); and from the skeletal muscle of patients with cirrhosis (CIR) and healthy controls (CTL) (n = 5 in each group). (G) Fold changes of the expression levels of the 45S rRNA in C2C12 myotubes treated with 10 mM AmAc for 30 min or 3, 6, or 24 h in the gastrocnemius muscle of portocaval anastomosis (PCA) and sham-operated pair-fed control rats (n = 5 each) and the skeletal muscle of patients with cirrhosis and controls (n = 5 each). rRNA expression was normalized against β-actin. (H) RNA gel of 28S and 18S bands in untreated myotubes and those treated with 10 mM AmAc for different times. (I) Effect of AmAc treatment on the polysome/monosome ratio in C2C12 myotubes. Representative polysome profiles from a sucrose gradient (20 to 47%) were obtained by taking the optical density at 254 nm (OD254) for untreated control and 10 mM AmAc-treated C2C12 cell extracts. Positions of 80S and polysome species are indicated. A.U., arbitrary units. All cellular experiments were performed in at least 3 biological replicates, and data are expressed as means ± SD. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 (versus the control).

Lower levels of rRNA were accompanied by reduced levels of the ribosomal component protein RPL5, -23, and -32 as well as RPS9, -19, and -26 mRNAs in hyperammonemic myotubes (Fig. 2A and B) and of RPL5, -23, and -32 proteins in hyperammonemic myotubes, gastrocnemius muscle from the PCA rat, and skeletal muscle from patients with cirrhosis (Fig. 2C to E). Interestingly, the ammonia-induced reduction in the expression of RPL5, -23, and -32 proteins was not limited only to skeletal muscle but was also observed in nonmuscle HEK293 cells (Fig. 2F). Ribosomal proteins may have relatively long half-lives after their incorporation into ribosomes; however, our studies on protein expression in response to cycloheximide (CHX) as a measure of protein degradation and MG132 as a measure of protein translation support the use of these inhibitors to study the stability of RPL5, -23, and -32 proteins and their expression in response to hyperammonemia (Fig. 2G). Consistently, during hyperammonemia, the expression of ribosomal proteins was significantly decreased, and MG132 treatment prevented ammonia-induced reduction of the RPLs studied (Fig. 2G). We also noted that the expression of a housekeeping gene, β-actin, was unaltered, but that of a nonhousekeeping, regulatable gene, total P70S6 kinase (P70S6K), was decreased by cycloheximide (which shows that it is regulated by translation) but did not change in response to hyperammonemia (Fig. 2G). An unbiased proteomics analysis of myotubes treated with ammonium acetate (AmAc) compared to untreated cells showed alterations in ribosomal proteins (Table 1). There was a reduction in the expression of 12 ribosomal proteins that are incorporated into the 40S subunit and 20 ribosomal proteins that are incorporated into the 60S subunit. Together, these data show that during hyperammonemia, rRNA and protein levels are decreased in skeletal muscle during hyperammonemia.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Hyperammonemia impairs skeletal muscle ribosomal biogenesis. (A) Relative fold changes in expression of ribosomal RPL5, RPL23, and RPL32 mRNAs, comparing myotubes treated with 10 mM AmAc for 6 or 24 h with untreated (UnT) controls, measured by RT-quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR). (B) Relative fold changes in expression of ribosomal RPS9, RPS19, and RPS26 mRNAs, comparing myotubes treated with 10 mM AmAc for 6 or 24 h with untreated controls, measured by qRT-PCR. (C to E) Representative immunoblotting and densitometry of expression of ribosomal proteins RPL5, RPL23, and RPL32 from untreated C2C12 myotubes or those treated with 10 mM AmAc for 24 h (C); from the gastrocnemius muscle of portocaval anastomosis (PCA) and sham-operated, pair-fed control (Sham) rats (n = 5 each) (D); and from the skeletal muscle of patients with cirrhosis (CIR) and controls (CTL) (n = 5 each) (E). (F) Representative immunoblotting and densitometry of ribosomal biogenesis markers RPL5, RPL23, and RPL32 in untreated HEK cells and those treated with 10 mM AmAc for 6 or 24 h. (G) Representative immunoblotting and densitometry of expression of ribosomal proteins RPL5, -23, and -32 show that with 24 h of treatment with the translational inhibitor cycloheximide (CHX), there is reduced expression of ribosomal proteins, which is blocked by proteasome inhibition. However, the expression of a housekeeping gene, β-actin, did not change in response to these interventions, and the expression of a regulatable, nonhousekeeping gene (P70S6K) did not change, except with cycloheximide treatment, which resulted in lower expression levels than in untreated cells. All cellular experiments were performed in at least 3 biological replicates, and all data were normalized to β-actin and are expressed as means ± SD. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 (versus untreated cells or controls for all panels).

TABLE 1.

Unbiased proteomics analysis of myotubes treated with AmAc for 24 h compared to untreated cellsa

NCBI accession no. Protein Designation Mol wt (kDa) LFQ intensity at 24 h
LFQ intensity for Ct
Ratio of 24-h/Ct LFQ intensity P value by t test MS/MS count
Expt 1 Expt 2 Expt 3 Avg Expt 1 Expt 2 Expt 3 Avg
P60867 40S ribosomal protein S20 Rps20 13.373 1.81E+09 1.91E+09 1.87E+09 1.86E+09 2.07E+09 1.97E+09 2.04E+09 2.03E+09 0.92 0.018 152
P63325 40S ribosomal protein S10 Rps10 18.916 4.04E+08 4.42E+08 4.33E+08 4.26E+08 4.64E+08 5.07E+08 4.97E+08 4.89E+08 0.87 0.022 117
P62242 40S ribosomal protein S8 Rps8 24.205 2.17E+09 2.73E+09 2.46E+09 2.46E+09 2.85E+09 3.19E+09 3.01E+09 3.02E+09 0.81 0.040 300
P62754 40S ribosomal protein S6 Rps6 28.68 1.55E+09 1.90E+09 1.75E+09 1.74E+09 2.35E+09 2.29E+09 2.34E+09 2.32E+09 0.75 0.005 251
P62267 40S ribosomal protein S23 Rps23 15.807 5.13E+08 6.54E+08 5.60E+08 5.76E+08 7.20E+08 7.31E+08 9.23E+08 7.92E+08 0.73 0.050 133
P62281 40S ribosomal protein S11 Rps11 18.431 1.24E+09 1.37E+09 1.27E+09 1.29E+09 1.82E+09 1.49E+09 1.41E+09 1.57E+09 0.82 0.100 198
P62855 40S ribosomal protein S26 Rps26 13.015 6.72E+08 7.12E+08 6.49E+08 6.77E+08 6.86E+08 8.06E+08 7.41E+08 7.44E+08 0.91 0.164 78
P63276 40S ribosomal protein S17 Rps17 15.524 1.54E+09 1.58E+09 1.65E+09 1.59E+09 1.65E+09 1.63E+09 1.84E+09 1.71E+09 0.93 0.190 165
P25444 40S ribosomal protein S2 Rps2 31.231 1.58E+09 1.77E+09 1.69E+09 1.68E+09 1.90E+09 1.72E+09 1.75E+09 1.79E+09 0.94 0.219 232
P62264 40S ribosomal protein S14 Rps14 16.273 1.53E+09 1.65E+09 1.56E+09 1.58E+09 1.74E+09 1.53E+09 1.65E+09 1.64E+09 0.96 0.435 154
P62274 40S ribosomal protein S29 Rps29 6.6767 5.77E+08 6.43E+08 5.40E+08 5.87E+08 6.81E+08 6.02E+08 5.73E+08 6.19E+08 0.95 0.512 56
P62301 40S ribosomal protein S13 Rps13 17.222 5.37E+08 4.54E+08 4.94E+08 4.95E+08 6.56E+08 4.41E+08 4.94E+08 5.30E+08 0.93 0.634 120
P27659 60S ribosomal protein L3 Rpl3 46.109 2.41E+09 2.73E+09 2.56E+09 2.56E+09 3.05E+09 3.08E+09 3.09E+09 3.07E+09 0.83 0.005 377
Q9CPR4 60S ribosomal protein L17 Rpl17 21.423 1.37E+09 1.60E+09 1.36E+09 1.44E+09 1.88E+09 1.79E+09 1.70E+09 1.79E+09 0.81 0.023 225
P47963 60S ribosomal protein L13 Rpl13 24.305 1.84E+09 2.10E+09 1.96E+09 1.97E+09 2.44E+09 2.50E+09 2.69E+09 2.54E+09 0.77 0.006 229
Q9Z2Q5 39S ribosomal protein L40, mitb Mrpl40 24.301 5.55E+07 4.90E+07 4.49E+07 4.98E+07 6.26E+07 7.00E+07 6.07E+07 6.45E+07 0.77 0.025 46
P41105 60S ribosomal protein L28 Rpl28 15.733 5.35E+08 6.39E+08 5.51E+08 5.75E+08 7.57E+08 7.45E+08 7.53E+08 7.52E+08 0.77 0.006 156
P61255 60S ribosomal protein L26 Rpl26 17.258 5.93E+08 7.08E+08 6.82E+08 6.61E+08 9.70E+08 9.00E+08 8.02E+08 8.91E+08 0.74 0.019 141
P62717 60S ribosomal protein L18a Rpl18a 20.732 2.82E+08 3.72E+08 3.69E+08 3.41E+08 4.67E+08 4.90E+08 5.20E+08 4.92E+08 0.69 0.010 108
P12970 60S ribosomal protein L7a Rpl7a 29.976 6.47E+08 6.23E+08 6.11E+08 6.27E+08 9.71E+08 9.43E+08 8.53E+08 9.22E+08 0.68 0.001 191
P47911 60S ribosomal protein L6 Rpl6 33.509 1.35E+09 1.65E+09 1.53E+09 1.51E+09 2.33E+09 2.27E+09 2.14E+09 2.25E+09 0.67 0.002 246
Q6ZWV7 60S ribosomal protein L35 Rpl35 14.552 3.94E+08 5.16E+08 4.34E+08 4.48E+08 6.72E+08 7.17E+08 6.46E+08 6.78E+08 0.66 0.005 73
P62918 60S ribosomal protein L8 Rpl8 28.024 9.82E+08 1.28E+09 1.12E+09 1.13E+09 1.82E+09 1.59E+09 1.78E+09 1.73E+09 0.65 0.006 205
Q8BP67 60S ribosomal protein L24 Rpl24 17.779 3.58E+08 4.28E+08 3.97E+08 3.94E+08 6.99E+08 6.28E+08 6.35E+08 6.54E+08 0.60 0.001 110
Q9D1R9 60S ribosomal protein L34 Rpl34 13.293 1.38E+08 1.62E+08 1.75E+08 1.58E+08 3.30E+08 2.45E+08 2.56E+08 2.77E+08 0.57 0.014 48
Q9CR57 60S ribosomal protein L14 Rpl14 23.564 1.84E+08 1.79E+08 1.99E+08 1.87E+08 3.77E+08 3.54E+08 2.95E+08 3.42E+08 0.55 0.004 75
P35980 60S ribosomal protein L18 Rpl18 21.644 1.65E+08 2.64E+08 1.81E+08 2.03E+08 3.06E+08 4.06E+08 5.40E+08 4.17E+08 0.49 0.045 92
P14148 60S ribosomal protein L7 Rpl7 31.419 3.59E+08 5.29E+08 3.65E+08 4.18E+08 7.76E+08 8.50E+08 9.51E+08 8.59E+08 0.49 0.004 161
P47964 60S ribosomal protein L36 Rpl36 12.215 3.93E+08 4.58E+08 4.83E+08 4.45E+08 5.49E+08 5.12E+08 6.25E+08 5.62E+08 0.79 0.052 93
P19253 60S ribosomal protein L13a Rpl13a 23.464 5.08E+08 7.59E+08 5.99E+08 6.22E+08 7.35E+08 7.91E+08 7.84E+08 7.70E+08 0.81 0.121 157
P62892 60S ribosomal protein L39 Rpl39 6.4066 3.29E+08 3.83E+08 3.53E+08 3.55E+08 3.75E+08 4.06E+08 4.84E+08 4.22E+08 0.84 0.138 55
Q9D823 60S ribosomal protein L37 Rpl37 11.078 500,000 1,372,000 3,744,100 1.87E+06 2,985,600 2.45E+07 500,000 9.33E+06 0.20 0.387 7
a

LFQ, label-free quantitation; Ct, control group.

b

mit, mitochondrial.

Hyperammonemia impairs the β-catenin–cMYC axis.

Since the β-catenin–cMYC axis regulates ribosomal components and ribosomal biogenesis (6, 54), we determined whether hyperammonemia impaired ribosomal biogenesis and protein synthesis via perturbations in this axis. cMYC regulates protein synthesis by increasing ribosomal biogenesis and has also been suggested to mediate skeletal muscle hypertrophy (6, 10). We observed reductions in the levels of cMYC and UBF1, a ribosomal DNA transcription factor, during hyperammonemia, with lower levels of ribosomal biogenesis in all models evaluated (Fig. 3A to C). Expression of β-catenin, a transcriptional activator of cMYC, was also decreased during hyperammonemia in all 3 models studied (Fig. 3D to F). These effects of hyperammonemia extend beyond those in the skeletal muscle because similar findings were observed in HEK293 cells during hyperammonemia (Fig. 3G). β-Catenin-dependent signaling is activated by dephosphorylation, followed by nuclear translocation and upregulation of its target genes. Reporter assays using Topflash/Fopflash showed that decreased expression of active, dephosphorylated β-catenin was associated with reduced transcriptional activity during hyperammonemia (Fig. 3H). Importantly, the cells still retained their ability to activate β-catenin, as two chemical stabilizers of β-catenin, 6-bromoindirubin-3′-oxime (BIO) and lithium chloride (LiCl), were able to increase β-catenin levels, nuclear translocation, and transactivation (Fig. 3H and I). These data show that hyperammonemia decreased β-catenin stability and transcriptional activity.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Reduced skeletal muscle β-catenin expression during hyperammonemia. (A to C) Representative immunoblotting and densitometry of cMYC and upstream binding factor 1 (UBF1) expression in untreated (UnT) murine C2C12 myotubes or those treated with 10 mM AmAc for 24 h (A); skeletal muscle from portocaval anastomosis (PCA) and sham-operated, pair-fed (Sham) control rats (n = 5 each) (B); and skeletal muscle of patients with cirrhosis (CIR) and controls (CTL) (n = 5 each) (C). (D to F) Representative immunoblotting and densitometry of total (T) and active, dephosphorylated (A) β-catenin expression from untreated C2C12 myotubes or those treated with 10 mM AmAc for 24 h (D); from the gastrocnemius muscle of PCA and sham-operated, pair-fed control rats (n = 5 each) (E); and from the skeletal muscle of patients with cirrhosis and control subjects (n = 5 each) (F). (G) Representative immunoblotting and densitometry of total and activated β-catenin as well as its transcriptional targets cMYC and UBF1 in untreated HEK cells or those treated with 10 mM ammonium acetate for 6 or 24 h. (H) Luciferase activity measuring transcriptional activity of β-catenin using Topflash reporter activity (normalized to Renilla) comparing untreated myotubes and those treated for 24 h with 10 mM AmAc, 5 mM lithium chloride (LiCl), or 2 μM BIO (6-bromoindirubin-3′-oxime) (small-molecule inhibitor of GSK3β with resultant activation of β-catenin), expressed as fold changes over untreated cells. (I) Representative photomicrographs of immunofluorescence of active, unphosphorylated β-catenin expression (green) in murine C2C12 myotubes treated with 10 mM AmAc or 2 μM BIO for 24 h. Nuclei are counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (blue). Scale bars, 40 μm. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 (versus untreated cells). All data are expressed as means ± SD. All cellular experiments were performed in at least 3 biological replicates, and all blots were normalized to β-actin. The antibody against active β-catenin recognizes the unphosphorylated, stable form of β-catenin.

Hyperammonemia results in β-catenin degradation that is independent of GSKβ.

Regulation of β-catenin is mediated primarily by stabilization through the Wnt signaling pathway, which phosphorylates and inactivates GSK3β, the canonical inhibitor of β-catenin (55). Even though GSK3β is the best-recognized regulator of β-catenin (56), during skeletal muscle hyperammonemia, phosphorylation of GSK3β was unaltered (Fig. 4A to C). Interestingly, we showed that muscle atrophy during hyperammonemia was not reversed by silencing of either GSKα or GSKβ in myotubes (Fig. 4D). Consistently, either chemical inhibitors of GSK3β, BIO and LiCl, or genetic depletion using short hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting GSK3α (shGSK3α) and shGSK3β increased active β-catenin expression in untreated cells but did not restore active β-catenin expression during hyperammonemia (Fig. 4E and F). Expression of total P70S6K was used to show that the expression of a regulatable, nonhousekeeping gene did not change in response to hyperammonemia (Fig. 4F). Chemical inhibitors of GSK3β, BIO and LiCl, could not restore the β-catenin transcriptional activity, as shown by a Topflash assay (Fig. 5A). Finally, using the proteasome inhibitor MG132, we could prevent β-catenin loss during hyperammonemia, showing that canonical proteasome-dependent degradation of β-catenin was unaltered (Fig. 5B). To further determine if mTORC1 contributes to the effects of hyperammonemia on ribosome biogenesis, we treated myotubes with rapamycin and observed that expression levels of RPL5, -23, and -32 mRNAs were unaltered by blocking mTORC1, while phosphorylation of P70S6 kinase, a known target of mTORC1 signaling, was inhibited by rapamycin (Fig. 5C and D).

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Skeletal muscle hyperammonemia does not alter GSK3β expression or activity. (A to C) Representative immunoblots of phosphorylated and total GSK3β from untreated (UnT) C2C12 myotubes or those treated with 10 mM AmAc for 6 or 24 h (A), skeletal muscle from portocaval anastomosis (PCA) and sham-operated pair-fed control (Sham) rats (n = 5 each) (B), and skeletal muscle of patients with cirrhosis (CIR) and controls (CTL) (n = 5 each) (C). (D) Representative photomicrographs and myotube diameters of differentiated C2C12 myotubes depleted of GSK3β or GSK3α or transfected with a vector with a random construct (shRan), treated with and without 10 mM ammonium acetate (AmAc). Scale bars, 40 μm. (E) Representative immunoblots of dephosphorylated active (A) and total (T) β-catenin, as well as GSK3β, in untreated C2C12 myotubes or those treated with 10 mM AmAc for 24 h in the presence or absence of GSK3β inhibitors, 5 mM lithium chloride (LiCl) or 2 μM BIO (6-bromoindirubin-3′-oxime), that activate β-catenin. Densitometry of blots from active β-catenin were normalized to β-actin. (F) Representative immunoblots of GSK3α and GSK3β and immunoblots and densitometry of RPL5, RPL23, RPL32, P70S6K, and β-actin in myotubes with silencing of GSK3α and GSK3β with and without 10 mM AmAc for 24 h. Expression of total P70S6K was used to determine the response of a nonhousekeeping, regulatable protein with hyperammonemia. All cellular experiments were performed in at least 3 biological replicates, blots were normalized to β-actin, and data are expressed as means ± SD. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 (versus untreated cells). The antibody against active β-catenin recognizes the unphosphorylated, stable form of β-catenin.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Hyperammonemia effects on ribosomal proteins are mediated by GSK- and mTORC1-independent effects. (A) Luciferase activity measuring transcriptional activity of β-catenin using the Topflash reporter assay (normalized to Renilla) comparing untreated (UnT) myotubes and those treated for 24 h with 10 mM AmAc in the presence or absence of 5 mM LiCl or 2 μM BIO. Data are depicted as fold changes over Topflash activity. (B) Representative immunoblots for β-catenin phosphorylated at Ser33/37 in untreated C2C12 myotubes or those treated with 10 mM AmAc for 6 or 24 h. Proteasome activity was blocked with 10 μM MG132 for the last 1 h to prevent ubiquitin-mediated degradation of phosphorylated β-catenin. (C) Fold changes in mRNAs for RPL5, -23, and -32 in myotubes treated for 24 h with and without 10 mM AmAc and/or rapamycin (Rap) (1 μg/ml). (D) Representative immunoblots of phosphorylated P70S6 kinase in response to 10 mM ammonium acetate for 24 h or 1 μg/ml rapamycin. All cellular experiments were performed in at least 3 biological replicates, blots were normalized to β-actin, and data are expressed as means ± SD. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 (versus untreated cells). The antibody against active β-catenin recognizes the unphosphorylated, stable form of β-catenin.

Noncanonical degradation of β-catenin during hyperammonemia.

We then determined how increased β-catenin degradation occurred, independently of the canonical GSK3β pathway, during hyperammonemia. We previously reported increased IKK-dependent signaling during hyperammonemia (38). The IKK complex is comprised of both IKKα and IKKβ, in addition to other components (5759). We genetically depleted IKK to determine whether β-catenin stability is regulated by IKKα or IKKβ. As shown in Fig. 6A, only knockdown of IKKβ restores β-catenin levels during hyperammonemia. Genetic depletion of IKKβ prevented not only hyperammonemia-induced reduction in active β-catenin but also expression of its targets cMYC and UBF1 (Fig. 6A and B). Silencing of IKKβ also partially reversed myotube atrophy during hyperammonemia, while random shRNA or shIKKα did not result in a reversal of the sarcopenic phenotype response to hyperammonemia (Fig. 6C). Consistently, depletion of only IKKβ resulted in nuclear translocation of active β-catenin by immunofluorescence studies (Fig. 6D). The Topflash reporter assay also showed that silencing of IKKβ restored the ammonia-induced reduction in the transcriptional activity of β-catenin (Fig. 6E) and partially reversed ammonia-induced impaired protein synthesis (Fig. 7A). These effects are likely via direct protein-protein interactions because IKKβ and β-catenin were associated with each other in both myotubes and HEK293 cells during hyperammonemia (Fig. 7B and C).

FIG 6.

FIG 6

Skeletal muscle IKKβ is a novel β-catenin kinase during hyperammonemia. (A) Representative immunoblotting and densitometry of active dephosphorylated and total β-catenin, cMYC, and UBF1 in C2C12 myotubes transfected with shRNAs targeting IKKβ or a scrambled shRNA (shRan) that were either untreated (UnT) or treated with 10 mM AmAc for 24 h. (B) Representative immunoblots of IKKβ and IKKα and immunoblots and densitometry of total and active β-catenin in untreated C2C12 myotubes or those treated with 10 mM AmAc for 24 h, stably expressing IKKβ or IKKα shRNA or a scrambled control (shRan). (C) Representative photomicrographs and myotube diameters of differentiated C2C12 myotubes depleted of IKKα or IKKβ or transfected with a vector with a random construct (shRan), treated with and without 10 mM AmAc. Scale bars, 40 μm. (D) Representative photomicrographs of immunofluorescence of active, dephosphorylated β-catenin expression (red) in myotubes stably expressing shRNAs targeting IKKβ or IKKα or a scrambled shRNA (shRan) that were either untreated or treated with 10 mM AmAc for 24 h. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars, 40 μm. (E) Luciferase activity for β-catenin transcriptional activity quantified by a Topflash assay (normalized to Renilla) in untreated C2C12 myotubes or those treated with 10 mM AmAc for 24 h, stably expressing either an shRNA targeting IKKβ shRNA or a scrambled control (shRan). All cellular experiments were performed in at least 3 biological replicates, all blots were normalized to β-actin, and data are expressed as means ± SD. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 (shIKKβ versus shRan). The antibody against active β-catenin recognizes the unphosphorylated, stable form of β-catenin. Bars, 40 μm.

FIG 7.

FIG 7

Hyperammonemia regulates β-catenin via IKKβ. (A) [3H]phenylalanine incorporation in untreated myotubes and those treated for 24 h with AmAc and depleted of IKKβ or IKKα showing a partial reversal of AmAc-induced protein synthesis with silencing of IKKβ. (B) Immunoprecipitate of β-catenin probed for IKKβ and immunoprecipitate of IKKβ probed for β-catenin in untreated (UnT) murine C2C12 myotubes or those treated with 10 mM AmAc for 24 h. (C) Immunoprecipitate of IKKβ probed for β-catenin and immunoprecipitate of β-catenin probed for IKKβ in untreated HEK cells or those treated with 10 mM AmAc for 24 h. (D) Representative immunoblotting and densitometry of total β-catenin levels in C2C12 myotubes stably transfected with β-catenin mutants that are resistant to GSK3β phosphorylation (S33Y, S45Y, and N-terminal deletion [ΔN-ter] constructs). The β-catenin N-terminal deletion construct has a lower molecular weight. (E) In vitro kinase assay with purified β-catenin and either IKKβ or GSK3β (positive control) and negative controls. The blots were probed with phospho-β-catenin (Ser33/37/41) antibody. The purity of reagents was tested by immunoblotting. All cellular experiments and in vitro kinase assays were performed in at least 3 biological replicates, all blots were normalized to β-actin, and data are expressed as means ± SD. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; NS, not significant (versus mock-transfected untreated control myotubes).

Finally, we investigated whether the IKKβ-mediated phosphorylation of β-catenin that occurs during hyperammonemia is independent of GSK3β. C2C12 myotubes stably transfected with either the S33Y, S45K, or N-terminal deletion mutant of β-catenin had reduced expression of β-catenin during hyperammonemia (Fig. 7D). These data demonstrate that despite mutations in the phosphorylation sites of GSK3β, β-catenin was still degraded during hyperammonemia, suggesting that a GSK3β-independent, IKKβ-dependent pathway is active during hyperammonemia. Consistently, in vitro kinase assays showed that purified, active IKKβ phosphorylated β-catenin, as did GSK3β (Fig. 7E).

Overexpression of β-catenin reverses protein synthesis and ribosomal biogenesis.

To determine whether β-catenin degradation is not only necessary but also sufficient for decreased ribosomal biogenesis and protein synthesis during hyperammonemia, gains of β-catenin function were evaluated in myotubes. Overexpression of β-catenin in myotubes increased the expression of its targets, the cMYC and UBF1 genes (Fig. 8A) and ribosomal proteins (Fig. 8B) and reversed the reduction in protein synthesis (Fig. 8C), 45S ribosome RNA (Fig. 8D), and the muscle atrophy phenotype during hyperammonemia (Fig. 8E).

FIG 8.

FIG 8

Overexpression of β-catenin restores reduced cMYC and protein synthesis. (A) Representative immunoblotting and densitometry of total (T) and active (A) β-catenin, cMYC, and UBF1 in untreated (UnT) or 10 mM AmAc-treated murine C2C12 myotubes overexpressing wild-type β-catenin or a mock construct. (B) Representative immunoblotting and densitometry of ribosomal proteins RPL5, RPL23, and RPL32 in untreated C2C12 myotubes or those treated with 10 mM AmAc for 24 h, stably overexpressing either wild-type β-catenin or a mock construct. (C) Representative immunoblotting and densitometry of puromycin incorporation in untreated C2C12 myotubes or those treated with 10 mM AmAc for 24 h, overexpressing wild-type β-catenin or a mock construct. (D) Relative fold changes in 45S rRNA expression in untreated myotubes or those treated with 10 mM AmAc for 24 h, overexpressing wild-type β-catenin or a mock vector. (E) Representative photomicrographs and myotube diameters of differentiated C2C12 myotubes with β-catenin overexpression compared with mock vector-transfected myotubes treated with and without 10 mM AmAc. Scale bars, 40 μm. All cellular experiments were performed in at least 3 biological replicates, all blots were normalized to β-actin, and data are expressed as means ± SD. ***, P < 0.001 (mock versus β-catenin overexpression). The antibody against active β-catenin recognizes the unphosphorylated, stable form of β-catenin.

DISCUSSION

We provide novel evidence that during hyperammonemia, loss of β-catenin and an ensuing decrease in cMYC expression result in impaired ribosomal biogenesis and translational capacity and a consequent reduction in protein synthesis. Complementing reports that an increase in β-catenin signaling contributes to skeletal muscle hypertrophy, we show that impaired β-catenin–cMYC ribosomal biogenesis occurs with skeletal muscle atrophy.

Canonical regulation of β-catenin is mediated by GSK3β-dependent phosphorylation, and the activity of β-catenin is regulated by phosphorylation followed by proteasome-mediated degradation (21, 25). During hyperammonemia, we observed no alteration in the phosphorylation of GSK3β or reversal of β-catenin expression or function in response to classical GSK3 inhibitors. Instead, β-catenin is phosphorylated by a different Ser/Thr kinase. Loss- and gain-of-function studies show that IKKβ is the kinase primarily responsible for hyperammonemia-induced loss of skeletal muscle. Consistent with the critical role of β-catenin in regulating ribosomal biogenesis, hyperammonemia resulted in impaired ribosomal biogenesis and decreased protein synthesis, with a sarcopenic phenotype. Importantly, we also observed hyperammonemia-induced IKKβ/β-catenin-dependent decreases in ribosomal biogenesis and muscle loss in vivo in rats and in patients with hyperammonemia.

Our studies show that hyperammonemia impairs protein synthesis in both muscle and HEK cells. These data are consistent with reports by others that ammonia impairs protein synthesis in a variety of systems, including skeletal muscle (52, 6062). Protein synthesis is regulated at multiple levels, including initiation, elongation, and termination. Most studies to date have focused on the signaling pathways regulating protein synthesis via kinase- and phosphatase-dependent mechanisms (63). Since skeletal muscle is the largest protein store in the body, ribosomal biogenesis is critical for protein homeostasis (1). Ribosome biogenesis is initiated by the synthesis and processing of rRNA and proteins and their assembly into the two major subunits, a large 60S subunit, which comprises 28S, 5S, and 5.8S rRNAs and 47 large ribosomal proteins (RPLs), and a 40S subunit, which comprises 18S rRNA and 33 small ribosomal proteins (RPSs) (1, 64). Ribosome biogenesis is increased during muscle hypertrophy and growth (6), but there are very limited data about the converse, that is, the decreased ribosomal biogenesis that occurs during muscle atrophy (6, 28, 65). Similarly, translational capacity, determined by total ribosome content, has been reported to be increased during muscle hypertrophy, but whether ribosome content is altered during atrophy has not been reported (6). We show that the levels of the 18S and 28S subunits of the rRNA, as well as the RPL proteins and mRNA, are decreased in multiple models of muscle atrophy during hyperammonemia. Our observations of reduced ribosome content and biogenesis during hyperammonemia-induced muscle loss are consistent with those reported for disuse-related muscle atrophy, where lower skeletal muscle RNA content was noted in rats during hindlimb immobilization and spinal cord injury (66, 67) or in humans during inactivity (68). Importantly, this phenomenon is different from aging-related sarcopenia and sciatic denervation-induced atrophy, where the skeletal muscle total RNA concentration is not decreased (31, 65). Also, our data show that ribosomal alterations in muscle atrophy are not necessarily the reverse of hypertrophy, because the changes in hypertrophy are believed to be due to translational rather than transcriptional perturbations (27). Interestingly, our observations using polysome profiling show that hyperammonemia does not seem to affect the proper maturation and assembly of the ribosomes. These data suggest that different catabolic stimuli regulate ribosome content and biogenesis in skeletal muscle, indicating context-dependent, upstream regulatory mechanisms.

The transcription factor cMYC modulates cellular functions by upregulating the transcription of rRNA and ribosomal proteins as well as rRNA processing, ribosome assembly, and nuclear-cytoplasmic export of mature ribosome subunits (6, 12, 15). In addition, cMYC also regulates upstream binding factor 1 (UBF1) and other rDNA regulatory factors to enhance RNA polymerase I-dependent transcription (11, 28, 69). We also show decreased UBF1 expression, suggesting that the entire cMYC-dependent regulatory axis is perturbed during hyperammonemia. Even though SL1, another transcription factor, forms a complex with UBF1 for transcriptional activation for RNA polymerase I (70, 71), there are no sequence-specific DNA binding sites for SL1, suggesting that reduced expression of UBF1 in hyperammonemia is sufficient to cause perturbations in ribosomal biogenesis. Our observations on ribosomal regulation in conjunction with polysome profiling cannot exclude the possibility that hyperammonemia can perturb mature ribosomal content. By blocking translation and proteasome degradation, we also noted that some of the ribosomal proteins are indeed susceptible to rapid regulation during cellular stress.

β-Catenin is a well-recognized upstream activator of cMYC expression both via direct transcriptional activation as well as through indirect activation of paired-like homeodomain transcription factor 2 (Pitx2), which activates cMYC (72, 73). In our studies, we noted loss of β-catenin and reduced expression of its transcriptional target cMYC. Interestingly, overexpression of β-catenin in C2C12 myotubes was able to restore cMYC expression as well as protein synthesis, showing for the first time a direct link between the loss of β-catenin–cMYC and decreased ribosomal content and protein synthesis. Thus, our studies on the mechanism by which hyperammonemia resulted in decreased active β-catenin point to a critical role of a heretofore little-recognized aspect of β-catenin degradation. Classical activation of β-catenin occurs during Wnt signaling, and inactivation is initiated by priming phosphorylation at Ser45, followed by subsequent phosphorylation at other sites, including the GSK3β target Ser33 (25, 55, 56). Phosphorylated β-catenin is then rapidly degraded via proteasome-mediated proteolysis. GSK3β is activated by dephosphorylation and inactivated by phosphorylation at the Ser9 site, with consequent changes in β-catenin stabilization and transcriptional activity (21, 25, 56, 74). In skeletal muscle, GSK3β is phosphorylated and inactivated by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway (18, 19, 75). Interestingly, GSK3β expression and phosphorylation status were unaltered in skeletal muscle and myotubes during hyperammonemia. In addition to the classical GSK3β-dependent regulation of β-catenin, others have reported that the Ser/Thr kinase IKKβ phosphorylates and inactivates β-catenin (76). We previously reported IKKβ activation in the skeletal muscle during hyperammonemia (38). In the present studies, using association, loss- and gain-of-function, and in vitro kinase studies, we observed β-catenin phosphorylation and proteasome-mediated degradation via an IKKβ-dependent mechanism. These observations are similar to the recently reported regulation of β-catenin via IKKβ in mesenchymal stem cell differentiation (26), but our observations suggest that some of the effects of IKKβ can be mediated via β-catenin degradation. Interestingly, deletion of the priming phosphorylation sites on Ser33,45 or the N-terminal domain of β-catenin, a target of GSK3β, did not affect β-catenin degradation during hyperammonemia. We also noted that despite mutation of the GSK3β target Ser33 on β-catenin, β-catenin continues to be degraded via the proteasome. These observations suggest that during hyperammonemia, phosphorylation of β-catenin occurs via a noncanonical GSK3β-independent, IKKβ-dependent mechanism, following which the degradation of β-catenin occurs through the established proteasomal pathway. Whether IKKβ-mediated loss of β-catenin is relevant for other causes of muscle loss that are characterized by a decreased ribosomal content (e.g., immobilization and spinal cord injury) and whether it occurs in other organ systems need to be determined. These observations are therefore of high biological relevance, given that this regulatory mechanism of β-catenin degradation as a dominant pathway has not been described to date. Our observations also have therapeutic translational potential for dealing with muscle loss in chronic diseases, given the availability of small-molecule inhibitors of IKKβ (77).

In summary, our studies in myotubes and skeletal muscle in vivo show that during hyperammonemia, reduced protein synthesis and ribosomal content are accompanied by decreased ribosomal biogenesis. The classical regulation of ribosomal biogenesis by the β-catenin–cMYC axis is preserved. However, instead of GSK3β-dependent phosphorylation, IKKβ is the major upstream kinase implicated in β-catenin degradation (Fig. 9). Impaired ribosome biogenesis during muscle atrophy and noncanonical regulation of β-catenin during hyperammonemia have the potential for broad application, given that both perturbations of ammonia metabolism and muscle loss occur in a diverse group of chronic diseases.

FIG 9.

FIG 9

Schematic model of regulation of ribosomal biogenesis. Canonical regulation of β-catenin is mediated by Wnt ligand binding to its cognate receptor, Frizzled, leading to the phosphorylation and inactivation of GSK3β and the stabilization of β-catenin. Nuclear translocation of β-catenin transcriptionally activates target genes, including cMYC, which in turn induces ribosomal biogenesis and protein synthesis. During hyperammonemia, noncanonical regulation via GSK3β-independent, IKKβ-dependent phosphorylation and degradation of β-catenin results in impaired ribosomal biogenesis and protein synthesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials.

All chemicals were of molecular biology grade and obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Anti-active β-catenin (catalog number 05-665) (this recognizes the unphosphorylated, stable form of β-catenin), anti-IKKβ (catalog number 05-535), and antipuromycin (catalog number MABE343) antibodies were obtained from EMD Millipore (Burlington, MA). Anti-phospho-β-catenin Ser33/37, anti-phospho-GSK3β (catalog number 5558T), anti-GSK3β (catalog number 12456), and anti-RPL5 (catalog number 14568) antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA). Anti-GSK3α (catalog number NB100-81943) and -GSK3β (catalog number NBP1-47470) were obtained from Novus Biologicals (Centennial, CO). Anti-total β-catenin (catalog number sc-7963) was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX). Anti-cMYC (catalog number GTX103436), anti-RPL23 antibody (catalog number GTX130214), and anti-RPL32 antibody (catalog number GTX130214) were obtained from GeneTex, Inc. (Irvine, CA). Purified GSK3β, IKKβ, and β-catenin were obtained from SignalChem (Richmond, BC, Canada). shIKKβ, and shIKKα were from Joseph A. DiDonato at the Cleveland Clinic. shGSk3β and shGSK3α were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).

Human cirrhosis with hyperammonemia.

Vastus lateralis muscle specimens from patients with cirrhosis and healthy volunteer control subjects were obtained using a Bergstromm needle. The technique and clinical characteristics of the patients and controls were previously reported (43). Human studies were performed after obtaining written informed consent, and the studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Cleveland Clinic and conformed to the Helsinki Declaration on human studies.

Hyperammonemic rat.

Gastrocnemius muscle from hyperammonemic PCA and sham-operated, pair-fed control rats were used as described previously (45). The PCA rat has been shown to have lower muscle mass than pair-fed controls, and the lower muscle mass is partially reversible by ammonia lowering or follistatin, a myostatin antagonist (45, 47, 50). Pair feeding was performed to ensure that reduced food intake by PCA rats did not contribute to the differences from the sham-operated rats. Animals were housed in individual cages in a 12-h-light/12-h-dark controlled environment. The details of animal maintenance were previously described (45). All animal studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Cleveland Clinic.

Cell culture.

In vitro cell culture studies were performed in differentiated C2C12 myotubes (ATCC CRL 1722; ATCC, Manassas, VA) as described by us previously (39). In brief, myoblasts were grown to confluence in proliferation medium (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium [DMEM] with 10% fetal calf serum), which was replaced by differentiation medium (DMEM plus 2% horse serum) for 48 h. Differentiation to myotubes has been reported by us to occur using this time course based on the fusion index and creatine kinase activity (78). Cells were treated with 10 mM ammonium acetate for the indicated times. This concentration has been reported by us to generate clinically relevant intracellular concentrations of ammonia (38, 79) and a muscle loss phenotype with reduced myotube diameter (45). To demonstrate that ammonia-induced β-catenin degradation occurs in other cell types as well, human embryonic kidney cells (ATCC CRL 1573; ATCC, Manassas, VA) were grown in Eagle’s minimum essential medium with 10% fetal bovine serum to confluence and treated with 10 mM ammonium acetate for 6 and 24 h, with untreated cells serving as controls. 6-Bromoindirubin-3′-oxime (BIO) at 2 μM and lithium chloride at 5 mM were used to inhibit GSK3β and thereby stabilize β-catenin expression (80).

RNA sequencing and bioinformatics analyses.

Total RNA was extracted from C2C12 myotubes that were untreated or treated with 10 mM ammonium acetate for 24 h using the RNeasy Plus minikit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD). Total RNA quality was evaluated using an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA), and the amount of the isolated RNA was determined using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Infinigen Biotechnology, Inc., City of Industry, CA). RNA-Seq libraries were generated using an Illumina TruSeq kit and by sequencing on an Illumina HiSEQ4000 instrument (all according to protocols provided by manufacturer) by the University of Chicago Genomics Facility. Sequence alignment and bioinformatics analyses were done by Novogene (Chula Vista, CA), using TopHat2 for mapping sequences, with a mismatch parameter set at 2 and other parameters at default settings. All the sequencing analyses (quality control, alignment, gene expression quantification, and differential expression analysis) were performed by Novogene using their standard pipeline for mouse RNA-Seq/transcriptome studies. TopHat2 has been widely used in RNA sequence analysis publications and has been used by Novogene as the mapping tool because TopHat2 can generate a database of splice junctions based on the gene model annotation file and thus provides a better mapping result than other nonsplice mapping tools. However, recent programs, including HiSat and STAR, are more robust in terms of resource utilization and mapping accuracy, but despite the limitations of TopHat2, the newer alignment programs generally yield similar results. For quantification of gene expression, we used HTSeq v0.6.1 to count the number of reads mapped to each gene. Read counts were normalized by conversion to fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM). Differential expression analysis of two conditions/groups (two biological replicates under each condition) was performed using the DESeq2 R package (1.18.0). DESeq2 determines differential expression using a model based on the negative binomial distribution, and statistical tests were done using a Wald chi-square test. The resulting P values were adjusted using the Benjamini-Hochberg approach for controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) (81). Genes with an adjusted P value of <0.05 found by DESeq2 were assigned as differentially expressed. Heat maps were plotted by the mean of FPKM values in groups. Row and column were clustered by hclust, and the values were centered and scaled in the row direction.

The reference genome for mouse, GRCm38, was released by the Genome Reference Consortium in January 2012. It is based on the Mus musculus strain C57BL/6J. This assembly was used by UCSC to create their mm10 database that corresponds to GenBank assembly accession number GCA_000001635.8.

Outcomes from RNA sequencing analyses were uploaded into Qiagen’s IPA system and overlaid with the global molecular network in the Ingenuity Pathway Knowledge Base (IPKB) to determine the canonical pathways and gene networks to classify differentially expressed genes. Heat map and hierarchical cluster analyses were used to demonstrate the expression patterns of these differentially expressed genes.

Ribosomal abundance and components.

Total RNA (from an equal number of cells) was used as a measure of ribosome abundance and translational capacity, since the majority of total RNA is rRNA, and nearly two-thirds of the ribosome is RNA (28, 53, 82, 83). Eukaryotic 80S ribosomes comprise a large, 60S subunit and a small, 40S subunit (84). The 60S subunit is composed of rRNA and 47 ribosomal large proteins required for peptide bond formation, the critical step in protein synthesis. Expression levels of ribosomal proteins were quantified using real-time PCR and immunoblotting.

Polysome profiling.

For polysome profiling, differentiated C2C12 myotubes were treated with 10 mM ammonium acetate for 24 h, and equal numbers of untreated myotubes were used as a control. At the end of 24 h, untreated and AmAc-treated myotubes were treated with 100 μg/ml cycloheximide (CHX) for 10 min, followed by two washes with 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 100 μg/ml cycloheximide. Cells were then collected in 1× PBS containing 100 μg/ml cycloheximide and centrifuged for 3 min at 2,000 rpm, and the pellet was suspended in 200 μl of ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES [pH 7.4], 250 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 250 mM sucrose, 1% Triton X-100, 1.3% sodium deoxycholate, 1× protease cocktail inhibitor [catalog number P8340; Sigma], 1 mM 1,4-dithiothreitol [DTT], 200 U/ml RNase inhibitor [catalog number N261A; Promega]) and homogenized by aspiration and injection via a 26-gauge needle. The lysate was placed on ice for 10 min, followed by centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 10 min. Supernatants were transferred into a fresh Eppendorf tube, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C for subsequent analyses. Buffers containing 20 and 47% sucrose were prepared in a solution containing 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 5 mM MgCl2, 75 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, 1× protease inhibitor cocktail, 4 U/ml RNase inhibitor, and 100 μg/ml cycloheximide and used for the gradient generation. Linear gradients were prepared using a Foxy Jr. gradient maker (Teledyne Isco, Lincoln, NE) and stored at 4°C for a minimum of 1 h. Two hundred microliters of the cell lysate was loaded on top of a 20 to 47% linear sucrose density gradient, followed by ultracentrifugation at 29,000 rpm for 4 h at 4°C. Gradients were eluted immediately after ultracentrifugation, fractions were collected using an Isco model fraction collector, and absorbance was measured using a UV absorbance monitor (Teledyne Isco, Lincoln, NE). The ratio of polysomes to polysomes and monosomes was quantified in ammonia-treated myotubes and normalized to that in untreated controls in 3 biological replicates. These experiments were performed using an equal number of myotubes. The use of an equal quantity of proteins or RNA may not be the best approach for these experiments because a lower number of ribosomes in a cell will result in lower total RNA (80 to 90% rRNA) and lower total protein concentrations due to decreased protein synthesis.

Ribosomal protein kinetics.

Since some of the ribosome proteins can be very stable after incorporation into ribosomes, the half-life of ribosome proteins was evaluated by a cycloheximide chase assay using previously reported methods, with some modifications (85). Since cycloheximide inhibits the translation of new protein synthesis, and MG132 prevents proteasome degradation, the expression of ribosomal proteins in response to cycloheximide is a measure of the rate of degradation, and the response to MG132 can be used as a measure of the rate of translation. The use of different combinations of cycloheximide, MG132, and hyperammonemia will allow for determination of protein stability. Briefly, C2C12 myotubes differentiated for 48 h were either untreated or treated with 20 μg/ml of CHX (Sigma-Aldrich) for 24 h to block translation as a measure of protein stability. To determine the proteasomal breakdown of the ribosomal proteins, myotubes were also treated with and without a potent proteasome inhibitor, MG132 (20 μM), for the last hour during the 24-h treatment with 10 mM ammonium acetate. Cells were harvested in ice-cold radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer with 1× protease inhibitor cocktail at various time points. Total protein from the cell lysate was quantified using the bicinchoninic acid assay, and equal concentrations of samples were loaded onto 10% SDS-PAGE gels for immunoblotting for the expression of the ribosomal proteins RPL5, -23, and -32. Additionally, to dissect the role of mTORC1 inhibition during 24 h of hyperammonemia, myotubes were treated with and without rapamycin (1 μg/ml) for the last 12 h, expression levels of ribosomal protein mRNA were quantified by real-time PCR, and total and phosphorylated P70S6 kinase protein levels were determined by immunoblotting.

Proteomics studies in myotubes.

Untreated C2C12 myotubes and myotubes treated with 10 mM AmAc for 24 h were washed in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and centrifuged at 800 rpm at 4°C, and the cell pellets were transferred to 1.5-ml centrifuge tubes. A 200-μl aliquot of 8 M urea in 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8) with a Complete Mini protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) was added to each sample. The samples were placed on ice and lysed four times for 15 s each at 70% energy using an ultrasonic cell disruptor. Lysed samples were centrifuged, and the supernatant was transferred to a new Eppendorf tube. Five microliters of the supernatant was used for quantifying protein concentrations using the bicinchoninic acid assay. A 40-μg aliquot of each sample was removed for digestion. For protein digestion, the samples were reduced with DTT and alkylated with iodoacetamide prior to in-solution digestion. All samples were digested using trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI) by adding 1 μg trypsin in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate and incubating the samples overnight at room temperature. The peptides were desalted using Sep-Pak C18 columns (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA). These extracts were evaporated in a SpeedVac and then resuspended in 1% acetic acid to make up a final concentration of ∼0.2 μg/μl for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis.

Unbiased proteomics were performed on a Thermo Scientific Fusion Lumos hybrid mass spectrometry system (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA). The high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column used was a Dionex 15-cm- by 75-μm-internal-diameter Acclaim PepMap C18, 2-μm, 100-Å, reversed-phase capillary chromatography column (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA). Five-microliter volumes of the extract were injected, and the peptides eluted from the column by an acetonitrile–0.1% formic acid gradient at a flow rate of 0.3 μl/min were introduced into the source of the mass spectrometer online. The microelectrospray ion source is operated at 1.9 kV. The acquisition method was a data-dependent-based MS/MS method that begins with a full MS scan in an Orbitrap analyzer (60,000 resolution), followed by selection of the parent ions in the MS scans, fragmentation by high-energy collision-induced dissociation (HCD), and detection with the Orbitrap analyzer. The data were analyzed using MaxQuant V1.5.2.8 with the search engine Andromeda, which is integrated in MaxQuant software, and the parameters used were default settings for an Orbitrap instrument. The database used to search the tandem MS (MS/MS) spectra was the UniProt mouse protein database containing 25,035 entries with an automatically generated decoy database (reversed sequences). Oxidation of methionine and acetylation of protein N termini were set as dynamic modifications, and carbamidomethylation of cysteine was set as a static modification. The false discovery rate (FDR) was set to 1% for both peptide and protein, with a minimum length of 7 amino acids, and two unique or razor peptides were required for positive identification. The “match between runs” feature of MaxQuant was used to transfer identifications to other LC-MS/MS runs based on their masses and retention times (maximum deviation of 0.7 min), and this was also used in quantification experiments. Quantifications were performed with the label-free quantitation method available in the MaxQuant program (86).

Quantitative real-time PCR.

Total RNA was extracted using the TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and quantified as previously described (47). Reverse transcription was performed using a Clontech Advantage RT-for-PCR kit (TaKaRa Bio USA, Mountain View, CA), followed by quantification using real-time PCR (RT-PCR) on a Stratagene RT-PCR thermocycler. The primer sequences are shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2.

Primers used in this study

Primer Positions Sequence Product size (bp)
Hu 45S rRNA FW 851–868 5′-GAACGGTGGTGTGTCGTT-3′ 130
Hu 45S rRNA Re 961–980 5′-GCGTCTCGTCTCGTCTCACT-3′
Mu 45S rRNA FW 434–455 5′-CTGAGAAACGGCTACCACATC-3′ 107
Mu 45S rRNA Re 519–541 5′-GCCTCGAAAGAGTCCTGTATTG-3′
RT 45S rRNA FW 984–1004 5′-AAGACGAACCAGAGCGAAAG-3′ 98
RT 45S rRNA Re 1062–1082 5′-TCGGAACTACGACGGTATCT-3′
Mu RPS26 FW 215–235 5′-GTGCTTCCCAAGCTCTATGT-3′ 81
Mu RPS26 Re 276–296 5′-GCGGGATCGATTCCTAACAA-3′
Mu RPS21 FW 147–166 5′-CAAGACCTGCGTGGTAACT-3′ 101
Mu RPS21 Re 229–245 5′-GTTGCTTGCGGAGCATTT-3′
Mu RPS19 FW 221–240 5′-AAGTCCGGGAAGCTGAAAG-3′ 103
Mu RPS19 Re 308–328 5′-GAAGCAGCTCGTGTGTAGAA-3′
Mu RPL5 FW 485–507 5′-GGAGGTGAATGGAGGTGAATAC-3′ 97
Mu RPL5 Re 562–582 5′-GTCTTGCCCGAACTACAACT-3′
Mu RPL23 FW 203–224 5-CTCTGTGAAGGGAATCAAGGG-3′ 129
Mu RPL23 Re 310–332 5′-TACATCCAGCAGTGGTAATTCG-3′
Mu RPL32 FW 225–245 5′-CGGTTATGGGAGCAACAAGA-3′ 128
Mu RPL32 Re 331–353 5′-TCTTACTGTGCTGAGATTGCTC-3′
Hu RPS26 FW 1043–1063 5′-TCCCAAAGTGCTGGGATTAC-3′ 84
Hu RPS26 Re 1103–1127 5′-CCAACCATACGACCACAATTAAAG-3′
Hu RPS21 FW 174–195 5′-AGGTCACAGGCAGGTTTAATG-3′ 98
Hu RPS21 Re 252–272 5′-ATTCCATTCTCCGATTGGCC-3′
Hu RPS19 FW 18–40 5′-GTATTCTCCACCACTGTTCCTT-3′ 105
Hu RPS19 Re 101–123 5′-CTCTCTCTATTACACTCCGGGA-3′
Hu RPL5 FW 135–157 5′-TAGAAGACGACGAGAGGGTAAA-3′ 115
Hu RPL5 Re 227–250 5′-TGATAGTTCGTGTGACAAACAGA-3′
Hu RPL23 FW 872–894 5′-ACTGCTCAATGACTGGCTATACA-3′ 105
Hu RPL23 Re 956–977 5′-TAATCCCAACACTTTCGGAGG-3′
Hu RPL32 FW 708–730 5′-GCACAGACTAGCCTTAGTCATC-3′ 92
Hu RPL32 Re 777–800 5′-GGTAGGTTCTGAGACACTTGAAGA-3′

Immunoblotting.

Protein extraction from skeletal muscle and myotubes followed by quantification was performed as previously described (51). In brief, cell lysates (30 μg protein) were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, electrotransferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane, and incubated overnight with the appropriate primary antibody, followed by washes and incubation with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-tagged secondary antibody. Signals were revealed by an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagent (GE Healthcare, Marlborough, MA) and visualized by autoradiography. Expression of β-actin was used to confirm equal loading of protein for all immunoblot assays. Blots were quantified using ImageJ software (87).

Immunoprecipitation assays.

Cells were harvested in lysis buffer containing 20 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 137 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 20% glycerol, 10 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 2 μg/ml leupeptin and aprotinin. The lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatant solutions were used for immunoprecipitation. Proteins (β-catenin and IKKβ) were immunoprecipitated by incubating the cell lysates with protein A/G-agarose beads (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and the respective antibodies at 1:500 dilutions, overnight at 4°C. Associated proteins were probed with the appropriate antibodies at a 1:1,000 dilution overnight, followed by incubation with HRP-tagged secondary antibody. Signals were revealed with ECL reagent (GE Healthcare, Marlborough, MA) and visualized by autoradiography. Input protein loading and IgG for nonspecific responses were also blotted.

Transfection.

Mutant β-catenin constructs that were resistant to phosphorylation by GSK3β (S33Y) and casein kinase 1α (S45K) as well as N-terminally deleted β-catenin were generated as previously reported (88). Cassettes with shRNA to IKKβ and IKKα were made from Sigma Mission shRNA clones (3 clones each) as a multimer driven by the U6 promoter for each clone. Myoblasts were transfected using Mirus TransIT-2020 transfection reagent (Mirus, Madison, WI). To determine if the responses to chemical inhibition of GSK3β using either lithium chloride or BIO were specifically due to GSK3β, genetic depletion of GSK3α and GSK3β was achieved using shRNA, stable clones were selected, and protein synthesis in response to hyperammonemia was studied.

Protein synthesis in myotubes.

The rate of muscle protein synthesis was quantified in differentiated C2C12 myotubes in response to 10 mM ammonium acetate or the vehicle alone as previously described by us (51). Incorporation of either [3H]phenylalanine or puromycin was used for these assays. In brief, following incubation in 10 mM ammonium acetate or the vehicle, myotubes were washed, incubated with 1 μCi of [3H]phenylalanine for 3 h, and then washed and lysed, and the protein content and radioactivity were quantified. The rate of incorporation of [3H]phenylalanine was expressed as counts per minute per milligram of protein. Phenylalanine was the preferred amino acid because it is not synthesized (essential amino acid) or catabolized by the myotubes.

For puromycin incorporation as a readout for protein synthesis, a protocol described previously by us was used (51). In brief, ammonia-treated or untreated control myotubes were incubated with 1 μg/ml puromycin for 30 min, and cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting using antipuromycin antibody (1:10,000 dilution). Densitometry of all the bands on each lane across the entire molecular weight range of puromycin-incorporated protein was quantified and normalized using β-actin protein. All experiments were done in at least 3 biological replicates.

Reporter assays.

β-Catenin signaling was assessed using Topflash and control Fopflash luciferase reporters. The Topflash reporter plasmid contains three copies of 2 sets of wild-type T-cell factor (TCF) binding sites driving luciferase gene expression; the control construct Fopflash contains mutated TCF binding sites. Topflash and Fopflash were obtained from Upstate Cell Signaling Solutions (Billerica, MA). A Renilla luciferase reporter vector was used as an internal control and was obtained from Promega (Madison, WI). These assays were performed as previously reported, and luciferase luminescence normalized to values for Renilla transfection (89).

In vitro kinase assays.

Kinase reactions were performed by mixing purified glutathione S-transferase (GST)-tagged β-catenin (500 ng) with either purified GSK3β (10 ng) or IKKβ (10 ng) in kinase assay buffer containing 5 mM morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) (pH 7.2), 2.5 mM glycerol phosphate, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 0.4 mM EDTA, and 0.05 mM DTT with 50 μM ATP. Reaction mixtures without β-catenin, GSK3β, or IKKβ served as negative controls. The reaction mixture was incubated at 30°C for 60 min, and the reaction was stopped by adding SDS-PAGE sample buffer, followed by incubation at 95°C for 5 min. Samples were separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel, transferred to a PVDF membrane, and incubated with phospho-β-catenin (Ser33/37/Thr41) that detects only the phosphorylated form but not unphosphorylated β-catenin (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA). Purity of the proteins used for the kinase assay was tested by immunoblotting.

Statistical analyses.

All experiments were performed in at least 3 biological replicates in myotubes or in vitro experiments. All data are expressed as means ± standard deviations (SD) unless otherwise stated. Analysis of variance with a Bonferroni post hoc or Student t test was performed to compare quantitative variables, and a P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Data availability.

All sequencing files have been uploaded to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) (BioProject accession number PRJNA495054).

Supplementary Material

Supplemental file 1
MCB.00451-18-s0001.xlsx (325.6KB, xlsx)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported in part by NIH grants RO1 GM119174 (S.D. and G.R.S.), RO1 DK 113196 (S.D.), P50 AA024333 (S.D.), R21 AR 71046 (S.D., G.D., and O.W.), and UO1 AA021893 (S.D.) and by the Mikati Foundation (G.D. and S.D.). The Fusion Lumos instrument was purchased via an NIH shared-instrument grant, 1S10OD023436-01.

Guidance for polysome profiling was provided by Scott Kimball from Penn State University, Hershey, PA. Technical assistance and support were provided by Varalakshmi Veera.

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00451-18.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Thomson E, Ferreira-Cerca S, Hurt E. 2013. Eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis at a glance. J Cell Sci 126:4815–4821. doi: 10.1242/jcs.111948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Belin S, Beghin A, Solano-Gonzalez E, Bezin L, Brunet-Manquat S, Textoris J, Prats AC, Mertani HC, Dumontet C, Diaz JJ. 2009. Dysregulation of ribosome biogenesis and translational capacity is associated with tumor progression of human breast cancer cells. PLoS One 4:e7147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sanchez CG, Teixeira FK, Czech B, Preall JB, Zamparini AL, Seifert JR, Malone CD, Hannon GJ, Lehmann R. 2016. Regulation of ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis controls germline stem cell differentiation. Cell Stem Cell 18:276–290. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chaillou T, Zhang X, McCarthy JJ. 2016. Expression of muscle-specific ribosomal protein L3-like impairs myotube growth. J Cell Physiol 231:1894–1902. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kirby TJ, Lee JD, England JH, Chaillou T, Esser KA, McCarthy JJ. 2015. Blunted hypertrophic response in aged skeletal muscle is associated with decreased ribosome biogenesis. J Appl Physiol 119:321–327. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00296.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chaillou T, Kirby TJ, McCarthy JJ. 2014. Ribosome biogenesis: emerging evidence for a central role in the regulation of skeletal muscle mass. J Cell Physiol 229:1584–1594. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Viktorovskaya OV, Schneider DA. 2015. Functional divergence of eukaryotic RNA polymerases: unique properties of RNA polymerase I suit its cellular role. Gene 556:19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2014.10.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Moss T, Langlois F, Gagnon-Kugler T, Stefanovsky V. 2007. A housekeeper with power of attorney: the rRNA genes in ribosome biogenesis. Cell Mol Life Sci 64:29–49. doi: 10.1007/s00018-006-6278-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Campbell KJ, White RJ. 2014. MYC regulation of cell growth through control of transcription by RNA polymerases I and III. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 4:a018408. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dai MS, Lu H. 2008. Crosstalk between c-Myc and ribosome in ribosomal biogenesis and cancer. J Cell Biochem 105:670–677. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Arabi A, Wu S, Ridderstrale K, Bierhoff H, Shiue C, Fatyol K, Fahlen S, Hydbring P, Soderberg O, Grummt I, Larsson LG, Wright AP. 2005. c-Myc associates with ribosomal DNA and activates RNA polymerase I transcription. Nat Cell Biol 7:303–310. doi: 10.1038/ncb1225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schlosser I, Holzel M, Murnseer M, Burtscher H, Weidle UH, Eick D. 2003. A role for c-Myc in the regulation of ribosomal RNA processing. Nucleic Acids Res 31:6148–6156. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Guo QM, Malek RL, Kim S, Chiao C, He M, Ruffy M, Sanka K, Lee NH, Dang CV, Liu ET. 2000. Identification of c-myc responsive genes using rat cDNA microarray. Cancer Res 60:5922–5928. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Poortinga G, Wall M, Sanij E, Siwicki K, Ellul J, Brown D, Holloway TP, Hannan RD, McArthur GA. 2011. c-MYC coordinately regulates ribosomal gene chromatin remodeling and Pol I availability during granulocyte differentiation. Nucleic Acids Res 39:3267–3281. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.van Riggelen J, Yetil A, Felsher DW. 2010. MYC as a regulator of ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis. Nat Rev Cancer 10:301–309. doi: 10.1038/nrc2819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kim S, Li Q, Dang CV, Lee LA. 2000. Induction of ribosomal genes and hepatocyte hypertrophy by adenovirus-mediated expression of c-Myc in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:11198–11202. doi: 10.1073/pnas.200372597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Xiao G, Mao S, Baumgarten G, Serrano J, Jordan MC, Roos KP, Fishbein MC, MacLellan WR. 2001. Inducible activation of c-Myc in adult myocardium in vivo provokes cardiac myocyte hypertrophy and reactivation of DNA synthesis. Circ Res 89:1122–1129. doi: 10.1161/hh2401.100742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Armstrong DD, Esser KA. 2005. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling activates growth-control genes during overload-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 289:C853–C859. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00093.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Armstrong DD, Wong VL, Esser KA. 2006. Expression of beta-catenin is necessary for physiological growth of adult skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 291:C185–C188. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00644.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Aschenbach WG, Ho RC, Sakamoto K, Fujii N, Li Y, Kim YB, Hirshman MF, Goodyear LJ. 2006. Regulation of dishevelled and beta-catenin in rat skeletal muscle: an alternative exercise-induced GSK-3beta signaling pathway. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 291:E152–E158. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00180.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ikeda S, Kishida S, Yamamoto H, Murai H, Koyama S, Kikuchi A. 1998. Axin, a negative regulator of the Wnt signaling pathway, forms a complex with GSK-3beta and beta-catenin and promotes GSK-3beta-dependent phosphorylation of beta-catenin. EMBO J 17:1371–1384. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.5.1371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kishida S, Yamamoto H, Ikeda S, Kishida M, Sakamoto I, Koyama S, Kikuchi A. 1998. Axin, a negative regulator of the Wnt signaling pathway, directly interacts with adenomatous polyposis coli and regulates the stabilization of beta-catenin. J Biol Chem 273:10823–10826. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.18.10823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lin K, Wang S, Julius MA, Kitajewski J, Moos M Jr, Luyten FP. 1997. The cysteine-rich frizzled domain of Frzb-1 is required and sufficient for modulation of Wnt signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:11196–11200. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.21.11196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yochum GS, Sherrick CM, Macpartlin M, Goodman RH. 2010. A beta-catenin/TCF-coordinated chromatin loop at MYC integrates 5′ and 3′ Wnt responsive enhancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:145–150. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912294107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liu C, Li Y, Semenov M, Han C, Baeg GH, Tan Y, Zhang Z, Lin X, He X. 2002. Control of beta-catenin phosphorylation/degradation by a dual-kinase mechanism. Cell 108:837–847. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00685-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sui Y, Liu Z, Park SH, Thatcher SE, Zhu B, Fernandez JP, Molina H, Kern PA, Zhou C. 2018. IKKbeta is a beta-catenin kinase that regulates mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. JCI Insight 3:96660. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.96660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pereira MG, Dyar KA, Nogara L, Solagna F, Marabita M, Baraldo M, Chemello F, Germinario E, Romanello V, Nolte H, Blaauw B. 2017. Comparative analysis of muscle hypertrophy models reveals divergent gene transcription profiles and points to translational regulation of muscle growth through increased mTOR signaling. Front Physiol 8:968. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mobley CB, Mumford PW, Kephart WC, Haun CT, Holland AM, Beck DT, Martin JS, Young KC, Anderson RG, Patel RK, Langston GL, Lowery RP, Wilson JM, Roberts MD. 2017. Aging in rats differentially affects markers of transcriptional and translational capacity in soleus and plantaris muscle. Front Physiol 8:518. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stec MJ, Mayhew DL, Bamman MM. 2015. The effects of age and resistance loading on skeletal muscle ribosome biogenesis. J Appl Physiol 119:851–857. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00489.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Haddad F, Adams GR. 2006. Aging-sensitive cellular and molecular mechanisms associated with skeletal muscle hypertrophy. J Appl Physiol 100:1188–1203. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01227.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Roberts MD, Kerksick CM, Dalbo VJ, Hassell SE, Tucker PS, Brown R. 2010. Molecular attributes of human skeletal muscle at rest and after unaccustomed exercise: an age comparison. J Strength Cond Res 24:1161–1168. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181da786f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dasarathy S, Muc S, Hisamuddin K, Edmison JM, Dodig M, McCullough AJ, Kalhan SC. 2007. Altered expression of genes regulating skeletal muscle mass in the portacaval anastomosis rat. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 292:G1105–G1113. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00529.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dasarathy S, Mullen KD, Conjeevaram HS, Kaminsky-Russ K, Wills LA, McCullough AJ. 2002. Preservation of portal pressure improves growth and metabolic profile in the male portacaval-shunted rat. Dig Dis Sci 47:1936–1942. doi: 10.1023/A:1019683703951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Holecek M. 2012. Muscle wasting in animal models of severe illness. Int J Exp Pathol 93:157–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2613.2012.00812.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Molinari F, Malara N, Mollace V, Rosano G, Ferraro E. 2016. Animal models of cardiac cachexia. Int J Cardiol 219:105–110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Langen RC, Gosker HR, Remels AH, Schols AM. 2013. Triggers and mechanisms of skeletal muscle wasting in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 45:2245–2256. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2013.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dasarathy S, Hatzoglou M. 2018. Hyperammonemia and proteostasis in cirrhosis. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 21:30–36. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Qiu J, Thapaliya S, Runkana A, Yang Y, Tsien C, Mohan ML, Narayanan A, Eghtesad B, Mozdziak PE, McDonald C, Stark GR, Welle S, Naga Prasad SV, Dasarathy S. 2013. Hyperammonemia in cirrhosis induces transcriptional regulation of myostatin by an NF-kappaB-mediated mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:18162–18167. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317049110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Qiu J, Tsien C, Thapalaya S, Narayanan A, Weihl CC, Ching JK, Eghtesad B, Singh K, Fu X, Dubyak G, McDonald C, Almasan A, Hazen SL, Naga Prasad SV, Dasarathy S. 2012. Hyperammonemia-mediated autophagy in skeletal muscle contributes to sarcopenia of cirrhosis. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 303:E983–E993. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00183.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dasarathy S, Mookerjee RP, Rackayova V, Rangroo Thrane V, Vairappan B, Ott P, Rose CF. 2017. Ammonia toxicity: from head to toe? Metab Brain Dis 32:529–538. doi: 10.1007/s11011-016-9938-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shanely RA, Coast JR. 2002. Effect of ammonia on in vitro diaphragmatic contractility, fatigue and recovery. Respiration 69:534–541. doi: 10.1159/000066459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Weiner ID, Mitch WE, Sands JM. 2015. Urea and ammonia metabolism and the control of renal nitrogen excretion. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 10:1444–1458. doi: 10.2215/CJN.10311013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tsien C, Davuluri G, Singh D, Allawy A, Ten Have GA, Thapaliya S, Schulze JM, Barnes D, McCullough AJ, Engelen MP, Deutz NE, Dasarathy S. 2015. Metabolic and molecular responses to leucine-enriched branched chain amino acid supplementation in the skeletal muscle of alcoholic cirrhosis. Hepatology 61:2018–2029. doi: 10.1002/hep.27717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Durand F, Buyse S, Francoz C, Laouenan C, Bruno O, Belghiti J, Moreau R, Vilgrain V, Valla D. 2014. Prognostic value of muscle atrophy in cirrhosis using psoas muscle thickness on computed tomography. J Hepatol 60:1151–1157. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kumar A, Davuluri G, Silva RNE, Engelen M, Ten Have GAM, Prayson R, Deutz NEP, Dasarathy S. 2017. Ammonia lowering reverses sarcopenia of cirrhosis by restoring skeletal muscle proteostasis. Hepatology 65:2045–2058. doi: 10.1002/hep.29107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kant S, Davuluri G, Alchirazi KA, Welch N, Heit C, Kumar A, Gangadhariah M, Kim A, McMullen MR, Willard B, Luse DS, Nagy LE, Vasiliou V, Marini AM, Weiner D, Dasarathy S. 2019. Ethanol sensitizes skeletal muscle to ammonia-induced molecular perturbations. J Biol Chem 294:7231–7244. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.005411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Dasarathy S, McCullough AJ, Muc S, Schneyer A, Bennett CD, Dodig M, Kalhan SC. 2011. Sarcopenia associated with portosystemic shunting is reversed by follistatin. J Hepatol 54:915–921. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.08.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gingras AC, Raught B, Sonenberg N. 2001. Regulation of translation initiation by FRAP/mTOR. Genes Dev 15:807–826. doi: 10.1101/gad.887201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.You JS, Anderson GB, Dooley MS, Hornberger TA. 2015. The role of mTOR signaling in the regulation of protein synthesis and muscle mass during immobilization in mice. Dis Model Mech 8:1059–1069. doi: 10.1242/dmm.019414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dasarathy S, Muc S, Runkana A, Mullen KD, Kaminsky-Russ K, McCullough AJ. 2011. Alteration in body composition in the portacaval anastamosis rat is mediated by increased expression of myostatin. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 301:G731–G738. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00161.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Davuluri G, Krokowski D, Guan BJ, Kumar A, Thapaliya S, Singh D, Hatzoglou M, Dasarathy S. 2016. Metabolic adaptation of skeletal muscle to hyperammonemia drives the beneficial effects of L-leucine in cirrhosis. J Hepatol 65:929–937. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Holecek M, Sprongl L, Tichy M. 2000. Effect of hyperammonemia on leucine and protein metabolism in rats. Metabolism 49:1330–1334. doi: 10.1053/meta.2000.9531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nader GA, McLoughlin TJ, Esser KA. 2005. mTOR function in skeletal muscle hypertrophy: increased ribosomal RNA via cell cycle regulators. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 289:C1457–C1465. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00165.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Noubissi FK, Elcheva I, Bhatia N, Shakoori A, Ougolkov A, Liu J, Minamoto T, Ross J, Fuchs SY, Spiegelman VS. 2006. CRD-BP mediates stabilization of betaTrCP1 and c-myc mRNA in response to beta-catenin signalling. Nature 441:898–901. doi: 10.1038/nature04839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hagen T, Di Daniel E, Culbert AA, Reith AD. 2002. Expression and characterization of GSK-3 mutants and their effect on beta-catenin phosphorylation in intact cells. J Biol Chem 277:23330–23335. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M201364200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Thomas GM, Frame S, Goedert M, Nathke I, Polakis P, Cohen P. 1999. A GSK3-binding peptide from FRAT1 selectively inhibits the GSK3-catalysed phosphorylation of axin and beta-catenin. FEBS Lett 458:247–251. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)01161-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.DiDonato JA, Hayakawa M, Rothwarf DM, Zandi E, Karin M. 1997. A cytokine-responsive IkappaB kinase that activates the transcription factor NF-kappaB. Nature 388:548–554. doi: 10.1038/41493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Woronicz JD, Gao X, Cao Z, Rothe M, Goeddel DV. 1997. IkappaB kinase-beta: NF-kappaB activation and complex formation with IkappaB kinase-alpha and NIK. Science 278:866–869. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5339.866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Krappmann D, Hatada EN, Tegethoff S, Li J, Klippel A, Giese K, Baeuerle PA, Scheidereit C. 2000. The I kappa B kinase (IKK) complex is tripartite and contains IKK gamma but not IKAP as a regular component. J Biol Chem 275:29779–29787. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M003902200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Schott K, Poetter U, Neuhoff V. 1984. Ammonia inhibits protein synthesis in slices from young rat brain. J Neurochem 42:644–646. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1984.tb02730.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Helgeland K. 1984. Inhibitory effect of NH4Cl on secretion of collagen in human gingival fibroblasts. Scand J Dent Res 92:419–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Seglen PO. 1978. Effects of amino acids, ammonia and leupeptin on protein synthesis and degradation in isolated rat hepatocytes. Biochem J 174:469–474. doi: 10.1042/bj1740469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Egerman MA, Glass DJ. 2014. Signaling pathways controlling skeletal muscle mass. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 49:59–68. doi: 10.3109/10409238.2013.857291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Brogna S, Sato TA, Rosbash M. 2002. Ribosome components are associated with sites of transcription. Mol Cell 10:93–104. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00565-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Machida M, Takeda K, Yokono H, Ikemune S, Taniguchi Y, Kiyosawa H, Takemasa T. 2012. Reduction of ribosome biogenesis with activation of the mTOR pathway in denervated atrophic muscle. J Cell Physiol 227:1569–1576. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Haddad F, Roy RR, Zhong H, Edgerton VR, Baldwin KM. 2003. Atrophy responses to muscle inactivity. I. Cellular markers of protein deficits. J Appl Physiol 95:781–790. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00317.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Babij P, Booth FW. 1988. Alpha-actin and cytochrome c mRNAs in atrophied adult rat skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol 254:C651–C656. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1988.254.5.C651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Petersson B, Wernerman J, Waller SO, von der Decken A, Vinnars E. 1990. Elective abdominal surgery depresses muscle protein synthesis and increases subjective fatigue: effects lasting more than 30 days. Br J Surg 77:796–800. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800770725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Grandori C, Gomez-Roman N, Felton-Edkins ZA, Ngouenet C, Galloway DA, Eisenman RN, White RJ. 2005. c-Myc binds to human ribosomal DNA and stimulates transcription of rRNA genes by RNA polymerase I. Nat Cell Biol 7:311–318. doi: 10.1038/ncb1224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Bell SP, Learned RM, Jantzen HM, Tjian R. 1988. Functional cooperativity between transcription factors UBF1 and SL1 mediates human ribosomal RNA synthesis. Science 241:1192–1197. doi: 10.1126/science.3413483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Hempel WM, Cavanaugh AH, Hannan RD, Taylor L, Rothblum LI. 1996. The species-specific RNA polymerase I transcription factor SL-1 binds to upstream binding factor. Mol Cell Biol 16:557–563. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.2.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.He TC, Sparks AB, Rago C, Hermeking H, Zawel L, da Costa LT, Morin PJ, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW. 1998. Identification of c-MYC as a target of the APC pathway. Science 281:1509–1512. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5382.1509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Baek SH, Kioussi C, Briata P, Wang D, Nguyen HD, Ohgi KA, Glass CK, Wynshaw-Boris A, Rose DW, Rosenfeld MG. 2003. Regulated subset of G1 growth-control genes in response to derepression by the Wnt pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:3245–3250. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0330217100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Stambolic V, Ruel L, Woodgett JR. 1996. Lithium inhibits glycogen synthase kinase-3 activity and mimics wingless signalling in intact cells. Curr Biol 6:1664–1668. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)70790-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Rochat A, Fernandez A, Vandromme M, Moles JP, Bouschet T, Carnac G, Lamb NJ. 2004. Insulin and wnt1 pathways cooperate to induce reserve cell activation in differentiation and myotube hypertrophy. Mol Biol Cell 15:4544–4555. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e03-11-0816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Lamberti C, Lin KM, Yamamoto Y, Verma U, Verma IM, Byers S, Gaynor RB. 2001. Regulation of beta-catenin function by the IkappaB kinases. J Biol Chem 276:42276–42286. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M104227200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Gamble C, McIntosh K, Scott R, Ho KH, Plevin R, Paul A. 2012. Inhibitory kappa B kinases as targets for pharmacological regulation. Br J Pharmacol 165:802–819. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01608.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Davuluri G, Allawy A, Thapaliya S, Rennison JH, Singh D, Kumar A, Sandlers Y, Van Wagoner DR, Flask CA, Hoppel C, Kasumov T, Dasarathy S. 2016. Hyperammonaemia-induced skeletal muscle mitochondrial dysfunction results in cataplerosis and oxidative stress. J Physiol 594:7341–7360. doi: 10.1113/JP272796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.McDaniel J, Davuluri G, Hill EA, Moyer M, Runkana A, Prayson R, van Lunteren E, Dasarathy S. 2016. Hyperammonemia results in reduced muscle function independent of muscle mass. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 310:G163–G170. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00322.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Meijer L, Flajolet M, Greengard P. 2004. Pharmacological inhibitors of glycogen synthase kinase 3. Trends Pharmacol Sci 25:471–480. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2004.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Benjamini Y, Drai D, Elmer G, Kafkafi N, Golani I. 2001. Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behav Brain Res 125:279–284. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(01)00297-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Mobley CB, Fox CD, Thompson RM, Healy JC, Santucci V, Kephart WC, McCloskey AE, Kim M, Pascoe DD, Martin JS, Moon JR, Young KC, Roberts MD. 2016. Comparative effects of whey protein versus L-leucine on skeletal muscle protein synthesis and markers of ribosome biogenesis following resistance exercise. Amino Acids 48:733–750. doi: 10.1007/s00726-015-2121-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.McConkey EH. 1974. Composition of mammalian ribosomal subunits: a re-evaluation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 71:1379–1383. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.4.1379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Wilson DN, Doudna Cate JH. 2012. The structure and function of the eukaryotic ribosome. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4:a011536. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a011536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Patrick GN, Zhou P, Kwon YT, Howley PM, Tsai LH. 1998. p35, the neuronal-specific activator of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5) is degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. J Biol Chem 273:24057–24064. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.37.24057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Cox J, Hein MY, Luber CA, Paron I, Nagaraj N, Mann M. 2014. Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ. Mol Cell Proteomics 13:2513–2526. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.031591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Lee JM, Yang J, Newell P, Singh S, Parwani A, Friedman SL, Nejak-Bowen KN, Monga SP. 2014. Beta-catenin signaling in hepatocellular cancer: implications in inflammation, fibrosis, and proliferation. Cancer Lett 343:90–97. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.09.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Wessely O, Kim JI, Tran U, Fuentealba L, De Robertis EM. 2005. xBtg-x regulates Wnt/beta-catenin signaling during early Xenopus development. Dev Biol 283:17–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.03.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1
MCB.00451-18-s0001.xlsx (325.6KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

All sequencing files have been uploaded to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) (BioProject accession number PRJNA495054).


Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES