Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2019 Jul 30;14(7):e0220340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220340

Response of seedling growth and physiology of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench to saline-alkali stress

Jingkuan Sun 1,*, Lei He 1, Tian Li 1
Editor: Haitao Shi2
PMCID: PMC6667135  PMID: 31361760

Abstract

Soil salinization is a serious problem that affects the seedling growth in many regions. A greenhouse experiment was carried to investigate the adaptation ability of seedlings (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.) in coastal saline alkaline environment. Seedlings of sorghum were treated by different salt and alkali stress (NaCl: Na2SO4: NaHCO3 were 2:1:0, 2:1:1, 2:1:2). The treatments consisted of three levels of salinity (100, 200 and 300 mmol/L) and pH values were 7.08, 8.78 and 9.04. The results showed that the seedlings of sorghum have good adaptability to salt stress under low pH (pH ≤7.08). The plant height, the maximum leave areas of seedlings all dropped and root length first ascended and then descended with the increasing of salt and alkali stress. The contents of Chlorophyll b degraded significantly under salt and alkali stress. Salt and alkali stress stimulated the accumulation of organic solutes (proline and protein) and inorganic ions (Na+, Cl-, SO42-). Our results showed that salt and alkali stress have significant effect on growth indexes except root length and the interaction effect has significantly on physiology.

Introduction

Soil salinization has become one of the most serious global environmental problems. There are more than 800 hectares salt-affected lands throughout the world [1]. Although a lot of considerable measures have been taken on this problem, Salt stress plays an important role in plant growth and physiological indexes [24]. When HCO3 and /or CO32– are contained in saline soil, the soil pH (potential of hydrogen) increased, crops will be exposed to saline-alkali stress.

Seedling growth is the vitally important stage on the process of the plant growth. The adaptation of different seedlings to the environment may be different [56]. There are many reports on the physiological and ecological research of plants on salt stress, in generally, plant height, fresh and dry biomass, photosynthesis are inhibited by high levels of salt stress [710].

Sorghum bicolor is an energy plant with high biomass yield and a wild variety of ecological functions. It has good adaptability to salt stress and belongs to C4 plant with the high photosynthetic rate, which is considered to be one of the most potential energy plants [11]. It has great significance of exploring seedling growth mechanism under saline-alkaline stress for expanding the sorghum planting area, development and utilization of land resources and relieving the energy crisis.

Materials and methods

Plant material and cultivation condition

Sorghum Seeds were collected from institution of plant research in Chinese Academy of Sciences. Relatively uniform seeds were planted plastic pots(32 cm in diameter), filled with 8 kg of washed sand (through 2 mm sieve). After the seeds germination, 20 seedlings are contained in each pot, watered with Hoagland nutrient solution at 18:00 every day. All of the pots were placed in the green house with day average temperatures 22.5°Cand night average temperature 13.6°C.

Stress treatment

According to the soil conditions in the Yellow River Delta, three salts (NaCl, Na2SO4, NaHCO3) mixed in an quality ratio were used for simulating saline-alkali stress. The treatment group labeled as A, B, C in order according to gradually increasing proportion of alkaline salts. The quality ratio of each group (NaCl:Na2SO4:NaHCO3 were 2:1:0, 2:1:1, 2:1:2. Treatments consisted of three levels of salinity (100, 200 and 300 mmol/L) in each of three pH levels: A (pH 7.08±0.02), B (pH 8.78±0.17), C (pH 9.04±0.14), the control groups were watered by Hoagland nutrient solution(CK). In each treatment group, with the increase of salt concentration, pH has no significant change because of buffer system. Stress treatments were according to the methods Shi and Li [2,10].

Growth index determination

Two weeks later, the plants were harvested and washed clean. The roots, stems, and leaves of plants are separated, roots length, plants height, the maximum leaves areas were measured and weighed. Relative growth rate (RGR) was determined by the following formula[12].

RGR=lnfinaldrybiomasslninitialdrybiomassDurationoftreatment(days)

Physiological index determination

Physiological parameters were measured during the experimental period. Net photosynthetic rate were measured after one week treatment per cultivar per treatment combination using a CIRAS-2 portable photosynthesis system. The light intensity was maintained at 1200 μmol· m-2·s-1 on the third leaf.

Chlorophylls a and b and total concentrations were determined using compounding solution of 5 mL 80% acetone and 5 mL 95% ethanol. The sample was completely socked in the compounding solution in the test tube, and was measured until the color changing to white. Physiological parameters were measured during the experimental period. Superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), malondialdehyde (MDA), the proline and total soluble proteins were measured by test kit from Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China.

Inorganic cations and anions

Dry leave samples were homogenized by powdering, 400 mg dry leave samples were treated with acid digestion to measured the contents of K+, Na+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ by atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AA-6800). For Cl-, SO42-, NO3- determination, 100 mg of dry leave samples were taken and heated in 10 mL of distill water at 100°C, then determine the content by ion chromatography (ICS-2000).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed by the SPSS 16.0 software package. Two-way ANOVA was performed to test the significance of main effects (salinity and pH) and their interaction on physiological indices.

Results

Response of seedling growth of sorghum to saline-alkali stress

Biomass decreased with increasing saline–alkali stress except for treatment group A1 and B2 (Table 1). With the increasing of salinity and alkalinity, the plant height and the maximum leave areas all dropped except for treatment group A1 (Table 1), which have the maximum values and were significant differences between the other groups. The greatest inhibition was the C3 treatment with the salinity was 300 mmol/L and the pH value was 9.04, plant height, the maximum leave areas, root length were respectively decreased to 43.66%, 78.47%, 29.17% comparing to the control. The biomass percentage of dry biomass of sorghum to saline-alkali stress was shown (Fig 1). The lowest biomass percentage of stem and leaf was found in C3.

Table 1. Plant height, the maximum leave areas, root length, biomass and relative growth rate (RGR) of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench seedlings under various salt and alkali stresses.

Treatment Salinity Plant height Leaf area Root length Biomass RGR(%)
(mmol/) (cm) (cm2) (cm) (mg)
CK 0 38.89±0.90a 46.03±1.41a 13.78±0.95a 374.10±21.75a 13.37±0.42a
A1 100 46.64±2.44b 60.16±7.54b 14.18±0.46a 379.20±19.17a 13.48±0.36a
A2 200 38.04±2.97ac 47.25±9.00ac 15.51±1.02ab 371.60±45.88a 13.25±0.84a
A3 300 31.45±1.09de 32.37±3.00d 14.74±0.37ac 246.40±11.82bc 10.40±0.35bd
B1 100 33.72±2.68ad 40.68±2.84ade 18.04±0.28b 340.60±11.71ad 12.72±0.25ac
B2 200 32.90±1.39cdf 34.10±2.90ae 16.99±1.22bce 406.20±7.75a 13.98±0.14a
B3 300 26.74±1.18egh 26.89±2.53f 13.28±0.97ad 215.30±19.68b 9.39±0.69b
C1 100 28.11±1.31fg 31.31±0.2672dg 14.97±0.44ade 293.30±41.75cd 11.52±0.98cd
C2 200 24.33±0.62gh 19.44±1.71h 15.00±0.54ade 204.60±4.16b 9.08±0.14b
C3 300 21.91±1.19h 9.91±1.46i 9.76±1.44f 128.30±4.50e 5.75±0.25e

Note: Values represent means±S.E. Values at each treatment group followed by different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).

Fig 1. Response of the persentation of dry biomass of sorghum to saline-alkali stress.

Fig 1

Note: Values represent means±S.E. Values at each treatment group followed by different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).

Growth index of sorghum seedlings were significantly affect by salinity (F2,18 = 20.206, P<0.001 for plant height; F2,18 = 17.044, P<0.001 for leaf area; F2,18 = 14.167, P<0.001 for root length; F2,18 = 33.545, P<0.001 for biomass; F2,18 = 52.137, P<0.001 for RGR) and alkalinity (F2,18 = 43.848, P<0.001 for plant height; F2,18 = 26.908, P<0.001 for leaf area; F2,18 = 8.572, P<0.01 for root length; F2,18 = 25.298, P<0.001 for biomass; F2,18 = 41.443, P<0.001 for RGR) (Table 2).

Table 2. Two-way ANOVA of effects of salinity (S), alkalinity (A), and their interactions on growth, physiological index organic solutes, inorganic cations and anions of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench seedlings.

Source of variation
S A S×A
Plant height/cm 20.206*** <0.001 43.848*** <0.001 2.280 n.s. 0.101
Leaf area/cm2 17.044*** <0.001 26.908*** <0.001 0.654 n.s. 0.632
Root length/cm 14.167*** <0.001 8.572** <0.01 3.929* <0.05
Biomass/mg 33.545*** <0.001 25.298*** <0.001 2.927n.s. 0.05
RGR (%) 52.137*** <0.001 41.443*** <0.001 3.809* <0.05
Chl a /mg·g-1 5.482* <0.05 16.867*** <0.001 8.304** <0.01
Chl b /mg·g-1 5.661* <0.05 3.285n.s. 0.061 1.171n.s. 0.356
Chl (a+b) /mg·g-1 6.790** <0.01 12.742*** <0.001 5.813** <0.01
Pn /umol·m-2·s-1 204.800*** <0.001 497.500*** <0.001 254.258*** <0.001
Proline content/mg ·g-1·DW 134.073*** <0.001 1.289n.s. 0.300 1.239n.s. 0.330
Soluble protein/ mg·g-1·FW 21.111*** <0.001 11.942** <0.01 0.965n.s. 0.451
SOD activity/Umg-1prot 6.183** <0.01 6.444** <0.01 2.337n.s. 0.095
CAT activity /Umg-1prot· 1.447n.s. 0.261 4.174* <0.05 1.389n.s. 0.277
POD activity /Umg-1prot· 10.749** <0.01 4.307* <0.05 3.912* <0.05
MDA content /mmol·g-1prot 2.297n.s. 0.129 1.191n.s. 0.327 0.442n.s. 0.777
Na+ content 608.785*** <0.001 58.987*** <0.001 15.454*** <0.001
K+ content 9.205** <0.01 97.962*** <0.001 11.382*** <0.001
Mg2+ content 17.130*** <0.001 7.815** <0.01 0.380n.s. 0.820
Ca2+ content 22.355*** <0.001 12.882*** <0.001 6.844** <0.01
Cl- content 325.295*** <0.001 42.798*** <0.001 9.035*** <0.001
SO42-content 216.531*** <0.001 110.247*** <0.001 10.853*** <0.001

Note: Data represent F-values at 0.05 level.

*p < 0.05;

**P < 0.01;

***P < 0.001;

n.s., non significant.

Response of chlorophyll and net photosynthetic rate of sorghum to saline-alkali stress

The content of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll (a+b) and net photosynthetic rate were significantly affected by the salinity (F2,18 = 5.482, P<0.05, F2,18 = 6.790, P<0.01, F2,18 = 204.800, P<0.001), alkalinity (F2,18 = 16.867, P<0.01, F2,18 = 12.742, P<0.001, F2,18 = 497.500, P<0.001) and the interaction of salinity and alkalinity (F4,18 = 8.304, P<0.01, F4,18 = 5.813, P<0.01, F4,18 = 254.258, P<0.001) (Table 2). Salinity and alkalinity reduce net photosynthetic rate, the maximum and minimum net photosynthetic rates were respectively in A1 and C3 treatment (Table 3).

Table 3. Chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b (Chl b), chlorophyll (a+b) and net photosynthetic rate (Pn) of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench seedlings under various salt and alkali stresses.
Treatment Salinity (mmol/L) Chl a (mg·g-1) Chl b (mg·g-1) Chl (a+b) (mg·g-1) Pn (μmol/m2/s)
CK 0 1.29±0.12ae 1.75±0.06a 3.04±0.08a 14.34±2.61a
A1 100 1.53±0.11ab 1.14±0.04bcd 2.67±0.15bcd 39.93±0.04b
A2 200 1.69±0.06bd 1.27±0.07b 2.96±0.13ac 35.30±0.25c
A3 300 1.38±0.04ace 1.12±0.01bcd 2.50±0.04bd 16.08±0.52a
B1 100 1.59±0.09bc 1.19±0.06bc 2.78±0.14abc 21.12±0.21d
B2 200 1.55±0.10ab 1.24±0.11bc 2.80±0.19abc 15.73±0.37a
B3 300 1.86±0.12d 1.22±0.03bc 3.07±0.14a 0.67±0.67e
C1 100 1.26±0.07e 1.09±0.03cd 2.35±0.10d 4.32±0.03f
C2 200 1.60±0.08bcd 1.24±0.01b 2.84±0.08abc 6.98±0.20g
C3 300 0.93±0.08f 0.98±0.04d 1.91±0.12e 0.12±0.04e

Note: Values represent means±S.E. Values at each treatment group followed by different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05)

Response of proline and soluble protein content of sorghum to saline-alkali stress

Proline content was significantly affected by salinity (F2,18 = 134.073, P < 0.001). Proteins content was significantly affected by salinity (F2,18 = 21.111, P < 0.001) and alkalinity (F2,18 = 11.942, P < 0.01) (Table 2).

Salinity stress stimulated the accumulation of proline (Fig 2A). In comparison with control, the proline contents of the leaves increased by 871.86%, 1005.16% and 1171.06% at A3, B3 and C3 treatment, respectively. The protein content in fresh leaves of sorghum seedlings showed a statistically significant between control plants and other treatment groups, and presented first ascended and then descended with the increasing of saline-alkali stress (Fig 2B). The maximum values in the A, B, C treatment group appeared in A2, B2, C2 treatment, the values were respectively 2.74 g/L, 2.90 g/L, 2.51 g/L, indicating that the high alkaline environment had a inhibition effect on synthesize of protein.

Fig 2. Response of proline and soluble protein content of sorghum to saline-alkali stress.

Fig 2

(A)Proline content. (B) Soluble protein content. Note: Values represent means±S.E. Values at each treatment group followed by different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).

Response of antioxidative enzymes and MDA content of sorghum seedlings to saline-alkali stress

The protective enzyme system is sensitive to saline-alkali stress[1314]. POD activity was significantly affected by the salinity (F2,18 = 10.749, P < 0.01), alkalinity (F2,18 = 4.307, P < 0.05) and the interaction of salinity and alkalinity (F4,18 = 3.912, P < 0.05). SOD activity was significantly affected by the salinity (F2,18 = 6.183, P < 0.01) and alkalinity (F2,18 = 6.444, P < 0.01) (Table 2). POD activity significantly increased with the increasing alkalinity under middle (200mmol/L) and high salt environment (300mmol/L). SOD activity significantly decreased under salt stress and in the low and middle salt environment, SOD activity was not significantly affected by the alkalinity (Table 4).

Table 4. Superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), malondialdehyde (MDA) content of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench seedlings under various salt and alkali stresses.
Treatment Salinity(mmol/L) SOD(U/mg-1prot·) CAT(U/mg-1prot·) POD(U/mg-1prot·) MDA(mmol·g-1prot)
CK 0 20.21±2.44a 7.91±0.97a 25.93±2.95a 3.69±0.37a
A1 100 15.31±0.04b 6.28±0.17ab 27.65±1.38a 5.10±0.34ab
A2 200 13.78±0.57bc 5.82±1.20abd 14.94±0.58b 5.91±1.07abd
A3 300 15.55±0.66b 4.37±0.11bc 14.63±2.46b 9.02±0.65bc
B1 100 14.50±0.87bc 4.77±0.44bc 23.76±4.21a 7.93±1.02ac
B2 200 11.25±0.44cd 3.40±0.74c 25.71±4.18a 6.24±0.81abd
B3 300 9.25±2.55d 3.28±0.65c 23.73±0.84ac 8.82±0.88bc
C1 100 15.70±0.99b 4.39±0.87bc 27.92±0.97a 6.79±0.99abd
C2 200 14.64±0.71bc 3.71±0.96cd 11.58±3.25b 9.25±2.07bc
C3 300 11.17±1.23cd 5.13±0.54bc 21.32±2.22bc 10.61±4.27cd

Note: Values represent means±S.E. Values at each treatment group followed by different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05)

Response of inorganic cations and anions of sorghum seedlings to saline-alkali stress

Inorganic cations (Na+ content, K+ content Mg2+ content and Ca2+ content) were significantly affected by salinity (F2,18 = 608.785, P < 0.001, F2,18 = 9.205, P < 0.01, F2,18 = 17.130, P < 0.001, F2,18 = 22.355, P < 0.001) and alkalinity (F2,18 = 58.987, P < 0.001, F2,18 = 97.962, P < 0.001, F2,18 = 7.815, P < 0.01, F2,18 = 12.882, P < 0.001) (Table 2).

The Na+ and K+ of plants will be changed under saline-alkali stress[15]. Na+ content in leaves of sorghum sharply increased with the increasing of saline-alkali stress (Fig 3A). K+ content in leaves of sorghum decreased with the increasing of saline-alkali stress(Fig 3B). The Mg2+ content in leaves of sorghum seedlings were significant decreased(Fig 3C); the response to the Ca2+ accumulation in leaves were similar to the Mg2+(Fig 3D).

Fig 3. Response of inorganic cations and anions of sorghum seedlings to saline-alkali stress.

Fig 3

(A)Na+ content. (B) K+ content. (C) Mg2+ content. (D) Ca2+ content. (E) SO42-content. (F) Cl-content. Note: Values represent means±S.E. Values at each treatment group followed by different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).

Inorganic anions (Cl- content and SO42- content) were significantly affected by salinity (F2,18 = 325.295, P < 0.001, F2,18 = 216.531, P < 0.001), alkalinity (F2,18 = 42.798, P < 0.001, F2,18 = 110.247, P < 0.001) and the interaction of salinity and alkalinity (F4,18 = 9.035, P < 0.001, F4,18 = 10.853, P < 0.001) (Table 2). The two anions showed the same trend, with the increasing salinity and alkalinity, two anions content significant increased whereas Cl- accumulated under various salt–alkali mixed stresses higher than SO42-(Fig 3E and 3F). The maximum Cl- and SO42- values appeared in B3 treatment group and C3 treatment group.

Discussion

Seedling growth is a critical stage for the establishment of plant populations under saline-alkaline conditions [1]. The effect of different environmental conditions on seedling growth and physiology are different [7]. Generally, saline-alkali stress has serious effects on plant growth rate [2, 10], biomass, plant height, leaf areas and root length [1617]. However, in the low salt and alkali environment, salinity and alkalinity stimulated the growth of sorghum seedlings [1819]. Our studies found that the plant height, leaf areas, biomass in A1 treatment were greater than the controls (Table 1). The leaves biomass of sorghum seedlings accumulated with the increasing of saline-alkali stress, which account for 47.9%~72.7% of total dry weight. The percent of root biomass showed a downward trend because root was the first contacting organ to the treatment solution, which was demonstrated by the phenomenon that root accumulated more Na+ and suffered more serious iron toxicity [20].

In general, saline-alkali stress leads to a decrease in chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rates [3,10, 2122]. In high alkali environment, chlorophyll content first increased and then decreased, indicating the moderate salt concentration can promote to synthesize more chlorophyll content, which can capture more light for photosynthesis use. Then in high salt-alkali environment (C3), the minimum chlorophyll content was 0.93mg/g, which showed that a high salt-alkali concentration could speed up the decomposition of chlorophyll content in the body of sorghum plants, reducing its photosynthetic efficiency [8, 2324]. In this study, photosynthetic rate of sorghum increased under low saline environment., when the pH value was 9.04 and the salinity was 300 mmol/L (C3 treatment), the minimum net photosynthetic rates was 0.12 μmol·m-2·s-1, which is caused by non-stomatal factors [25].

In general, the osmotic regulators of plants contain inorganic ions and organic compounds [2, 26]. The compounds that accumulate most commonly are proline and soluble sugar, etc [27]. In this study, with the increasing of saline-alkali stress, proline content in leaves of sorghum seedlings increased in order to defense the stress. The protein content in fresh leaves of sorghum seedlings presented first ascended and then descended with the increasing of saline-alkali stress, which indicating that the high alkaline environment has a inhibition effect on synthesize of protein.

Under saline-alkali stress, plants will produce a large number of reactive oxygen products, resulting in damage to the plant membrane lipid peroxidation. The protective enzymes in plants play an important role in removing membrane lipid peroxidation [4, 22]. SOD is a key protective enzyme for the removal of reactive oxygen species, which can decompose reactive oxygen into H2O2 and O2, then CAT and POD turn H2O2 into H2O and O2 [28]. In this study, the SOD activity in fresh leaves of sorghum seedlings significantly decreased with the increasing salinity stress. The possible reason of this phenomenon is that saline-alkali stress blocks the pathway of enzyme synthesis and reduces enzyme activity [29]. In the low alkali environment, SOD activity was not affect by the salinity, which showed that SOD activity of sorghum seedlings has a certain adaptability to saline-alkali stress [30]. CAT activity showed the same trend of SOD. The content of MDA is an important sign of membrane lipid peroxidation damage in plants [25,31]. The MDA content increased with the increasing of saline-alkali stress, the maximum MDA value appeared in the C3 treatment, which showed that sorghum seedlings suffered severe oxidative damage under high salt- alkaline stress.

Meanwhile, plants usually accumulate inorganic ions in vacuoles under saline-alkali stress to reduce the cell water potential [32]. The environment of low Na+ and high K+ in the cytoplasm is a necessary condition to maintain the normal activity of a series of enzymes in plant cells. Saline-alkali stress can damage the balance of Na+ and K+ in the plant cytoplasm [3335]. In this study, with the increasing of saline-alkali stress, Na+ content in leaves of sorghum seedlings increased (Fig 3). Conversely, K+ content decreased. This is because under saline-alkali stress, a large amount of Na+ enter the plant body, affecting the absorption of K+ and destroying the balance between Na+ and K+ in the plant [34].

In this study, with the increasing of saline-alkali stress, the Mg2+ content and Ca2+ in content leaves of sorghum seedlings were significant decreased. This shows that salt and alkali stress affects the absorption of Ca2+ and Mg2+ process [36]. The main effect on the plant leaf was to accelerate the plant senescence process with the Mg2+ deficiency [37]. Reduced the function of Ca2+ to maintain the integrity of the cell membrane and regulate the selective transport of Na+ and K+ [38].

In conclusion, sorghum seedlings were capable of surviving well under low pH (pH ≤ 7.08) regardless of the levels of salinity. Low and moderate salinity concentration can promote to synthesize more chlorophyll content and promote the photosynthetic rate. In order to adapt the saline environment, more proline and protein in the leaves of sorghum seedlings were accumulated with increasing salinity through osmotic adjustment. SOD activity was not changed regardless of the levels of salinity under low alkali environment. POD activity significantly increased with the increasing alkalinity under middle (200mmol/L) and high salt environment (300mmol/L). This results show that the seedlings of sorghum could adapt to salt- alkali stress environment by adjusting their physiological indexes.

Acknowledgments

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41871089).

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

Jingkuan Sun were supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41871089).

References

  • 1.Song J., Fan H., Zhao Y.Y., Jia Y.H., Du X.H., Wang B.S. Effect of salinity on germination, seedling emergence, seedling growth and ion accumulation of a euhalophyte Suaeda salsa in an intertidal zone and on saline inland. Aquatic Botany. 2008;88: 331–337. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shi D.C., Sheng Y.M. Effect of various salt–alkaline mixed stress conditions on sunflower seedlings and analysis of their stress factors. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2005;54: 8–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang X.P., Geng S.J., Ri Y.J., Cao D.H., Liu J., Shi D.C., Yang C.W. Physiological responses and adaptive strategies of tomato plants to salt and alkali stresses. Scientia Horticulturae. 2011;130: 248–255. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ashraf M. Some important physiological selection criteria for salt tolerance in plants. Flora—Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants.2004;199: 361–376. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hu G.F., Liu Y.M., Zhang X.Z., Yao F.J., Huang Y., Ervin E.H., Zhao B.Y. Physiological evaluation of alkali-salt tolerance of thirty Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) lines. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0125305 10.1371/journal.pone.0125305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ganesh P., Subrahmanyam D., Sreenu K., Ram T., Subbarao L.V., Parmar B., Giri A., Sarla N., Rai V. Effect of salt stress on seedling growth and antioxidant enzymes in two contrasting rice introgression lines. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2013;18: 360–366. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu J., Guo W.Q., Shi D.C. Seed germination, seedling survival, and physiological response of sunflowers under saline and alkaline conditions. Photosynthetica. 2010;48: 278–286. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wei Y., Xu X., Tao H., Wang P. Growth performance and physiological response in the halophyte Lycium barbarum grown at salt-affected soil. Annals of Applied Biology. 2006;149: 263–269. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shams M., Yildirim E., Ekinci M., Turan M., Dursun A., Parlakova F., Kul R. Exogenously applied glycine betaine regulates some chemical characteristics and antioxidative defence systems in lettuce under salt stress. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology. 2016;57: 225–231. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li R., Shi F., Fukuda K. Interactive effects of various salt and alkali stresses on growth, organic solutes, and cation accumulation in a halophyte Spartina alterniflora (poaceae). Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2010;68: 66–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vasilakoglou I., Dhima K., Karagiannidis N., Gatsis T. Sweet sorghum productivity for biofuels under increased soil salinity and reduced irrigation. Field Crops Research. 2011;120: 38–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kingsbury R.W., Epstein E., Pearcy RW. Physiological responses to salinity in selected lines of wheat. Plant Physiology. 1984; 74: 417–423. 10.1104/pp.74.2.417 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gunes A., Inal A., Alpaslan M., Eraslan F., Bagci E.G., Cicek N. Salicylic acid induced changes on some physiological parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress and mineral nutrition in maize (Zea mays L.) grown under salinity. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2007;164: 728–736. 10.1016/j.jplph.2005.12.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bernstein N., Shoresh M., Xu Y., Huang B. Involvement of the plant antioxidative response in the differential growth sensitivity to salinity of leaves vs roots during cell development. Free Radical Biology and Medicine.2010;49: 1161–1171. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.06.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tiwari J.K., Munshi A.D., Kumar R., Pandey R.N., Arora A., Bhat J.S., Sureja A.K. Effect of salt stress on cucumber: Na+–K+ ratio, osmolyte concentration, phenols and chlorophyll content. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum.2010;32: 103–114. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ramoliya P.J., Pandey A.N. Effect of salinization of soil on emergence, growth and survival of seedlings of Acacia nilotica. Forest Ecology and Management. 2003;176: 185–194. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.De Lacerda C.F., Cambraia J., Oliva M.A, Ruiz H.A. Changes in growth and in solute concentrations in sorghum leaves and roots during salt stress recovery. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2005;54: 69–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Khan M.A., Ungar I. A., Showalter A.M. Effects of salinity on growth, water relations and ion accumulation of the subtropical perennial halophyte, Atriplex griffithii var. stocksii. Annals of Botany. 2000;85: 225–232. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Imada S., Yamanaka N., Tamai S. Effects of salinity on the growth, Na partitioning, and Na dynamics of a salt-tolerant tree, Populus alba L. Journal of Arid Environments. 2009;73: 245–251. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chelli-Chaabouni A., Mosbah A.B., Maalej M., Gargouri K., Gargouri-Bouzid R., Drira N. In vitro salinity tolerance of two pistachio rootstocks: Pistacia vera L. and P.atlantica Desf. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2010;69: 302–312. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Parida A.K., Das A.B., Sanada Y., Prasanna M. Effects of salinity on biochemical components of the mangrove, Aegiceras corniculatum. Aquatic Botany. 2004;80: 77–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tuna A.L., Kaya C., Dikilitas M., Higgs D. The combined effects of gibberellic acid and salinity on some antioxidant enzyme activities, plant growth parameters and nutritional status in maize plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2008;62: 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ma H.C., Fung L., Wang S.S., Altman A., Huttermann A. Photosynthetic response of Populus euphratica to salt stress. Forest Ecology and Management,1997;93: 55–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Koyro H.W. Effect of salinity on growth, photosynthesis, water relations and solute composition of the potential cash crop halophyte Plantago coronopus (L.). Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2006;56: 136–146. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Meloni DA, Oliva M.A., Martinez C.A., Cambraia J. Photosynthesis and activity of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and glutathione reductase in cotton under salt stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2003;49: 69–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Geungjoo L, Carrow RN, Duncan R.R., Eiteman M.A., Rieger M.W. Synthesis of organic osmolytes and salt tolerance mechanisms in Paspalum vaginatum. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2008;63: 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hasegawa P.M, Bressan R.A., Zhu J.K., Bohnert H.J. Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity, Annual Reviews of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology.2000;51: 463–499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li Q.Y, Niu H.B., Yin J., Wang M.B., Shao H.B., Deng D.Z., Chen X.X., Ren J.P., Li Y.C. Protective role of exogenous nitric oxide against oxidative-stress induced by salt stress in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2008;65: 220–225. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dionisiosese M.L., Tobita S. Antioxidant responses of rice seedlings to salinity stress. Plant Science. 1998;135: 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Agarwal S., Pandey V. Antioxidant enzyme responses to NaCl stress in Cassia angustifolia. BiologiaI Plantarum.2004;48: 555–560. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shalata A., Mittova V., Volokita M., Guy M., Tal M. Response of the cultivated tomato and its wild salt-tolerant relative Lycopersicon pennellii to salt-dependent oxidative stress: the root antioxidative system.Physiologia Plantarum.2001;112: 487–494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Munns R. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant,Cell and Environment. 2002;25:239–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Blumwald E. Sodium transport and salt tolerance in plants. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2000;12:431–434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhu J.K. Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2003;6:441–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tester M. M R. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. The Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2008; 59:651–681. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Khan M.A., Ungar I.A., Showalter A.M. Effects of salinity on growth, ion content,and osmotic relations in Halopyrum mocoronatum (L.) Stapf. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 1999;22:191–204. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Candan N.,Tarhan L. Relationship among chlorophyll-carotenoid content, antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation levels by Mg2+deficiency in the Mentha pulegium leaves. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2003;41: 35–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rengel Z. The role of calcium in salt toxicity, Plant Cell And Environment, 1992;15: 625–632. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES